Defend Speech Even When Your Side Hates It
Civil liberties attorney Jenin Younes recounts her role in Murthy v. Missouri, her opposition to pandemic mandates, and why she believes Trump poses an even greater threat to free speech than Biden.

This week's guest host on The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie is Billy Binion, who talks with Jenin Younes, a civil liberties attorney who first gained national attention when she sued the Biden administration for pressuring social media companies to censor content it didn't like. That case, Murthy v. Missouri, ultimately reached the Supreme Court.
A former New York City public defender, Younes is now national legal director at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, where she is preparing to sue the Trump administration. She and Binion discuss her path to civil liberties advocacy, the threats to free speech coming from both the left and the right, and why defending the First Amendment should be a universal cause—even when that speech is offensive.
0:00—Introduction
1:00—Younes' commitment to civil liberties
3:38—The state of free speech in America
7:34—Opposing COVID restrictions
12:33—Jimmy Kimmel, the FCC, and Murthy v. Missouri
27:39—Donald Trump's record on free speech
39:41—Noncitizens and constitutional rights
42:23—Censorship in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination
48:33—Pam Bondi and "hate speech"
57:52—How can we protect free speech?
Upcoming Reason Events
Reason Versus: Mass Immigration Is Good for America, October 2
- Producer: Paul Alexander
- Audio Mixer: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Unless it was Rosanne barr. Or trump. Or Mackey. Or Alex Jones. Or Mike Lindell. Or Giulliani. Or Tucket Carlson.
The Reason after-the-fact “I didn’t like that” card seems to be played here.
Or Emmanuel Cafferty.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/sdge-worker-fired-over-alleged-racist-gesture-says-he-was-cracking-knuckles/2347414/
Or Trump. Remember all those illegal judicial gag orders?
Guess which show I ain't listening to.
Indeed. I too have zero interest in more Billy bullshit.
Govt shouldn’t censor free speech.
Affiliates can choose not to air a programme because the host is a douchebag.
Customers of education and healthcare have a legitimate claim of not wanting to fund partisan psychopaths where the standard of care can be called into question.
Free speech for democrats requires companies to lose millions of dollars a year.
Sinclair did not receive congressional approval nor did former Bud Light drinkers when they pivoted away from tranny queer beer.
You are fucking retards.
The 'free speech' you are defending is the freedom for the left to murder people who use their free speech to speak against the left because THAT is what the left is justifying.
The freedom for the left to celebrate that murder, the freedom for the left to castigate and censor anyone who disagrees with them AND THEN kill them.
This is what you're defending.
The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to PREVENT others from speaking.
The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to PREVENT people from hearing others free speech.
This guy gets it
Amen. +1
Didn’t make it in the roundup bit I’m sure someone at Reason will cover it:
BREAKING: Suspicious package found ahead of TPUSA's Utah State event, building evacuated
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-suspicious-package-found-ahead-of-tpusas-utah-state-event-building-evacuated
Eliminate the left.
How much more are we going to take?
and why she believes Trump poses an even greater threat to free speech than Biden.
Because Obama/Biden harvested her brain?
Speech Matt Welch hates?
“Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2”
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
Reason has no place advocating for free speech, as they clearly don’t believe in it for anyone but murdering, treasonous leftists, annd illegals.
MORE Leftard-Self Projection.
Where's this 'evidence' the Trump Administration is censoring anyone?
It's like you're trying to invent/accuse a problem out of thin air.
Jenin, the moron, defends the Biden admin's egregious attacks on free speech as if they compare at all to a talk show host enduring a 3 day suspension.
It never ceases to amaze me when the lunatic left goes on a rant, and then demands anyone who contradicts their laughable Marxist ideas to be censored.
The lunatic left actually believes anyone who disagrees with them is either a racist or a fascist.
Yes, boys and girls, the lunatic left really is this stupid and hypocritical.
"...and why she believes Trump poses an even greater threat to free speech than Biden..."
Aw, and she was doing so well before the TDS kicked in.