Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Self-Defense

Recent Shootings Are a Wake-Up Call To Take Responsibility for Your Own Defense

At best, the authorities will show up after the threat has already occurred.

J.D. Tuccille | 3.16.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Police gathered at the entrance to Old Dominion University, after a recent shooting. | Kendall Warner/TNS/Newscom
(Kendall Warner/TNS/Newscom)

My son spent last week training in defensive pistol use at Gunsite Academy, in Arizona. The scheduling couldn't have been timelier given the double terrorist attacks on Thursday. Both incidents were stopped by people at the scene who were willing and able to end the threat without waiting for police to arrive.

It's not something most of us want to think about. But if somebody decides to take out their grievances on innocents, any of us could become default defensive details for ourselves and the people around us.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Synagogue Guards 'Engage in a Gunfight' With Attacker

The attack on Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan, is an especially disturbing case since more than 100 children were attending school at the facility. The terrorist, a Lebanese immigrant named Ayman Ghazali, drove his incendiaries-laden truck into the synagogue and down the hallway where he was confronted by security.

"At approximately 12:20, Ghazali's vehicle gets jammed between hallway walls and he begins firing through the windshield of his vehicle," according to FBI Special Agent Jennifer Runyan, who described events during a press conference. "Ghazali and the first security officer engage in a gunfight through the rear window of Ghazali's vehicle. And at this point, Ghazali is unable to extract himself due to the vehicle being jammed in the hallway. At approximately 12:22 p.m., a second security officer engages Ghazali in a gunfight from the front of the vehicle. And soon thereafter, Ghazali's vehicle, his engine compartment catches on fire."

Under fire from defending synagogue guards, stuck in a burning truck, and undoubtedly aware he'd loaded the bed of his vehicle with commercial fireworks and gasoline, Ghazali ended the incident by shooting himself in the head.

Besides light injuries to the synagogue's director of security, Danny Phillips, and fire damage, Temple Israel got off relatively easily for the target of a terrorist attack. The same can't be said of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, where U.S. Army Lt. Col. Brandon A. Shah was killed by an attacker while teaching a Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) class. Two others were sent to the hospital with wounds. Fortunately, those on the scene prevented the situation from becoming worse.

A Terrorist Came Calling and Students 'Rendered Him No Longer Alive'

"There were students that were in that room that subdued him and rendered him no longer alive," FBI Special Agent Dominique Evans responded to a question about the incident. "I don't know how else to say it, but they basically were able to terminate the threat."

According to some reports, one ROTC student stabbed to death terrorist Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, presumably with a pocketknife, though pens and pencils will do in a pinch. Apparently, though it's not the recommended course of action, you can prevail with a knife in a gun fight.

Like synagogues across the United States, Temple Israel was prepared for an attack amidst a rising tide of antisemitism. Its staff conducted a training session with the FBI just weeks prior to the attack. The ROTC students probably were less worried about being targeted, but when targeted anyway, their mindset and preparedness were up to the challenge.

A Wave of Political Violence

Both Ghazali and Jalloh appear to have been Islamists. Ghazali's brother was reportedly a Hezbollah commander killed by an Israeli airstrike, so terrorism was something of a family trade. Jalloh was released from prison in December 2024 after serving time for attempting to provide material support to ISIS. He yelled "Allahu Akbar" as he launched the Old Dominion attack.

While violent crime overall has resumed its decades-long decline, political violence of various flavors is up across the country. On Friday, the Justice Department announced nine convictions in the prosecutions of Antifa members who shot up an ICE center last summer and wounded a police officer. Conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated in September. Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman (D–Brooklyn Park) and her husband, Mark, were murdered in an attack in which state Sen. John Hoffman (D–Champlin) and his wife, Yvette, were wounded. Luigi Mangione is currently being tried for, allegedly, the ideologically motivated murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Short of lethal consequences, a large number of mostly conservative figures have been targeted for harassment and swatting attacks. That's a very incomplete list of this country's ongoing problems with political violence.

Which is to say, it's a good time to take your own safety seriously. If something happens, police will no doubt show up, as they did in West Bloomfield and Norfolk, to investigate the crime. But dealing with the immediate threat is left to those who are there when it occurs.

'Armed Citizens to Defend and Protect Them'

"If my family were being attacked by bloodthirsty terrorists like those in Kenya or Paris, then I would want armed citizens to defend and protect them," former Interpol Secretary General Ron Noble, an American who previously worked in the U.S. Treasury and Justice Departments, concluded in 2016. He raised similar concerns during his term in office following the 2013 Westgate mall attack in Nairobi.

Unfortunately, not all authorities are open to people possessing the means to defend themselves. Old Dominion University bans weapons, including knives with blades over three inches long. That policy didn't stop Jalloh, who also illegally purchased the gun he used from another criminal. Despite the abject failure of policy and law, Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Ramin Fatehi called on lawmakers to pass tighter gun restrictions. He must be furious that ROTC students found the means to resist a terrorist.

But the students at Old Dominion University did successfully halt the attack on their class, as did the guards at Temple Israel. Likewise, parishioners and staff at Crosspointe Community Church in Wayne, Michigan, engaged and killed an armed attacker last June. And Elisjsha Dicken shot and killed a would-be mass murderer at Indiana's Greenwood Park Mall in 2022.

Hopefully, nobody else will ever again have to shoulder such responsibilities. But hope isn't a plan. Being ready and able to take on unpleasant situations should they arise offers a better chance for good outcomes.

My son is now better prepared for threats after his defensive pistol class, which follows over a decade of martial arts training. My wife and I graduated last year from that same pistol class, practice frequently, and we have another session scheduled through her synagogue with a private trainer.

They might mean us well, like the officers who responded to Temple Israel and Old Dominion University, or they could resent empowered members of the public, like the Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney, but government officials can't always be in place to defend us when malicious people attack. Whether we want it or not, we all must shoulder the responsibility for protecting ourselves and our loved ones.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Nuclear Power Regulators Scrap Rule Saying New Reactors Must Withstand 9/11-Style Plane Crashes

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Self-DefenseGunsMass ShootingsweaponsGun OwnersSecond AmendmentPoliceCivil Liberties
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (57)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. MasterThief   2 months ago

    Not one mention of Muslim or trans when those are the ideologies motivating almost all the recent mass shootings.
    Studiously ignoring the problem to offer a partially effective solution

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      IDK, 'Islamists... terrorism as family trade' is about as racist/religious/tribally (de)coded as I can recall hearing from Reason.

      I'm no fan of JD's but short of some incoherent, Yosemite Sam, Tourette's-style screed or overt call to violence, I don't know what else JD should write.

      1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

        So ignore the apparent motivations because God forbid somebody somewhere might be offended.

        My priority is the safety of myself and those for whom I am responsible; consideration for feelings is dead last.

        1. mad.casual   2 months ago

          So ignore the apparent motivations because God forbid somebody somewhere might be offended.

          This is pretty sarcasmic-style "English motherfucker, do you speak it?" retarded.

          1. mad.casual   2 months ago

            Ctrl+f "islam": 1 result.
            Ctrl+f "Alla": 1 result.
            Ctrl+f "antifa": 1 result.
            Ctrl+f "terror": 9 results.

            None of them very, if at all, apologetic or exculpatory... again, one even openly indicating the practice as family trade, to be sure.

            1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

              Well, do you speak it?

              1. mad.casual   2 months ago

                Would your feelings stop being hurt because I or JD didn't say *enough* mean words?

            2. Flaco   2 months ago

              Crtl+f "allahu akbar" (the scariest words in the English langugage): 1 result.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          "consideration for feelings is dead last"

          You terrible, mean colonizing patriarch! How dare you challenge people who want their feelings protected and emotional justice!

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Not ignoring. The left media continues their propaganda program. And the left idiots in their bubbles suck it up. Just ask any of them and they will tell you that (1) these attacks did not happen and (2) the attackers were alt-right Nazis with MAGA hats.

    3. Flagger   2 months ago

      Unfortunately, it’s impossible to pre-identify who is going to criminally misuse firearms. Painting with a broad brush (eg, trans people, people of specific religions, and "mentally ill" people) to avoid even a few bad actors slipping through results in many good actors being stripped of adequate defense.

    4. B G   2 months ago

      The only national news story that comes up on a google search for the Temple Israel attack is a CBS story about how a local restaurant sent pizzas, cookies and viataminwater to the location where all of the kids were taken to for their parents to come get them.

      The linked story identified the attacker by name, and that he's a "Lebanese born US Citizen" and that the vehicle was checked for IED type explosives "out of an abundance of caution". There's also some standard-issue mild condemnation from Gov Whitmer and some rep from CAIR.

      Hardly surprising that neither indecent got any significant traction with media more than 10 miles from the site of it. If the major outlets even know that either one happened, they're probably still "investigating the motives of the attack", just as they apparently still are for the San Bernardino shooting in 2015 where local cops wouldn't follow up on reports from neighbors about the shooters storing guns and making bombs in their garage because they didn't want to be seen as engaging in "racial profiling" (an offense worse than mass murder during the Obama administration). Oddly, nobody in the local media at the time hesitated to run with the initial description of the attacker as a "white male in a pickup truck" despite the shooting having been done by a married arab couple.

  2. 9f5c84a   2 months ago

    I understand the concept of defending myself on paper, but I’m worried that if everybody has guns and knives with them 24/7 I’d be even less safe. I used to frequent a nightclub that was in a rough part of town. A friend of mine who was an avid hunter and owned handguns as well told me he wouldn’t carry a gun when going to the nightclub. I asked him why and he told me he was afraid he might have to use it.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      I used to frequent a nightclub that was in a rough part of town.

      I carry a knife everywhere I go. The majority of people I know have. I assume everyone has at least a pen or the ability to sharpen a stick or break a piece of glass and stab people do death with it. They just don't.

      I'm more worried that I wake up in a world where everyone is constantly intellectually bludgeoned by retards who say stupid shit "I used to go to hootenanny's on the wrong side of the tracks..." rather than keeping their retardation to themselves.

      Imagine for a minute that "rough part of town" has nothing to do with guns and knives, dumbass.

      1. SRG2   2 months ago

        I carry a knife everywhere I go

        Do you ever enter a government building, or fly? It would seem not.

        Do you think that people should be permitted to carry weapons into courtrooms? To politicians' rallies?

        1. GroundTruth   2 months ago

          Yes, and this is bullshit.

          My pocket knife with a 3 inch blade is a tool. I guess I could use it in a fight if I were that sort, and I guess I would if I had to, but going down that line of logic leads to calling feet and hands "dangerous weapons" (but then, welcome to Massachusetts).

        2. Henweigh   2 months ago

          Yes, everywhere.
          Nowhere in the constitution does it say any infringements are allowed with respect to arms.

        3. jimc5499   2 months ago

          Until the late 2000's our County Courthouse had lockers in the foyer. You could walk in, lock your weapon in a locker with your own lock and then proceed through security into the Courthouse. A District Attorney from a certain Party got elected and that all went away. This same DA publicly stated that in her opinion there was no such thing as Self Defense. She stated that she would prosecute anyone claiming self defense no matter the situation.

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      Here’s some advice; if a venue has such a horrible reputation for violence, don’t go there.

      1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

        Exactly; those training classes include a lot of situational awareness discussion, and where not to go, and when to leave.

    3. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

      "I asked him why and he told me he was afraid he might have to use it."

      It's a good thing that this totally made-up anecdote never happened because it is one of the dumber things I have read.

    4. charliehall   2 months ago

      "he told me he was afraid he might have to use it."

      Guns in bars are a really Really REALLY bad idea. Bring one into a bar in NYC is a good way to get free room and board in a NY State prison.

      1. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

        "BUT CRIME IS DOWN!"

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        We must submit to the state!

      3. Grifhunter   2 months ago

        If the citizen in the bar isn't drinking, whats the problem? Said citizen might prevent their own demise at the hand of some sociopath or released violent felon?

      4. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        Where can you take one anywhere in NYC?

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

          Legally, I should say.

          Lots of guns in NYC.

      5. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        "'Guns in bars are a really Really REALLY bad idea."'

        Guns can be a bad idea at a protest if you think you are going to protect people from the feds.

    5. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Brother - everyone already has guns 24/7. They are *concealed*. That you can not see them does not mean they are not there.

    6. MK Ultra   2 months ago

      I kinda miss "City Gardens" in Jersey.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    And soon thereafter, Ghazali's vehicle, his engine compartment catches on fire."

    Who writes crap like this?

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Idiot AI, and idiot leftists.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Yes. "Jalloh was enjoying a peaceful drive down the synagogue hallway, when all of a sudden..."

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      It should be noted that he's quoting the FBI and, still, recommending people keep their powder dry.

      Beats the fuck out of the "Were they carrying membership cards?" we've gotten out of Reason for almost a decade.

    3. Agammamon   2 months ago

      More importantly, what are all of Reason's editors doing all day?

  4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'The ROTC students probably were less worried about being targeted, but when targeted anyway, their mindset and preparedness were up to the challenge.'

    Sure, more of that toxic masculinity. If only we could feminize the ROTC then poor Jalloh would still be enjoying his stroll around campus.

  5. charliehall   2 months ago

    More alarmist junk. The US has been getting much safer for several years. Homicides in NYC have dropped 41% this year alone, and many other cities have been experiencing similar drops.

    1. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

      While correlation does not equal causation, they seem to be in a pretty intense romantic relationship.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Meta-analysis: The more you say "correlation does not equal causation", the more likely it is that you don't understand statistics.

        The correlation between seat belts and traffic accidents is exceedingly weak.

        1. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

          You understand that I'm inferring that the drop is in part due to an increasingly-armed populace right?

          It's hard to tell here sometimes when there are so many idiots posting.

    2. Agammamon   2 months ago

      28 people have been killed in the last month of the Iran war.

      25 people have been murdered during the same period in Chicago.

      That it's not 50 means it is safer, not that it is safe.

    3. Grifhunter   2 months ago

      Caused at least in part because NYC is now into about year 2 of having to issue concealed carry permits post Bruen.

  6. mad.casual   2 months ago
  7. GroundTruth   2 months ago

    The title says it all; in the end, you and you alone are responsible for your own safety.

  8. Z Crazy   2 months ago

    This is a wakeup call to adopt Singapore-style justice.

  9. Grifhunter   2 months ago

    The leftist media and political class abhor citizen self defense for several reasons.

    1) It represents the autonomy and capability of the individual. Someone saving their families' lives with citizen self defense represents individual action, rather than the collective response to a serious life and death problem. Any kind of self defense, knife, gun, baton, etc., is a rejection of the exclusive need for agents of the state.

    2) The same implements that repel gang bangers, terrorists, and home invaders can theoretically repel an over-reaching, anti-constitutional government. It is, therefore, a threat to the state's desire to have the exclusive ability to make violence to impose state values and ensure complete power in the political leadership.

    3) Guns are fun, and anything fun with an element of risk is foreign to these beta's who spent their life amassing credentials, rather than experiences outdoors.

    4) They believe every criminal is a victim. Society let them down by not having enough school funding, taxpayer bought social programs, DEI, free mental health drugs, etc. Any prosecution of, or God forbid, violent reaction to these predators is just further societal bullying of these already "broken" individuals.

    1. Z Crazy   2 months ago


      4) They believe every criminal is a victim. Society let them down by not having enough school funding, taxpayer bought social programs, DEI, free mental health drugs, etc. Any prosecution of, or God forbid, violent reaction to these predators is just further societal bullying of these already "broken" individuals.

      Thjis last part's especially toxic. They feel criminals from Colonized Groups®™ should be excused for the crimes they commit against people.

      This is why the same people who say, "No One is Illegal on Stolen Land" also support mass migration into Europe.

      They hate white people because they blame white people for all the ills of the world. They feel white victims deserve it, especially when white girls are raped by men from Colonized Groups®™.

      White Girls Matter!

    2. GroundTruth   2 months ago

      1 and 2 are especially true.

      3 is just icing on the cake for the big government types... no one should be having fun.

      This also why they hate the personal car, it engenders too much freedom and pleasure.

  10. mtrueman   2 months ago

    Heart warming picture of Kim Jongun and his teenage daughter Kim Juae firing pistols.

    https://e3.365dm.com/26/03/2048x1152/skynews-kim-jong-un-kim-ju-ae_7189895.jpg?20260312103114

  11. car-keynes   2 months ago

    Quite clearly, now, Ghazali re-thought his position on using ammo safely.

  12. Rick James   2 months ago

    Both Ghazali and Jalloh appear to have been Islamists. Ghazali's brother was reportedly a Hezbollah commander killed by an Israeli airstrike, so terrorism was something of a family trade.

    *head snap* Whoa! So he wasn't a constitutional observer helping out a fellow protester.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      A family trade here, a tribal past time there, pretty soon you're talking about a seriously violent, totalitarian, religious enthnostate.

  13. mtrueman   2 months ago

    "Ghazali's brother was reportedly a Hezbollah commander killed by an Israeli airstrike, so terrorism was something of a family trade."

    Presumably some of his potential victims had relatives in Israel, direct participants in war crimes or their supporters.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      Hamas?

  14. jimc5499   2 months ago

    I took training when I first decided to carry. The first lesson taught was that if you were going to carry, carry. You had to get used to the weapon. You didn't want to be constantly shifting it, adjusting it because that was going to draw attention to you. You had to work things out, like how to use a public restroom and others. At that time the Instructor asked how many people lived in a house where all of the bedrooms were on the second floor? At that time, the Law was so convoluted that if you heard someone breaking into your house and you went downstairs, with a weapon and shot the burglar, even in self defense, you were going to jail. You provoked the confrontation. Thankfully the Law has since changed.

  15. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    Although being armed appropriately for self defense is certainly a factor, ultimately the most important thing when you happen to be in the area of an attack is your mental response - and only training and practice can achieve that. Yes, you want to be able to aim accurately. But avoiding panic, avoiding being caught in a position where you cannot respond, being willing to wait for the right moment and launching your counterattack with presence of mind are what will result in a dead criminal instead of a dead victim.

    1. docduracoat   2 months ago

      To MWA doc,
      Very well, said, I agree with every word.

      A laser on your gun allows you to shoot from unorthodox positions without having to bring the gun up to eye level.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Health Bureaucrats Are Undermining Confidence in Vaccines

Ronald Bailey | 5.7.2026 10:30 AM

Florida Wins the Curriculum Wars

Liz Wolfe | 5.7.2026 9:30 AM

11 Big SCOTUS Cases That Will Be Decided Soon

Damon Root | 5.7.2026 7:00 AM

Photo: Technology Is Bringing Lost Paintings Into the Public Eye

Fiona Harrigan | From the June 2026 issue

Brickbat: Tell Us Your Name

Charles Oliver | 5.7.2026 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks