Beverly Gage: The Dark Truth About J. Edgar Hoover's FBI
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.

No federal bureaucrat played a bigger role in 20th-century law enforcement than J. Edgar Hoover (1895–1972), who served as the head of the FBI and its predecessor agency for half a century.
Hoover oversaw crackdowns on everything from real and imagined communists in the first Red Scare of the 1920s and its sequel in the 1950s; staged high-profile shootouts with "public enemies" like John Dillinger and Babyface Nelson in the 1930s; surveilled Nazi and Axis sympathizers during World War II; infiltrated the Ku Klux Klan in the 1960s; and pursued extralegal operations against civil rights leaders and antiwar protesters in the 1960s.
His personal vendetta against Martin Luther King, Jr. led to one of the most shameful incidents in FBI history, when the bureau sent an anonymous letter to King shortly before he was to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, encouraging him to commit suicide or be exposed as a serial philanderer.
Hoover is the subject of Yale historian Beverly Gage's new biography, G-Man: J. Edgar Hoover and the Making of the American Century. Gage seeks to complicate and flesh out the life and legacy of Hoover, who is rightly notorious for often brushing aside constitutional limits on state power like so much police tape at a crime site. Yet she points out that he opposed the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, undermined Sen. Joe McCarthy's overwrought anti-communist witch hunts, and refused to do political surveillance for Richard Nixon, inadvertently leading to the bungled Watergate break-ins and the 37th president's fall from grace.
Gage tells Reason that to understand Hoover in all his complexity—including his much-whispered-about personal relationship with his FBI colleague Clyde Tolson—is to understand the moral ambiguities of the country he served, as well as the promise and limits of constitutional government in an open society.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Nick!
You can't use the 'c-word' any more. People who just wanna wear women's undies don't exist - fetishization of womanhood is 'transgender' now.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Just for the record; Tail-gunner Joe actually did find the witches.
Really? How many?
I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on
the accompanying site… http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Lots. Pretty much every place he investigated was heavily Marxist. Hollywood, the civil service, etc.. and they certainly flourished on those places since. As they’re all chock full of Marxist traitors currently.
If by Marxist traitor you mean anyone who didn't support the violent overthrow of government on January 6th, then you're right.
If by violent overthrow of government on January 6th you mean the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, then you're right.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link------------------------------------>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
When you call an unarmed protest a "violent overthrow of government", you make it plain that you're a lying lefturd scumbag.
-jcr
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.WORKSCLICK.COM
Thank God the FBI has now cleaned up their act.
Well as far as the Reason crew is concerned, they have by excessively targeting conservatives for every bit of constitutionally protected speech and action (plus the bit of entrapment here and there).
So this is Reason's reaction to the Twitter Files?
Holy crap.
So for once in history, 60% of the nation is deeply skeptical of the powers of the FBI, CIA and other alphabet agencies. The question is what to do about it? The only significant population that consistently supports the FBI/CIA is the democrats, according to national surveys. So like it or not, if you want to reign in the power of these agencies, it will mean partnering with GOP and Independent legislators.
Well, the Mises Caucus understand this. As you may have noted, Reason thinks Mises are fake Libertarians for even considering working with icky Republicans.
But trust ENB, the commentary here doesn't represent "true" Libertarians.
Ah, so now Reason tries to downplay the totalitarian security state by highlighting how it's just business as usual.
Can't wait til they line you up against the wall
^ This. Return to normalcy.
Of course, if the FBI is targeting Reason's favored groups, like sex workers, then you can expect plenty of crying.
I guess we'll have to wait 50 years to for Reason's column about the dark truth about 1973-2023's FBI.
Refresh my memory regarding the letter to King. Who was the President? Who was Hoover's Atty Gen boss? And how did these stalwarts punish Hoover?
Darn this destroyed the story of Hoover and Klinger of M.A.S.H having cross dressing parties at Alan Alda's home.
Did Gage verify this with TMZ?
I've generally been disgusted with reason for the past couple of years after reading it regularly for the previous 10. It's hard to imagine that I would never be a regular reader again. I periodically visit to see if I've woken up from the bad dream yet. I had held out hope that Nick Gillespie himself had retained some integrity despite the site largely turning into a left-wing publication masquerading as libertarian. Oh well…
A translation of terms for any other international readers out there:
American libertarians are basically just old school liberals.
The GOP is and was basically liberal too, no matter what it had to say/promise to sizable portions of its base. (Which is why the party rarely delivered on core issues — for decades.)
The neocons are also just liberal. There was never anything conservative about them at all, especially as one their core interests is to liberalize the globe, ie, foist American liberal values and systems, top-down, upon undemocratic, illiberal, non-Western cultures, and to feign possession of the social engineering skills required to make it work and to stick.
The ‘liberals’, since the early 20th century, are just varieties of social democrat and democratic socialist.
The ‘progressives’, in turn, are social democrats, democratic socialists, and Marxists. (The Marxists, however, are now deemed to be a threat to progressive identity politics agenda. So they are now being cancelled and excluded too. Some Marxists thus see American ‘progressive’ politics as a psy-op, used to distract the masses from the class warfare being perpetrated against them by both the Dems and GOP.)
The Trumpians are paleocons a la Perot and Buchanan. Despite Buchanan’s love of Nixon, Trump’s rise is perhaps the first time America has mainstreamed anything resembling Anglosphere or European conservatism. This being perceived as a threat to the country’s oligarchs, and its ability to perpetuate the illusion of real differences (and so real choice) between the blue and red teams, the Trumpians must be delegitimized as ‘far right’ and ‘fascist’.
That the far right and the fascists are, and have always been, opposed to international capital and, instead, in favour of corporatism and a genuinely local socialism/robust social welfare system, is no bother to Trumpians’ critics and denouncers because they aren’t interest in the truth anyway.
Hoover was corrupt, but can't hold a candle to the corruption of today's FBI, products of Obama and Biden. That would include Comey and Wray.
Because Charles Koch. Oddly, he's in league with George Soros (and the WEF for that matter).
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK