Free Speech Absolutism in Practice
Author James Kirchick supports the First Amendment, full stop. Why don't more journalists?
HD Download"If the problem with campus speech codes is the selectivity with which universities penalize various forms of bigotry," wrote James Kirchick recently in The New York Times, "the solution is not to expand the university's power to punish expression. It's to abolish speech codes entirely."
Kirchick was writing about widespread outrage at the nuanced and hypocritical defense of speech offered by the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania at a congressional hearing about antisemitic and anti-Zionist campus reactions to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel.
Although Kirchick, the author of Secret City: The Hidden History of Gay Washington and The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age, is an ardent defender of Israel, he is also a self-described free-speech absolutist who is disgusted by calls to restrict expression, whether on or off-campus.
Reason's Nick Gillespie spoke to Kirchick about how identity politics has overwhelmed the left's traditional defense of free speech, why so many younger journalists seem lukewarm at best to the First Amendment, and how to muster the courage to speak up for first principles in uncomfortable and hostile situations.
Articles mentioned:
"What Happens Where Free Speech Is Unprotected," by James Kirchick
"Calling Out An Antisemite," by James Kirchick
- Video Editor: Adam Czarnecki
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"the solution is ... to abolish speech codes entirely."
This is wrong on at least two levels: first, selective enforcement is not "the problem," although it is A problem for the victims of the double standards; and secondly, abolishing speech codes is not a solution in the usual sense of that word. Abolishing speech codes on campus merely shifts the complaints, squeezing the toothpaste from one end of the tube to the other without solving anything.
Abolishing speech codes on campus merely shifts the complaints
Shifts the complaints to what?
In this case from Zionists to anti-Zionists. And from insensitive people to fragile safe-spacers.
DEAD WRONG. Abolishing speech codes doesn't shift the complaints. Openly condemning someone's position while stating they have the right to express it is the proper position in many cases. That said, punishing groups actively calling for violence is different than punishing speech.
What is there to solve?
"Author James Kirchick supports the First Amendment, full stop. Why don't more journalists?"
Someone might point out that Trump is a victim of a witch-hunt.
And really, of what journalists does The Jacket speak?
Is Elon Musk still banning people on X(Twitter)?
It is confusing. Wingnuts say it is okay when Elon does it but is a violation of free speech rights when Jack Dorsey did it.
You got banned from Twitter for posting kiddie pics? How touching.
He’s getting rid of you Soros worshipping pedophiles because you post kiddie porn. Although it would be much easier to just execute you.
The only people getting banned from Twitter seem to be the pedophiles, like yourself, Pluggo. Hell, the man even held a vote to see if Alex Jones should be reinstated.
"Is Elon Musk still banning people on X(Twitter)?"
The only group he banned were pedophiles posting content and how-to's.
Twitter suspended user who revealed pedophile flag
Zero surprises that Buttplug is mad about that.
Here's a surprise for you, ML.
Just check out my reply to Rev. Artie further down below. These guys are sure to shake your paradigm.
🙂
😉
Journ-O-Lists have never cared for free speech.
Actual journalism is dead.
Or at leas toughly endangered. If I were president, I would clean house at the DoJ and put in some real fire breathers to take down the leftist democrat machine. I’m sure cases can be made under existing federal election laws that organizations like MSNBC, CNN, NYT, etc. are in fact engaging in democrat campaign speech under the guise of reporting news. And once that is established it’s a quick trip to an onslaught of prosecutions under RICO.
And unlike all the Trump cases, this is actually based in real law.
Well, they do care about the First Amendment.
As would anyone else who makes a buck off a Constitutional right. I don't have anything in particular against information capitalists. Except, perhaps, that they should be more capitalist and less altruistic.
"Actual journalism is dead."
Matt Taibbi, Glen Greenwald, Bari Weiss and Michael Shellenberger (All lefties BTW) are still practicing actual Journalism. So is our Robbie when he isn't being craven and sneaks one past KMW and the Koch censors, but other than that they're the exceptions that prove the rule.
At least the journalist that reported honestly about Ukraine is, because zelenski had him killed
lol... Did anyone think the Commie-Indoctrination campuses and their journalist graduates would protect free speech? That's like asking an apple tree to grow oranges.
If they were private on the other hand. If you don't like the code of conduct you have competitive 'options' or just start your own.
>>Author James Kirchick supports the First Amendment, full stop. Why don't more journalists?
how's the wireless in your cave?
The obvious answer is that doing so helps them punish their enemies. I think the better question is why Reasoners continue to pretend there’s some sort of mystery here.
Yes, there was long a tradition of journalism and free speech principles helped advance and sustain it. But essentially everyone in the field now openly defines their role as activism and advocacy. So naturally they choose other principles more in line with that ethos.
Reasoners are becoming like dinosaurs.
Wild guess: A Tablet employee doesn't have much to say about the censorship, dogma, nonsense, speech codes, flouting of academic freedom, conduct codes, statements of faith, or loyalty oaths at conservative-controlled (and low-quality) schools, focusing instead on ostensible outrages involving our nation's strongest research and teaching institutions.
Carry on, clingers.
lol... "nation’s strongest research and teaching institutions"
Yeah... Like that's happening.. UR a joke.
Unless of course you referring to free-market corporate research and institutions.
The liberal-libertarian mainstream operates, attends, and admires Harvard, Yale, Michigan, Princeton, UCLA, Williams, Wellesley, Berkeley, Columbia, Swarthmore, New York University, Pennsylvania, and a couple of dozen like them.
Conservatives operate, attend, and embrace Wheaton, Liberty, Biola, Cedarville, Regent, Grove City, Ouachita Baptist, Bob Jones, Oral Roberts, Franciscan, Brigham Young, Thomas Aquinas, and many dozens like them.
The acceptance rates of our strongest schools tend to approximate 5-10 percent.
Many conservative schools' acceptance rates exceed 80 percent, some reaching 99 percent. Any and every slack-jaw welcome.
This -- the disparity between our best schools and conservatives' low-quality hayseed farms -- is part of the reason conservatives are doomed to continuing defeat in the culture war.
What do you think education is? A mob popularity contest? Soon enough your kind will have gov-'gun' eaten the conservative 'hayseed farms' your very survival depends on to their death and you'll all starve as the pointless and useless mobs of destruction you are.
History 101.
Bitch please, you’re a high school drop out.
...is part of the reason conservatives are doomed to continuing defeat in the culture war.
This reads like the wishcasting of a perpetual victim. I've always known you were a beta, Reverend, but your whimpering about it is just fucking pathetic.
What are your thoughts about this below, Rev. Artie? This kinda throws a monkey wrench in both Conservative Christian presuppositions and yours too!
Here is what Thomas Sheedy of Atheists For Liberty and James Lindsay propose we should do about speech codes and Wokeism in Academia:
Don’t Give Money to Your Alma Mater! (it will only get worse)–James Lindsay https://youtu.be/Duf4eK8Z8ZA?si=W8zxHGP65LROHPgf
Or are you as silent as you are when Herr Misek is in the Comments?
Carry on, Klinger! And make sure your flourishing cape can reach the drive shaft of your vehicle!
🙂
😉
Why don't
morejournalists?I don't know, honestly.
I ran across this yesterday when checking up on Timothy Egan, longtime journalist and Seattle Times correspondent to the NY Times.
How kids, lawsuits and legislation can save democracy.
How inexperienced teenagers we'll give the vote to, lawfare and authoritarian crackdowns can save Democracy.
“Just as the founders never envisioned how the right of a well-regulated militia to own slow-loading muskets could apply to mass murderers with bullet-spewing military-style semiautomatic rifles, they could not have foreseen speech so twisted to malevolent intent as it is now.”
It’s astonishing they never use this logic with other constitutional rights more often. Glad they finally let the mask drop and let this slip.
Oh, my sweet summer child, we're well past the mask-slipping stage. The mask has been ripped off and tossed in the garbage, like so much Trump voter walking into a public school in 2021.
"The mask has been ripped off and tossed in the garbage"
Right now they're all affixing little toothbrush moustaches under their lips and practicing high step marching.
I never in my life would've imagined things would go south this fast.
How exactly does some guy on Facebook positing that a shooting is a false flag operation endanger democracy. Will his 60k followers vote for the wrong candidate? Will they write in the Facebook guy and elect him to city council? And how would that outcome not be democracy? Its obvious that this word "democracy" doesn't mean what it meant even 5 years ago. But I honestly don't know what the contemporary definition is.
contemporary definition is = A propaganda tool used to conquer the USA for a [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire without having to get the correct "democracy" (state ratification) required to actually change the definition of the USA (US Constitution).
Reason's Nick Gillespie spoke to Kirchick about how identity politics has overwhelmed the left's traditional defense of free speech,
Which all you lefties were warned about back in the 1990s, but you didn’t listen.
Author James Kirchick supports the First Amendment, full stop. Why don't more journalists?
Because the vast majority are Bolsheviks. Seriously, that is the answer.
My right to not hear something over-rules your right to say it!
- A voice from the safe space room
I'm totally cool with this whole free speech thing. But as a New Koch Libertarian it's clear that our primary goal should be to protect the absolute right of private corporations to censor on behalf of the ruling regime.
"Private-Public partnerships! What could be more libertarian?"
Has this ever been attempted by now defunct governments?
Popular in the 30's and 40's with the Europeans.
My aunt thinks those are terrific. My aunt was also a college professor in California, and pretty much a Trotskyite who though Alger Hiss was a swell guy.
People need to learn not to be so sensitive and follow the advice of Marcus Aurelius (121-180) “Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears.”
James Kirchick? Not THE James Kirchick? Well then, I'll get right on that!
So where was this Leftist (not Nick, the other one) when conservatives were being muzzled everywhere? Too busy holding his tongue you say. How about you Leftists shut the fuck up with your first defense being only to demand free speech for your allies. Play again next time when it is your opponents on the block and I'll take you more seriously.
Kirchick is a "free speech absolutist," unless it's in a newsletter written by an actual libertarian:
https://newrepublic.com/article/98811/ron-paul-libertarian-bigotry
"the solution is not to expand the university's power to punish expression. It's to abolish
speech codesuniversities entirely."I'd say: abolish public universities.
As for private universities, see here:
https://reason.com/volokh/2023/12/06/should-universities-ban-advocacy-of-genocide/?comments=true#comment-10346274
It seems to me this is preferrable to threading the needle of "fairness" when it comes to deciding what speech is allowed and what is not. Clearly, universities are having a great deal of difficulty with devising and applying rules meant to promote fairness.
happy