The Chronicle of Higher Education on the Greg Patton / USC / "Neige" Matter
A very interesting article, with many comments from Prof. Patton himself.
A very interesting article, with many comments from Prof. Patton himself.
The poll shows extensive ignorance among millenials and Generation Z, and is consistent with many previous studies showing widespread ignorance about politics and history. But one of its findings may be less bad than it looks.
A symposium looking back at the agency's history, and forward to its future.
October arguments will be over the phone again.
Race-preferential admissions policies are not a gentle thumb on the scale for under-represented minorities in otherwise close cases.
Not every erroneous panel decision needs to be reversed by the full Circuit Court, but was Davenport v. MacLaren such a case?
Only black and Pacific Islander women are eligible -- almost certainly a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Yale Law School Professor Bruce Ackerman and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna propose an idea that might help avert a constitutional crisis.
A very interesting law review article from Profs. Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Instapundit) & Penny White.
What is wrong with requiring government agencies to consider and disclose the likely environmental consequences of their actions?
A trial court judge refuses to make a reasonable sentencing decision, and the Sixth Circuit is not amused.
The article will appear in the North Carolina Law Review.
I am working on a long article on the 1st, 2nd, and 14th Amendment rights during the pandemic. Stay tuned.
A court should decide that question by interpreting the state Bill of Rights, the New Hampshire Supreme Court says; it shouldn't conclude that this is a "political question" to be decided purely by the Legislature and the people.
The Cincinnati Enquirer and I have just filed a petition seeking this, in the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Heart of Atlanta, McClung, and Dole
The AG's opinion applies strict scrutiny under the First Amendment and the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and concludes that the medical evidence suggests total shutdowns aren't necessary to preserve public health.
A thought experiment that came to my mind; I'd love to hear what others think about it.
Plus a new draft law review article on the subject, by Prof. Randall Kennedy (Harvard Law School), a leading scholar of race and the law, and me.
Across the Atlantic from Amazonia lies ... Ambazonia.
"The Massacre That Emboldened White Supremacists"
And what a way to welcome a new colleague: an opinion stating that she was appointed illegally!
"Binding precedent does not ... come with an expiration date."
There is enough evidence that the Times knew their allegations were false (or at least were likely false) to go to the jury.
Court says: Because of the epidemic and the resulting suspension of jury trials, bench trial it is.
Anti-Riots, bright youth, and a sick puppy.
"The faculty adopted the following Statement of Faculty Principles pertaining to respectful debate and the full and open exchange of ideas at the law school."
The Sixth Circuit says neigh to the horse owners' challenge to the Kentucky Derby's disqualification of their horse.
Three interesting opinions: a sound majority, a plausible concurrence, and another concurrence focused on "hate speech" that I think is unsound.
In response to a Trump Executive Order, the Justice Department seeks to diminish the import of agency guidance.
NBA players' brief boycott in protest of police abuses and racism raises the more general question of when such boycotts are appropriate. The strongest case for them is when the sports events organizers are themselves perpetrators of grave injustice, even more so when the event directly causes such wrongs.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10