Get Your Gross Sex Out of My Sick Politics!
Plus: "Black Nazi,” Oprah interviews Kamala, and yet another looming government shutdown.
In this week's The Reason Roundtable, editors Matt Welch, Nick Gillespie, Peter Suderman, and special guest Elizabeth Nolan Brown unpack the charges and implications of the federal sex trafficking case against Sean "Diddy" Combs.
01:45—Sean "Diddy" Combs faces federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges
17:13—CNN unearths North Carolina gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson's lurid posts on a porn message board
29:49—Weekly listener question
38:09—Government shutdown looms yet again
41:12—Oprah Winfrey interviews Vice President Kamala Harris
56:12—This week's cultural recommendations
Mentioned in this podcast:
"Decoding the Sex Trafficking Case Against Sean 'Diddy' Combs" by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
"Remembering the Mann Act or, How Prostitution Killed the Constitution" by Nick Gillespie
"Sex Slaves and the Surveillance State" by Thaddeus Russell
"Congress 'Can Regulate Virtually Everything,'" by Jacob Sullum
"Backpage's Michael Lacey Gets 5-Year Sentence" by Liz Wolfe
"The War on Sex Trafficking Is the New War on Drugs" by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
"Kamala Harris Is a Cop Who Wants To Be President" by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
"'Yeah, I'm a "Perv" Too!'" by Eric Boehm
Mark Robinson: 'There is no separation of church and state.'
"The GOP's Long Love Affair with Schmucks" by Nick Gillespie
"The 2024 GOP Platform Barely Mentions Gun Rights" by Jacob Sullum
"Neither Harris Nor Her Party Perceives Any Constitutional Constraints on Gun Control" by Jacob Sullum
"Donald Trump Tax Plan and Ideas: Details and Analysis" by Tax Foundation
"Kamala Harris Tax Plan and Ideas: Details and Analysis" by Tax Foundation
"Flip-Flopping Toward Freedom?" by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
"Trump Dodged My Question About the Federal Debt" by Nick Gillespie
"Kamala Harris Is Not an Ideas Candidate" by Christian Britschgi
"Trump Dodged My Question about the Federal Debt" by Nick Gillespie
"Why Did Americans Stop Caring about the National Debt?" by Brian Riedl
"An Evening with Richard Dawkins: The Final Bow Tour"
"How the War of 1812 Eroded U.S. Liberalism" by Sheldon Richman
Upcoming Events:
- Reason live events! Go here to see what's coming up and go here to sign up for Reason's New York City Events newsletter.
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsors:
- From Greek philosophers, who are the wellspring of democratic ideals, to America's founding fathers to contemporary critics who question everything: each is welcome at St. John's College—where students encounter Adam Smith and Karl Marx; St. Augustine and Friedrich Nietzsche; James Baldwin and Virginia Woolf. Here, there are no secondary sources, no experts, and no one telling you what to believe. Rather, there are original sources and a community devoted to collaborative inquiry, intellectual humility, and the discomfort that comes from diverse opinions. Explore 3,000 years of human thought on campuses in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Annapolis, Maryland. For Master's degree candidates, we also offer studies in the great texts of the East, in-person or online. Learn more at SJC.edu/reason.
- In an election year, getting overwhelmed by the constant buzz of news and opinions is easy. Understanding the true impact of political events can be a challenge. Not Another Politics Podcast, from the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy, provides clear, research-driven perspectives on the biggest issues. Get the insights you need to truly understand the political landscape—no spin, just facts. Subscribe today at harris.uchicago.edu/napp or look for Not Another Politics Podcast wherever you get your podcasts.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Hunt Beaty
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
- Producer: Hunt Beaty
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
41:12—Oprah Winfrey interviews Vice President Kamala Harris
This pales in comparison to Nick Gillespie's David Frost-esque grilling of Donald Trump.
It was like the difference between hard-hitting and getting hit hard.
In other news, something's going on at my local daily.
Big orange surround on the website with a banner above the top of the page which reads, "News that holds those in power accountable". Then in the side bar, "digging deep to get to the truth".
Then in the spaces where they would normally have advertisements, they've got:
"News that digs deep to hold those in power accountable".-- again, literally in every space where advertisements would normally go.
In the background in faded letters (Irony? I can never tell) are a string of no-spaced words reading:
dig deep speak up speak out stand up reveal expose uncover act report investigate protect advocate commit improve fact-check improve local truth educate dig deep speak up speak out action reveal expose change uncover consequences share...
And so on.
This strikes me as very strange, almost... defensive. Like they're trying to deflect some accusation going around.
or they've been taken over by marauding cybernerds
And on that note:
Today's headlines...
Trump:
Harris:
And last but not least, current sitting president and leader of the free world, commander in chief of the Armed Forces, Biden:
I didn't see “News that holds those in power accountable”.
I guffawed at: "US to seek attempted assassination charge against man accused of staking out Trump at golf course"
Like the guy was Joe Flaherty's character from Happy Gilmore and totally not armed with, and aiming, an evil automatic rifle or anything and the Secret Service just overreacted.
There were no popping noises. No harm no foul.
Secret service has learned to keep teleprompters away, so they don't explode and cut anyone.
Huh. I just see regular ads.
Betting odds look bad for girl-bullying MAGAts, with a 7-point spread. A True Believer would rush out and bet life savings on Donald Trump. That would necessarily improve the odds and embolden less zealous fellow-travelers.
>>CNN unearths
lol if you guys didn't have it in your hit-folders maybe you're not part of the circuit
There’s a Democratic Party in your mouth…
So I clicked on the Not Another Political Podcast link. Here's a sample,
Can Fact-Checking Counter Misinformation?
The COVID-19 pandemic has been an era of misinformation. From social media to cable news, the spread of false or misleading information about COVID vaccines has been rampant. Some social media platforms have moved more aggressively by trying to flag misleading posts with disclaimers. Can fact-checking reduce the spread of misinformation? And perhaps more importantly, can fact-checks change people's minds about getting vaccinated?
100% safe and effective!
Jack Marshall wrote about COVID misinformation.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2020/06/08/oh-no-its-monday-ethics-review-6-8-2020-a-yoos-rationalization-orgy/
It's always good to keep that stuff around, because that's exactly the shit that some sonofabitch somewhere will say never happened...
Misinformation on vaccines? Like saying the vaccines are worthwhile and effective for children?
At least Zeb is real enough to have a blog. Beware: the last libertarian to say parents and doctors ought to decide nonsurgical treatment for kids was scorched by the boiling wrath of Jesus Caucus zealots, imbeciles and Trumpanzees.
Get your spin out of my linear thrusts.
Let he who among you is without spin stone the first newscaster!
You fucking Leftist cunts had nothing to say as politics got sick other than "yeah man make it sicker" so fuck you when nobody cares about the immorality you've championed, thus depriving you of a weapon.
Yes, Reason has become completely useless when it comes to holding those in power accountable, but they are still slightly more useful than 99.99% of the other journalists
The first rule of Kamala Harris club is "Don't talk about Kamala Harris's policies."
And, in other news.
https://babylonbee.com/news/shout-for-joy-here-are-the-top-10-verses-from-the-new-kamala-harris-bible-translation
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-invite-foreign-leader-to-swing-state-to-meddle-in-election
"Oprah interviews Kamala."
Clueless, elitist billionaire interviews clueless slut who slept her way to the top.
Some relative of the latest republican wannabee Trump shooter was just charged with possession of a tiny card chock with kiddie porn. Is this Diddy character related to a republican wannabee Trump shooter too? (Asking for a friend...)
Maybe we should review the virtues of tranny porn:
* only consenting adults directly involved
* no participant gets pregnant for money, by accident, nor by intention during course of film production
* gender-politicized rivalries are not substantially promulgated; these acts demonstrate mutually-exclusively male capability no matter how you slice it
* males of adult legal age are not generally considered to be exploited for legally-run tranny porn productions
* thespian performances had traditionally consisted of all-male performers regardless of gender being portrayed
* no one were legally obligated to partake of any tranny porn act despite contact with watching this type of video
* therapeutic messages may be present
* tranny porn is not a necessarily damaging practice comparable to warfare
* sexual acts may be used to demonstrate safe use of safe sex devices
* men may participate in tranny porn to impress people of different gender or even to inspire persons of intentional gender. (Is it not sensible to try to attract interest from a potential mate by putting on displays of ostentation and prowess?)
* video in general exemplifies a medium of quasi-animate but largely indifferent activity
* You do not have to watch tranny porn any more than you have to watch the next person sit on the toilet
I think that covers it!!
I know what you are doing, you are trying to salaciously pull in psychos by calling this an expose. You get to be filthy and trashy by saying you are investigating.