Entertainment Industry's Copyright Surveillance System Ready To Launch
Subject to the recording industry's concept of appropriate use, of course
Subject to the recording industry's concept of appropriate use, of course
Why pay for the panopticon when others will build it for you?
He would have been better-protected with snail mail
But the feds interpret them scrupulously, of course
Cops are just using them for the hell of it, now. Really.
Whatever you do, don't call your ex a "disease"
Google's getting more requests from governments than ever before
Sen. Lieberman never gave up the fight for Big Brother
Official requests for user data are up 67 percent from last year
Says it's just a matter of time
With regards to the David Petraeus scandal, as you dig through the very human details of a powerful man's dalliance with an attractive woman, an important question should occur to anybody with more than a National Enquirer-level interest in the matter.
Email spying doesn't appear to be tied to anything resembling an actual threat
The Wall Street Journal notes a possibly inappropriately close relationship between the woman whose complaints of harassing emails began the investigation that led to Petraeus' career-ending affair and the FBI agent doing the investigating.
That would be a felony in Illinois
Filed a patent that would use cameras to detect whether user paid for content being viewed, be it on a TV or a smartphone
You have to wonder if John Galt his own self has taken the helm at the Telecommunications Industry Association.
Good luck avoiding these
It's why they need more power, of course
Just what do the feds plan to force companies to do for them?
It's slow progress, but a federal judge agrees with the Electronic Frontier Foundation that federal agencies, including the FBI, are dragging their feet on releasing documents that would reveal the extent to which private companies will be forced to tailor their technology to make it easier for the government to spy on the Internet.
It's different when the guy you like does it
"Extraordinarily wide-reaching power," says Justice Kennedy
And if you don't like it, they already know
All this over a friggin' copyright case
Very skeptical of government arguments
What is this "Fourth Amendment" of which you speak?
Will decide whether Americans are even allowed to challenge the practice
Called out by Jon Stewart, he fibbed
If we're allowed to assert our rights, the nation would surely crumble
So that you fear international snoops instead of terrorists
Spying on New York's Muslims, baiting them, and taking their words out of context.
"Stingray" tracks all the mobile devices on a given network in an area
They should probably lose them when "working late at the office"
But it would inconvenience everybody
It's only bad when countries America doesn't like do it
What do you have to hide? Oh ... that.
He said he didn't know, but he did, and then ...
Yes, it's designed to operate beyond the reach of D.C.'s spooks
Feds claim their conduct is immune to judicial scrutiny