Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Tucker Carlson

Will Tucker Carlson Run for President? Don't Bet on It.

Third-party bids are much more fun to talk about than do. Plus, there's reason to suspect it's all a bid to boost J.D. Vance.

Matt Welch | 8.12.2026 11:17 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Tucker Carlson with Thomas Massie, Joe Kent, and Marjorie Taylor Greene | Marjorie Taylor Greene
(Marjorie Taylor Greene)

Third party/independent trial balloon season started three months early last Wednesday when the popular conspiratorial podcaster Tucker Carlson released his 10 principles for saving America, right after having been urged by a group of MAGA exiles—including Rep. Thomas Massie (R—Ky.) and former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.)—to run for president.

"Both parties have colluded against the population to make their lives better and our lives worse," Carlson said, sounding very much like the guy who told the Columbia Journalism Review last month that "there's going to be a third party, and I'm going to do everything I can to bring that about."

But will he? News articles abound with anonymous Carlson confidants throwing cold water on the idea. Politico's Playbook newsletter on Monday quoted a "source close to Carlson" as saying, "He won't run against JD Vance. He will very likely run if [Donald] Trump endorses [Marco] Rubio."

As the Ohio-based political observer and critic of postliberalism Jason Hart never tires of pointing out, Tucker Carlson and Vice President J.D. Vance have an intense and productive political relationship, anchoring one major side of the Trump-succession fights that have roiled the conservative coalition since the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Carlson was one of a dozen attendees at a foundational 2019 meeting in Rockbridge, Ohio, convened by Vance and his longtime mentor Peter Thiel, that soon blossomed into "one of the most influential forces in GOP politics," according to a November 2025 Washington Post article about the collection of Silicon Valley investors, economic populists, and media entrepreneurs. "Political strategists," the Post asserted, "credit the close-knit network of businessmen-cum-donors with helping fuel the president's reelection last year and propelling one of its own—Vance—into the vice presidency."

It was also good for Carlson: 1789 Capital, a "patriotic" and "anti-woke" venture capital firm founded by some of the Rockbridge attendees in 2022, chose as its first investment Last Country Inc., the digital media company Carlson founded after being fired by Fox News. (Beginning in the momentous month of November 2024, the venture fund brought on Donald Trump Jr. as a partner.)

The vice president and the podcaster have had each other's backs ever since that first meeting, in service of Rockbridge's aim to (in the Post's characterization) "equip MAGA to outlive Trump." In March 2025, Carlson called Vance "the only person in the entire Republican Party…who's capable of carrying on the Trump legacy and expanding it, making it what it should fully be." At a Heritage Foundation event the following month, he said "J.D. Vance is the future, period."

Things got squirrely after the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, which sent some in the conservative mediasphere down conspiratorial and antisemitic rabbit holes, leading both to widespread condemnation and strategic fence-sitting. Amid a season of reporting about racist and antisemitic trolling among professional young conservatives in Washington, D.C., Carlson chose this moment to interview Nazi Groyper Nick Fuentes, a decision that would soon lead to convulsions at the Carlson-supporting Heritage Foundation.

Vance's first response to all that was to post on X that "The infighting is stupid." Then, in a December 2025 interview with Unherd's Sohrab Ahmari, the veep expanded.

"Tucker's a friend of mine. And do I have disagreements with Tucker Carlson? Sure. I have disagreements with most of my friends, especially those who work in politics," he said. "I find the idea that Tucker Carlson…that his views are somehow completely anathema to conservatism, that he has no place in the conservative movement, is frankly absurd. And I don't think anybody actually believes it. I think that there's a certain amount of gatekeeping where people are trying to settle their own ideological scores, and that's what's really going on here."

At the time, Vance's big-tent approach toward Carlson was shared by his boss. But no more. After Trump's fateful decision to launch what would become an open-ended war with Iran this February, the president's former campaign hype man became one of his fiercest critics, accusing the commander in chief of being hoodwinked by Israel to betray American First. Trump responded by telling the New York Post that "Tucker's a low IQ person that has absolutely no idea what's going on," then following that up with a Truth Social broadside against Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and the resigned director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent.

Kent was around the dinner table earlier this month with Massie, Greene, and other anti-war voices trying to convince Carlson to run. "We said no more foreign wars and we meant it and supported Donald Trump because he made that promise," Greene wrote on X. "But he's betrayed us all. Our commitment is America First for all Americans, right, left, and center. The movement has begun."

If that movement is contingent on whether Donald Trump tabs Vance over Rubio in the succession sweepstakes, then it's not likely to attract much of the left and center, let alone the more Rubio-sympathetic right. Vance's approval ratings, while not as disastrous as Trump's, still hover in the low 40s and high 30s.

Carlson's gambit also puts Vance in the awkward spot of being championed by the very people Trump has run out of his own movement. As we have seen for nearly a decade now, conservatives who dare to publicly oppose the two-time president do not last very long in national Republican politics. If Vance is seen as the exiles' champion, neither will he.

So if Trump called Carlson's bluff by anointing Rubio, would that trigger the threatened third-party run? Don't bet on it.

The last two decades have seen an almost impressive list of trial-ballooned new-third-party or independent presidential campaigns that mostly never got off the ground: Howard Schultz, Mark Cuban, Larry Hogan, Kanye West, Mike Bloomberg, John Kasich, Evan McMullin, David French, No Labels, Americans Elect, American Renewal, the Forward Party, ad infinitum. One of the only start-from-scratch presidential efforts to achieve ballot access in even half the country over that span was the 2024 run by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who happily exchanged what would have been a distant third-place showing for a plum Cabinet spot.

The work of overcoming major-party-devised ballot-access laws in 50 states is a bewilderingly tedious slog, much more strenuous and unsexy than hosting a daily podcast with millions of subscribers, or attending small meetings with the billionaires and populists who might make the next king or at least finance your next venture.

Indeed, the Carlson juggernaut may be over even before it's begun. "Tucker, he's not running for president," Greene told Politico. "Our argument is the two-party system is a complete and total failure.…I am 100% totally completely disgusted with both parties."

This will not be the last time you hear that statement before November 7, 2028. Nor will it be the last time you hear about a presidential candidate who will not, in fact, run for president.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Hong's Swan Song

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Tucker CarlsonThomas MassieElection 2028Donald TrumpJ.D. VanceThird PartiesCampaigns/ElectionsPolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Dillinger   2 months ago

    bunch of loser poseurs even if JD cut them loose today he won't get my vote. no Bernie Bros for president ever.

    1. Thoritsu   2 months ago

      Tucker who?

  2. Templeton Ferrari the 3rd (The Commentariat member formerly known as SCOTUS)   2 months ago

    Tucker would be torn apart if he ran for president.

  3. creech   2 months ago

    Why do we need a third party? The juggernaut that is the Libertarian Party will roll to victory with an open borders candidate who wants to end social security tomorrow, provide gender-affirming health procedures on the taxpayer dimes, set up heroin distribution centers at your kid's school, let the Muslims, Russkies, and Chinese rule everything right up to the shores of Malibu and Atlantic City, and let - and this is really horrible - dogs and cats live together.

  4. middlefinger   2 months ago

    No because the Jooooooooooezzzzzz or something

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      Yes, Jews will vote for Democrats, and the Israel Firsters will vote for whoever gets the AIPAC funding. Sorry Tucker.

  5. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

    Tuck her? I hardly even know her!

  6. Anastasia Beaverhausen   2 months ago

    Last time there were some nutballs within the LP who wanted RFK Junior to be our candidate. Thank pasta that was shot down, because he's proven to be absolutely NOT a Libertarian. I expect some similar clowns to try and get Tucker to be the LP nominee next time.

    1. James K. Polk   2 months ago

      There was never a moment in time when RFK Jr ever appeared to be a libertarian. I have some sympathy for the stated goals of the Mises Caucus, but not supporting Chase Oliver and many of their other infantile shenanigans is unforgivable. They are unserious. I will give Angela McArdle one huge chunk of credit, however: I think her deal-making efforts effectively agreeing to support Trump and not Oliver got Ross Ulbricht his pardon.

  7. bobodoc   2 months ago

    Tucker, MTG and Massie? Why not also talk about Candace Owens and Ye Ye? What a joke. Maybe this article is a joke...

    1. James K. Polk   2 months ago

      Welch is not supporting or opposing any of these ideas, he's just reporting them.

  8. Jim Conley   2 months ago

    "
    businessmen-cum-donors " ?

    "businessmen cum donors" ?

    I got my "donation" hanging, baby !

  9. Unreasonable   2 months ago

    We've had enough of unqualified talking heads who don't understand how government and governance work. You libertarians may think some sort of revolutionary will bring the answers, but in truth we need some young firebrand who's already familiar with how DC works and who is strongly anti-MAGA. I've never been a Democrat but if they get their actual act together and stop pussyfooting around they'll be the only answer at this point.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Has Been Trampling Free Speech for More Than 40 Years—and It Keeps Getting Worse

Jacob Sullum | 10.11.2026 7:00 AM

Canada's First Nations Are Using Their Land To Build Dense Housing

Christian Britschgi | From the November 2026 issue

New York's Controversial Anti-Swastika Law Turns Prosecutors Into Speech Police

Meagan O'Rourke | From the November 2026 issue

SpaceX Found a Way Around the FCC

Thomas W. Hazlett | 10.10.2026 8:00 AM

Mamdani's $131.5 Million DoorDash Settlement Is Not What He Says It Is

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 10.10.2026 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason