Judge Orders Video and Texts Unsealed in Case of Chicago Woman Shot 5 Times by Border Patrol
The Department of Homeland Security won't stop calling Marimar Martinez a "domestic terrorist," so she's getting the video of her shooting and text messages from the officer who shot her unsealed.
A federal judge in Chicago today ordered evidence unsealed in the case of Marimar Martinez, a U.S. citizen who was shot five times by a Customs and Border Protection officer last October.
U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois Georgia Alexakis ruled that Martinez had shown good cause for the release of text messages and body camera footage from the officer who shot her, while the government had shown "zero concern" for Martinez's reputation.
Martinez's attorneys have been pressing to unseal the evidence because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) refuses to retract its previous statements calling Martinez a "domestic terrorist," despite federal prosecutors dropping the charges against her. If the government won't correct the record, they argued, Martinez should have the opportunity to do it herself.
Alexakis agreed. "Ms. Martinez is a United States citizen. She's a resident of this district. And under our legal system, she is presumed innocent of any offense of which she has not been convicted," the judge said at today's hearing.
Border Patrol officer Charles Exum shot Martinez five times on October 4 after a traffic incident in Chicago. Martinez says she was following the officers in her car and blowing her horn to warn others of their presence before the CBP vehicle sideswiped her. In a press release issued the same day as the shooting, DHS claimed that agents were "boxed in by 10 cars" when Martinez's vehicle "rammed" their car. Officers were forced to fire defensive shots, the government claimed, when "a suspect tried to run them over." The statement also said Martinez had a history of doxxing federal agents and was armed with a "semi-automatic weapon."
Martinez and a man in the car, Anthony Santos Ruiz, were charged with multiple counts of impeding and assaulting federal law enforcement officers with a deadly weapon.
However, Martinez's attorneys say the sealed body camera footage shows Martinez never rammed them, officers were never boxed in or obstructed (there were only two cars, not 10), and she never threatened officers with her car. What the sealed footage does show, Martinez's lawyers told the Chicago Sun-Times, is an agent saying, "Do something, bitch," shortly before crashing into Martinez.
Some of Exum's text messages regarding the shooting were released in November. In one, he sent a link to a news story about the shooting and wrote, "Read it. Five shots, seven holes. I fired five rounds and she had seven holes. Put that in your book, boys."
Later in November, federal prosecutors filed a motion to dismiss the charges and exonerate Martinez and Ruiz.
Despite that, the DHS has continued to attack Martinez in public statements. Following the dismissal of the case against her, the department told Chicago news outlet ABC7 that, "Border Patrol law enforcement officers were ambushed by domestic terrorists.…Our law enforcement shows incredible restraint and prudence in their exercise of force."
In a story published January 31, NPR asked the DHS if it had plans to delete or update its statements on Martinez. DHS responded: "Border Patrol law enforcement officers were ambushed by domestic terrorists that rammed federal agents with their vehicles. The woman, Marimar Martinez, driving one of the vehicles, was armed with a semi-automatic weapon and has a history of doxing federal agents."
Martinez's attorneys say she is a 30-year-old Montessori school teacher with a legal concealed carry license, and that the allegations of "doxxing" are false.
Martinez originally agreed to keep the materials in the case sealed, but she changed her mind after the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal immigration officers in Minnesota. The DHS Office of Public Affairs has repeatedly issued false statements about incidents regarding use-of-force incidents by immigration officers, including in the recent fatal shootings of Good and Pretti.
"I am their voice," Martinez said in an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times and WBEZ, "I am here for a reason."
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Chicago agreed to the release of body camera footage but argued against unsealing more of Exum's text messages. Lawyers for the U.S. government claimed in court filings that "the release of these messages after the charges against Ms. Martinez have been dismissed with prejudice will serve only to further sully Agent Exum, his family, and co-workers without any corresponding benefit to Ms. Martinez."
In a court filing in response, Martinez's attorneys said the irony of the government's sudden concern about ruining someone's reputation was "shocking."
"Agent Exum sent these messages in the minutes, hours, and days after the shooting. These are his words," the filing by Martinez's attorneys said. "To the extent they would 'sully' his reputation more than his previously disclosed disgusting text messages already have, it is a fully deserved self-imposed sullying. Marimar Martinez had no say in being branded as a 'domestic terrorist' by her government. The Government drafted those words. The Government sent those words out to the world. Unlike Exum, she never had a say in the things being written about her, as opposed to Exum having had full say in the things he chose to write and disseminate."
Alexakis denied Martinez's request to also unseal automated license plate reader data collected by the government during its investigation of her.
Rep. Jesús "Chuy" Garcia (D–Illinois) announced this week that Martinez would be his guest at President Donald Trump's State of the Union address to Congress later this month.
