Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

Josh Shapiro Goes to War With Kamala Harris

Plus: Why apologize for hating on Jasmine Crockett?

Robby Soave | 1.22.2026 3:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Josh Shapiro | Bastiaan Slabbers/Sipa USA/Newscom
Josh Shapiro (Bastiaan Slabbers/Sipa USA/Newscom)

When former Vice President Kamala Harris passed over Josh Shapiro—the popular governor of the must-win state of Pennsylvania—in favor of perpetually befuddled (and subsequently scandal-plagued) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to join her presidential ticket, many assumed there was bad blood between the two. And that certainly appears to be the case: In his new book, Shapiro side-eyes the Harris campaign for seeking to relegate him to the role of extreme junior partner, insisting that he walk back certain policy statements, and asking whether he was an Israeli double agent.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This last issue generated significant coverage on social media this week. The mainstream media treated it as big news. Some Democrats expressed frustration with Team Harris and suggested that the question was inappropriate. In grilling Shapiro—who is notably Jewish, and who was the victim of an arson attack during Passover—on his views regarding Israel, Harris' people were implicitly playing into the noxious stereotype that Jews are more loyal to the state of Israel than to the United States. Shapiro himself seemed to feel this way about the question: He writes in the book that he was offended by the line of inquiry, and told the Harris campaign as much.

As I wrote in response on X, I like Shapiro much more than Harris' other potential veeps; indeed, I like him much more than I like Harris. It's crystal clear she should have picked him instead of the uninspiring Walz.

Yet it does not seem to me like these questions should have been deemed unreasonable. If Shapiro were merely asked about his ties to Israel because he is Jewish, then yes, that would have been scandalous. But Shapiro also spent five months living and studying in Israel during his college years, which included volunteering with the Israeli Army, according to The New York Times. Shapiro has subsequently claimed that this involved service projects on a military base: He did not perform military duties or activities.

There is nothing wrong with any of that, but in an election that involved Israel as a significant wedge issue for the Democratic coalition, Shapiro could have expected questions about it from voters and the media. It seems odd, then, for him to take umbrage with the Harris campaign for due diligence. The campaign also asked Walz about his ties to China, which were far more extensive. In retrospect, they should have looked more closely at his actual record of governance in Minnesota, which has not aged well.

Harris doesn't seem to generate very much positive media coverage these days: A typical, recent profile of her in Politico essentially makes the point that there isn't a particular constituency clamoring for her to return to politics, even though she appears determined to make another go of it. If anything, it's Shapiro who now generates glowing mentions: See this profile of him from The Atlantic in December. It begins: "It is a rare thing to see Josh Shapiro sweat." If that's true, then he shouldn't take offense at being asked about his time abroad.


In Other Shapiro News…

Another Shapiro moment that caught my eye: After Shapiro criticized Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the official HHS X account unleashed on him for having "forced masks on babies and toddlers" during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Josh Shapiro forced masks on babies and toddlers. https://t.co/m6Ddo7j4fG pic.twitter.com/1lPZ5SuZ1d

— HHS Rapid Response (@HHSResponse) January 22, 2026

There's just one problem: Shapiro was not the governor during the COVID-19 pandemic. He took office in 2023.

That tweet referenced and screenshotted by HHS was not written by Shapiro, but rather by his predecessor, former Gov. Tom Wolf, from the official governor of Pennsylvania social media account. When a new governor assumes the position, he inherits the account, and the little profile icon changes. If a Republican were eventually elected governor of Pennsylvania, you could make it look like he had written in favor of masking toddlers, too.

This can produce some pretty amusing results. Glenn Greenwald called attention to this old X post from former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio that now looks like it was written by Mayor Zohran Mamdani:

That Zohran took over the @NYCMayor account without deleting all of the old tweets from Eric Adams and Bill De Blasio, or doing anything else to prevent old tweets from appearing under his name, will be a never-ending source of confusion (and amusement): https://t.co/r609R5ofxm

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 8, 2026


Too Late To Apologize

I ran out of time to turn in this newsletter the last two weeks—and I apologize for that!—so I am late weighing in on this: Two left-of-center comedians issued groveling apologies after (correctly) pointing out that Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D–Texas) is not going to win the Texas Senate race and Democrats would be better off spending their money elsewhere.

Matt Rogers: "Don't waste your money sending to Jasmine Crockett."

Bowen Yang: "I must agree." pic.twitter.com/ljM5dVaoVJ

— Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) January 8, 2026

"I have great respect and admiration for Rep. Crockett, and I regret that my words suggested otherwise," said Matt Rogers in a statement. "I just want us to win and I will be better at finding ways to help."

He had it right the first time, and in any case, there was zero reason to apologize for slagging Crockett. I suspect the reason he did so was because he faced pushback from online progressives along the lines of How dare he criticize a black woman! Of course, he did not criticize her because he harbors racism or sexism; he criticized her because she is a thoroughly unimpressive and gaffe-prone candidate who is obviously far less likely to win a general election in Texas—a red state—than her opponent, James Talarico. Remember when she accused Republican opponents of taking money from Jeffrey Epstein…but it was a different Jeffrey Epstein?


This Week on Free Media

I am joined by Amber Duke to discuss the news of the week.

Also, are you watching Freed Up, my new show with Christian Britschgi? It's taking the world by storm!


Worth Watching

Many people have asked for an update on my fantasy novel, so here it is: It's coming along! Obviously I missed my self-imposed, very aggressive deadline of January 1. Nevertheless, I have completed about two-thirds of it, maybe more. A third of that is in really good shape and only requires minimal editing, and another third is done but needs serious revision. The last third is still being written. My new plan is to finish by the end of next month. That's probably a bit ambitious, but progress is progress.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The GOP Looks Increasingly Like a Home for Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismPoliticsIsraelCancel Culture
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (8)

Latest

The FDA's Hands-Off Approach to Medical AI Is a Win for Health-Conscious Consumers

Alexandra Stinson | 1.22.2026 4:35 PM

Uvalde Cop's Acquittal Shows Why It's Hard To Criminalize Failing To Stop a Mass Shooting

Jacob Sullum | 1.22.2026 4:20 PM

The Greenland Fiasco Shows the Stock Market Is the Ultimate Check on Trump

Jack Nicastro | 1.22.2026 3:47 PM

Josh Shapiro Goes to War With Kamala Harris

Robby Soave | 1.22.2026 3:20 PM

The GOP Looks Increasingly Like a Home for Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders

Veronique de Rugy | 1.22.2026 2:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks