Are State Law Climate Change Tort Suits Preempted by Federal Law?
A recent panel discussion on whether state and local suits against fossil fuel producers are preempted by federal law (and my arguments for why the answer is "no, they are not").
A recent panel discussion on whether state and local suits against fossil fuel producers are preempted by federal law (and my arguments for why the answer is "no, they are not").
Only one justice indicated any interest in premature consideration of state-law climate change lawsuits.
The former Attorney General disagrees with me on whether state and local government climate change lawsuits belong in federal court.
Yet another federal circuit court of appeals rejects energy company removal claims.
The justices are considering whether to grant certiorari in Minnesota's lawsuit against energy companies.
New York City and New York state are locked in a battle over sale of the fatty liver delicacy.
The paper's editorial board is happy to endorse the centralization of decision making when it supports their liberal policy preferences.
A local California ordinance prohibiting natural gas hookups in new construction conflicts with federal law according to a federal appellate court.
The Eighth Circuit joins the First, Third, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth in rejecting the arguments for removal, but Judge David Stras writes an interesting concurrence.
Five Circuits have considered, and rejected, fossil fuel efforts to get state-law tort and nuisance claims removed to federal court. Will their luck change in the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Nuisance claims may not be a particularly effective way to address the problem of climate change, but federal law does not preempt state common law nuisance claims seeking compensatory damages.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10