"This President" v. "The Presidency"
Issues from Trump v. Hawaii return to Trump v. Mazars.
No, such individuals are pledged to violate university policy, civil rights laws, and academic freedom.
It's Episode 315 of the Cyberlaw Podcast.
Fun fact about McGirt v. Oklahoma, where Oklahoma is arguing against the claim that Indian tribes had maintained jurisdiction over large chunks of Oklahoma (including Tulsa).
How will the Supreme Court handle oral arguments in the future? I propose a ticket lottery.
I will be talking about the Constitution and the Coronavirus over Zoom for the WIlliam F. Buckley Program
Adrian Vermeule responds to Josh Hammer. We are watching an important debate unfold before our eyes.
But that provision did not make the final bill.
This question may soon become relevant in the District of Columbia.
So the Sixth Circuit held today, because of the many exceptions the Kentucky order provides for secualr activities.
Beer innuendo, fishing in the mail, and the finality trap.
A strange affirmative action classification in Boston suggested that the answer is no.
Another big legal victory for environmental groups this week.
This case could head to the Texas Supreme Court soon
Will the 6th Circuit vacate take the case en banc sua sponte?
Linda Greenhouse speculates that Gorsuch's dissent became the majority opinion
Environmental groups were worried the Court would curtail CWA jurisdiction in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. It didn't.
Miami’s police chief orders officers to reduce ticketing and public interactions. Mayhem doesn’t ensue.
How often does the SG dismiss an indictment while a cert petition is pending, without a confession of error? And is there a connection to the Obamacare case?
Thanks for Marcia Coyle for tracking down the Solicitor General's confession of error, which was not publicly available
My law school is. Anyone else?
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court weighs in.
On due process and citizenship litigation
Gems from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
Ramos was not nearly as fractured as Apodaca, but the Court is still splintered on the value of precedent
All three of today's Supreme Court decisions featured unusual alignments among the justices.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10