The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Three Books for Black History Month
February is Black History Month, and this year's this is "African Americans and Labor." Here are three books I recommend:
1. Robert Higgs, Competition and Coercion: Blacks in the American Economy 1865-1914. Higgs argues that despite significant coercion, there were sufficient competitive forces in the American (and in particular southern, where most black Americans lived) economy to allow African Americans as a group to significantly improve their standard of living during the relevant time period. The book, written in the 1970s, received an undeservedly negative reception from the Marxist-dominated labor history world.
2. Paul Moreno, Black Americans and Organized Labor: A New History. In my review of this book, I wrote:
Moreno, unlike many historians, does not treat black workers and the black people more generally as passive bit players in a larger class conflict between "capital" and "labor." Nor, unlike many historians, does he pay disproportionate attention to the relatively few examples of racially egalitarian unions in the pre–New Deal period, which some historians use as purported exemplars of the true spirit of labor solidarity. Rather, he properly treats African Americans as striving as best they can to promote their individual and collective well-being in a hostile economic and social environment.
3. David E. Bernstein, Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal. My book started from a simple premise that went almost entirely unrecognized in the relevant literature: given that black Americans lacked political power, one could expect that labor regulations at best would not take their interests into account, and at worse would intentionally be used to exclude them from the labor market. I back up that basic intuition with studies of laws restricting labor recruitment in the south, licensing laws, railroad labor laws, prevailing wage legislation, and New Deal labor laws. I also note that contrary to conventional wisdom, court decisions protecting free labor competition tended to help black workers in the relevant time period.
I'm not going to argue that these are necessarily the three *best* books one can read on African American labor. But I would say that if you are interested at all in the subject, you have probably already read books and articles from a more standard progressive or Marxist perspective, and these books are both well-researched and provide a more market-friendly and regulation-skeptical perspective.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
On a site with no nonwhite bloggers, and no one who can talk about personal experiences, either first or second or third hand, this post is laughable.
I expect that Eugene Volokh, via his parents' and grandparents' experiences as Jews inside the Soviet Union; can at least speak to being oppressed and discriminated against, solely due to immutable characteristics. Yes, different from skin color, I grant you. (I'm not friends with any of the other VCers, so I can't speak to their own life histories, and what kinds of discrimination they have or have not experienced.)
{Your underlying point--about the VC, after 30 years or so of existence, having zero regular contributors who are female, or Asian, or Latino, or Black--is worthy of mention, and is duly noted. Dale's past contributions were almost always interesting, and I very much regret losing that pipeline into that particular demographic as well.}
(I hope it goes without saying that no pun was intended re Dale and "pipeline.")
? What? If this is a crude sexual implication I don’t detect it (and anyone who read my movie reviews here in the summer of 2023 knows that I have sensitive antennas).
Well there's a plus side to that in that it means no females, Asians, Latinos, Blacks or other singularities can be assigned blame for the striking decline in quality with time here.
Dale C's contributions were indeed worthwhile.
I am assuming Irina Manta was/is a woman (and maybe non-white). I found her posts to range from Interesting to Dumb to .... Really Weird.
There must be a way to gain understanding and insight to people who have experiences that are different than you??? Perhaps people could write down stuff and others could read it. I should patent that.
All these modern historians purporting to know something about the ancient Greeks and Romans. What a bunch of posers!
Well. . . speaking as one who grew up in a town with no nonwhite people, and being liberal (not a dirty word but a brave thing to be in my home town), and thinking I had an idea as to what black people think is important, when I finally moved to where there were black people and got to know them, what I had thought was important to them got turned around significantly.
One of these books purports to be speaking on behalf of black people, nor does one have to be a black person to be able to write about history that related to black people, any more than a black historian couldn’t write about, say, religious persecution of Mormons in the 19th century or Okies in the 1930s. But if you want to go all Gov Forbus on us, I can’t stop you.
Which one?
I am guessing based on his use of "nor" later that he meant to write "None."
None not one
"But if you want to go all Gov Forbus on us, I can’t stop you."
A particularly thoughtless and insensitive comment.
I don't think anyone is saying that non-black people cannot write about black history. Nor that the books you suggested aren't worth reading or don't make a valuable contribution to the literature. But during Black History Month, I think it would have been better form to include at least one recommendation for a book by black author. It would support black scholarship, and I think it can safely be said that when writing about black history, black authors are more likely to have insights gained through experience that authors from other racial groups might lack (at least as a general rule).