"Who knows? Maybe President Trump will even at that point retract the domestic terrorist label of her, which would be great and she would be there to see it," Christopher Parente, Martinez's attorney, told reporters outside a federal courthouse following the ruling.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Oh come on. Sure, Ms. Martinez was shot five times, sure she was accused of being a "domestic terrorist" even though no charges were filed against her, sure the government has been provably lying about her, but let's be real here - the brave ICE agents are the real victims here.
Should've, bare minimum, doubled the shots into her.
And let's just be plainly honest. Ms. Martinez is part of a domestic conspiracy to undermine America and so even if the government did *technically* treat her improperly, their motives were pure when the brave government agents shot her five times and lied about her. They were just doing their part to protect the homeland from domestic enemies such as her. Lesson to everyone - don't become a domestic enemy, support our brave heroic law enforcement officers, 1000% without question!
You're gonna fit in just great here.
Why would I believe lying leftist cunts looking to destroy the US? Same with plaintiff here, not just Reason writers.
"Officers were forced to fire defensive shots, the government claimed..." Hey, the Trump Bible said it, I believe it, that settles it! I'll lay 9 to 7 odds that's what the gICEtapo lawyer defending "our" heroic masked man says exactly that.
I must say, even with the Reason-standard one-sided reporting this whole story is hanky as fuck.
Even if you take it at face value, it's more incredible than the idea that the LAPD tried to frame OJ Simpson.
But, SSDD, play "Let's Make A Deal" enough times, you're *going* to win a goat.
Instead, Parente said, the FBI found only that Martinez had been driving around the city and suburbs going to Target, to a hobby store, and other places where “regular people go.” On the day she was shot, Martinez had been heading to her local church to donate clothes, he said.
So, out of nowhere and for no particular reason at all CBP agents sideswiped a random *armed* woman *in Chicago* on her way to donate clothing at the Church and put 5 rounds in her leaving 7 bullet holes? La Maggie? This woman? Who was doxxing this guy? Really?
I love how every Reason sob story is just a baby angel Aladdin (h/t ActualJusticeWarrior), doing stuff to feed their family or what have you.
None are actually in the wrong. Ever.
I was wondering why I hadn't heard of this case before now. So she was one of the stories of "protesters" ramming ICE vehicles.
Yeah, she's a domestic terrorist. I probably need to delve into the videos more, but it seems likely she is guilty and earned a bullet or two.
Reason loves defending their indefensible criminals.
I wouldn't even necessarily affirm (or deny) the "domestic terrorist" label. It seems a bit of a moot point. There seems to be a mistaken impression that it's anything other than "person of interest".
What is interesting is that the incident happened in October and the DOJ is willingly agreeing to release the footage *now*. Seems likely that, either specifically or in the round, the footage doesn't show what Parente and Martinez thinks it shows (and/or likely that one side or the other will selectively edit it for propaganda purposes).
There seems to be a mistaken impression that it's anything other than "person of interest".
I mean, we're up to, what, the 5th? 6th? Time federal prosecutors and State AGs have shown "zero concern" for a POTUS nominee's reputation, what makes Martinez so special?
These are "our" brave agents, sworn to uphold the Constitution--Bill of Rights and all. Sworn like Richard Nixon who violated the Constitution to sign treaties guaranteeing communist Russia could attack us unhampered by Anti-Ballistic-Missile defenses. This eliminated "potentially dangerous defensive competition" for us, then Ukraine--all in the spirit of love and trust thine enemy. Now ICE is showing voters how much trust "our" sworn, loyal gunmen have earned. Should Don sign another treasonous treaty to infringe our militia's right to keep and bear arms?
Somebody explain to our trained firearms-wielding math whiz how JFK was shot once in the throat, yet TWO HOLES resulted--the one in his back, called the "Exum wound" on the physician's diagram, was lower than the one in his throat. But the Republican theory is that a lone gunman--six stories up--shot Kennedy from behind and the bullet somehow looped upward to his tie knot. Feds kept local police from doing the required forensic investigation. Maybe ICE will say the medical examiner drilled extra holes in the lady with a Makita.
>Some of Exum's text messages regarding the shooting were released in November. In one, he sent a link to a news story about the shooting and wrote, "Read it. Five shots, seven holes. I fired five rounds and she had seven holes. Put that in your book, boys."
I mean, this looks bad. 5 shots, 7 holes, and she still lived. That makes her look badass and the cop a pussy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MslWQDRMSqo
I mean, this looks bad. 5 shots, 7 holes, and she still lived.
If he's standing at the door as she pulls away, sure. Otherwise, five shots and seven holes isn't really terrible (PBUH). Considering she drove herself to the hospital, it sounds more like the linked demonstration.