The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
On Frederick Douglass, the Declaration of Independence, and Juneteenth
Lucas Morel and Jonathan White channel the insight and vision of Frederick Douglass.
Today is Juneteenth. The most recently recognized federal holiday (formalized in 2021 as Juneteenth National Independence Day), Juneteenth recognizes the freeing of enslaved people in Texas at the end of the Civil War.
In today's Wall Street Journal, Lucas Morel and Jonathan White write on the day's significance:
Juneteenth joined Independence Day as a federal holiday in 2021, celebrating the day the Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves in the outer reaches of rebel-held territory. Critics of Lincoln's proclamation—now as then—say it was ineffective because it took so long to be enforced. Yet Frederick Douglass, who devoted his life to freedom for black Americans, understood that paper declarations sowed the seeds of a more perfect union.
On June 19, 1865, Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger declared at Galveston, Texas, that "all slaves are free" by virtue of Lincoln's edict dated Jan. 1, 1863. It took more than two years to make the promise of freedom a reality.
As Morel and White note, Frederick Douglass saw the Declaration of Independence as a commitment to individual liberty and human dignity that would be fulfilled over time. In the same way, the Emancipation Proclamation was issued in 1863, but not given full effect throughout the southern states until the end of the war in 1865 (and slavery would not be wholly eradicated under U.S. law until ratification of the 13th Amendment).
They write:
Although Douglass disagreed with Lincoln about the timing and rationale of emancipation, he predicted that Lincoln's proclamation would stand as "the greatest event of our nation's history, if not the greatest event of the century," placing "the North on the side of justice and civilization, and the rebels on the side of robbery and barbarism." Douglass and Lincoln alike clearly took inspiration from the Declaration of Independence—America's first Emancipation Proclamation. Both were committed to realizing the promises of 1776, nearly a century later.
Juneteenth and Independence Day honor the struggle of an imperfect people on an imperfect path to freedom and equality. American history—"a heap of Juneteenths," in the words of Ralph Ellison—can be read as one journey, full of setbacks and triumphs, toward realizing the truths of the Declaration of Independence. That "ink and paper proclamation," nearly 250 years old, established a way of life that remains, in Lincoln's words, "the last best hope of earth."
Of additional note, Morel and White have a forthcoming volume of Douglass's writings on Abraham Lincoln. I very much look forward to reading it.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Critics of Lincoln's proclamation—now as then—say it was ineffective because it took so long to be enforced.
Lincoln was unable to magically free all the slaves in areas the federal government could not control.
The proclamation made the army a moving emancipation force. There was also no turning back. The slaves were now "forever free." The South knew if they lost the war, slavery was done (a type of serfdom was another matter).
The EP had language such as this:
the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.
The EP also authorized blacks, including former slaves, to join the “armed service of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service."
"Lincoln was unable to magically free all the slaves in areas the federal government could not control."
And didn't purport to free them in areas the federal government could...
Doing so would have violated the Constitution. I know you don't think Lincoln cared a whit about the Constitution, but he explicitly brought this up at the time.
Not sure FD would characterize his freedom work that way.
https://gloriaromanorum.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-conversion-of-frederick-douglass.html
Just to pre-empt the inevitable comments (not that it will): if your response to discussion of Juneteenth revolves around either (a) the name; or (b) the date that was chosen, you've lost the plot. (And if your response is a complaint about the very idea of commemorating emancipation, it's not so much that you've lost the plot as much as it is that you're the villain of the story.)
and above all remember that David gets to award or withhold the 'villain' designation
" if your response to discussion of Juneteenth revolves around either (a) the name; or (b) the date that was chosen, you've lost the plot."
Conversely, if you agree with the concept of Juneteenth, you should celebrate it!
Does everybody have their red food and drinks ready?
A meaningless holiday celebrating a political stunt by Lincoln.
The 13th Amendment ended slavery on December 6, 1865.
“Meaningless”
Can you clarify? Are you saying that this particular date— June 19th is meaningless and this would be better commemorated on Dec 6?
Or are you saying that you find the commemoration of emancipation to be meaningless?
I'm saying if it should be celebrated, then Dec. 6 would be the appropriate date.
“I'm saying if it should be celebrated”
Well— don’t be shy! Do you think it’s worth commemorating?
How are you supposed to have a picnic on Dec 6?
Of course, no one picked June 19th out of a hat, it developed organically as the day black people celebrate emancipation "the black fourth of July"
“How are you supposed to have a picnic on Dec 6?”
Key point. If one were adding a new holiday, doesn’t June seem like a nice time for it, with the presumably fairer weather allowing for outdoor activities and fun?
But no— people would rather whine about “historical accuracy” and “paid vacation days.” Sad!
Enjoy your fried chicken and watermelon.
????
Curious comment.
In any event, owing to an unfortunate incident in my younger days, I will not be having any watermelon.
?????
Picnic food.
"In any event, owing to an unfortunate incident in my younger days, I will not be having any watermelon."
What's the matter? Did you try fucking a watermelon?
“Picnic food”
LOL, ok bumble. I thought you were quoting Fuzzy Zoeller!
“fucking a watermelon?”
LOL! Truly the apotheosis of Trumpist wit! Any resemblance to the comedic stylings of a dumbass 12-year old is completely coincidental, I’m sure!
"doesn’t June seem like a nice time for it"
Everyone knows its impossible to celebrate a holiday in December.
Bob from Ohio : "Everyone knows its impossible to celebrate a holiday in December."
Unless - of course - it's a meaningless date pilfered from a pagan celebration...
" Are you saying that this particular date— June 19th is meaningless and this would be better commemorated on Dec 6?"
Well, obviously, since it's supposed to represent when the last slaves were freed, which did not, in fact, happen until December 6th.
I see. So you have no objection to commemorating emancipation— you would just prefer that it occur in December, for purposes of historical accuracy?
Correct. Brett is a pedant about holidays. Well, holiday.
I'm not sure whether the last person legally enslaved in a border state was officially freed on December 6, when sufficient states had ratified the 13th amendment, or on December 18 when ratification was announced. But, who cares? If total legal emancipation is worth celebrating (and, of course, it is) who should care whether it's on December 6, December 18, or June 19? We celebrate the birth of JC on December 25, which is not his birthday, and nobody seems to get all riled up. We don't celebrate Washington's birthday an his birthday (whichever you choose as correct) and nobody seems to get all exercised over it. I suspect something else is going on with the odd pedantry about emancipation.
Man, DMN got you both pegged.
Quibbling over the exact date is at best losing the plot.
At worst, it's subsuming zero-sum based resentment that black people got another thing.
Same energy as the grumpiness over MLK day.
Of course, as a government employee I'm sure you're always happy to have another paid holiday.
Just saw where New Jersey celebrates it on Friday (so much for the significance of the date) ensuring a 3 or 4 day weekend for their employees.
Not just federal employees! Plenty of private sector people off today.
Trumpists grousing about other people having days off— a tale as old as time! Lighten up, Francis!
Few private sector employees have the day off.
So, not worth commemorating, then? Why so evasive?
Trumpist grumpy that other people might have a nice day off on a Thursday in June, just like last year! Maybe this day can be commemorating both emancipation and conservative misanthropy?
"So, not worth commemorating, then? "
That's not what I said, but you be you.
“That's not what I said”
That right— you said “IF it’s worth commemorating” and so I asked you IF YOU thought it was. Now you’ve responded several times and still not offered an opinion. Why so cagey??
"Plenty of private sector people off today."
Banks employees mainly. Fed closed.
You think a day off is what motivate my support of Juneteenth?
Not everyone is a s small as you.
“DMN got you both pegged”
It’s kinda funny to see them both jump immediately out of the woodwork to demonstrate what David was talking about. Very predictable!
zero-sum based resentment
The history of modern American right-wing populism, in four words.
Not only did you do exactly what I said, but your comment is bizarre since Juneteenth doesn't commemorate what Lincoln did; it commemorates the actual ending of slavery in Texas.
"A meaningless holiday celebrating a political stunt by Lincoln.
The 13th Amendment ended slavery on December 6, 1865."
Like a blind hog finding an acorn, Mr. Bumble has gotten something right. The Emancipation Proclamation was, at most, an ultra vires pronouncement.
Douglass realized that the Founders, for all their being mired in slavery, wrote a Declaration that by it's text promised a liberty that was universal. And in the post-Civil War Framing, a Constitution that could do the same.
Our history shows is that it's not an easy promise to live up to. We're still working on it. The hope so many African Americans still have in that promise is humbling.
America's ambitions, as laid out by leaders like Douglass, are exceptional.
The authors of the Declaration did not intend it to be a promise to free the slaves. Douglass was saying what he wanted to believe.
Intent comes after text.
The text is not ambiguous:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights."
Did you read the part about the Indians?
That bit never really became part of our national fabric, somehow.
"the Declaration of Independence—America's first Emancipation Proclamation"
That was Lord Dunmore's proclamation, actually. Second was the Philipsburg Proclamation. These would have likewise placed England "on the side of justice and civilization, and the rebels on the side of robbery and barbarism," if England had won.
Juneteenth is a holiday because it is another step to paying racial reparations to Black people. Blacks will keep demanding free stuff.
"Blacks will keep demanding free stuff." Juneteenth, a day dedicated to demanding free stuff, specifically, the freedom to not be in -perpetual bondage in Texas. Other free stuff demanded: the freedom to be treated equally in commerce, the freedom to marry as they choose, the freedom to serve in the military equally, and much more free stuff. Yeah, those greedy black people all covetous over the free stuff that white people take for granted.