Stockton, California Went Bankrupt. Is Your City Next?
What to look for as your burg goes belly up!
Stockton, California made history in June 2012 when it became the largest U.S. municipality in history to file Chapter 9 bankruptcy. It wasn't the first Golden State city to do so, and what's happening in out west is spreading to the rest of the country.
Stockton, like many U.S. city governments, spent lavishly throughout the 1990s when the real estate bubble filled public coffers with property tax revenue. Public officials approved big public works projects such as a new arena, a waterfront park and a grand, new city hall building that the city government never had the money to occupy. But even this spending pales in comparison to Stockton's crippling public employee contracts. The city is on the hook for more than $800 million in unfunded liabilities for pensions and other post-employment benefits.
"We're saddled w
ith this debt that we don't have the revenues any more to service," says Stockton's Vice Mayor Kathy Miller.
Miller lays much of the blame at the feet of former city manager Dwayne Milnes, who she says was tired of dealing with public employee unions and who, through his loose accounting, enabled city council members to give in to nearly every union demand.
"[The information] was not always accurate. And in some cases, I think it was almost misleading," says Miller.
Milnes now runs an association representing the interests of the city's retired public employees, which opposes cuts to some of the very benefits Milnes now admits might have been a mistake to approve. Milnes believes that Stockton would be broke regardless of the decisions made in the '90s.
"When you ask who's going to tip over, it's not 'Who is providing the pension benefits?,' it's, 'Who is providing the pension benefits in an economic environment that they can't support it?'" says Milnes.
Reason Foundation senior analyst Adam Summers says that Stockton's story is becoming an increasingly common one for cities across the U.S.
"There's a real kind
of moral hazard, whereby [city officials] have incentives to offer goodies to people, knowing that they won't have to bear the costs of those decisions," says Summers.
In Stockton, residents, taxpayers, and retirees are bearing the costs of short-sighted political decisions. Stockton's general fund, meant to be for basic city services such as police and fire, has been gutted by the poor fiscal decisions, resulting in a 26-percent reduction in city police. Last year, a record
58 murders took place in Stockton. This year, they've already had 34.
Stockton officials hope bankruptcy proceedings will allow the city to opt out of some of its more stifling contracts (PDF) and to avoid repaying all of the bondholders while maintaining some money in the general fund to keep its most basic city services. Such a solution might give Stockton some breathing room but most of the hard work of rebuilding the town's economy, tax base, and creditworthiness is still ahead of it.
This much is certain: With cities across the country locked into expensive long-term contracts, Stockton's title as the largest U.S. city ever to go bankrupt might be short-lived.
About 9 minutes.
Written and Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Music by Case Newsom, Century of Aeroplanes, and Dexter Britain.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cities filing for bankruptcy is actually a great thing for the citizen-taxpayers that live there as it is the only way to disavow kickbacks and graft unsustainable 'contracts' implemented by corrupt politicians.
Sometimes, the citizens even get less government.
So it's all good.
It may never rain in Southern California, but it surely pours down everywhere else!
Harrisburg, the capital city of PA here. The city council so badly wants to declare bankruptcy that their chairs get moist and council meetings, but the state is determined for that not to happen.
Law prevents them from doing so for a few months more, and council is ignoring the appointed receiver's recovery plan like a teenager told not to go to the mall.
Basic problem: Like other cities, one-party Democrat party rule combined with a snuggle-bunny relationship with city unions leads to spending like, well, a teenager with your credit card at the mall.
I thought Jefferson County, Alabama was the largest bankruptcy?
Emphasis added.
This is actually ambiguous. Jefferson County is considered a municipality for bankruptcy purposes. The story should have claimed only that Stockton is the largest CITY to declare bankruptcy.
This cannot be right, Tony and Shrike have assured me that when you spend lots of money on police and firemen, the economy gets stronger, as they spend more money on the local economy, also businesses should do better since they operate in a safer environment, this is all propaganda.
I see only upside from these bankruptcies:
(1) The credit markets are reminded that lending to governments is a very risky business, indeed, over a long enough time frame, and it will be harder and more costly for cities and counties to borrow.
(2) Illegitimate/corrupt union contracts get broken.
Your first point is the one that really matters. Simply assign all the risk to the creditors, and soon local governments will not have access to too much credit. Neither bondholders nor unions will accept the hollow promise of a local government (unless creditors expect a bailout). If cities have to pre-fund their retiree obligations, they will be much less generous.
"Stockton's general fund, meant to be for basic city services such as police and fire, has been gutted by the poor fiscal decisions, resulting in a 26-percent reduction in city police. Last year, a record 58 murders took place in Stockton. This year, they've already had 34."
1. Correlation does not imply causation.
2. So what?
Yeah equating a lack of police presence to murder rate increases are silly at best.
Economics and cultural differences weigh much more heavily on murder rates than whether there are a few more fat asses shoving donuts in their mouth inside of their climate controlled Crown Vics riding around.
None of this is a shock though. CA has a long track record of giving everything to unions and essentially raping the residents (most of whom aren't in said unions) and running them into the ground. It's embarrassing.
That smirking fuckstick that "negotiated" all those long-term contracts and lavish pension and then went to work for the union thumping the tub for them needs his ass kicked.
you cannot make this stuff up.
San Bernardino City Councilwoman Wendy McCammack regarding the lowering of the retirement age:
"I knew it was going to be costly in the long run, however, this city is one of the toughest to police. In order to attract and retain the kind of officers that it takes to police a city like this, that was a benefit that we had to negotiate"
So let me get this straight. She knew she was voting for a benefit that San Bernadino could never afford and would in all likelihood drive it into bankruptcy in the "long run" in order to attract and retain police officers. Huh?
http://bluecravat.blogspot.com.....nment.html
It's not a stretch to assume that the Stockton government has had an effect on the ridiculously high crime rate of the city, unless you are one of those who doesn't believe in deterrence.
Private police officers are more responsible I think.
Also the government frequently messed up in union negotiations. More things simply need to be privatized.
"There's a real kind More important: Police or defined-benefit packages?of moral hazard, whereby [city officials] have incentives to offer goodies to people, knowing that they won't have to bear the costs of those decisions," says Summers.
The praagon of understanding these issues is right here!
Reading by way of your nice content, will help me to do so sometimes.
fantastic blog article thank you for share where can i find out more?
valuable information this text is worth everyone's attention thanks again
great articles i find it amazing that you give this information for free following this cool website
how can i find out more? you got a nice blog informative article
thanks for share saved as a favorite i truly appreciate this article