The Inflation Reduction Act Barely Puts a Dent in the Deficit
But it will raise taxes and sic thousands of new IRS agents on American households.
HD DownloadWhen President Joe Biden took office, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the federal government was on pace to run a $12.1 trillion deficit over the following 10 years.
But thanks to a boatload of new spending passed by Congress and signed by Biden during his first 16 months in the White House, that figure has climbed to about $14.5 trillion. In short, Biden has overseen a $2.4 trillion increase in America's longterm budget deficit.
One way or another, that shortfall has to be accounted for by cutting spending, raising taxes, or printing money. So what does the new Inflation Reduction Act do to address the problem?
It doesn't cut unnecessary spending or wasteful government programs. Instead, it raises taxes. And those tax increases will only reduce the deficit by about $300 billion. That's just 2 percent of what the government is forecasted to borrow over the decade after Biden took office.
In other words, even if you assume Congress won't further hike spending, we'd still need about 50 more bills just like the Inflation Reduction Act to avoid adding more debt in the next decade. And that doesn't even address the $30 trillion in debt the country has already accumulated.
Even that small deficit reduction requires a massive corporate tax increase that will hurt the economy. There's also a plan to squeeze more money out of taxpayers by hiring 87,000 new IRS agents and beefing up the agency's audit powers.
This bill is indeed the first major piece of legislation to move through congress that would have even a slightly positive impact on future federal deficits since at least the middle of the Obama years. But it's not a serious attempt to grapple with our coming fiscal nightmare.
The actual drivers of future deficits are entitlement programs. President Biden and Congress are doing nothing to reform the programs that account for about half of the longterm budget deficit: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Thirty-six trillion of the 72 trillion dollars the federal government is expected to spend over the next 10 years goes to pay for these programs. Social Security and Medicare, in particular, are expected to ring up massive budget deficits over the next decade because they're structured like a Ponzi scheme in which current workers are paying the benefits of today's beneficiaries. A massive wave of older Americans are retiring and beginning to receive benefits, and there aren't enough working-age Americans to cover what they're owed. The system is starting to collapse.
Yes, $300 billion might sound like a lot of money, but in the context of government spending under Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden—as well as the exploding costs of eldercare entitlements—it's not very much at all.
Music Credits: "Everytime," by Ben Fox via Artlist.
Photo Credits: Neon Tommy, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Newscom; Ron Sachs - CNP/Polaris/Newscom; Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA/Newscom; N Giovannucci, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Tulane Public Relations, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Craig Michaud at English Wikipedia, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom.
Written and narrated by Eric Boehm. Edited by Regan Taylor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
we'd still need about 50 more bills just like the Inflation Reduction Act
“Can do!” /Congress
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (alo--516) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
"Ha!Ha!Ha!! And you silly people though you owned or earned anything with your labors... All you earned is a big fat BILL...", Sincerely your never-ending/growing Nazi(National Socialist)-Regime.
You dumb commie cunts, there is nothing in this spending bill to reduce inflation in the slightest. There are green boongmdogles and added stassi audits, but please make excuses for your Democrat heroes.
Great rebuttal snowflake.
Did you even read the article?
As Reason put it perfectly in another article.
It's the Build Back Better bill (wolf) in sheeps clothing (?reduce inflation? WTF?)
It will only increase inflation with unfunded green programs and kill the economy with over taxation of home businesses, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and small corporations. What it won't tax is large and multinational corporations and billionaires.
It is only a small reduction in debt, but it a reduction and that is something we have not seen in a while. As for taxes, Americans are undertaxed for the services we receive. It is had to cut those services because we don't know the true cost. Tax at a more appropriate level and people would know the cost of services and could make decision on the worth of those services.
As for the IRS, I just got a letter on my 2020 taxes, that is 16 months after I filed the tax form. This suggests that the IRS may well be understaffed. And I would remind people again, the IRS are not responsible for your taxes, that is Congress. There are two ways to address this, staff the IRS or simply the code so less people are needed.
You're out of your mind.
Let's get that corrected...
"Americans are under-taxed for the DICTATION we receive..."
Funny thing is; Dictation isn't part of a USA Gov-Guns job description, agenda or goal... And those people who feel so pathetic they cannot live without a dictator to worship can pay for one of their own will instead of FORCE-ABLY make other pay for their pathetic excuse of a life.
What dictator? The Congress or state legislatures approved the service and spending. These are people who the American people elected. And they get reelected because they provide services cheaply because they put part of the cost on the debt.
My point, which I have made before, is that you will not see cuts in spending because people are getting things at bargain prices. Tax at appropriate levels, people would see the true cost, and then you could make progress in cutting services.
Gov-Guns dictating.. Did you think law was just a suggestion?
I assure you productive people are already being taxed out of existence already and that's half the problem.
What happens when productive people get taxed (STOLEN-FROM) out of profitable existence? They resort to STEALING via Gov-Guns. As the old saying goes, "If you can't beat them join them."
Above you have a recipe for a complete destruction of a nation as more, more, more Gov-Gun theft is required (sadly the path the Nazi-Regime has put the USA on).. One needs to recognize that the "GUN" dictation is the problem. There is no better/fairer/abrupt way to teach people they cannot SPEND more than they earn than Individual Liberty and Justice for all. [WE] communist thinking is what destroys that. (which is essentially a what's yours is mine selfish ideology).
I mean, you could definitely start solving the "problem" of entitlements by actually reforming healthcare.
Even Bernie's very generous plan would save money over the cost of our current system. A more slimmed down version would easily save a ton of money. Or even a public/private version akin to Germany's would be a huge cost savings.
But oh no- we wouldn't be able to pretend the free market works in a clearly inelastic market then now would we?
Quite frankly- you fix the issue that Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA cover roughly 40+% of the population but have alllll their services duplicated by an inefficient, profit-driven insurance system on the private side and you could actually do a lot for the budget.
But no- stick your fingers in your ears instead and pretend the "market" will figure it out....someday.
OMFG!!!!!! "Even FDR's very generous plan would save money over the cost of our current system." ... "Even Obama's very generous plan would save money over the cost of our current system." ... "Even Biden's very generous plan would save money over the cost of our current system."
And let me guess Solar and Wind is going to supply too much energy for nothing and it'll be so much cheaper.. blah, blah, blah..........
Will you leftards ever spout a speckle of TRUTH????????????
Or is your *reality* forever embedded in your delusions of Gov-Guns will make EVERYTHING (never-mind who they're pointed at)???
And to think once upon a time doctors showed up at the door for the price of a pizza.
Yes, they did and at the time most doctors were limited in what they could do for the patient. Medicine has come a long way since the time of house calls and the cost have risen with the amount and quality of service.
Do you also wonder how in the world its possible that television, radio and internet could possibly deliver messages CHEAPER than a horse delivered telegram from 1850..... Gosh with all that speed and "quality of service" prices to delivering an internet message should be $1,000,000 (per FDR, Obama, Biden Gov-Gun-Lords)...
I be thinking it's a leftard narrative that people's innovation (human progress) must be deemed a net loss of value until it's 'priced' by Gov-Guns. Leftards worship of Gov-Gun-Lords is sickening.
Heck; You non-universal tooth doctors are still coming to the door for the price of a pizza. Maybe the FDR>Obama>Biden "plan to save money" will fix that one too???
UR so loaded with leftard indoctrination.
"Barely puts a dent" is still "putting a dent."
Every penny counts - so this where you alleged "fiscal conservatives" drop to your knees and thank Biden and the Democrats.