The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
David Boaz, RIP
One of libertarianism's greatest and most principled advocates passed away today.

David Boaz passed away today. Liberty has lost one of its greatest and most principled advocates. As the Cato Institute's longtime vice president for public policy and executive vice president for over forty years, he - more than any other single person - built Cato into the world's leading libertarian think tank. His 2015 book The Libertarian Mind is one of the best and most accessible introductions to libertarian ideas. In an edited volume, The Libertarian Reader, David compiled a wide range of classic libertarian writings by leading thinkers.
Central to David's thought was the idea that libertarianism requires both a broad conception of the range of liberties that must be protected, and a broad view of the range of people entitled to that full protection. Thus, he advocated radically cutting back on government policies that violated economic liberty, such as taxation and welfare state spending. But he was equally concerned about those that threatened liberty of other kinds, such as immigration restrictions and the War on Drugs. And he repeatedly emphasized that the full range of liberties must be available to everyone - whether they be black or white, gay or straight, men or women, immigrants or natives.
Thus, in a 2010 article, he cautioned libertarians against nostalgia for an imagined past, where liberty was supposedly greater. While some types of government intervention were less prevalent in the 18th and 19th centuries, it was - he noted - also an era of slavery, segregation, and other forms of oppression that have since been at least in large part overcome.
David also repeatedly reminded libertarians that we must be concerned about dangers to liberty from both right and left. Unlike some, he did not minimize or ignore the threat of right-wing authoritarian ethno-nationalism exemplified by the rise of Trump in the US, and similar movements in Europe. In his contribution to National Review's 2016 "Against Trump" symposium, David wrote that "From a libertarian point of view…. Trump's greatest offenses against American tradition and our founding principles are his nativism and his promise of one-man rule." He was right then, and remains right today.
I knew David for over thirty years, since I was an intern at Cato in 1992, during the summer after my freshman year in college. A small incident from that time illustrates David's simultaneous commitment to high standards and intellectual outreach.
In those days, Cato was housed in a small building, which included a storage room filled with books published by the Institute. I liked to go there and browse - it was more fun than the work I was assigned to do! Early one morning, David happened by the storage room, and saw me reading a book there.
"Mr. Somin," he asked, "did your paycheck come on time this week?"
"Yes, sir," I answered.
"Then, why," David inquired, "are you late to work?"
Whether they were a vice president or an intern, everyone at Cato had a job they should be focused on. David had little tolerance for slackers.
Duly chastened, I moved to get back to work. But David also made sure to point out that Cato interns were entitled to free copies of Institute publications. If I wanted to read that book (or any other Cato book), he said, I should simply take it home with me - and read it on my own time. He never forgot that developing and spreading ideas was the main focus of a think tank's mission. And that is how I got copies of David's excellent edited volumes, Liberating Schools, and The Crisis in Drug Prohibition.
That same commitment to ideas and outreach made David a great promoter of libertarian thought to a wide range of audiences. He had the rare skill of always maintaining civility, while also never pulling his punches.
In later years, I became a Cato adjunct scholar, and - eventually - the Institute's Simon Chair in Constitutional Studies (in addition to my primary employment as a law professor at George Mason University). Over that time - thanks to David's support - Cato co-published two of my books, and I did various other projects with the Institute, as well. Thus, I often had the opportunity to work with David and learn from him. I could not help but admire both his unfailingly high standards, and his commitment to principle. Cato and other libertarian institutions should strive to continue his legacy.
In closing, I would like to extend my condolences to David's family, friends, and colleagues.
The Cato Institute has posted a summary of David's career, and tributes by many Cato scholars, here.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Anyone claiming that Trump threatens to become one man rule is either deluded or disingenuous.
Trump literally said he'd be a dictator.
With Trump, see what he does, not what he says.
He laid out no path or desire to become a dictator.
dwshelf — What Trump did was attempt to overthrow American constitutionalism. Steal state secrets and show them around. Rape women. Tyrannize immigrant families, and break them up. Incessantly undermine the rule of law. Tear down the material and legal infrastructure that supports public health—at a cost of at least tens-of-thousands of avoidable deaths—while leaving the nation unprepared for the next pandemic. Undermine national defense and diplomatic relations. Corrode NATO. Ruin the careers of a long list of would-be supporters—while getting a startling number of them thrown in prison. Direct stochastic terrorism to target election workers. Set race relations back nearly a century. Defame voting machine vendors. Corrupt the Supreme Court. Turn about a third of American adults into brain-dead zombie cultists. And then systematically grift the cultists. And he played golf.
When I look that over, I see there isn't much in it that is actually anti-libertarian, so maybe you have a point.
But I offer one caution, if you are a gun enthusiast. If Trump wins the election—or somehow ends up in the White House without winning the election—don't count on Trump to support gun rights for any rival "libertarians." Only for whatever thugs he needs to keep him in power. Perhaps you can aspire to that.
Delusions.
No, I think that when someone promises to do something bad, it's foolish — heck, recklessly idiotic — to say, "Well, let's wait and see if he actually follows through on this bad thing before we worry about it."
Also, he tried to overthrow the government the last time he lost an election, which seems kind of like under the "what he does" category.
I think that saying one wants to be a dictator is pretty much exactly laying out a desire to become a dictator.
His pathetic fawning over some of the world's most loathsome authoritarians is also just a coincidence.
Trump supporters love Trump because he means what he says...except when he doesn't.
Trump loyalists are already planning how to erode checks and balances and increase presidential power. It's something if Biden did it, you'd rightly be having a fit.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/08/russ-vought-trump-second-term-radical-constitutional/
What some libertarians just can't accept is the reality that Trump was the most libertarian President in modern times.
And to suggest that maybe the Democratic nominee would be more libertarian than Trump is just ludicrous.
