3 Supreme Court Cases To Watch in June 2025
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
Are outdated laws ripe for abuse? A listener asks whether it's time to sunset certain old laws.
The result is the same: attacks on tech companies and attempts to violate Americans' rights.
Karoline Leavitt's threat against ABC News is an attack on free speech.
An Eleventh Circuit panel (by a 2-1 vote) issues a stay of the preliminary injunction that the district court issued in Naples Pride's favor.
Sen. Blackburn introduced a bill this week that would make it a crime to publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer.
"Unsealing the May 6 Order is essential for the public to see the government's overreach in searching cellphones without probable cause and [is essential for] publishing precedent as courts unpack future such requests."
I haven't been closely following the many filings in the case, but I'm very glad the court is enforcing a fairly broad right of public access here.
So Texas's high court for criminal matters held yesterday.
The fight against anti-Semitism is undermined when it is conflated with mere criticism of Israel's government.
As the prosecution rests in the OneTaste case, the defense lays out the free speech implications if the government succeeds.
Signaling legislative contempt, one sponsor called the student groups "sex clubs." But in targeting the content of student speech the bill probably infringes First Amendment free speech rights and tramples the Equal Access Act of 1984
"Because Congress intended for the Civil Service Reform Act to strip district courts of jurisdiction only if federal employees were otherwise able to receive adequate and independent review of their claims, we vacate and remand to the district court to consider whether the text, structure, and purpose of the Civil Service Reform Act has been so undermined that the jurisdiction stripping scheme no longer controls"
Olympus Spa had sued on First Amendment grounds.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
which is to say the court that is the most in favor of public access to court records in such cases.
though the court found the plaintiffs had standing to bring the claim, and gave them one last chance to amend their complaint to plausibly allege enough to allow the case to go forward.
More in Prof. Rebecca Scofield's defamation lawsuit against alleged psychic Ashley Guillard, based on Guillard's accusation that Scofield was involved in the Nov. 2022 murder of four University of Idaho students.
Although the school failed to properly assess whether the threat was valid, school officials determined that his expulsion didn’t violate due process.
The order also covered the man's family and public officials, as well as the lawyers in the case.
Marco Rubio has announced a plan to deny visas to foreigners who censor Americans.
But he declines to conclude that another judge, against whom a complaint was lodged over participation in such a boycott, violated the rules.
Speech codes intended to battle misinformation are instead empowering the government to be the arbiter of truth.
So the Ninth Circuit held today, by a 2-1 vote. I tentatively think the majority got it right as a matter of First Amendment law and statutory interpretation, though I think such statutes ought to be written to include some privacy exceptions as to gender identity and not just sex.
A Massachusetts 7th grader was sent home for wearing the shirt, though the school allows students to challenge the idea it conveyed.
The president's crusade against attorneys whose work offends him, which defies the First Amendment and undermines the right to counsel, has provoked several judicial rebukes.
Swedish authorities voted to criminalize the purchase or procurement of online sex acts, in a move targeting customers of webcam platforms and sites like OnlyFans.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks