Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett rule against Trump (again).
Back-to-back losses at SCOTUS and the 11th Circuit.
Texas welcomes Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock and Justice James P. Sullivan
The Judicial Conference will study the issue, but hints the answer is probably no.
Who is defying the Courts?
A federal court ruled that the ERA could not be adopted. Democrat members of Congress told President Biden to adopt it anyway.
What Vance actually said: "I think the thing that you can do in the Senate is push the legal boundaries, as far as the Supreme Court will let you take it."
The 2024 year-end report tells us what keeps the Chief awake at night.
Yes, the Articles of Confederation provided for judges and courts.
It is common enough for the Court to issue administrative stays on the emergency docket to afford itself more time, and maintain the status quo. What about an administrative injunction that would maintain the status quo?
Trump wants to make a deal so SCOTUS doesn't have to.
No "Presumption of Regularity" for Trump 2.0
The opposition is trying to impeach the Acting President for insurrection, who claims he lacks the power to make appointment to constitutional court, which may not have enough members to remove the impeached President.
The timing of TikTok v. Garland.
Should he be forced to recuse from any case involving the Trump Administration?
The role that was created for her, and for no one else, has a value that cannot be stated on a disclosure form.
The Fifth and Eleventh Circuits already dismissed similar complaints, but the Chief Judge of the Court of International Trade asked the Chief Justice to refer it to another circuit, and Roberts did so.
Will Judge Stranch be the next "Obama Judge" to show her true blue colors?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks