The Sierra Club conflates illegal conduct with the ability to challenge illegal conduct in court.
Three justices bitterly dissented. One observed that after Hurricane Katrina, some test-takers had to retake portions of the bar exam.
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
The Fifth Circuit struck the brief. Judge Brasher (CA11) recused.
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
The former uses "further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion" and the latter uses "further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
Colleges need to establish continuity of operations plans to deal to ensure minimal disruptions in teaching and grading.
State Prosecutors would then prosecute state criminal offenses in federal court.
For state court appeals, 25 days "after entry of judgment." For federal court appeals, "a formal mandate does not issue unless specifically directed."
Developing high-quality content is difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. No content may be better for students than weak content.
Opinion states that an "inaccurate, offensive, or upsetting" point of view discussed at a CLE Program would not violate Model Rule 8.4(g).
The unintended consequences of not reading the Constitution’s “office”- and “officer”-language intratextually.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins and Presser v. Illinois were decided that term.
All 16 are now ready for the Barnett/Blackman supplement.
Comparing the reactions from Presidents Jefferson and Trump.
A question that is harder to answer than it may seem.
"The Roberts court, alas, only sang from the judiciary’s score. The executive’s verses fell silent."
The full history of the proceedings, not the sanitized version presented in Trump v. Vance
The Court GVR's other contraceptive mandate cases, but grants the FHFA and First Amendment cases
It must be nice to have John Marshall on your side.
Tax Return Thursday is on deck.
Marbury v. Madison does not support modern severability doctrine.
The Court's conservatives are sharply divided on severability.
The Supreme Court papered over important differences between the Washington and Colorado cases.
"John Marshall is not walking through that door." But what exactly did John Marshall say?
Justice Gorsuch does not agree with, or even cite, Reed v. Town of Gilbert.
I am skeptical how many current students actually want to learn on campus this fall. When push come to shove, they will realize that in-person instruction is too risky.
Justice Kavanaugh recognize the difference between a judgment and precedent, but falls back to judicial universality.
Justice Kagan articulates why most originalists favor original public meaning, over original expectations originalism.
The Court studiously avoided addressing a central element of the Electors' Argument
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks