The Bukele Model Means Security Without Liberty
El Salvador stands at a crossroads between popular sentiment and adherence to constitutional principles.
HD Download"They were delicious," said a woman about the pupusas she received after casting her vote in El Salvador's recent presidential election. The stuffed corn tortillas, the country's best-known dish, were handed out courtesy of the federal government and its incumbent President Nayib Bukele, who was running for reelection despite a constitutional ban on serving consecutive terms. Giving out food at polling stations might qualify as illegal voter interference. Bukele was undeterred.
Bukele ended up winning 85 percent of the popular vote, and his New Ideas party held on to its majority control in Congress. The 42-year-old president called the landslide victory "a record in the entire democratic history of the world."
"This will be the first time where one party rules a country in a completely democratic system," he told a crowd of thousands who had gathered in San Salvador's central square on election day. "The entire opposition has been pulverized."
El Salvador is the smallest country in Central America with a population of about 6.3 million, but Bukele has made himself one of the best-known political leaders in the world. His outsized public profile stems from his public embrace of bitcoin and the staggering decline in crime and violence in El Salvador since he took office.
But Bukele has also taken control of the federal judiciary and has clamped down on press freedoms. He overrode a constitutional rule against running for a second term so that he could remain in office. His defenders point to his broad popular support as evidence that he has a mandate to do what's necessary to fix the impoverished and crime-ridden country he presides over. But this view is shortsighted: Latin America's slide toward authoritarianism points to the long-term cost of allowing political majorities to undermine the rule of law.
The former mayor of the capital of San Salvador, Bukele was elected president in 2019, becoming Latin America's youngest leader at 37. The self-described "world's coolest dictator" (he trolls his critics by owning their epithets) entered the political arena amid widespread disillusionment with traditional parties and rampant corruption. His anti-corruption pledges and his unconventional policies made him immensely popular. So did his social media savviness: A fluent English speaker, he often bashes his critics on X, formerly Twitter, where he's garnered 5.9 million followers.
The backward-hat-wearing president first caught the world's attention in September 2021, when he announced to an adoring crowd of bitcoin devotees at a conference in Miami that El Salvador would become the first country in the world to adopt the cryptocurrency as legal tender. The move alarmed international financial institutions like Moody's and the International Monetary Fund, but it turned him into a celebrated figure who sought to end the U.S. dollar's global dominance. He installed bitcoin ATMs around the country and launched a government-sponsored crypto wallet, where citizens could access the $30 in bitcoin that El Salvador gifted to all of its citizens.
His reputation as a visionary leader was further cemented when he announced Bitcoin City, a new urban center that he claimed was inspired by Alexander the Great, where the government will use geothermal energy from nearby volcanoes to mine the cryptocurrency.
But bitcoin use hasn't taken off in El Salvador, which has been on a dollar standard since 2001. What has won the support of voters is Bukele's broad attack on the country's violent criminal gangs, which transformed the murder capital of the world into a nation with the lowest homicide rates in the region. And it happened over the course of just two years.
By imposing a state of emergency in the spring of 2022, Bukele was able to detain around 75,000 alleged gang members, or about 1.7 percent of the population. He built a "mega-prison" with capacity for up to 40,000 inmates dubbed the "Terrorism Confinement Center."
No longer the murder capital, El Salvador now has the world's highest incarceration rate.
Bukele's gang crackdown suspended constitutional protections and drew allegations of human rights abuses. People were arrested without a judicial order or access to a lawyer. Arrest quotas were handed out and thousands were wrongfully detained. Mass hearings are being held for as many as 300 defendants at a time. There are reports of over 250 people being placed in a single prison cell, and inmates are often denied food for extended periods. There are allegations of torture. And Bukele's government is accused of secretly negotiating a truce with gang leaders, buying their support with financial benefits and special privileges.
But Bukele remains incredibly popular thanks to the dramatic improvement in public safety. According to a recent poll, he has the support of 70 percent to 90 percent of the country.
He launched his reelection campaign with a promise to continue the crackdown and the state of emergency. If his party, New Ideas, didn't win the election, he said that it would reverse his accomplishments.
In the short term, Bukele has dramatically improved daily life in El Salvador. But when popular leaders subvert constitutional constraints to achieve even worthy goals, it can have catastrophic effects in the long term.
In 2020, Bukele stormed the Legislative Assembly with heavily armed troops after lawmakers didn't approve his security loan proposal. A year later, he replaced the Supreme Court's judges with loyalists, who then paved the way for his reelection. He made electoral reforms, reducing the number of deputies in the Legislative Assembly. Bukele and his party control every branch of power.
Bukele has also targeted critics and journalists with harassment and intimidation techniques, facilitated by a government-run propaganda apparatus that disseminates official narratives. Activists, union leaders, and opposition politicians who speak out against his regime have faced retaliation and censorship. For instance, the editors of El Faro, a prominent critical news outlet, were forced to flee the country after enduring state-sponsored harassment and surveillance of their journalists.
One of Bukele's boldest legislative maneuvers led to his reelection. In El Salvador, at least six articles of the Constitution prohibit presidential reelection, clearly stipulating that candidates can only serve one five-year term. So Bukele changed the makeup of the court, which then reinterpreted the Constitution to allow his reelection by a 4-0 vote (with one judge abstaining).
Bukele has indicated that he won't remain in office for a third term and has said that "the current norms don't permit" indefinite reelection. But he has a record of breaking norms.
Bukele's vice president, Felix Ulloa, told The New York Times, "To these people who say democracy is being dismantled, my answer is yes — we are not dismantling it, we are eliminating it, we are replacing it with something new." When asked about Ulloa's comments by the Spanish newspaper El País, Buekele said, "I don't trust anything the New York Times says….El Salvador has never had democracy….We are bringing democracy to this country."
Latin America's recent history is rife with cautionary tales of imperial presidencies. Hugo Chávez seized direct control over every component of Venezuela's state apparatus after he was elected president in 1998, including the judicial system and military. He, too, enjoyed broad popular support. In 2009, he amended the Constitution, allowing him to remain in office indefinitely.
Chávez died in 2013, but his decision to end term limits has been a factor in the return of authoritarian rule. There's little hope of dislodging Chávez's successor, Nicólas Maduro, who is currently under investigation by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. Maduro recently barred opposition member María Corina Machado from participating in the upcoming election. In a free election, she'd likely defeat him.
In 2014, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega pushed through a constitutional reform allowing his indefinite reelection. As with Chávez, Ortega enjoyed broad popular support at the time of the change. Today, both Venezuela and Nicaragua are effectively dictatorships.
Bukele brushes aside claims that he is forming a single-party state, pointing to his landslide victory and broad support. There's an understandable tendency to overlook rule-bending for expedience in deeply troubled nations, but if robust institutions don't constrain El Salvador's political majority, it could become yet another Latin American dictatorship.
Beware the short-term allure of pupusas at the polling booth.
Music Credits: "Eyes on the Ball" by Sémø via Artlist; "Yelema" by Captain Joz via Artlist; "Piki Piki" by Captain Joz via Artlist; "CloudCity" by Out of Flux via Artlist.
Photo Credits: Valter Campanato/ABr, CC BY 3.0 BR, via Wikimedia Commons; nicolas genin from Paris, France, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Dilma Rousseff, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Alexander Pe?a / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; La Prensa Gráfica, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Salvador alc, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; MPfoto71/Newscom; Camilo Freedman/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom; 總統府, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Franklin Reyes from La Habana, Cuba, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; The photographer is Carlos Granier-Phelps., CC BY-SA 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons; Alexander Pe?a / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; Camilo Freedman/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; DPST/Newscom; Album / Oronoz/Newscom; Claudia Guadarrama/Polaris/Newscom; La Prensa Gráfica, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Joka Madruga, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Fernanda LeMarie - Cancillería del Ecuador, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Cancillería Ecuador, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Camilo Freedman/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Camilo Freedman/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Jonathan Alpeyrie/SIPA/Newscom; Joel Alvarez (Joels86), CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Russian Foreign Ministry/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; RICARDO BARBATO / BlackStar Photos/Newscom; Eneas De Troya, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; LEONARDO GUZMAN / GDA Photo Service/Newscom; Prensa Miraflores; Darafsh, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Secretaría de Prensa El Salvador; Javier Campos/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Francisco Arias/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Notimex/Newscom; Allison Dinner/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Jimmy Villalta/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Cindy Miller Hopkins / DanitaDelimont.com / "Danita Delimont Photography"/Newscom.
- Video Editor: Regan Taylor
- Graphics: Adani Samat
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
where citizens could access the $30 in bitcoin that El Salvador gifted to all of its citizens.
Worth about $60 now.
Hey, free food, a hipster presidente, and a living (or euthanized) constitution. What's not to like?
The Bukele Model Means Security Without Liberty
Bukele?...Isn't that a sausage party where the guys are in a circle jerk and a pivot person is in the center getting all their happy endings? Oh, wait, that's Bukkake!
🙂
😉
This entire discussion requires a discussion on what liberty is. Those citizens of el Salvador who feel safer as they go to markets, dinner, schools, etc would all claim they have more liberty as they no longer fear the violent criminals. The violent criminals would argue less liberty as they are now in prisons.
The argument on balance seems to be regarding the edge cases of those caught up as members of a gang. With all the caterwauling by some, this would be everyone who has been sent to jails.
A society is not free if they have fear of criminal organizations or fear of government. That is the balance government provides. El Salvador was clearly unbalanced with deference to gangs. I haven't seen evidence they are going after people completely innocent. The crack downs are focused on known violent gangs.
America we see the opposite focus. Longer sentences for non violent protestors, political opponents, business etc, while violent repeat offenders are let out. Would you say the people and business losing tens if millions to theft in America are experiencing liberty?
Without a discussion on the balance the discussion is sophistry.
Cite yer source, Bozo. You didn't write that. The grammar and spelling is not to your low standard.
Are you posting AI?
I don’t think anyone is going to take a directive from a pedophile.
You’ve been extra retarded today shrike.
Youre free to put any sentence from my post in quotes and search Google. You won't though. Because again you've been extra retarded today.
You know what a better way would be to strip power away from the gangs? Legalize drugs, guns, and prostitution. That wouldn't deprive the gangs of all their money-making activities, but it would sure do a lot. That's a common-sense libertarian reform that everyone should support. Instead, you find a way to defend the police state.
You know what a better way would be to strip power away from the gangs? Legalize drugs, guns, and prostitution.
They'd just move on to blackmail and kidnapping.
Frankly, I prefer when gangs focus on drugs and prostitution because it's easy to avoid becoming either a police or a gang target when that's where they operate.
But control of vice is where organized crime makes their money, and they wouldn't have control withoutvthe anti-vice laws.
And illegal vice isn't confined to one area. It can move to your Stepford too, whereas when legal and cheap, vice requires economies of scale and hence operations bigger than a home in a neighborhood.
Does nothing for extortion.
Extortion exists today, but wiith no victimless crimes, there would be much less leverage for blackmailers and extortionists to use against victims.
If you think that’s actually going to strip away their power, you’re even dumber than I imagine. These are sophisticated criminal operations, not a bunch of knuckle-dragging morons, and legalizing every kind of vice will do jack shit for breaking their power. It's the equivalent of these lefty snakes claiming that crime rates are dropping, because they're refusing to actually prosecute criminal acts.
It’s not an accident that crime started dropping after the Clinton crime bill passed, and no, that wasn’t due to abortion on demand like those Freakonomics idiots claimed. Or Guiliani’s strict policies actually making NYC a relatively decent place to visit for tourists after 25 years or so of it degenerating into a crusty-ass, AIDS infected shithole.
Thank you for making it clear that you consider drug use, gun ownership, and prostitution to be criminal acts. The libertarian philosophy is not a good fit for you. You obviously prefer a world where only criminals are empowered to provide those things to people.
If drugs, guns, and prostitution were legalized, it would do a lot to strip power and money away from the gangs, and there would be little that they could do about it, no matter how sophisticated they are.
Legalizing alcohol did little to reduce the power of gangs here.
Just sayin'.
Because the gangs then moved on to illegal prostitution, gambling, and drugs.
Woof, the question-begging in your post is nuclear-level, but I wouldn't expect an LOLWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDUUUUUUUUUUUDE idiot to understand that.
Where is the question-begging? The premise is separate from the conclusion and there is no Appeal to Emotion here.
Memorize your logical fallacies. Once the paywall goes up, I may not be around to teach them.
If drugs, guns, and prostitution were legalized, it would do a lot to strip power and money away from the gangs, and there would be little that they could do about it, no matter how sophisticated they are.
That's wishful thinking.
The libertarian philosophy is not a good fit for you.
Libertarianism keeps failing because of naive fools like you.
It's a crusty-ass, AIDS-infested shithole with the victimless crime laws still in place.
Yeah, laws that are rarely enforced these days. How's that working out?
OK. Open a brothel or an opium den and see how far you get without bribing a cop.
Oh, and tell your banker it's The Taj Mahal so you can get a Trumpie mortgage for it.
🙂
😉
so US woke "democracy' failed. Just like in Argentina. What say the "democracy dies in darkness" folks? If "democracy" can't protect your life, liberty or property sounds like a failed system. Look at shit hole LA or Detroit or Chicago.."democracy" at action?
Maybe "democracy" isn't the silver bullet. Might be more than "voting" is the path to prosperity.
I mean, as long as the guy isn't a retarded commie like Chavez and Maduro, I could see El Salvador coming out of this rather well off.
And hell, 1.7% of the population is a lot less than history shows a country as losing in a Communist Revolution.
Maybe this guy should seek advice from Milei.
Overall, the guy is pretty centrist. What set him off was the cartels going on a killing spree through San Salvador in March 2022 that was kind of the final straw on all this shit.
Maybe it's because Bukele is part Arab, that it takes a lot more than petty Latin American-style bribery for him to look the other way on gang violence. He's basically using a Middle Eastern power tactic to show them that he's the one in charge, and they better not do anything to fuck with that.
JesseAz: "...fear of criminal organizations or fear of government..."? You repeat yourself.
Society will always endure criminals. It will suffer more if a coercive gang enjoys unconditional/unlimited support, i.e., like a govt. There is zero "balance". Before govt. arrived in the early pioneer days, society was much more cohesive, cooperative, without violence. The "Wild West" was a myth invented to sell dime novels in cities.
Released violent criminals stay away from a "gun culture" area. Why? They fear those who take their life, their property, their defense, "in their own hands". Self-defense is logical, brave, wise.
where citizens could access the $30 in bitcoin that El Salvador gifted to all of its citizens.
That's it? We all got $1400 Donnie checks.
Just do the world a favor and off yourself. Not even good at trolling. Open society is not sending their best person here.
Sad thing is...he might be the best they have.
Hugo Chávez seized direct control over every component of Venezuela's state apparatus after he was elected president in 1998, including the judicial system and military. He, too, enjoyed broad popular support. In 2009, he amended the Constitution, allowing him to remain in office indefinitely.
Donnie envious.
I'd say he is living in your brain rent-free...but, let's be honest, microscopic organisms would be living quite tightly in there.
I want free papusas.
The main perspective from the US must be:
Do these changes affect migration from El Salvador to the US. That shouldn't the goal of whatever we influence there - but it should be the outcome we monitor.
If the people want security and lack of security is why they are pushed from there, then security is a positive. If what we are doing is simply advocating security/clampdown because that's what we think is positive, then we are just advocating dictatorship and likely for corrupt reasons that have been pervasive in our relations with that part of the world for 100+ years.
There will always be 'pull' reasons for migration to the US. And that's mostly ok imo unless those 'pull' reasons are internally destructive to the US - for example, more wage competition for roofers, farm grunts, and maids to drive down wages at the bottom and diminish governance here in the US.
But there are no benefits to the US for migrants who are 'pushed' here.
Reason would rather the gangs stayed, the country remained the murder capital of the world.
Because 'principles' - here. Not so much elsewhere.
But this view is shortsighted: Latin America's slide toward authoritarianism points to the long-term cost of allowing political majorities to undermine the rule of law.
Historically, successful libertarian societies arise out of conservative, law-and-order societies, often monarchies or benign dictatorships.
We have never gotten a libertarian society from the kind of social democracy Reason and progressives envision.
Historically, successful libertarian societies arise out of conservative, law-and-order societies, often monarchies or benign dictatorships.
Because they actually have some measure of stability. It's critical that not become "stagnation", but there's a lot to be said for stability, especially when the world is crashing down around everyone else's ears. Hell, that phenomenon post WWI and WWII is a big chunk of what made the US as big a player as it is.
Yeah, the countries that demonstrate the most internal stability and collective national identity are going to be the ones that end up coming out on top over the next generation of global power politics. This is why it's likely the US and Europe are going to go into significant decline, while Russia and China end up ascending--the former has been effectively taken over by its own left-wing subversives into what is fixing to be a self-mortification death spiral, while the latter are coming out with an ultra-nationalist bent that seems to give them far more focus and purpose.
That's also, incidentally, why the US does these color revolutions--it's a deliberate strategy to sow internal division and instability to bring down governments, such as the Arab Spring and the Floyd riots.
You expect anywhere in Central America to have a legitimate government?
Well, bless your heart.
Based on what Salvadorans are saying, they have the liberty of not being extorted, harrassed, and murdered by these criminal cartel gangs on a routine basis. Sometimes safety and liberty go hand-in-hand, and it's mostly been left-wing activists of the Soros rata type complaining about Bukele's methods, so that means he's doing something right.
This wouldn't have even been necessary if the situation hadn't been allowed to reach DEFCON levels long ago. Bukele's just the first to actually do something about it.
They were not in a normal security scenario. They literally had to go to war with gangs to secure their nation.
Everybody supporting "victimless crime" laws, outta the pool! Start again!