Ten teams of high school students presented oral arguments on Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton.
Roberts will find that the removal was unlawful, but that the court lacks an equitable cause of action to reinstate it, leaving backpay as the only available judicial remedy.
Is this opinion a "one and done" decision to evade en banc review?
Federal judges are walking on thin ice by issuing unappealable TROs and failing to stay their rulings.
No, this did not occur in Texas.
Did Kennedy v. Bremerton overrule the precedent on precedent from Rodriguez de Quijas?
It is never too early to make predictions!
Can a federal judge ask a DOJ lawyer "What do you think Jesus would say"?
Apart from the Appointments Clause, I think we are standing at the precipice of federal courts revolution.
But Justice Thomas is still the only Justice who (correctly) concludes that Haywood v. Drown (2009) was incorrectly decided.
This decision may not pan out for the court.
Twenty-two teams of high school students presented oral arguments on Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton.
There are two sides to the constitutional crisis coin: if the president seeks a timely appeal, courts should consider those appeals in a timely fashion.
Another problematic point raised in a resignation letter.
Another day, another resignation letter.
The ABA has been planting the seeds of its own demise for decades.
The District Court injunction did not stay its ruling, but the Court of appeals did shortly thereafter.
Judge Bibas, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware, revises his prior summary judgment opinion.
Prosecutorial discretion comes full circle.
Everyone take a deep breath.
