Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

Democrats' Maine Problem

Plus: NYC's construction boom, how the DSA was hijacked by communists, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 7.7.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Graham Platner | Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA/Newscom/CNN/Graham Platner/Facebook
(Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA/Newscom/CNN/Graham Platner/Facebook)

Rape allegations: Yesterday, Graham Platner—who is trying to unseat Susan Collins from her U.S. Senate seat, and who already won the Democratic primary, positioning him quite well to flip that seat from red to blue come November—faced the most serious allegations yet: that he had raped a woman.

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Jenny Racicot met Platner via a dating app in 2019, starting an on-again, off-again relationship with him. In 2021, she alleges that he assaulted her—allegations Politico broke yesterday, that Racicot discussed on CNN.

"I said, 'No, don't come over,'" Racicot told CNN. "Like, 'I'm not in the mood. Don't come over.'" When he didn't respond via text, she assumed "he got the message," she said, but "half an hour later, I heard a noise outside my door and then he came in. He just came into my house. It was unlocked." Platner "jumped on top of" her while she was lying on the couch and "indicated that he had intentions that were sexual in nature," Racicot added. "I remember just at first being like, 'Hey, I'm not into this,'" she said. "Like, 'Don't, I'm not in the mood.'" Then she saw a "look in his eyes" and the smell of booze. "I was like, 'This is different—he is heavily intoxicated,'" she told CNN. "And that blank stare was kind of like a photographic memory that I still have of that night."

She pushed Platner away, and he backed into her antique sewing kit, causing sharp objects to scatter all over the floor. "I remember specifically him grabbing at my chest, and I hit his hand and I said, 'Don't touch me,'" she added. Racicot says Platner forced himself on her. After the encounter, she says she cut off all contact with him.

Politico "also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office" to corroborate the account.

Racicot told Politico that "one of the reasons I didn't come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person….I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person."

The sexual assault accusations against Graham Platner by Jenny Racicot are really quite severe. She says that he entered her home in a blackout state after she had definitively told him not to come. Then he forced himself on her. She cut off all contact afterward.

Barging into…

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) July 6, 2026

This is in addition, of course, to the many other problems with Platner's character. As I wrote just last month:

"You might take issue with his Nazi tattoo—a skull-and-crossbones design called a Totenkopf, that he got with other Marines in Croatia back in 2007, that he has repeatedly claimed he didn't know the significance of. (His former girlfriend, Lyndsey Fifield, begs to differ, saying Platner used to frequently joke about his Nazi tattoo.) Or maybe the fact that he has a history of roughing up his girlfriends a bit. Or cheating on his wife by sexting other women. Or his weird Reddit comments, ("You don't have much experience with Latin American hookers, do you?") per The Wall Street Journal. Or the fact that he was a Redditor at all."

Fifield, for her part, spoke with The New York Times, serving as a source for a big piece on Platner's history of domestic abuse. Fifield—who is conservative—was unhappy with the way Times journalists portrayed her, and the lack of due diligence she claims they did when she was highly cooperative in helping them corroborate her story.

Platner's trainwreck of a campaign is an incredible wealth of data because it shows us exactly where the Democrat establishment line of tolerance is:

------ACCEPTABLE-------

- describing self as a communist
- being a fake working class nepo baby
- ACAB comments
- fantasizing…

— nic carter (@nic_carter) July 6, 2026

"With so much at stake, the best path forward is for Graham Platner to step aside as the Democratic nominee and address these serious allegations outside this Senate race," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.), who had campaigned with Platner and boosted his image.

"With Republicans holding 53 seats, Democrats must defend all the seats they hold and flip four more to win control in November," reminds The New York Times. Flipping Collins' seat is a top priority for Democrats, but will pursuit of this seat delude Democrats into thinking they should just stick it out with Platner?

Platner can withdraw from the race anytime prior to July 13. The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to replace him on the ticket.


Scenes from New York: New York City "added 38,682 units to its housing stock last year—the most new apartments completed in a single year for the city since 1965, according to the Department of City Planning, when developers rushed to complete buildings before a new zoning resolution," reports The Wall Street Journal. "The city's residential push shows no sign of slowing down. New application filings indicate a robust pipeline, with 16,815 new units across 281 buildings proposed in this year's first quarter, a recent Real Estate Board of New York report shows."


QUICK HITS

  • "By most measures, the Catholic Church is becoming less of a force in American life. Revelations of sexual abuse and official cover-up have taken a toll at dioceses around the country, as has the gravitational pull of secular society. Catholic-school enrollment has fallen by roughly a million students since the beginning of the century. Infant baptisms have fallen by more than half. Catholic weddings have dropped even more steeply. In most places, the story of American Catholicism is one of decline," writes Nate Weisberg at Intelligencer. "And yet Catholicism has never felt more powerful or politically salient in the places where American conservatism governs. Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are Catholic. So are more than a third of the members of [Donald] Trump's second-term Cabinet, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, CIA director John Ratcliffe, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon. Prominent non-Cabinet figures in the administration including press secretary Karoline Leavitt and border czar Tom Homan are also Catholic. And then, of course, there is Vance."
  • "A tragic irony of history is that the Democratic Socialists of America was formed in opposition to the very thing it has become," writes Jonathan Chait for The Atlantic (in "There's Nothing Democratic About These Socialists"). "The writer and activist Michael Harrington helped found the DSA in 1982. His goal was to build a socialist movement that would eventually pull the Democratic Party toward more humane domestic and foreign policies. He believed that a commitment to freedom of speech, elections, and other democratic norms was an absolute requirement for any socialist organization. And generations of bitter experience taught Harrington and his allies that socialist organizations had failed because they allowed communists to infiltrate them and take control of their organizing structures."
  • "The Supreme Court on Monday declined to pause enforcement of a Texas law that restricts which apps children can download from online stores, in a case that involves the balance of online safety for kids and the Constitution's free-speech guarantees," reports The Washington Post. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Man Who Invented Online Sports Betting—and Went to Prison for It

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsReason RoundupMaineDemocratic Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (187)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...faced the most serious allegations yet: that he had raped a woman.

    The donkey no longer believes all women though.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Most serious because the woman was a democrat.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        ^-- get a load of the biologist!

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      They're abandoning him pretty quickly, so they've had it with his parade of incidents.

      -------------

      “Graham Platner needs to immediately withdraw as the Democratic nominee for Senate and allow Maine Democrats the opportunity to choose a new candidate who can defeat Susan Collins,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) Chair Sen. Kristin Gillibrand of New York said in a statement. “The DSCC will not invest in the Maine Senate race if Platner remains on the ballot.”

      Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren also joined the pile-on, saying in a statement that “the best path forward is for Graham Platner to step aside,” while Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker wrote on X that Platner “must drop out” and that the party “should continue to stand with all survivors of sexual assault.”

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Nice to see that:
        1) Having Nazi tattoos
        2) Being an admitted Socialist
        3) Assist in training far-left armed gangs
        4) Raping conservative women

        All are A-OK with the DNC.

        Raping progressive women? THAT is the bridge too far.

        1. Sylvie1   2 months ago

          Plus he wanted to represent people he calls stupid and racist.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            Well, if they vote for him, at least one of the two adjectives for them is actually accurate.

            1. Scooter   2 months ago

              They could be stupid, as well.

              1. damikesc   2 months ago

                Good one.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        They aren't angry about the incidents. They are angry they couldnt control the disclosure and it was revealed.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

          Id wager that the DSA folks are angry they couldn't control the discourse or hide the incident, but the DNC at large is fucking giddy that they found a way to get rid of the albatross and have a chance at an establishment friendly candidate that will be a good little soldier.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Dnc already hitched their wagons to Islam and socialists. They need the 5-10% of thr vote those groups get them. So they bend the knee to them. Same thing as Labour in Britain.

        2. Scooter   2 months ago

          They're also upset at being so close to the deadline to replace him on the ballot.

    3. Scooter   2 months ago

      The donkey never believed all women. Just some Liberal women.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Platner can withdraw from the race anytime prior to July 13. The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to replace him on the ticket.

    Since this is coming out now and not right before the election tells you it wasn't GOP who leaked it. It appears the Democrats are going to take the unprecedented step of removing a candidate that their primary voters chose and replace him with a party-picked one.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

      One would have to be very cynical to think this was the plan all along.

      Or have basic pattern recognition.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Indeed, we just saw this play out. Hopefully Dems pick another Harris-like loser.

        1. HorseConch   2 months ago

          How many do-overs will it take for their crazy leftists to catch on?

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            A lot, apparently. Right after the election in 2024, I thought maybe they were catching on. But I guess they still think gay race communism is a winner.

            1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

              Sadly it is winning often enough to keep it going and with the corruption cover Democrats are creating it can survive with power even as a zombie for years to come.

      2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        As self proclaimed King of Cynicism, I disagree it was planned the whole time.

        What it was is an indication that the Democrats have no intention of changing their strategy of cramming the worst possible candidate into every election as a way to say "Fuck You" to the voters.

        And they're currently holding the Republicans' beer who not only install the worst possible candidate, but actively purge their party of honest and principled candidates.

        Both parties are only for the parties and completely and openly corrupt.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          But they are totally above saying 'fuck you' to the voters in the general election and would never stuff the ballot box with fraudulent mail-in ballots.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            It's not that Dem's wouldn't steal an election. It's that the evidence is lacking. They did quasi-legal mail in ballot schemes, election law changes and Hunter laptop story stuff, so they fall short on the "totally above" issue.

            But we're 6 years past the 2020 election including 1.5+ years with the alleged victim of the stolen election in control of all the federal branches of investigation and we still have only claims, but no rigorous evidence that the election was stolen.

            This is nothing to do with Dem's integrity. They'd steal the election if they could, but the fact is that stealing an election in a (waning) high trust nation with nearly 50% opposition (including many in positions of power) without being blatant, let alone still little beyond accusations 6 years later is pretty conclusive that they did not.

            So is Trump so incompetent that he cannot find the evidence of millions of fake votes or was his claim always just blowing smoke?

            1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

              Or maybe the dems, with four years to seethe and plan, used tactics that made it easier to cover their tracks?

              Mail in voting and no voter ID is some shady shit, I don’t care what the apologists say.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Qb still has hope.

      3. damikesc   2 months ago

        As long as what they do by naming an unelected person "protects democracy"

    2. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Shocking! They've never done this (multiple times) before;)

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Real removing of a voter-chosen socialist and replacing him with an annointed party insider has never been attempted before.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Bernie wakes up and says "Heyyyyy....."

          1. mad.casual   2 months ago

            Trotsky's still dead though, right?

    3. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Yes, this is something the Democrats have never, well, hardly ever, done before.

      1. Sylvie1   2 months ago

        Bless you for the Pinafore reference.

    4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Unprecedented is the snark here right? Literally what happened with kamala.

    5. Scooter   2 months ago

      I wonder if they can find another "Lautenberg"?

    6. charliehall   2 months ago

      You think that it is a bad thing that a Nazi-adjacent politician won't have a chance to serve in the US Senate?

      What kind of monster are you?

    7. Scooter   2 months ago

      Pretty clear, at this point, their internal polling showed Platner losing against Collins w/ more incidents to be revealed.

      Interesting that they likely knew about most of this stuff when he announced but decided to back him anyway.

  3. HorseConch   2 months ago

    Who could have imagined that the guy with the Nazi tattoo turned out to not be a great guy?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    New York City "added 38,682 units to its housing stock last year—the most new apartments completed in a single year for the city since 1965...

    THANK YOU, MAYOR MADMANI

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Mamdani wasn't mayor last year.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    New application filings indicate a robust pipeline, with 16,815 new units across 281 buildings proposed in this year's first quarter...

    The migrant community will be awash in cribs.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    And yet Catholicism has never felt more powerful or politically salient in the places where American conservatism governs.

    This former altar boy knows quite a few Catholics who vote for the abortion-loving party religiously.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Da Pope?

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    He believed that a commitment to freedom of speech, elections, and other democratic norms was an absolute requirement for any socialist organization.

    The first thing the commie does when seeking power is cry for speech rights. The first thing he does when gaining power is remove speech rights.

    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      One Man, One Vote, One Time

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        Kind of like how the persecuted Mohammed was all "can't we get along" in Mecca, but in Medina when he was in charge that tune changed real fucking fast. Interesting parallel between that and the commies.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          Red-Green alliance, birds of a feather

    2. Agammamon   2 months ago

      When I am weaker than You, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Also known as taqiyya. Or maybe it's kitmān. They've got so many specialized names for the different types of lies they use to spread.

  8. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Not all atrocities are committed by illegal aliens. Hope the prisoner justice system works...

    https://www.localmemphis.com/article/news/crime/four-memphis-men-indicted-rape-exploitation-young-children/522-576cb8e0-7877-4e66-8c3d-10d55ef4b474

    Four Memphis men indicted for rape, exploitation of young children

    Four men were indicted Thursday on multiple felony counts in a case involving the sexual abuse of two young children and a baby that they performed and recorded on cellphone videos, said Shelby County Dist. Atty. Gen. Amy Weirich.