The deeply anti-libertarian aspect of current Democratic politics is the oppressor-victim narrative, and the intended use of governmental coercion to address it by rigging things against the so called oppressors. Trump got this one far, far better than any modern president.
Ending abortion is conservative, not libertarian.
Blocking immigration, especially when the economy is doing well, is liberal, not libertarian. It’s a Ceasar Chavez thing, to stop depressing union wages, in theory. We’ll skip for the moment the historically recent Democrats’ official position has changed to gung ho capitalism and economic power, the usual and proper reasons for open immigration. I doubt it is driven by that.
He seems to be choosing the diametrically wrong things from a libertarian perspective.
Trump was never for "blocking immigration".
He was for sorting out would be immigrants into yes/no decisions made by the USA.
I'm not sure just what the libertarian view is on that, but for sure there's no libertarian view which says we have to accept criminals and terrorists.
Which part of his record was more libertarian? The focus on banning trade or the focus on banning immigration?
What was libertarian about his increased import taxes, increased farm subsidies, increased federal debt, and increased military spending? What about his "take the guns, due process later"? Or his push for increased police powers and his administration being against reforming Qualified Immunity? How about his appointing the Drug War Loving Sessions as AG? All very libertarian to you?
"Which part of his record was more libertarian?"
The focus on deregulation.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/waynecrews/2021/01/19/status-report-what-regulations-did-the-trump-administration-eliminate-in-2020/
Also, please stop conflating legal immigration with illegal immigration. They are two different things.
"Also, please stop conflating legal immigration with illegal immigration. They are two different things."
Not to a libertarian! Any restriction on immigration is an abomination. See pretty much every Somin post for more detail.
Look, it is not crazy to say you thought most if not all Trump's policies were good and wise. Reasonable minds can differ on that. It is, however, insane to claim Trump was a libertarian in any commonly-understood sense of the word.
Reread what I wrote. I answered based on David's format "more libertarian" no arguing that Trump is a libertarian.
I thought less regulation was a libertarian want.
Nope, plus, Trump was no fan of the former either.
"Nope" they are not two different things or "nope" you won't stop conflating them?
"Trump was no fan of the former either."
I think his major beef was with the visa lottery system/
Trump reduced legal immigration as well. It hurt US industries.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/crab-concerns-maryland-seafood-trade-workforce-nearly-halved-by-trump-visa-lottery
"he cautioned libertarians against nostalgia for an imagined past, where liberty was supposedly greater"
A good lesson. People regularly speak of some imaginary golden age that we need to "get back to" or about how things "are now" bad or some other phrasing that assumes a golden age that never existed.
Many things in the past were far more libertarian.
There was no income tax in America until 1913.
You could make money and not report it to the government.
Lots of money.
That's an important level of libertarianism.
That’s an important level of libertarianism.
If your libertarianism comes down to 'I hate taxes' you're not a libertarian, you're just a freeloader who wants to rationalize.
- Person A complains he isn't getting enough $ from gov't.
- Person B complains gov't is taking his $ to give to Person A.
Guess which kind of "freeloader" Sarcastr0 has a problem with...
I assure you Sarcastro, being required to live in a world where you need to report to the government any income you make, is a severe compromise on your liberty.
There are alternatives to income taxes to finance necessary governmental functions.
Tell me about it. Not only do I have to "report" to the government every year, I receive no benefits in return from that government (which are not purely theoretical). Fortunately, tax credits and exemptions for non-US residents offset most of my US tax liabilities.
If Trump can end that particular tyranny, maybe even I will vote for him...
…if you were a white, heterosexual, Christian male.
There were taxes before 1913.
It often involved making money.
How did women, blacks, homosexuals, and Asians (most of whom were unable to become citizens unless they were born here) feel about their liberty in 1913? How about freedom of speech?
To be clear: there is a difference between being "a libertarian" and "the most libertarian president".
Trump is pretty much the only president in any of our lifetimes which is at all libertarian. Fast dishwashers that work, a fine example. Quickly undone by Biden. That doesn't make him a "libertarian", and he never claimed to be one, so we'll agree he's not.
Seems you're wallowing in anecdotes and not looking at the net libertarianism of Trump.
Being obsessed with using the government to own the libs is very anti-libertarian. Just because you don't like a group doesn't mean they can be ignored.
"Being obsessed with using the government to own the libs is very anti-libertarian."
???
What did Trump do as president (or threatened to do) that qualifies as "using the government to own the libs"?
"Just because you don’t like a group doesn’t mean they can be ignored."
Wait, I thought the whole idea of libertarianism is government "ignoring" things / people. As in:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire
- https://www.harpercollins.com/products/leave-us-alone-grover-norquist
Get a fucking clue...
Are you on drugs? (Though, ironically, if you were you would immediately see how Trump was not at all libertarian.) Jimmy Carter actually did major deregulation. Bill Clinton cut the size of government. Trump did neither. (Neither Carter nor Clinton were libertarian, of course. But at least they did some libertarian things.) Reagan had very good libertarian rhetoric, though his follow-through was lacking (though that wasn't all his fault; a Democratic Congress wouldn't give him much). Trump was neither libertarian policywise nor rhetorically.
In doubt?
Biden yesterday announced fuel economy requirements which would end our ability to buy a vehicle capable of pulling a significant recreational trailer.
Trump would end that, and did end it as president.
Bush didn't.
That's the difference.
Trump promises to end the import of electric vehicles.
If Trump were a pedophile, would you still vote for him?
David Boaz was a kind and generous person.
.
I emailed him out of the blue and asked him to recommend a conservative book editor to review my manuscript. (I had engaged another editor, who read my manuscript and said, "This stuff it too conservative for me to associate myself with.")
.
David took the time to put me in touch with a wonderful editor.