Is Nostr an Antidote to Social Media Censorship?
What if there was a social media platform owned not by Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or the Chinese Communist Party, but by everybody and nobody all at once?
HD DownloadWhy is social media so easily corrupted by the state? Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey says guys like him are the problem.
"I was a single point of failure," Dorsey said at the 2024 Oslo Freedom Forum, an annual conference hosted by the Human Rights Foundation. "It creates a chokehold. You have a company, a CEO, a board, that represents one place where an entity can put pressure on."
That was especially true during the COVID-19 lockdowns, when federal officials were in contact with every major social media platform, coercing them to remove content. Even in normal times, Google and Meta collect vast troves of personal information on their users and receive hundreds of thousands of requests every year from governments around the world to access that data. When Dorsey was running Twitter, the company's Indian offices were raided after a tweet offended a member of the ruling party. The government of France recently arrested Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, and wants to hold him criminally liable for illicit activity taking place on the network.
What if there were an alternative platform with no offices to raid and no single CEO to arrest? What if it were owned not by Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or the Chinese Communist Party, but by everybody and nobody all at once? What if there were no administrators with direct access to user personal data?
That alternative exists, and it's called Nostr. Like bitcoin, it's a community-run digital network highly resistant to censorship and corruption. If bitcoin has the potential to serve as the foundation of a new global monetary system, Nostr could do the same for communication and identity in the digital sphere.
Take it from Martti Malmi, who was one of the first developers to work on bitcoin, collaborating with Satoshi Nakamoto himself. Now, he's a Nostr developer.
"Bitcoin is freedom of money, and Nostr is freedom of everything else," Martti said during a recent bitcoin conference in Prague.
When did social media get so broken? In what feels like a lifetime ago, Arab Spring activists used Twitter and Facebook to organize, coordinate, and topple long-standing dictatorships. It was intoxicating—but this tech-powered revolution from below was a mirage. Military regimes cracked down, and the very same networks that empowered the masses were repurposed as tools of censorship, surveillance, and repression.
There are several decentralized social media networks that, like Nostr, aim to fulfill the same promise of community empowerment. But they're often heavily siloed, have integrated crypto tokens, and are funded by venture capitalists hoping for windfall returns on their investments. Handfuls of people are still in charge, making them overly susceptible to manipulation and control, just like the networks they're designed to replace.
Nostr, by contrast, is open, simple, and ownerless. You control your own feed, and you choose what algorithms to use, if any. To join, you generate a public online address and a password that secures your identity. Then you choose which Nostr-compatible social networks or services to join. If you change your mind, you can migrate your identity and data elsewhere, which is vital for human rights activists and empowering for everyone.
"To be able to, to create content and to create and build your identity and then be able to move it around under your agency, I think is the most powerful idea," Dorsey said at the Oslo Freedom Forum. "And I think the only reason people haven't really valued Nostr yet is because they haven't had that feeling yet. It's there, it's powerful, it's available for everyone."
The Nostr network is constructed like a spider web that can morph and regenerate, making it almost impossible to censor. If the Chinese government attacks Nostr again, as it did last year, the network can spin up new connections.
Martti Malmi predicts that eventually "every conceivable app we have today will be built on Nostr."
That includes payment services, like Venmo. Nostr doesn't need its own crypto token because it integrates seamlessly with bitcoin. Users routinely locate other people in the network's public directory and send them what's called a "zap," which can range from a micropayment to $10,000 worth of bitcoin.
Like every financial services app, Venmo occasionally censors transactions and de-platforms users. But nobody can stop you from sending bitcoin on Nostr. To pay or get paid you don't need to fill out paperwork. And you can be located anywhere in the world.
Nostr had only a small handful of users before Jack Dorsey started funding its development. Edward Snowden and the financial writer and investor Lyn Alden are among Nostr's biggest boosters. The entrepreneur and tech visionary Naval Ravikant recently endorsed Nostr, and the arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov brought another surge of interest. Today, the network has more than 40,000 weekly active users.
"[Nostr] is coming and it's just a matter of time," Dorsey said in a 2024 talk. "And when we all decided to do it, when we all decided to remove these dependencies because we believe more in humanity than these companies and, and, corrupt governments, and how they, how they interact with each other."
Social media is how we speak, transact, and shape our identities. We can't entrust our primary communication network to a handful of corruptible humans. And now we don't have to.
This video is adapted from Can Nostr Make Twitter's Dreams Come True?
Photo Credits: Kris Tripplaar/Sipa USA/Newscom; China News Service, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Jonathan Rashad, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Sallam from Yemen, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Syria-Frames-Of-Freedom (Pro-FSA information), CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; kris krüg, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Mark Warner, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA/Newscom; Envato Elements. Generative AI Images and Videos: Midjourney/Model V6.1. RunwayML/Gen-3 Alpha.
Music Credits: "Volcano," by Romeo via Artlist; "Ember," by Tristan Burton via Artlist; "Retrospection," by Peter Matri via Artlist; "Infinite Circles," by Ardie Son via Artlist; "North of Hope," by Romeo via Artlist.
- Video Editor: Regan Taylor
- Motion Graphics: Adani Samat
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Again?
It's not going to get bigger than Mastodon all by itself.
Alex Gladstein is the chief strategy officer at the Human Rights Foundation and author of Check Your Financial Privilege (BTC Media).
LOL. "Check Your Privilege"/open society activist pimps own speaker at his foundation's own conference.
Owned by everyone. Where ALL our rights apply. That’s public.
Owned by nobody. That’s bullshit.
Social media is already our public town square.
It’s long past due that it is recognized as such.
What? Communicating to millions of people "without oversight and regulation?" That would be a threat to our very democracy!!
Nostr has the worst UI/UX imaginable.
Great idea, but the UK already has a law to ban something like it, and France, Canada, Australia and NZ are pushing bills to do so right now.
We need to do something about the Young Global Leaders graduates if we want to preserve free speech, because every one of those anti-speech leaders took the course.
NOSTR, the $100 laptop of social media.
Isn’t it far more effective to round up all the Marxists and get rid of them?
So nobody would be in charge? Nobody would make certain the bills would be paid? Nobody would hand out assignments to the employees to make certain things run properly? Not buying it. Someone would be in charge and it is they who would make decisions on what is and is not allowed. The only real difference I see is that at least with X we know who is running things.
I mostly agree with Elon and still think it's a bad look for him to be so vocal and biased. It makes any moderation against the left look politically motivated. On the other hand, I've seen nothing to suggest he is even remotely as bad as Twitter used to be even if the predominant culture on the platform flipped
No matter how biased you feel it makes it look against the left it doesnt hold a candle to the ACTUAL FREAKIN' BIAS that platform had (and to some extent still has) against conservative views and values and political debates and representatives
Plus Musk did more takedowns than Dorsey before him. Looks bad when you come in on the platform of free speech and then start dropping speech you don't like.
Such as?
Brandy just assumes that because he licks more dude's assholes than his Mom since he took over the business from her, that's just how things work.
The issue is night and day retarded. Especially considering all the self-deleting morons who swore they were going to go to Mastadon because Elon turned Twitter into a Hellscape.
Brandy's not trying to make a real argument, he's just advertising how much he really, really likes to lick assholes.
How to say "I'm clueless about how open-source works" without using those exact words.
I'd suggest something along the lines of "I, Rossami, don't seem to understand that NOSTR is not software, but a protocol, that even if it were open source software, there is still a source, and that the internet already runs on several dozen different protocols (HTT*P*, FT*P*, SNM*P*, SMT*P*, TC*P*-I*P*, ICM*P*, UD*P*, DHC*P*, AR*P*...) none of which are software either but all of which are 'open'."
Really, though, if you're this clueless about all this you should just lean on ChatGPT or similar to do your heavy intellectual lifting for you.
But, returning to the original comment, no one is in charge of the protocols or decides what is and is not allowed.
Because it’s timely: The Riddle of Steel
It wasn't the weakness of the protocol that failed the first time(s).
So you believe that the government could never find a way to interfere?
What if there was a social media platform owned not by Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or the Chinese Communist Party, but by everybody and nobody all at once?
Shit everywhere and all the grass has been over grazed.
Mastodon II, This Time We're Serious
White Mike would stalk bad Liz there just like on the original.
The government of France recently arrested Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, and wants to hold him criminally liable for illicit activity taking place on the network.
*ctrl-f rumbl 0/0*
I here there's a considerable effort to do more than just hold the creator of Truth Social criminally liable, again, and some question as to the motives of the most recent guy to take a shot at him.
That alternative exists, and it's called Nostr. Like bitcoin, it's a community-run digital network highly resistant to censorship and corruption. If bitcoin has the potential to serve as the foundation of a new global monetary system, Nostr could do the same for communication and identity in the digital sphere.
Let's hope for NOSTR's sake that it's NOT to federated internet freedom what Bitcoin is to money.
Right, let's hope it's more like what NNTP, BitTorrent, or Tor is to communication and identity in the digital sphere.
Wait, no...
Tragedy of the uncommons.
So how much was Reason paid for this advertisement?
It sounds nice but the article seems completely credulous to Dorsey's claims.
Until that guy in France who’s partner has a penis locked up Durov, Telegram was the choice of a new generation.
If the French people had any balls at all, Macron would be feeding the worms by now.
Too bad they don't.
French women don’t shave their armpits and Macron’s “wife” doesn’t shave her balls.
I'm ok with a little hair but would it kill them to use a little deodorant like every third day? I mean they don't need 23 different kinds.
This is a stupid conspiracy rumor.
Brigitte Macron is a woman.
What is a woman?
Wtf is « NOSTR » . How much did Reason get paid by some idiotic « techbro » to sell his stupid crypto web3 scam?
Whatever the fuck he’s pretending to sell aleady exists and works fine.
It’s called the activitypub, enabled among other things in Mastodon.
The bleating sheep will still exist.
Only tyrants and dictators fear the people. Only tyrants and dictators use their power to censor and imprison those who dare speak out.
This is to remind the governments of France, Germany, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand what happens when dictators finally push the people too far.
Just remember what happened to Benito Mussolini and Nicolae Ceausescu ( and their wives).
Not that I'm advocating for the same thing to those dear servants of the people......
Poor Reason - Mastodon, then Threads... 3rd times the charm?
ID10T
If govt coerces Apple/Google not to allow the Nostr app in their app store has not a major enabler for the use of Nostr been removed? People can still use from a laptop but no Nostr app on phones seem like a killer for Nostr. Yes? No?
Social media is how we speak, transact, and shape our identities.
Go fuck yourselves.
This isn't unwriting internet censorship. It's baking "You will own nothing and like it." in harder.
A truly anonymous network means groups like Fancy Bear, Volt Typhoon, The Lazarus Group, or the FBI get to write software to run on machines and I don't get to know about it, as protocol. So, either the protocol has some way of verifying sources or I have to bar it from accessing resources on my network. The idea is the same retardation consistently demonstrated by low brow, if not psychopathic, teen-tech optimists; "Technology is a tool, and I know tools can be used against me, but this time it's (D)ifferent!"
Jack "Know nothing, Sell hard, Fail upwards" Dorsey is at his usual tricks and Reason can't help but suck any dick that happens to appear in the techno-libertopia glory hole no matter how many times they catch COVID and monkeypox, at the same time, from it.
Imagine thinking the guy who CEO'd the censorship efforts at Twitter is someone to pay attention to for anti-censorship work. It's fucking insulting.
I can't believe we're still having this debate, especially after Twitter was wrenched from the grasp of the censorship clique. I am all for developing technology to mitigate censorship efforts, but no, Nostr is not an antidote to social media censorship. We live in a country where all the infrastructure is controlled by regulated entities, and where even unregulated entities must still comply with court orders. So yes, please, make more privacy tech, but the real fight is to promote and defend a culture of freedom of speech, not surrender to censorship and try to encrypt our way back to privacy and free thinking.
The "Arab Spring" was nothing more than a joint US-Israeli-EU social media multi-faceted color revolution driven by the social media and CIA-sponsored encrypted messaging apps that Reason seems to pine for.
I’ve got an even better communications protocol. It’s called paper. For all those times when you want to communicate with someone without spamming the world looking for attention.
"What if there was a social media platform owned not by Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or the Chinese Communist Party, but by everybody and nobody all at once?"
Sorta like a public restroom?
Hahaha
That’s how you use social media.