Beyond the First Amendment: Anti-Libel Injunctions in States That Have Repealed Criminal Libel Laws
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
Congress should fix its FGM statute—and all the other ones too.
The Appellate Court of Illinois reverses a trial court decision that deferred to a Muslim divorce from India.
Fourteen years after the notorious Kelo case, the state where the case originated still has one of the nation's weakest eminent domain reform laws. A bill currently before the state legislature could change that.
Seems like a pretty clear First Amendment violation, even if the name is viewed as an offensive reference to illegal aliens (which the corporate owners apparently don't intend).
My latest article on "original-law originalism" with Steve Sachs
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on state separation of powers principles?
A markedly interesting case from the Sixth Circuit.
An interesting development, in a country that (like others in Eastern Europe) has had a long history of anti-Semitism.
Like Warren, I'm a fan of the Dragon Queen. But Warren overstates the character's virtues and minimizes her flaws - sometimes in ways that reveal shortcomings of Warren's own worldview.
A relatively novel suggestion, aimed at providing libel defendants with the necessary First Amendment protections while still giving libel plaintiffs protection early in the litigation process.
That's the legal theory behind a case just filed by prosecutors in Ohio.
to any decision that favors freedom against authority, even against representative government. The student of the Constitution requires something more ...."
Halfway originalism, frustrated immigration enforcement, and sit down or be put down.
"... and renews this court's faith in conscientious billing practices."
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
The ruling, written by a Republican-appointed judge, is an important victory for federalism.
The symposium includes contributions by a variety of legal commentators, including fellow VC blogger Keith Whittington and myself.
Should the availability of anti-libel injunctions turn on the subject matter of the false and defamatory speech that's being enjoined?
This actually came up in a hypo, based on a real extortion case.
A Pennsylvania court decision said they can (though relying on cases generally allowing restrictions on Public Trial Clause and First Amendment trial access rights in the interest of preventing embarrassment to witnesses).
George H.W. Bush appointee denounces second-class citizenship, cites to my work with Cassandra Robertson
The speech had been cosponsored by three faculty-run programs at the College.
Harvard Kennedy School Prof. Christopher Robichaud interviews me on this topic for his "This Week in Dystopia" podcast series.
Apparently, that's so of qualified privileges and of the All Writs Act -- but what on earth does that mean?
This is the key proposal from my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions -- a way of taming the anti-libel injunction to include important First Amendment procedural protections, but still allow its use to prevent genuine libels.
The answer is no, despite conservatives' claims to the contrary. But that does not entirely resolve questions about the wisdom of the policy.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
The Trump Administration is attempting a welcome redefinition of "waters of the United States"
The decision is likely to be unpopular. But it is the right thing to do nonetheless, as the law is unconstitutional. Not every evil must be addressed by a federal law.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
Just click on the little fuchsia speech-balloon at the end of the post, on the right hand side.
The East St. Louis Housing Authority stipulates to allowing residents to possess guns.
Cherry regulation, landfill corruption, and taking some air.
The Supreme Court's efforts to shift procedures in death penalty litigation.
The second edition of "Breaking Numbers Into Parts": very highly recommended.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
The imminent start of the final season of Game of Thrones is a good time to consider the series' political message, and reprise some of my work on that subject. Plus, a discussion of the political economy portrayed in George R.R. Martin's recently published prequel to the series.
Please share it widely!
I thought I'd serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions; here is the section on criminal libel law -- the article argues that anti-libel injunctions are like mini-criminal-libel laws.