Indiana Is Still Arguing That It's Constitutional To Seize Your Car for Driving 5 MPH Over the Speed Limit
"Historically the answer to that question is yes, and we're sticking with that position here."
"Historically the answer to that question is yes, and we're sticking with that position here."
If Kavanaugh is a committed originalist, you would never know it based on his complacent behavior in Timbs v. Indiana.
The Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive fines and fees applies to states as well, SCOTUS rules, opening a new way to challenge outlandish forfeitures.
The future of civil asset forfeiture law in the United States now revolves around a single Land Rover.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10