Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
An unvaccinated firefighter, HIV-positive airmen, and a racist lawyer.
An unvaccinated firefighter, HIV-positive airmen, and a racist lawyer.
A federal appeals court rejects an expansive reading of the federal arson law.
Is "state capacity libertarianism" really where "smart" libertarians are headed? I am skeptical.
Episode 295 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Courts struck down Marsy’s Law last year. Lawmakers want to bring it back.
Is the Rule of Law a Law of Rules or a Law of Law? Some conservatives seem to prefer the former. Should they?
Confederate monuments, bird handling, and tied houses.
No, yes, then no again said the State of Washington, ultimately upheld by the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
A change to state law keeps it from applying to the plaintiff, which makes the request for injunctive and declaratory relief moot.
A Public Service Announcement, especially for the lawyers among our readers.
Sen. Hawley's resolution resembles a hypothetical rule I proposed last month, which I think is constitutional
Julian Davis Mortenson and Nick Bagley say "no." Ilan Wurman responds, "not so fast."
Plus: the never-quite-there Klobuchar Moment, how Fox News learned to love the deep state, and more...
"Every lawyer has a professional duty to undertake affirmative steps to remedy de facto and de jure discrimination, eliminate bias, and promote equality, diversity and inclusion in the legal profession"
Less dependence on bail and stronger requirements for evidence sharing will help defendants fight charges.
Hate crime enhancements meet three-strikes laws, and the consequences are terrible.
Stranger abductions are actually extremely rare.
Tessa Majors may have been on way to buy illegal pot when she was stabbed to death. But if that's true, it's an argument against prohibition, not for it.
Be good, boys and girls, or we'll sue you, too.
"The public—including other litigants—and other judges who may come into contact with [Richard] Liebowitz, a frequent litigant in this District, have an interest in the Court's determination of the veracity of these representations."
Once can be an honest mistake; now it looks intentional
No, the order does not "interpret Judaism as a nationality"
And this isn't "hijacking" in some virtual sense. (Computer crime—you're doing it wrong.)
While political attention is focused on impeachment, the Senate continues to confirm judicial nominees
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10