Also, come on. You saw this criticism coming but chose not to preempt it. I'm skeptical that you could not have found at least one book by a black academic that provided a "more market-friendly and regulation-skeptical perspective." Thomas Sowell. Walter Williams, Alan Keyes, Marvin Scott. Shoot, I would imagine there are even writings from Malcolm X that would fit the description.
The only book that I'm aware of that is historical, about black people and labor, market-friendly, and written by a black author is Walter Williams' South Africa's War Against Capitalism. Putting aside whether I would recommend the book, the relevant annual theme is "African Americans and Labor," and needless to say, South Africans are not African *Americans*. If I'm missing something, feel free to let me know, but I'm specifically recommending books on the annual theme, not "books I like about race that were written by black people."
Fair enough. I'm sure that you are more familiar with the scholarship than I am. Off the top of my head, I know that Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics" includes a historical overview of black labor in the United States as part of its discussion on differential impact. But in fairness, that is not the theme of the book.
To be clear, I'm not trying to accuse you of any prejudice or wrongdoing. I just think it was foreseeable that failing to include a black author in a list of Black History Month book recommendations would invite some criticism. It would have been better to include black-authored book about African American labor history that you enjoyed or found particularly insightful, regardless of whether it necessarily supports a "more market-friendly and regulation-skeptical perspective."
Perhaps, the Carter Woodson founded Black History month so that Black American history would be taken seriously, and the fact that it's written about by scholars of all backgrounds is a sign of success.
I just read a recent biography of Ralph Bunche titled "The Indispensable Man", which I though was very good. Can't remember the author's name off the top of my head, but he was not black.
"The Absolutely Indispensable Man" by Kal Raustiala
Bud, if personal experiences by nonwhites are the only relevant material, your comment is even more laughable.
This sort of "Only X are allowed to talk about Y!" racial/sexual essentialism gets tired fast.
I kid, it starts out tired.
That’s not what Dan is saying. It’s more like, imagine if a liberal member of an all-liberal department recommended three books on American conservatism (Perlstein’s Nixonland, Altemeyer’s The Authoritarians, and Robin’s The Reactionary Mind, for example). I imagine you’d say this person could have made a better selection if they had more regular access to conservative colleagues, neighbors, etc.
Yes, thanks.
You know what? I see symposia all the time that are like that, over at Jack Balkin's blog. They start with a book on why conservatives are horrible, and have a bunch of people who hate conservatives discuss it.
But ideology and race are fundamentally different, in that ideology is, literally, about what you think and believe, while race is just about cosmetic features of one's body, unrelated to beliefs.
So, when you pick people of an opposing ideology to discuss the ideology they oppose, you have baked in a fundamental hostility toward what is being discussed. You have people discussing their opponents.
Berstein and the other Conspirators might not be black, but they are not the adversaries of blacks. Your analogy would hold up better if the Conspiracy consisted of members of the Aryan Nation, perhaps.
It’s about missing out on relevant experiences. It’s a good idea to hear from conservative voices if you want to understand the conservative experience/movement, likewise blacks and the black experience.
If you wanted to understand Catholic views on labor a recommendation by a Quaker of three books by others from the Anabaptist tradition and Peace and Conflict area is likely going to miss something important.
Btw-a potential correction, while Quakers are not usually considered Anabaptist both are heavily involved in Peace and Conflict studies/movements. I don’t think my point is impacted, and even if so other examples could easily be supplied.
Right, but again, you're drifting into differences which are fundamentally about beliefs, which I think are different from differences about what people look like.
Anyway, if the Conspiracy were to invite Randall L. Kennedy to join, would that satisfy you?
People like Dan are talking about blacks as a cultural group (that’s why they don’t include dark skinned Indians).
I think having someone like Kennedy would increase the odds of getting a better picture of the experiences of black persons.
But blacks AREN'T a cultural group, which is another problem with his reasoning. They're a racial group that spans multiple cultures.
The idea that the RN living across the street from me, who grew up in a wealthy family, (Dad was a prominent doctor in the area.) is a member of the same culture, and has the same life experiences, as a gang banger in a ghetto, just because they're both black, is silly.
There IS no unifying "black experience", any more than there's a unifying "white experience".
We white folks don't see our experiences as white experiences because they're just normal, dammit! And if our ability to see and understand our white experience is limited, think of how much more limited is our ability to see and understand black experiences.
Again, there are no "white experiences", any more than there are "black experiences". Different people live DIFFERENT LIVES, even if they share complexions!
We have to overcome this tendency to treat people as mere instances of a group, and assume that everybody in the group has experienced the same things.
Brett, you can't make something true by repeating it OR USING CAPITAL LETTERS.
Ah yes, the racist white savior liberal here tell everyone what to think, react and feel. You are one part of the white experience the world could do without.
I think Brett has a point. White William and black Bob live in two parent families, go to the same school, join the Army, serve 30 years, ..., while white Walter and black Bill grow up in a broken home where there mom's turn tricks, they join gangs, and go to prison, .... When you draw the Venn diagram, William/Bob overlap each other a lot more than William/Walter or Bob/Bill.
That's not saying that white and black experiences are the same, but it isn't always the biggest factor. To riff from the comedian, I don't think you could pay Bob enough to trade places with Walter.
SJIN:
What is it like being you? I really want to know.
Absoraka:
Of course different people have different lives based on a variety of circumstances, not all of them race-related, but Brett insists "there are no 'white experiences', anymore than there are 'black experiences'." That just isn't true, and only willful blindness to the advantages we white folk have simply by virtue of being white and the all too common, race-based experiences of non-white people. One small example of such a thing. My middle-class-two-parent family relatively affluent black boss has often experienced store clerks and security shadowing her in high-end stores while white women dressed no differently from her serenely wander through the aisles. A black transplant surgeon I once represented has been stopped numerous times by Westchester County cops for no better reason than that a black man driving a BMW is, to them, the de facto definition of probable cause. (And it isn't his driving either. From sad experience he knows better than to drive imprudently and gain even more unwarranted attention.) These are experiences that these utterly, even boringly, respectable black people have precisely because they are black and that we don't have precisely because we are white.
There's a reason Chris Rock tells white men in his audience that they wouldn't change places with him even though he's rich.
But — even setting aside that Prof. Bernstein expressly stated that these recommendations are not necessarily the three best books on the topic and are for three books that would not already be part of the standard readings — the books aren't about "[Black] views on labor."
If I wanted to know black views on labor, then sure, it might make sense to read what black people wrote. If I wanted to know the economic effects of unions on black people, then I'll ask an economist/historian, not a black person. (Which is not, of course, to say that those are mutually exclusive categories.)
You are being too kind. Malika is treading dangerously close to a type of Lysenkoism -- the notion that individual groups have their own truth. Scholarship and expertise do not depend on genetic or cultural heritage.
And even worse than Lysenkoism is the notion that certain groups have their own falsity. Cf " Jewish Science" or even "Jewish Letters" as in this piece from Martin Bormann quoted in an excellent comment yesterday:
"It is false to regard the so-called Gothic typeface as a German typeface. In reality, the so-called Gothic typeface consists of Schwabacher-Jewish letters. Just as they later came to own the newspapers, the Jews living in Germany also owned the printing presses… and thus came about the common use in Germany of Schwabacher-Jewish letters."
How does a black person in, say 2024 Berkeley, California, have any special insight into what, say, black farm laborers in the post-Reconstruction South were experiencing in the labor market? He or she would read the same sources as anyone else.
Have you thought of asking one face-to-face?
"Hidden Figures" is a book everyone should read. It tells the story of young black women in the 1940s and 50s who were recruited by Langley Laboratory in segregated Hampton VA to be computers (human calculators). These women had high level math skills and were ignored because of their race and gender. Given the opportunity they did very well and made major contributions to aeronautics and space flight.
That is what DEI is, opening the door and leveling the playing field, and the payoff is getting good employees that otherwise would be overlooked or discriminated against.
Molly, I haven't yet read the book. In your view; how did it stack up against the movie?
Have not seen the movie.
The movie, which is pretty good, was heavy on the dramatic license. Both can be enjoyed in their own ways.
So because someone wrote some fanfiction about how three women some of whom were blackwashed, out of the hundreds of thousands who worked on NASA singlehandedly got us to the moon and were opposed by the same racism DEI seeks to continue. DEI is a good thing?
BTW I thought the Nazis got us to the moon and the progs really loved to throw that out there as a sick burn against American exceptionalism. So should I be ashamed as an American that the Nazis got us to the moon or proud that a bunch of oppressed black women did?
A juvenile response to a heartfelt adult comment. Recess is over. Back to class. Sixth period is Algebra. Have you solved “completing the square”?
I see you have no actual response to the main point that the HF narrative is largely mythological. And even if it was all true it actually argues against DEI.
Your view, as a white elite, disqualifies you from having any opinion on the subject. How dare you!
Molly said “major contributions,” you said single-handedly.”
Bringing the extremism you attribute.
YES!
What you’re describing is generally quite popular, but it’s of course not remotely what DEI is. I’m not even sure it’s the motte anymore.
Didn't Hegsteth, the former Fox News weekend guy, ban Black History Month? He's going to promote Christian Nationalism tattoos, though, plus Oktoberfest when it comes around.
[Is DB trolling us?]
Here's the memo:
Identity Months Dead at DoD (Who came up with that title?)
"
Guidance from the Secretary of Defense: "Identity Months Dead at DoD"
Our unity and purpose are instrumental to meeting the Department's warfighting mission. Efforts to divide the force – to put one group ahead of another – erode camaraderie and threaten mission execution.
Going forward, DoD Components and Military Departments will not use official resources, to include man-hours, to host celebrations or events related to cultural awareness months, including National African American/Black History Month, Women’s History Month, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Pride Month, National Hispanic Heritage Month, National Disability Employment Awareness Month, and National American Indian Heritage Month. Service members and civilians remain permitted to attend these events in an unofficial capacity outside of duty hours.
Installations, units, and offices are encouraged to celebrate the valor and success of military heroes of all races, genders, and backgrounds as we restore our warrior culture and ethos. We are proud of our warriors and their history, but we will focus on the character of their service instead of their immutable characteristics.
This guidance is effectively immediately."
So, you can still celebrate your whatever identity, just do it on your own time and own dollar.
"He's going to promote Christian Nationalism tattoos"
That's a really stupid Democratic talking point, but then you knew that.
"plus Oktoberfest when it comes around"
And I kind of doubt that.
"That's a really stupid Democratic talking point, but then you knew that."
Says the guy who is all in on outrage over Justice Brown-Jackson's necklace.
Says the guy who rolled his eyes over the whole thing.
Appropriately.
Of course he is. It’s like a reverse 1619 thing (three books I’d recommend on July 4th about America’s Founding….).
Looks like DB counts as just another part of free-market magic a de facto social policy to wipe out with murder, arson, and pillage successful black business districts. Maybe that explains why the South of that post-Civil War era featured such a vibrant economy.
in what way does it "look like" that?
To borrow from ng: still waiting for an explanation from Lathrop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expulsions_of_African_Americans
Just for starters.
Still waiting for an explanation of how it "looks like" I consider violence against black people and the businesses they own to be part of "free market" logic. Even if you were daft enough to think one endorses something if a specific blog post on the general subject doesn't specifically denounce it, this post was about the theme of black labor history, not "successful black business districts." As for the "South of that post-Civil War era featured such a vibrant economy," Higgs is either right that there was sufficient market competition despite coercion for black Americans' living standards to improve overall, or he's wrong. The data suggests he is right. What that has to do with violence against black-owned businesses in urban areas in a somewhat later period seems apparent to you, but it's not to me. But you seem to have hit on exactly the reason Higgs' work was met with unjusitfied hostility; some people just are ideologically inclined not to acknowledge that market forces can be a positive force, even and maybe especially in the face of state-sponsored oppression.
I would be interested in reading Higgs' book, if I get the chance. But I wonder if his conclusion was that market forces were all that were necessary to overcome historical and continuing oppression, or if other measures were still required, like federal intervention in ways disapproved of by Justice Thomas.
You just explained what your claim was referencing; you didn't explain how Prof. Bernstein's post "looked like" that.
Teh biggest ripoff for many Blacks is court redistricting that puts them all together because "Blacks all think the sme, the skin color causes more similar pollitical views than does absence of pigment"
If you are a Black Republican Christian heterosexual of Antilles descent you are totally determined by being Black and the rest is relatively unimportant to you whether you realize it or not"
Pure BS that is
Next post he’ll rail against intersectionality…
Well researched & written, about a man with an entrepreneurial character, who challenged the system; how many readers would expect to learn about a property lawsuit brought in Massachusetts by a Black family at this point in American history?
Author: Gerzina, Gretchen.
Title: Mr. and Mrs. Prince : how an extraordinary eighteenth-century family moved out of slavery and into legend / Gretchen Holbrook Gerzina ; researched with Anthony Gerzina.
Publication Info. New York : Amistad, 2008.
Author Gerzina also appeared on BBC Radio 3 Private Passions some years ago, archived on the site.
When is White History Month?