The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
I've always been a bit of a late adopter, and so as with many other law professors during the pandemic, I've started a pilot season of a podcast, Dissenting Opinions, under the auspices of the Constitutional Law Institute at the University of Chicago. For the first season, the theme is scholars who have a heterodox view of a particular Supreme Court opinion—either criticisms of a generally canonical opinion, or a defense of an opinion that's generally maligned.
The first two episodes are here. The first features Genevieve Lakier defending Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizen Consumers Council, a commercial speech case with few full-throated defenders. The second features co-blogger Steve Sachs criticizing Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, a staple of the civil procedure canon. Two interesting federalism episodes will be coming next, posting every other Wednesday.
(There will also be a seven-hour deep dive into originalist theory, posting sometime this summer…)
This is all an experiment, so feedback is welcome, and suggestions about future interviews are especially welcome.
To get the Volokh Conspiracy Daily e-mail, please sign up here.