"Even if past [mentally distressing] speech that an offender made to a person ... could be considered ... integral to the criminal conduct of menacing by stalking [and thus unprotected], we do not believe that this principle may be applied categorically to future speech ... directed to others."
It is now available for preorder, and will be delivered by June 23.
Justices Thomas and Sotomayor disagree about how federal law construes a "right of way"
The IFP motion cited Magna Carta. And the Court grants the motion on June 15.
Texas challenges California's Interstate "Travel Ban"
Justices Thomas and Alito would have granted certiorari. Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, apparently, would not.
The per curiam majority and the dissent disagreed on many facts that would have benefited from argument.
We distilled the 120-page decision down to about 30 pages.
A podcast debate and discussion about the virtues and vices of Marijuana Federalism.
A ruling that Title VII protects gay and transgender employees may earn textualism strange new disrespect
Deaths from police shootings are too common but still rare, the majority of victims are white, and the Post wants to push a simple narrative about a complicated subject.
A new study finds that trade policies around the world effectively subsidize high-carbon industries.
I spoke with ReasonTV and the Little Rock Federalist Society Chapter. I am happy to speak to other groups as well!
Next week the Federalist Society is hosting an online conference on the legal issues raised by the pandemic.
Advice from Vice-President Biden.
Also for the FCC to police supposed "blatant falsity."
I debated Prof. F.E. Guerra-Pujol. Prominent takings lawyer Robert Thomas moderated.
"The mere fact a person may suffer embarrassment or damage to his reputation as a result of allegations in a pleading does not justify sealing the court file."
How much work does doctrine do?
It depends, whether as to looting or other threats to property.
The third installment of my new show about law professors.
"The people of Polk County like guns, they have guns."
The Supreme Court shows a willingness to enforce limits on Article III standing.
One of the internet's most prominent libertarian blogs ends its run. But many of the contributors will continue write elsewhere.
He included the same nomenclature in Barton v. Barr and Nasrallah v. Barr .
Do mandatory, integrated state bar associations violate the First Amendment? Two justices would like the Court to reconsider this question.
Fortunately, the Michigan Court of Appeals has just reversed that injunction.
Much can and must be done to curb police brutality. The task is difficult, but far from hopeless. But riots and looting are both wrong in themselves, and likely to have counterproductive results.
The available evidence suggests that police unions are a major obstacle to holding rogue police officers accountable.
"Groundless complaints defame innocent coworkers, undermine trust in the workplace, and waste resources."
Chief Justice Roberts, still haunted by the ghost of Lochner, may be trending towards Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
Chief Justice Roberts said no. Justice Kavanaugh said yes.
The cap (25% of capacity or at most 100 people) also generally applies to secular gatherings, but not to various commercial establishments.