    The multiple incidents occurred between July 2016 and October 2017 with victims that included a four-year-old girl, a three-year-old boy and a 9-month-old girl.

    -----

    A Shelby County jury found Daireus Ice guilty on all counts in the 2018 kidnapping and rape of a 4-year-old girl.

    The 29-year-old was found guilty of organizing, directing, and filming the sexual assault of the child.

    Defendants include Daerius (aka Dairus) Ice, 23; Isiah Hayes, 21, (aka Issiah Coleman); Antonio King, 26; and Antoine Wilson, 30.

    They were indicted on felony charges of criminal conspiracy, four counts of especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, three counts of aggravated rape of a child, rape of a child, and especially aggravated kidnapping.

    Ice and Hayes were indicted on two additional counts of aggravated rape of a child, and on one count of especially aggravated exploitation of a minor.

    Investigators said the case came to light when the baby’s mother found video of her daughter being abused on a cellphone that Ice had used and returned. Ice allegedly organized and directed the others to perform and video sex acts on the children for distribution.

    1. See.More   2 months ago

      Goddamnit!! Another story about ICE abuses... /smh

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        “How was I supposed to know she was your mom? It’s not like her last name is Ice!”

        “You shoulda known by the haircut.”

  9. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    CNN anchor Elex Michaelson at end of politics panel discussion re: Ossoff 2028:

    “As a Jew, some people read a little more Jewish than other people. And Jon Ossoff may not read as Jewish as Josh Shapiro does, for whatever that’s worth.”

    https://x.com/Andy_Dyer_NOVA/status/2072645182403555489

    He’s saying Ossof has a better chance of passing with the antisemites in his party.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Cannot fathom why anybody believes the DNC is not pro-Jewish folks and all.

      We've found the minority they can openly hate.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Not just the DNC. Now also the LP.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          I didn't leave the LP, the LP left me.

  10. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Democrats' Maine Problem

    The Democrats do not have a 'Maine Problem' Wolfe. They have a Nazi problem.

    They were fine with Platner, loved Platner, protected Platner - until he started falling in the polls.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      Puns based on Maine/main are really popular in Maine.

    2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      They do not have a Nazi problem, they have a Democrat problem. Every Nazi and communist in the DNC has mainstream support, these are not fringe radicals, they are the radical base.

    3. TJJ2000   2 months ago

      ^This +1000000000. Well Said.

    4. charliehall   2 months ago

      This Democrat sent Susan Collins a contribution hours after Janet Mills suspended her campaign.

      Unlike the DSA or MAGA, I have zero tolerance for Nazi-adjacent politicians.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        Do you think the Make America Great Again's campaign is about [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism]?

  11. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    I'm sure Jesse et al will be along shortly to tell us all breathlessly about the latest study from the Federal Reserve that tells us that illegal immigration drove up housing prices. They will crow that they were right all along! The illegals are destroying America! Also, I doubt that they would link to the actual study, instead linking to their preferred right-wing 'news' source instead. So here is the actual study, not biased through partisan news filters, read it yourself:

    https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/research/papers/2026/wp2607.pdf

    Here is the abstract from the study:

    From early 2021 to early 2024, the U.S. experienced an unprecedented boom in unauthorized immigration, followed by a rapid slowdown beginning in mid-2024. We provide the first systematic empirical assessment of the labor- and housing-market effects of this episode. Using newly available administrative microdata on individual immigrants, we construct measures of net unauthorized immigration at the national and local levels and exploit plausibly exogenous variation across local markets. We find that unauthorized immigrant worker flows (UIWF) increased local employment approximately one-for-one, without significant declines in local wages. These inflows also raised local house prices and rents without expanding housing supply, consistent with a housing demand shock in the face of short-run inelastic supply. Lastly, we find that UIWF reduced labor income per capita, consistent with downward wage composition of the local workforce, and strongly reduced government transfers. These findings should help inform policy debates surrounding how unauthorized immigrant labor supply impacts local labor and housing markets as well as public finances.

    So what is actually happening, is that when immigrants come to a community, they find work - they are not sitting around collecting welfare. Furthermore, while they do drive up the price of housing, this is primarily because of a shortage of housing and barriers to building new housing. If the same number of citizens had migrated in the same way, the same problem would have occurred. This problem isn't inherent to the migrants themselves. Finally, the migrants don't actually "drive down" wages, the wages grow at a slower rate. This is primarily because illegal immigrants will tend to work for lower wages.

    To summarize:
    - They don't sit around on welfare, they get jobs
    - They work for less wages because they don't have legal status
    - Their presence increases housing costs, but it is primarily a supply problem, and not inherent to the migrants themselves

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Pedojeffy:
      unauthorized immigrant worker flows (UIWF) increased local employment approximately one-for-one, without significant declines in local wages

      Also Pedojeffy:
      They work for less wages because they don't have legal status

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Oh! Thanks for catching that, glad I could help clarify. If you read the study, you'll see what is happening is that when illegal immigrants join the workforce, they work for less wages because they don't have legal status; but overall, wages don't go down because they aren't "stealing" a job from someone else, they are expanding the workforce. It is true that wage growth is not as high as it would be if all workers had legal status, but it is also true that the job situation is not a zero-sum game. Does that make sense?

        1. Rick James   2 months ago

          illegal immigrants join the workforce, they work for less wages because they don't have legal status; but overall, wages don't go down because they aren't "stealing" a job from someone else, they are expanding the workforce.

          Reason/CATO supply/demand economics.

          Increasing the supply of anything lowers the price... EXCEPT FOR LABOR!

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Here's an example that perhaps even you can understand.

            Suppose Jose from Guatemala comes here illegally and starts a food truck. How many jobs from Americans did Jose steal?

            Answer: none.

            Jose has now created one job (himself as a proprietor). In the aggregate, did overall wages go up or go down?

            Answer: wages went up (Jose has to pay himself something to remain profitable).

            So if you think this example is incorrect, please explain why you think so.

            1. damikesc   2 months ago

              Again, nice to see labor is the market where supply and demand is suspended as a motivating factor. I had no idea.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            I completely understand that if you buy into the right-wing caricature of illegal immigrants, you would think that the above scenario could never happen. According to the right-wing caricature, illegal immigrants are stupid, have low IQ, have no money, have zero agency and are in fact programmed by Soros's minions to invade and take over America, and then when they arrive they do nothing but sit around on welfare. Start food trucks? Creating their own jobs? That is impossible for illegals! They are sub-human rejects! Right?

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              I think you are painting a bit of a caricature there yourself. I'll grant that the online discourse doesn't always help. But people tend towards broad generalizations. I think that if pressed, a lot on the right will acknowledge that many illegal immigrants do come here to work and make something of themselves. But you are ignoring other parts of the argument, like rapid cultural change brought about by large influx of immigrants, abuse of the asylum system and rule of law concerns. The fact is that illegals are subject to deportation and that is not a new thing by any means.

              1. damikesc   2 months ago

                Or that plenty of migrants DO go on welfare (when exactly zero should ever be on it) and the crime and cultural degradation brought by them (Minneapolis has not, in any way, been helped by Somalis, no matter what the Democrats they fund say) is not worth anything positive.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Case in point right here, Zeb. Even when I link directly to an empirical study which finds that when there is an increase in illegal immigration, government transfer payments go DOWN, what does damikesc say? "Oh, well, plenty of them DO go on welfare". He's just plain ignoring reality at this point. This is not a "generalization", this is deception.

                  1. damikesc   2 months ago

                    I will focus on the reality. Feel free to stick with studies.

                    Minneapolis has turned into a shithole thanks to a bunch of inbred Somalis stealing billions thru fraud.

                    Love how MN, OH, and CA have been caught with BILLIONS of fraud for government funded medical services --- but you believe transfer payments have REDUCED. Hilarity.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                Zeb, you are giving them too much of the benefit of the doubt.

                But people tend towards broad generalizations.

                Sure - but that isn't what the MAGA anti-immigration crowd does. They are not broadly generalizing about illegal immigration, they are cherry-picking anecdotes and scapegoating illegal immigrants. A broad generalization might be something like "Sure, most immigrants do work, although there are other negative consequences as well." That would be a generalization that is supported by the data. But that isn't what the online discourse reflects. Instead, they IGNORE the positive and EMPHASIZE the negative. That is not a "broad generalization", that is scapegoating and demagoguery.

                But you are ignoring other parts of the argument, like rapid cultural change brought about by large influx of immigrants, abuse of the asylum system and rule of law concerns.

                The study cited above dealt with the economic factors previously discussed. It didn't discuss cultural or asylum or legal issues. Frankly Zeb, it is a bit unfair to accuse me of "ignoring" an argument that isn't germane to the conversation.

            2. TJJ2000   2 months ago

              So you'll let us know when the immigrating population stops voting 80%+ for the [D]emon-sh*T ?free? handouts and stops taking 2/3rds of the welfare then right?

              What you described really does fit 80% of current immigration.
              20% it doesn't. And thus why filtering (border-control) *IS* important.

          3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Increasing the supply of anything lowers the price... EXCEPT FOR LABOR!

            Well this must be true, otherwise an increasing population would cause ever-decreasing wages.

            Perhaps human laborers are also consumers thus on average increase supply and demand resulting in a net zero has something to do with it.

            1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

              Enter the pollution. Gov-Guns doesn't barter on supply and demand.
              Unless you're talking about life itself.
              Immigrants pushing for [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] *is* the problem.

        2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          Tell me you don't understand how labor markets work without saying 'I don't understand how labor markets work.'

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Okay, so explain how the analysis above is incorrect. If you can.

        3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Tell me you have never ran a business or made payroll or dealt with gov't regulations without telling me.

          I'd bet you are a librarian in a town of less than 10K.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            What does my personal experience have to do with the topic of conversation here?

            "Tell me you have never met an illegal immigrant before commenting on how you think they should all be deported."

            Funny how that type of argument never seems to work when leveled at your team.

            1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

              LOL... Oh I'm sure Idaho-Bob has met hundreds of immigrants.
              As-if the USA didn't allow any immigration.
              FFS; It has more immigration than any other larger nation in the world.

              Are you going to claim your 1500sqft house is way too small and violates your ?free? sh*T right-to-invade your neighbors 1800sqft home too?

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Pedojeffy is nust an ignirant communist retard.

        Doesn't realize housing costs are a large percent of income.

        Tries to get ahead if the story, looks even more retarded.

    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      without significant declines in local wages.

      Ahaha... AHAHAHA! AHAHAHAAAAA!

      It's happening, but it's not as bad as you say.

      Keep being you.

      1. Ron   2 months ago

        so there was a decline but inflation ate that up due to the increase in housing cost and government stupidity

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        This commenter is of two minds observing such shameless selective nuance.

        Wait, no I’m not…..

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      And the ones that aren't "workers"? Their children?

      Also this seems like a bit of motte and bailey. You start with the housing cost increases but then argue wages.

      I need to remember to redo my mute list...

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        They also argue that in a family of illegals, if they have a baby "citizen', NONE of the illegals are on welfare. Just that baby of theirs. Because that is legitimate and all.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          This is a strawman. No serious person claims this.

          What is the problem, however, is to claim that if the American citizen child of illegal immigrant parents receives a free school lunch, that the ENTIRE household is "on welfare" and it should be attributed to "illegals". That is the dishonest statistical game that the CIS folks like to play.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            YOU do, for fuck's sake. You may not realize it --- never said you were bright --- but almost all of the "illegals do not get welfare benefits" are based on PRECISELY what I laid out.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              No serious person, including me, claims that just because an illegal immigrant couple has an American citizen child, then that must automatically mean that couple is on welfare. That is just bullshit.

              What you and your team love to do, is to claim that if that American citizen gets free lunch at school, then the entire household must be labeled as "ON WELFARE" no different than if they were all sitting around unemployed on SNAP benefits. That is the dishonest part.

              1. damikesc   2 months ago

                No. You believe that if a family of 5 illegals with one child is on welfare, then illegals are NOT on welfare, the baby alone is. Which is laughable.

    4. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      "I'm sure Jesse et al will be along shortly to tell us all breathlessly about the latest study from the Federal Reserve that tells us that illegal immigration drove up housing prices."

      Its simple supply and demand. Illegals are known to live in houses. 8-10 million extra illegals in the country in 4 years.

      They are in the housing market, often getting subsidized govt loans.

      Is this hard for you? Is econ 101 too much?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        He still denies the 120B a year in costs. Ignores they are on welfare. Ignores they get extra welfare from anchor babies to cover the family. Ignores they commit crimes costing money and lives.

        He is an open border Marxist.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Oh do truly fuck off. You are the king of "narrative over facts" around here.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        If you actually look at the study, you will see that the main issue was the barrier to creating more housing. It would have been the same problem if the migration had been due to native-born citizens. So it is not some unique problem due to illegal immigration. The problem is too restrictive of housing policy.

      3. charliehall   2 months ago

        "8-10 million extra illegals "

        Asylum applicants aren't illegals.

    5. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      “I’m sure Jesse et al will be along shortly….”

      So good of you to get out in front of that, you obsessed little douchebag.

      Lol. Good lord dude, what the fuck is wrong with you?

    6. charliehall   2 months ago

      MAGA can't decide whether NYC's biggest problem is a loss of population or a population boom. Its losers who will never live in the Greatest City in the World can't get their resentful narrative consistent.

  12. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are Catholic. So are more than a third of the members of [Donald] Trump's second-term Cabinet

    It'd be nice if we could get a Catholic Pope again.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Idiot. All the Popes have been Catholic.

      A lot of the "traditionalists" are upset that John XXIII was the first Pope since Clement VII not to be an anti-Semite. Nor were his six successors. Anti-Semitism is no longer Catholic dogma and the Jew haters are losing their minds -- and their faith.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        “Idiot. All the popes have been Catholic.”

        Whoosh! Lol. Double whoosh! Hilarious.

        By the way, my iPhone didn’t auto capitalize catholic. It sure did with Muslim though. And Islam. Huh.

  13. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Reeeason's take on me too:

    Christine Blasey Ford - credible
    E. Jean Carroll - credible
    Lyndsey Fifield - not credible
    Jenny Racicot - credible

    Wonder what the (D)ifference is between a credible accusation and a right-wing political attack?

    1. See.More   2 months ago

      I am old enough to remember # as the pound symbol. Thus, #MeToo takes on a whole other meaning...

  14. BYODB   2 months ago


    one of the reasons I didn't come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person….

    So, she didn't want to tank his campaign because she agrees with his politics even though he 'raped her'.

    Almost unbelievable. What an insane thing for her to say out loud.

    Also, while we're on the subject, I'm pretty sure the old guard Democrats nuked him from orbit as some kind of warning against the other DSA upstarts.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      "I didn't want to turn in the muslim rape gangs because that could lead to islamaphobia."

      They fucking deserve it.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15498367/Anna-Krauthamer-rape-essay-prison-abolitionist.html

        A Columbia PhD candidate sparked widespread backlash after revealing she chose not to report her rape because of her stark prison abolitionist views.

        Anna Krauthamer published an essay titled 'Why I Didn’t Report My Rape,' explaining why she did not alert authorities to her 2021 sexual assault after she was gang raped in Las Vegas.

        Krauthamer, a self-proclaimed 'staunch prison abolition activist', said she did not report the assault because she wished it had never happened and believed imprisoning the abusers would do nothing for her.

        'The prospect of being a participant in other peoples’ incarceration is as alien to me as anything could be,' she wrote.

        'How silly and strange it would be to have a group of people incarcerated at my expense when doing so would do nothing to fix the damage they have already so thoroughly done.'

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          It's why I have few qualms taking the very unpopular stance that any rapes that person does from then onwards is partially on HER head. SHE could have stopped them but she opted not to.

          1. BYODB   2 months ago

            It shouldn't be unpopular, it has the benefit of being true. Funny how rarely that counts though.

            On the plus side, if anyone wants to rape someone they have a free pass on that individual. What an insane thing to say out loud to many would-be rapists.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Secretly she wanted other women to be future victims as well.

        3. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

          She's essentially volunteering to be their rapee. But I wouldn't imagine they'd want a willing victim.

        4. mad.casual   2 months ago

          Sounds like a bunch of shit that didn't happen.

          She had previously reported on rapes in the Congo and written articles about how the allegations of rape by Hamas soldiers was being exploited by the IDF.

          So, a rape journalist gets gang-raped in Vegas in the evening and checks out with her male colleagues in the morning and nobody says or notices anything? Alleges it happened (without evidence) counter-factually beyond the statute of limitations and then goes on to talk about the reactionary or counter-weaponization of rape allegations by "empires"?

          Can't flush that turd hard or fast enough.

        5. Marshal   2 months ago

          There's at least a ten percent chance something she wrote is true.

    2. damikesc   2 months ago

      European women did try to avoid protesting rapes by migrants for political reasons. Progressive women are the most afflicted with suicidal empathy.

      "Yes, all of those guys raped me. But think of the BACKLASH if this got out..."

      1. rswallen   2 months ago

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMyKGNy3CI4

    3. charliehall   2 months ago

      Would that the Old Guard Dems did that everywhere. We did where I live. Ritchie Torres got 72% of the vote.

  15. Rick James   2 months ago

    faced the most serious allegations yet: that he had raped a woman.

    *eyeroll*

    This appears to simply be another case of herpetologist's handshake. Knowing how the DNC works, I'm not sure I even believe the allegations. However, the veracity of the accusations aren't even the interesting part.

    Democrats: Always are able to deliver a mysterious 11th hour rape allegation.

    Democrats: If the rape allegation is leveled at them, Democrats are able to look past it.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      My conspiracy theory - the DNC won't back a candidate or help fund them unless they have raped someone or are a pedophile. Having murdered someone would be a qualification as well. This is a prerequisite. They need this kind of leverage so they can control the candidate and get rid of them if they ever step out of line.

      1. middlefinger   2 months ago

        The biggest mystery is the Cuomo thing? He was promised the presidency and was taken out. Maybe he wasn’t into one of the top five?

        The litmus test is federal property taxes, federal public housing projects, seizing assets, sterilization of children, male rapists in women’s locker rooms and prisons.

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          I think Cuomo was terrible - just not the right kind of terrible.

          40 years ago all they seemed care about was abortions and gay sex.

      2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        That used to be the purpose of secret societies like Skull and Bones. Get the details of young men's sordid secrets on record so they can safely be groomed for high positions.

      3. charliehall   2 months ago

        Trump has actually ordered murders and MAGA thinks that is a good thing.

        ICE has murdered Americans and MAGA thinks that is a good thing.

        Can the hypocrisy.

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          Neither party will tolerate a candidate for president unless they have been to Bohemian Grove and done some gay stuff.

  16. Rick James   2 months ago

    "he got the message," she said, but "half an hour later, I heard a noise outside my door and then he came in. He just came into my house. It was unlocked." Platner "jumped on top of" her while she was lying on the couch and "indicated that he had intentions that were sexual in nature," Racicot added.

    Incredible!

  17. Rick James   2 months ago

    Racicot told Politico that "one of the reasons I didn't come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person….

    This is the most DNC story... ever.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Oh, and fuck off. Do you no longer "support his politics" enough to continue to be quiet?

