The paper of record tars the reputation a former federal defender as part of a broader attack on originalism.
Justices Jackson and Kavanaugh both miss the obvious distinction.
The substantive due process question remains.
Justice Sotomayor is right. The majority cannot just wish away Bostock.
Justice Barrett rehabilitates Footnote 4, gives credence to Justice Kennedy's animus jurisprudence, and all but says that gays who were affected by a "legacy of de jure discrimination" are a suspect class.
The groups presented a unified front, but with a 6-3 loss, recriminations are flying.
Barring any surprises, I do not expect any surprises.
As I noted at the time, I was surprised how well she did. I wish we could see more of nominee Barrett.
Justice Barrett compares the Constitution to Odysseus. But I feel like Cassandra.
This case has been pending for nearly a decade, and has been remanded after both Fulton and Catholic Charities Bureau.
Five scholars discuss what role, if any, the ABA should play in the regulation of legal education.
Will EDMO become the new NDTX?
"Additional petitions for certiorari will likely be before this Court shortly and, in my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two."
FDR appointed Hugo Black because he was a "thumping, evangelical New Dealer." Why can't Trump want a "thumping, evangelical MAGA warrior"?
And that is the problem.
Do you really think Justices Thomas and Alito would prefer another Justice Barrett?
With the death of the blue slip, can the President just fill vacancies with the best available candidate?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks