The Government Fears This Privacy Tool
The Department of Justice indicted the creators of Samourai Wallet, an application that helps people spend their bitcoins anonymously.
HD DownloadThe Department of Justice indicted the creators of an application that helps people spend their bitcoins anonymously. They're accused of "conspiracy to commit money laundering." Why "conspiracy to commit" as opposed to just "money laundering"?
Because they didn't hold anyone else's money or do anything illegal with it. They provided a privacy tool that may have enabled other people to do illegal things with their bitcoin. But that's not a crime, just as selling someone a kitchen knife isn't a crime. The case against the creators of Samourai Wallet is an assault on our civil liberties and First Amendment rights.
What this tool does is offer what's known as a "coinjoin," a method for anonymizing bitcoin transactions by mixing them with other transactions, as the project's founder, Keonne Rodriguez, explained to Reason in 2022:
"I think the best analogy for it is like smelting gold," he said. "You take your Bitcoin, you add it into [the conjoin protocol] Whirlpool, and Whirlpool smelts it into new pieces that are not associated to the original piece."
Smelting bars of gold would make it harder for the government to track. But if someone eventually uses a piece of that gold for an illegal purchase, should the creator of the smelting furnace go to prison? This is what the government is arguing.
Cash is the payment technology used most by criminals, but it also happens to be essential for preserving the financial privacy of law-abiding citizens, as Human Rights Foundation chief strategy officer Alex Gladstein told Reason:
"The ATM model, it gives people the option to have freedom money," says Gladstein. "Yes, the government will know all the ins and outs of what flows are coming in and out, but they won't know what you do with it when you leave. And that allows us to preserve the privacy of cash, which I think is essential for a democratic society."
The government's decision to indict Rodriguez and his partner William Lonergan Hill is also an attack on free speech because all they did was write open-source code and make it widely available.
"It is an issue of a chilling effect on free speech," attorney Jerry Brito, who heads up the cryptocurrency nonprofit Coin Center, told Reason after the U.S. Treasury went after the creators of another piece of anonymizing software. "So, basically, anybody who is in any way associated with this tool…a neutral tool that can be used for good or for ill, these people are now being basically deplatformed."
Are we willing to trade away our constitutional rights for the promise of security? For many in power, there seems to be no limit to what they want us to trade away.
In the '90s, the FBI tried to ban online encryption because criminals and terrorists might use it to have secret conversations. Had they succeeded, there would be no internet privacy. E-commerce, which relies on securely sending credit card information, might never have existed.
Today, Elizabeth Warren mobilizes her "anti-crypto army" to take down bitcoin by exaggerating its utility to Hamas. The Biden administration tried to permanently record all transactions over $600, and Warren hopes to implement a Central Bank Digital Currency, which would allow the government near-total surveillance of our financial lives.
Remember when the Canadian government ordered banks to freeze money headed to the trucker protests? Central Bank Digital Currencies would make such efforts far easier.
"We come from first principles here in the global struggle for human rights," says Gladstein. "The most important thing is that it's confiscation resistant and censorship resistant and parallel, and can be done outside of the government's control."
The most important thing about bitcoin, and money like it, isn't its price. It's the check it places on the government's ability to devalue, censor, and surviel our money. Creators of open-source tools like Samourai Wallet should be celebrated, not threatened with a quarter-century in a federal prison.
Music Credits: "Intercept," by BXBRDVJA via Artlist; "You Need It,' by Moon via Artlist. Photo Credits: Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA/Newscom; Omar Ashtawy/APAImages / Polaris/Newscom; Paul Weaver/Sipa USA/Newscom; Envato Elements; Pexels; Emin Dzhafarov/Kommersant Photo / Polaris/Newscom; Anonymous / Universal Images Group/Newscom.
- Video Editor: Regan Taylor
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'But that's not a crime, just as selling someone a kitchen knife isn't a crime.'
Have you been to the UK lately?
We aren't the UK... yet.
I think it says somewhere in the Constitution that the government has the right to know everything about you, especially your financial transactions. So any effort to prevent that is a federal crime, right?
It’s in the penumbras.
Let’s see here. Article I says “Congress shall do everything necessary and proper to regulate commerce and promote the general welfare.” That looks like unlimited power. So let’s check the limitations in the Bill of Rights. 4A protects “houses and effects” which does not include financial transactions, property in the possession of another person, digital data or anything like that. Oh, and the 2A only protects muskets.
So yes, the government has the right to know everything about you except what is written down on physical pieces of paper located inside your house, which it can get with a warrant.
/what many judges really appear to believe
9th amendment, anyone?
The 4th actually says "persons, houses, papers, and effects". Financial transactions are the classic example of "papers". No, the government evades the 4th not by claiming that financial transactions are unprotected but by arguing that you've waived your privacy rights by sharing those transaction details with third parties.
Okay, I get that you were trying to be sarcastic but it wasn't really working.
If you can’t participate in society without sharing information with third parties, then you can’t not-waive those rights. So that claim doesn’t seem very reasonable or honest. Especially when attempts to avoid sharing that information, like keeping cash under the mattress, are considered probable cause that a crime is being committed.
I completely agree - that's why I called it an evasion of the 4th.
I think it says somewhere in the Constitution that the government has the right to know everything about you,
Income tax...
"The Government Fears This Privacy Tool"
The Government Fears Privacy
More accurately,
The democrats in Government Fear Privacy
Exactly. Just look at the PATRIOT Act, written by Democrats and signed by a Democrat. They hate privacy.
Poor sarc
Yes, pour Sarc.
Thank goodness Barry did away with the patriot act as soon as he got into office.
And there’s Sarc, rushing in to defend his precious democrats. But he’s totally not one.
And the way that President Nixon tried to protect the Democrats' privacy at the Watergate hotel was notable.
Thank goodness we have all these third party go-betweens to help make bitcoin both usable and anonymous. The two things that early bitcoin enthusiasts told us were native to, you know, bitcoin.
Satoshi Nakamoto and Banksy are the same person and BTC is a Banksy-style piece of quasi-performative mathematics intended to demonstrate how to get a bunch of idiots to use a zero-knowledge protocol to attempt to disprove a zero-knowledge proof (or an arbitrarily large collection of them).
Have you ever seen them both in the same room at the same time? QED.
Reason: “A bitcoin Whirlpool is like gold foundry. You put your bitcoin in and once all the gold is melted together the bitcoin can’t be traced back to you.”
Normie: “Uh… do you engrave your name on every piece of gold you own or something? Because all mine that isn’t jewelry just has the refiner’s mark, weight, and purity printed on it. Completely anonymous without even warming it up.”
Why not just print a QR code on all the money printed and track every financial exchange?
I've analyzed the indictment and discovered this secret code embedded therein: "Resistance is futile".
I've done a few futile things that were enjoyable at the time - - - - - -
This thread reminds me of the notion of an information meta-virus that replicates by becoming exposed to it.
Then, like the bullet that entered into the pre-fatal wound, the gun causes the violence instead of the shooter because it was an accidental discharge.
So, what about cases where the illegal transaction was made by accident and by baiting the hapless transactee and open source creator alike?
This thread reminds me of the notion of an information meta-virus that replicates by becoming exposed to it.
I lost the game.