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        I wonder if a guy yelled "BLACK LIVES MATTER" before raping her if she would even be upset about it.

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Or "ALLAH AKBAR!"

  18. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "And generations of bitter experience taught Harrington and his allies that socialist organizations had failed because they allowed communists to infiltrate them and take control of their organizing structures."

    Maybe because "Democratic Socialists" are, in the end, no different from Communists and that ideology is a cult that can brook no dissent or tolerance. It is naturally authoritarian.

    1. Marshal   2 months ago

      The Road to Serfdom applies. Every effort to control the population will fail, and to a socialist every failure justifies a stronger measure of control. They try making medical premiums tax free but they can't get full coverage. So they try Obamacare and mandate it but costs increase instead of decrease. Now they want Medicare for all. Once the government is paying for everyone the creep will continue on costs to taxpayers.

      Socialists who think they reject communism are fantasists.

  19. Rick James   2 months ago

    The sexual assault accusations against Graham Platner by Jenny Racicot are really quite severe. She says that he entered her home in a blackout state after she had definitively told him not to come. Then he forced himself on her. She cut off all contact afterward.

    Barging into someone else's house really puts this in a different category. It doesn't leave room for mixed messages about given or withdrawn consent or something like that.

    I love the media's 'take' on these types of allegations.

    "A story someone told is gravely serious! If it happened"

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      They only question IF it happened if the target of the accusation is a Democrat.

      As we saw with Kavanaugh --- no allegation is flimsy enough to question it if a conservative is involved.

  20. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "By most measures, the Catholic Church is becoming less of a force in American life. Revelations of sexual abuse and official cover-up have taken a toll at dioceses around the country..."

    Yet there are equal, if not greater, abuses in the public school system which do not that kind of play in the media. Almost, as if, there were demoralization psyops directed at the Catholic Church.

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      They did the same thing to the Boy Scouts.

  21. Rick James   2 months ago

    Fifield, for her part, spoke with The New York Times, serving as a source for a big piece on Platner's history of domestic abuse. Fifield—who is conservative—was unhappy with the way Times journalists portrayed her, and the lack of due diligence she claims they did when she was highly cooperative in helping them corroborate her story.

    This whole thing is a mobius strip of DNC skullduggery. Platner, a Democrat is being accused by Democrats ( as always) of sexual malfeasance. A story, being written by Democrats (the New York Times) who are notorious for fucking with story narratives and not practicing basic due diligence when dealing with 'conservatives', when the allegation is by Democrats.

    1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      He does seem like a shitbag of a human, but I will say this had "blasey ford" written all over it.

      Not because he or his story are in any way comparable to Kavanaugh, who was clean as a whistle, but because of the timing. They need this seat, and they think they are about to lose it, and then all of a sudden, poof, here comes a 'credible accuser'.

      Again, its 10000x more likely Platner, a piece of human garbage, did this to a woman than Kavanaugh assaulting someone, absolutely. But the timing is way too reminiscent.

      Why now? Not when the initial Nazi tattoo came out, not when all the other allegations of weird sex stuff, not with allegations of talking about rape and jerking off in weird places: no, it happened when it looked like from polling that they were going to lose the seat.

  22. Rick James   2 months ago

    Platner's trainwreck of a campaign is an incredible wealth of data because it shows us exactly where the Democrat establishment line of tolerance is:

    ------ACCEPTABLE-------

    - describing self as a communist
    - being a fake working class nepo baby
    - ACAB comments
    - fantasizing about rape
    - having a shirtless Kik account
    - cheating on wife multiple times
    - having a literal Nazi tattoo
    - physically and emotionally abusing a conservative woman

    ------UNACCEPTABLE-------

    - sexually assaulting a liberal woman

    Jury's still out on that last one, holmes.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      I think the only unacceptable thing here to Democrats is sinking in the polls. They'd be fine with dozens of documented rapes if he polled well.

      1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

        If he polled well we would be hearing about how this woman is a Russian plant, just like Tara Reid

        1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

          Hell, if you poll well enough you can trap a woman underwater and abandon her then be lionized by Democrats for decades.

  23. Rick James   2 months ago

    He believed that a commitment to freedom of speech, elections, and other democratic norms was an absolute requirement for any socialist organization. And generations of bitter experience taught Harrington and his allies that socialist organizations had failed because they allowed communists to infiltrate them and take control of their organizing structures."

    *eyeroll*

    The Democratic party at nearly every level has always flirted with, been apologetic to, or been downright sympathetic with Marxism pretty much all of my life. Sure, maybe back in the JFK years they made some overtures about rejecting communists... but that was before my time, and even then I suspect it was partially for optics.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Ya know, I have to hand it to you guys. You all have managed to convince a very large number of people that "Marxism" and "Communism" means stuff that would be considered centrist or center-left positions virtually everywhere else.

      I guess it is pointless to discuss what actual Marxism or actual communism is, since we live in a post-truth postmodern world now. Apparently now, giving kids free school lunches is "literal communism" and must be resisted as fiercely as America resisted the Soviets in the 1980s.

      I don't think any of us are going to like where this post-modernist crap ends up. When "patriotism" means "being a Republican", and "communism" means "being a Democrat", where do you think this type of thinking will naturally lead?

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Lynching blacks was centrist in the Democrat South of the 1940's, Yes, noticing a problem others have no problems with shows that the person noticing is the bad one.

        "Sure, Saudi Arabia will lock girls in burning schools if they are not dressed modestly enough. It is not a problem because most of that part of the world agrees" --- chemjeff

      2. See.More   2 months ago

        [...]Apparently now, giving kids free school lunches is "literal communism"[...]

        Something... something... "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"... something...

        Hmmm. Walks like a duck. Quacks like a duck.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          If you are going to go to the mat and insist that free school lunches must be resisted as fiercely as Soviet Communism, then fine. I guess you are going to war against about 70% of the population then.

          1. See.More   2 months ago

            Funny how you respond to something I never wrote. I merely, tongue-in-cheek, confirmed the "communist" adjective for free school lunches. That, you ignore.

            Instead, you reply to a response to "[...]and must be resisted[...]" that I never made; you completely imagined it. Your strawman game is as strong as ever!!

            +5 points for consistency
            -5 points for abject stupidity

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              What I initially wrote:

              Apparently now, giving kids free school lunches is "literal communism" and must be resisted as fiercely as America resisted the Soviets in the 1980s.

              -10 points for your reading comprehension

              1. See.More   2 months ago

                What I initially wrote:

                Apparently now, giving kids free school lunches is "literal communism" and must be resisted as fiercely as America resisted the Soviets in the 1980s.

