Partisan Hypocrisy on Display in Supreme Court Ruling on Anti-Prostitution Pledge and the First Amendment
Can the government compel speech? For Supreme Court justices, that seems to depend on the content of that speech.
Can the government compel speech? For Supreme Court justices, that seems to depend on the content of that speech.
"To survive as a ... professor requires constant self-censorship and compromise, especially in the humanities .... Resistance comes at a cost .... [H]er colleague ..., a law professor, was interrogated and suspended from teaching after publishing a series of essays critical of ...."
Rep. Devin Nunes can't hold Twitter liable for allegedly defamatory posts by Twitter user:
Plus: Time to cancel U.S. propaganda outlets, Twitch sued over sexy women, new Assange indictment, social-justice symbolism, and more...
Judge Adelman's article sharply criticizing the Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit concluded, was largely permissible under the Canons of Judicial Conduct, except "the opening two sentences of the article and the criticisms of recent policy positions taken by one political party."
"Publicly expressing anger toward an elected official is not a basis for entry of an injunction. In public debate, elected officials must tolerate insulting remarks—even angry, outrageous speech—to provide breathing room for the First Amendment."
"Defendant's Yelp post about plaintiff is reasonably and best understood to be, simply, name-calling."
"Be there by 10:30, lace your shoes, wear masks and gloves. Bring hammers bricks whatever you want."
Two years of rule-flouting by elites and ordinary citizens show the unsustainability of top-down prohibition.
Former professor John Cochrane: "I spent much of my last few years of teaching afraid that I would say something that could be misunderstood and thus be offensive to someone."
He remains a tenured faculty member.
The interest in fighting age discrimination in employment doesn't trump free speech rights.
"By the looks of it, the horse is not just out of the barn—it is out of the country."
Don't lock down expression along with so much else of American society.
Not a high-level official, not a spokesperson, not an endorser -- just an ordinary person.
The decision has been promptly appealed.
The heterodox hosts of the popular Blocked and Reported podcast talk about surviving internet outrage, the roots of speech repression, and the power of direct financial support from fans.
"Even if past [mentally distressing] speech that an offender made to a person ... could be considered ... integral to the criminal conduct of menacing by stalking [and thus unprotected], we do not believe that this principle may be applied categorically to future speech ... directed to others."
A lower court precedent left unchallenged would unjustly compromise First Amendment protest rights. The Supreme Court should reconsider.
"that eBay executives viewed as critical of the company" (as best I can tell, the newsletter is EcommerceBytes).
Her crime? Spelling out what the rap group N.W.A. stands for, and quoting one of their lyrics.
"in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion."
"An individual's right to speak is implicated when information he or she possesses is subjected to restraints on the way in which the information might be used or disseminated."
Plus: Breonna’s Law bans no-knock raids in Kentucky, Amazon's third-party problem, new findings on metabolism, and more...
Ninth Circuit allows plaintiffs to challenge California statute that bars students from attending some for-pay trade schools unless the students have a high school diploma, have a GED, or can pass a government-prescribed test.
"For me, demands for silence, for avoidance, or for bowdlerization will be offered no deference."
"Absent some concrete threat to the officers, which has not been suggested here, there is no principled way to discern why this case would justify redactions while others would not."
No, if the city endorses the messages as its own.
With a special cameo appearance by Eric Holder.
An interesting illustration of the qualified privilege that many courts recognize in such cases.
Not much as a legal matter, as best I can tell. [See UPDATE.]
UCLA says complaints -- about the fact that both the excerpt read from King's letter and the video included the word "nigger" -- have "been shared with UCLA’s Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion for review."
and other state (but not federal) intellectual property claims brought over platforms' hosting of third-party content.
From the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.