We Can Make It To Mars Without NASA
"We can—and should—develop space without government help," says Reason Foundation's Robert W. Poole.
HD DownloadAfter a few failed launch attempts, Artemis I finally completed its first unmanned journey on December 12, 2022. It's part of NASA's ambitious program to bring American astronauts back to the moon for the first time in half a century. And then on to Mars. That is, assuming NASA can pull it off, which is a big question mark given its record to date. Is the project worth hundreds of billions of government dollars? Is NASA just trying to relive the glory of the Apollo mission?
Could private companies take us back to the moon and Mars faster and cheaper? Most likely, yes.
Artemis is the latest in a long series of setbacks and reversals in America's space program. In 2010, President Barack Obama announced the shelving of the Constellation program, which was NASA's last attempt to bring astronauts back to the moon. The following year, the agency shut down its space shuttle program altogether because of cost and safety concerns. Obama also announced that NASA would begin relying more on private contractors.
Six years later, the Trump administration greenlighted the Artemis program, which was heralded as the beginning of a new space exploration renaissance at NASA.
Artemis I's first three attempts at liftoff were canceled because of leaking issues connected to the rocket's ground system. The fourth attempt, which was successful, brought the price tag to $4.1 billion, and the next three launches are each expected to cost about the same. NASA's auditor estimates that the Artemis program will spend $93 billion by 2025. Because of delays, it's unlikely that a human will make it back to the moon by the end of 2024, as originally planned.
Once upon a time, beating the Soviets to the moon bolstered America's claim to technological and ideological superiority in the 20th century.
"Basically [Artemis] is designed to repeat the Apollo program," says Robert W. Poole, who is the director of transportation policy at Reason Foundation, which publishes Reason and Reason TV. He says that NASA tends to stick to old ways of doing things, isn't particularly interested in cost savings, and its decision making is overly driven by politics.
The hardware that powered Artemis I is known as the SLS—the Space Launch System—and was developed in partnership with Boeing. Critics have another name for it.
"The Senate Launch System, because it was concocted by the Senate as a way to rescue Constellation, give it a new name," says Poole.
NASA would have been better off replacing the costly and dated Space Launch System used in the Artemis program. But it didn't. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that it was largely constructed and engineered in Alabama, the home state of Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Richard Shelby, who has a history of strong-arming NASA to preserve jobs for his constituents.
In 2019, the Senate earmarked $2.58 billion as a starting point to cover the Space Launch System's ballooning price tag. The Senate funding also required NASA to make use of old warehoused materials from Constellation, ostensibly as a cost-saving measure.
"It turns out," says Poole, "it's $600 million just to refurbish the used old tech engines for every single launch."
For four years in a row under two different administrations, NASA got more money from Congress than the president requested.
Ever since Neil Armstrong's one small step, there have been giant leaps in space transportation made in large part by the private sector.
In 2009, the private sector saw one of its biggest champions ascend to become the number two person at NASA. Lori Garver pushed to scrap the Constellation program as a way to entice the private sector to fill in the gaps. She also spearheaded the Commercial Crew Program, which continues to employ commercial contractors to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station. Today, companies like Elon Musk's SpaceX are launching rockets at a faster pace and for a fraction of what NASA spends. In 2022, the company successfully launched 61 rockets, each with a price tag between $100 million and 150 million.
Private companies already design and lease NASA much of its hardware. Poole says there's no reason NASA can't take it a step further and just use the SpaceX starship to cover the entire journey from Earth to the moon and eventually to Mars.
"If the current NASA plan goes ahead to have the SpaceX Starship actually deliver the astronauts from the lunar outpost orbit to the surface of the moon and bring them back, that would be an even more dramatic refutation of the idea that only NASA should be doing space transportation," he says.
Poole says that instead of flying its own missions, NASA should play a more limited and supportive role.
"The future NASA role that makes the most sense is research and development to advance science," he says.
Produced by Natalie Dowzicky and Zach Weissmueller; shot by Issac Reese; edited by Danielle Thompson; additional graphics by Isaac Reese; sound editing by Ian Keyser.
Music Credits: "Main Theme" by Maik Thomas via Artlist; "River Buzz" by Taru via Artlist; "Life" by Angel Salazar via Artlist; "There is a Way" by Alon Peretz via Artlist; "What Do You See" by Sebastian Borromeo via Artlist; "Concrete Walls" by Sebastian Borromeo via Artlist; "Digital Dreams" by Jimmy Svensson via Artlist; "New World" by Angel Salazar via Artlist; "Delivered into Arrival" by Jay Ray via Artlist
Photo Credits: Mediadrumimages/Tiziou News Serv/ZUMA Press/Newscom; (NASA/Bill Ingalls)/Newscom; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom; Ricardo Watson / UPI Photo Service/Newscom; The Print Collector / Heritage Images/Newscom; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom; SIPA USA/NASA/Sipa USA/Newscom; NASA via CNP/Newscom; NASA/UPI/Newscom; Cover Images/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Bill Ingram/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; KEVIN DIETSCH/UPI/Newscom; Aaron Schwartz - CNP / MEGA / Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom; Reginald Mathalone/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; JP5\ZOB/WENN.com/Newscom; JOE MARINO/UPI/Newscom; Reginald Mathalone/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Mediadrumworld.Com/Omaze/Virgin/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Blue Origin/ZUMA Press/Newscom; SPACEX/UPI/Newscom; Blue Origin/Mega / Newscom/IBLIM/Newscom; NASA; NASA/ Jim Grossman; NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS; NASA/Bill Ingalls; NASA/Kim Shiflett; NASA/Glenn Benson; NASA/Dimitri Gerondidakis; NASA/Jude Guidry; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
All you need to know is that Artemis so far has cost $30+B, each launch will cost $1+B, is completely disposable, and NASA predicts they can only manage one launch a year. It is built from recycled Space Shuttle technology and can barely lift more than a Saturn V moon rocket.
Meanwhile, SpaceX claims Starship will be fully reusable, they have spent a whole lot less to develop it, and each launch will cost 1/100th what Artemis costs. Yes, these are only claims, but it is SpaceX's money at stake and SpaceX has a better track record than NASA. Their first launches are coming up soon.
The Shuttle, for instance, cost $1.5B per launch and lost half the shuttles in stupid accidents. Anyone who has any faith in Artemis is a damned fool.
Doesn't SpaceX also works under fixed cost contract (not, profit + cost) for most if not all their government contracts? Another reason to support them if that's still the case.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
NASA, like every government agency, is little more than a jobs program.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)
OPEN>> GOOGLE WORK
Can we send the bots to Mars? Or is that cruelty to Martians?
C'mon they crushed it with New Horizon, Galileo, Juno, JWST and the Mars rovers.
You know who else we can do nicely without?
Lizzo?
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.onlinecash1.com
Sending humans to Mars and the Moon is a waste of time, money and effort. NASA should stick to what it's been successful at the last decade robotic probes, landers and telescopes.
And let the Chinese or Russians gobble up all the good real estate?
Well, I did read somewhere that they’ve detected global warming on Mars. To protect the Narrative, we really should get some people up there—preferably capitalists.
Yes. If they can figure out what to do with it great.
Very much agree.
"NASA should stick to what it’s been successful at the last decade robotic probes, landers and telescopes; and pushing global warming propaganda."
FTFY
What about the Muslim outreach? How can you have a space program without Muslim outreach.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job.
Open This Website……………..>>> onlinecareer1
If you're using disposable rockets, go back to the Saturn V.
They probably lost the blueprints. After all, NASA's original plan for the space station was to de-orbit it as soon as assembled, since they had no plans for its actual use.
Government Almighty boondoggle…
NASA will pay a staggering $146 million for each SLS rocket engine
The rocket needs four engines and it is expendable.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/05/nasa-will-pay-a-staggering-146-million-for-each-sls-rocket-engine/
Here’s another one, about political suppression of promising space tech, for political reasons, which is even worse than the inefficient per-state spreading of jobs goodies…
Below shows we are FINALLY moving in the right direction, at least…
https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/07/nasa-agrees-to-work-with-spacex-on-orbital-refueling-technology/
NASA agrees to work with SpaceX on orbital refueling technology
Out-take from there is below…
The rocket program mostly benefited the Alabama space center and was championed by Alabama State Senator Richard Shelby. The potential of in-space fuel storage and transfer threatened the SLS rocket because it would allow NASA to do some exploration missions with smaller and cheaper rockets. As one source explained at the time, “Senator Shelby called NASA and said if he hears one more word about propellant depots he’s going to cancel the Space Technology program.”
Here’s some GOOD news! Senator Shelby has been a REAL asshole about wasting money on the SLS, as those of us who follow space developments closely, know. He’s retiring! Good riddance!
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/02/so-long-senator-shelby-key-architect-of-sls-rocket-wont-seek-reelection/
So long Senator Shelby: Key architect of SLS rocket won’t seek reelection
Shelby said NASA’s exploration of space will “always” go through Alabama.
Not with that Nazi Elon Musk we won't!
Literally Twitler!
Twitler and his TWATZIs!!! Getting the hots to twats us all over!!!
(If we are sometwat LUCKY, when they force us to bend over, at least they will use Vaseline, which the Germans often call "viener-schlider"...)
Gets your mind out of der wasserklosset!
"Once upon a time, beating the Soviets to the moon bolstered America's claim to technological and ideological superiority in the 20th century."
In fact the Soviets were the first to land on the moon with a probe which sent back photos. They were also the first to land similar probes to Venus and Mars. They were the first to launch an ICBM, sputnik, the first male animal, the first female animal, the first man, the first woman, the first space walk, and more besides.
It should be noted that for every success there were many failures and they were too squeamish about the risks involved in sending people to the moon. The US relied on test pilots to do their moon shots, people who constitutionally seek out risk and embrace it.
I doubt the Soviets were squeamish about sending people on dangerous missions. More likely they got tired of spending money on failures.
"More likely they got tired of spending money on failures."
Russians have been pursuing rocketry since years before the Soviets came to power, and the pursuit continues today. Though the Soviet program was shrouded in secrecy, it doesn't seem that they incurred more (or much more) casualties than NASA toted up.
The story of Gene Cernan's spacewalk is well worth a read if you are not familiar with the details.
https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/almost-blind-and-completely-exhausted-gene-cernans-disastrous-gemini-spacewalk
"Finally, he made all the required connections, but he was sweating so profusely his visor fogged over. He could only use the tip of his nose to rub out a small zone of visibility. His heart began racing dangerously. Rather than letting him fly the AMU, Stafford ordered him to quit. Almost blind, Cernan slowly dragged himself back to the cockpit, where getting in and closing the hatch proved to be another nightmare. He was “in excruciating pain” as he bent the suit to sit down, assisted by Stafford. "
It was also interesting to learn that Cernan found the assigned tasks impossible to accomplish because of a lack of hand holds on the Gemini. Also it was the Commander, Stafford, who ordered Cernan to return, rather than Houston where hard liners like Buzz Aldrin were keen of carrying on, regardless.
It was tough climbing out of my crib, too, but today I can walk.
But private companies use engineers and math, not social workers and DIE/CRT classes!
Artemis finally matched the achievement level of Apollo 8, which was 54 years ago. Except Apollo 8 had a live crew. Artemis is still trying to make spacesuits that work.
That's ok, Elon Musk is still trying to make a self-driving car, tens of millions of which were supposed to be on the road in 2018 by every major manufacturer. In fact, *checks notes* you're not even supposed to own a car any more.
In related news, ENB has decided that going to space is so passe’.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://ukincome6.blogspot.com/
And Detroit is more of a wasteland than Mars is! FAR more difficult the colonize!
Detroit has more readily accessible fresh water than pretty well anywhere on the planet. That Americans consider the place a wasteland is testament to their destructive habits and slavish enthrallment to economists and lawyers.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.onlinecash1.com
In fact the Soviets were the first to land on the moon
The Soviets never landed on the moon.
They sent probes.
ONLY the US has landed on ANY other celestial body.
Only.
"They sent probes."
They sent many probes. Some of them landed successfully on the moon. Before Americans managed to do so. The Soviets also successfully landed probes on Venus and Mars before the Americans. The Soviets were the first to successfully launch ICBMs, artificial satellites (Sputnik), humans and animals, both male and female, and so on, all without the participation of NASA.
Beyond the fact that might be cool, what exactly is the point? What purpose does it serve to go to Mars? I see no point to it.
"What purpose does it serve to go to Mars? "
In a billion years or so, the sun will burn hotter and increase in size, and eventually the Earth will disintegrate. The sun's aging process may make Mars (and more distant bodies) habitable for humans and other life on Earth.
Today i am going to show you that how to earns more than $500 every day simply working and staying at home. Last month my earning from this are $16205 and i gave this job only 2 hours from my whole day. Easiest way to earn more income online and it doesn't needs any kind of special experience. Go to this website right now and follow details to get started right now.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.Worksclick.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com