                -10 points for your reading comprehension

                What I replied to: "[...]Apparently now, giving kids free school lunches is "literal communism"[...]"

                I only replied to the first half of your sentence. You failed to comprehend that and, instead, hallucinated a response to the second half of the sentence..

                At least you remain consistent in your strawman stupidity.

          2. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

            And here, once again, we have the "radical individualist" once again proving he is a typical collectivist. Unless by radical he means "180 degrees from".

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              I'm not *defending* free school lunches. I'm saying that it's not "literal communism" that must be resisted like Soviet communism. That's the difference.

      3. Marshal   2 months ago

        When "patriotism" means "being a Republican", and "communism" means "being a Democrat", where do you think this type of thinking will naturally lead?

        I see we're getting fake Jeffey again. Real Jeffey asserts Republicans and anyone to his right is racist, so he has no problem with fomenting hate by party. It's a bit much he abstracts that to where this "type of thinking" leads without considering himself, you'd think spelling it out that clearly would make it too obvious for even him to miss.

        But then left wingers have never applied to themselves the standards they believe justify hatred of others. And Jeffey has always been particularly clueless.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      I was in a waiting room the other day, and the TV was tuned to Fox Business (I think). The commentator there was talking about some story involving some Democrat, but he made it a point to use the phrase "hard left" over and over and over again. Asking questions like, "Do you think the American people would accept such a hard left policy?" or, turning to his co-host, "What do you think the result of electing such a hard-left candidate will be?" It was as if he is making a deliberate point to AVOID talking about policies or substance, and all he's trying to do is associate "Democrat" with "Hard Left" as often and as frequently as he can.

      I just find this all morbidly fascinating. I don't know how we are all going to survive this age where everything and every issue comes down to tribe and identity.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Why is "Far left" so shocking for you? Because the media NEVER uses that term to discuss guys like Mamdani? Has ANY DSA candidate been called "far left" by the Times? NBC? CBS? ABC?

        Democrats have gone VERY Left in the last few years. I know you AGREE with them so it is not an issue, but it is reality.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

          Its shocking because propaganda works really well on midwit intellects. Jeff is absolutely the target of Maddow/MSNBC talking points for people with college degrees that let them accuse education for intelligence.

          They refer to everyone right of Romney as ultra-MAGA or Far Right! They refer to out and out leninist/marxists as 'democratic socialists'.

          To someone who has little ability to take a step back, he sees "far right" everywhere, and almost never sees far left. The propaganda worked perfectly on him.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            At the time., they referred to Romney as Far Right. They referred to McCain as Far Right.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              They referred to Romney as The American Taliban which shows to them his believing in god is the same as Muslims murdering women for wanting to date outside their religion.

              They are shit people.

              1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                Isn’t that the guy who was “gonna put y’all back in chains”?

                Man, good thing we dodged that bullet. And stopped the rising of the seas to boot.

      2. Marshal   2 months ago

        Notice Jeffey doesn't identify the policy, he implies it's wrongly identified but provides no evidence.

        But in the real world socialism is a far left policy which is accompanied by massive death tolls.

    3. charliehall   2 months ago

      Nonsense.

      And communism isn't a threat to anyone outside of North Korea today.

  24. middlefinger   2 months ago

    The Democrat Party rehabilitation propaganda continues. It’s not like Ro Khanna wants to seize assets or anything- nothing to see here, he’s definitely NOT a communist.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      It is Trump who is taking over private businesses.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        LOL... 10%.
        Now tell us about Amtrak that was fully taken over by [D]emon-sh*Ts.
        Or does your 'alarming' only work on one single person?

  25. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Update from the front lines of the Stupidest War Ever:

    Three tankers hit in latest attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, British military says

    https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-israel-war-oil-4732228810c9839a1258309ad43b8289

    They were trying to use a route through the Strait that wasn't the Iranian-approved one.

    Congratulations to Team Trump for giving Iran even more power over the global economy than they had before!

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      "Maybe the crocodile will eat me last!" --- chemjeff

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      I predicted a week Trump attacked Iran that no good would come from it and I was right.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        LOL... Iran attacks British ships .... It's ALL TRUMPS FAULT! /s
        Are you seriously so TDS insane you can't see how stupid that is?

  26. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

    Defining image’ of America? Picture of Black woman surrounded by white supremacist group in DC on July 4 goes viral

    https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/patriot-front-dc-protest-viral-photo-b3009291.html

    Dude, I love all of these. Everywhere this is posted on social media its getting absolutely nuked from orbit with comments like "and then she arrived safely", "and she didnt die", "and she had a much better time than Iryna"

    People are fucking done with this shit. I dont care if they are an actual white nationalist group who like to march with their flags (while hurting literally no one), they are SPLC plants, or feds/CIA opp.

    The fact is this: you could be a black person in a bus surrounded by literal klansmen at this point and have a significantly higher statistical survival chance compared to a white person who asks a young black man to turn his music down please.

    People are noticing. Noticing is not good for the narrative.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      They could also point to the video of what she was doing shortly before they got on the bus.

      They did not seem to say a word to her --- but she did stop exposing herself. Not sure how that is a negative, but the press did not seem to approve.

      I am just impressed with how all of these news agencies were so well-versed on this group that nobody heard of before Sunday.

      Also, black men ALSO get murdered by black youth when asking them to stop talking on their phone on speakerphone.

      1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

        "They could also point to the video of what she was doing shortly before they got on the bus."

        I did see that but hadn't verified if it was AI or not yet. Even if its not true, the whole "this is America in 2026" bullshit is just getting a collective eye-roll and massively lambasted by every comments section.

        If that's your angle, its an objective improvement in every sense of the word. In the far past, a hate group would lynch or beat you with impunity. In the less far past, a black person would have had significantly less rights, be forced to the back of the bus of off the bus.

        Now? A 'hate group' if that's what it is, politely sits next to you and minds their business, you get to sit wherever you want, no one bothers you, and you go home safely and they go on to hurt noone. Again, as a non-black person, my risk is substantially higher if I walk through the hood than this girl had on maybe the safest train ride of her life.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Indeed.

      She wasn't stabbed in the neck repeatedly...
      She wasn't stabbed in the back...
      She wasn't pummeled in the face multiple times...
      She didn't have her hair ripped out while being screamed at...
      She wasn't raped on the train...
      She wasn't pushed off the platform onto the tracks...

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Hell, IF these guys were white nationalist, they did not do a very good job of it. I mean, she had a seat and all and you'd think that would not be the case.

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      I must say that for a White Supremacist organization, this photo, presumably on the same day if not the same subway car, is all kinds of interesting.

      Dude, I love all of these. Everywhere this is posted on social media its getting absolutely nuked from orbit with comments like "and then she arrived safely", "and she didnt die", "and she had a much better time than Iryna"

      It would be hilarious if that's the point. "Fucking USAID-funded White Supremacists, using public transportation in an orderly fashion without bugging anybody by doing anything other than existing! Instant Pulitzer. 100% deserving of journalism's top prize named after the (co-)creator of Yellow Journalism. America 2026."

  27. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

    - Platner is in the DSA adjacent crew that has recently been bucking the establishment dems and eating their lunch

    - He has had mounting mini scandals that are souring people on him slowly

    - Until recently he was popular enough that the establishment didnt have enough leverage to take him on without risk of embarrassment the likes of the recent mamdani et al elections, they didnt want the black eye

    - A rape allegation lets them tank his candidacy with enough 'he must resign' calls to push it over the edge, which they couldnt do otherwise

    Until proven otherwise, this is a DNC opp. I think its absolutely plausible that this mentally ill weirdo with a weird history and an alcoholic to boot, raped or assaulted a woman. But the timing is too cute by half, and this has DNC written all over it.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      If the DNC did it, good for them. Nazis and Nazi-adjacents are bad for America regardless of party.

  28. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Burn...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/why-don-t-these-left-wing-activists-want-a-migrant-camp-in-their-own-town/ar-AA27moG6

    Refugees Are Welcome Here. Left-wing activists love to chant this stirringly selfless slogan. There’s just one tiny thing that puzzles me.

    The Oxford branch of the group “Stand Up to Racism” has launched a petition, furiously opposing the Home Office’s plans to house 1,250 asylum seekers in a new camp near the charming Oxfordshire market town of Bicester.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Ah, they are laying out the Martha's Vineyard welcome mat.

  29. NoVaNick   2 months ago

    Since when as being a rapist disqualified a Democrat from office?
    - Bill Clinton
    -Joe Biden
    -Graham Platner

    Something tells me the dems have found a less problematic candidate.

    1. NoVaNick   2 months ago

      Or a candidate with, or who claims to have, a vagina.

  30. damikesc   2 months ago

    OT: Pfizer's former HQ Manhattan skyscraper in danger of collapse. 42d and 43d street near 2d avenue evacuated. Nearby buildings evacuated. Support beams buckling under stress.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      That is all anyone is talking about today in NYC. The developer has a long record of code violations and fines. Libertarians of course would repeal all building codes and if the buildings collapse, well, you should have had an engineer inspect every nearby building before moving in.

      1. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

        I think in this case, the developer was found to have done some "extra" excavation on site , and is at fault? Something about fined for unapproved cellar work ? I am at work and can't verify right now.

  31. damikesc   2 months ago

    Also, accuser of Platner in NYT rakes the Times over the coals for their claims they could not verify her claims, noting that she provided them multiple names of women who very much could verify her claims and they called exactly zero of them. One of the ones who could verify also said that she was never contacted by the Times and is not all that hard to find.

    The NYT ---- they are what you thought they were and, no, you do not hate them enough.

  32. Marshal   2 months ago

    You might take issue with his Nazi tattoo—a skull-and-crossbones design called a Totenkopf, that he got with other Marines in Croatia back in 2007,

    The left-media is pretending they didn't previously run all the assertions because they were not documented, but this element proves that's a lie. No one has ever corroborated that other Marines got the same tattoos with him yet that is constantly reported as fact. The left's operative principle is that any fact supportive of the left most person in any conflict is reportable, only facts negative to their position require proof.

  33. Marshal   2 months ago

    Platner can withdraw from the race anytime prior to July 13. The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to replace him on the ticket.

    This is not true. New Jersey had similar rules which were set aside when it became clear the Dem Senate candidate was going to lose. The fact is there are no election rules for Dems.

    Context of the Replacement:

    Incumbent Democratic Senator Robert Torricelli originally secured the Democratic nomination and spent most of the year running against Republican Doug Forrester. However, following a severe ethics scandal involving illegal campaign gifts, Torricelli's poll numbers plummeted. On September 30, 2002—just 36 days before the election—Torricelli abruptly dropped out of the race.

    The Legal Controversy:

    Republicans argued that replacing Torricelli at that stage was illegal because New Jersey election law explicitly barred political parties from changing candidates on the ballot fewer than 48 days before a general election.Despite the statutory deadline, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the Democrats, stating it was in the public interest to give voters a choice between both major parties on the printed ballot. The Democrats subsequently drafted retired former Senator Frank Lautenberg to take Torricelli's place. Forrester appealed the state court's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the high court declined to intervene, allowing the replacement to stand. Lautenberg went on to defeat Forrester in the November election.

  34. Marshal   2 months ago

    And generations of bitter experience taught Harrington and his allies that socialist organizations had failed because they allowed communists to infiltrate them and take control of their organizing structures.

    Eventually left wingers are going to have to grapple with the fact that their critics have been right all along. On communism, economics, race policy, education they fight the truth to the death, then admit those they hate the most were right all along (but still retain their hatred).

    Boy do I hate being right all the time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCeISa2TSa0

  35. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    FB feed now filling with posts like this one

    "Graham Platner is clearly a victim of lies by Trump allies, but it’s best if he drops out of the election now so that Main’s Democratic State Committee can pick a replacement candidate before their legal deadline. Picking a solid Bernie Sanders style Democratic Socialist candidate is the best path towards beating Susan Collins."

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Proof that the far left is as out of touch with reality as the far right. They think I am a Trump ally?

  36. Dick Gozinya   2 months ago

    Does anybody else find it ironic that a man who supposedly said he would rape an intruder to show he was dominant has now had his political career ended by a woman and is appearing in television ads dressed like Opie Taylor? Too funny.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

NYC Law Could Force Uber and Lyft to Keep Dangerous Drivers on the Road

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 9.5.2026 7:00 AM

The Iraq War Cheerleaders Were Wrong. They're Wrong About Iran Too.

Matthew Petti | From the October 2026 issue

A Federal Indictment Charges an ICE Officer With Lying About a Shooting That DHS Eagerly Defended

Jacob Sullum | 9.4.2026 5:00 PM

Texas Terrorism Law Chills Speech for Muslim Group

Ryan Curtis | 9.4.2026 4:25 PM

The Right to Trial is Vanishing. Could Bolder Juries Save It?

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.4.2026 4:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason