The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
SCOTUS in Fall 2022: Longer Arguments, Fewer Opinions
The Supreme Court's oral arguments have become significantly longer, but the Court has yet to issue an opinion on the merits so far this term.
2022 will come to a close without the Supreme Court issuing a single opinion in an argued case during October Term 2022. Nor has the Court issued a per curiam merits opinion. This is unusual, particularly considering the (relatively) small size of the Court's docket.
While the Supreme Court does not usually issue many Fall opinions, it typically issues a few opinions in argued cases, along with the occasional merits opinion in a case summarily reversing the opinion below. The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was often the first justice to issue an opinion in an argued case each term, but she was rarely alone in getting an opinion out the door before the New Year.
While the justices may not be writing much yet (other than in opinions related to orders) they are certanly talking. The Court's oral arguments have become substnatially longer this term, owing in part to the new format in which traditional, free-for-all argument is supplemented by seriatim questioning by the justices.
Over at SCOTUSBlog, Jake S. Truscott and Adam Feldman examine the 27 oral arguments the Court has held thus far this term and find that arguments are longer, the justices are speaking more, and the Court's newest justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, is speaking most of all (and it is not particularly close).
In the first three months of the 2022-23 term, the Supreme Court's newest member, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, was by far the most active participant in oral arguments, according to an analysis of the written transcripts for the 27 cases the court has heard so far.
Jackson has spoken, on average, nearly 1,350 words per argument. The court's next most-talkative members — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Neil Gorsuch, in that order — each have spoken, on average, between 800 and 900 words per argument. . . .
Truscott and Feldman also find that Justice Jackson does not speak more often than her colleagues. Rather, when she speaks she tends to speak longer.
Whether these trends will continue into the spring is anyone's guess. Presumably we will start to get opinions in January. I doubt, however, we will see significantly shorter arguments, particularly given some of the difficult and high profile questions on the Court's docket in the coming months.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So more Oral, less Written?? Guess Kavanaugh is having some impact.
Is PB&J insecure about her position on the Court? Is the first Black ?woman's? (Sotomayer being the first woman of color) long opinion laden questioning the equivalent of Fredo insisting that "he's smart" and deserves respect?
You can’t stop posting about her whenever the OP mentions her. And using the wrong name. And going off on her secret dumbness.
It’s weird.
...and of course you always have to reply. Weird indeed.
Look, you may disagree with Justice Jackson, you may have a different philosophy from her, you may wish a different President had nominated a different justice. You may even wish she talked a little less. But if you can’t see that she’s intelligent, you are blinded by racism.
Charles Manson was intelligent....
A rhetoric characterizing political opponents as insane criminals is a rhetoric of civil. war. The primary goal of the constitution is not instituting ideals reflecting a victory of one side, but keeping the peace. Its compromises are part of its fundamental nature and purpose, not inexplicable and ignorable departures from it.
Is she playing Jeopardy, giving an answer in the form of a long question?
"n the first three months of the 2022-23 term, the Supreme Court's newest member, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, was by far the most active participant in oral arguments, according to an analysis of the written transcripts for the 27 cases the court has heard so far."
If one is outnumbered, then one is inclined to speak more.
It would be interesting to see what Kegan thinks of her.
I think you need more than an hour for oral argument on major, foundational cases. The court should give these cases more argument time on the calendar rather than simply allow them to go over unofficially.