Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

Josh Shapiro Goes to War With Kamala Harris

Plus: Why apologize for hating on Jasmine Crockett?

Robby Soave | 1.22.2026 3:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Josh Shapiro | Bastiaan Slabbers/Sipa USA/Newscom
Josh Shapiro (Bastiaan Slabbers/Sipa USA/Newscom)

When former Vice President Kamala Harris passed over Josh Shapiro—the popular governor of the must-win state of Pennsylvania—in favor of perpetually befuddled (and subsequently scandal-plagued) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to join her presidential ticket, many assumed there was bad blood between the two. And that certainly appears to be the case: In his new book, Shapiro side-eyes the Harris campaign for seeking to relegate him to the role of extreme junior partner, insisting that he walk back certain policy statements, and asking whether he was an Israeli double agent.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This last issue generated significant coverage on social media this week. The mainstream media treated it as big news. Some Democrats expressed frustration with Team Harris and suggested that the question was inappropriate. In grilling Shapiro—who is notably Jewish, and who was the victim of an arson attack during Passover—on his views regarding Israel, Harris' people were implicitly playing into the noxious stereotype that Jews are more loyal to the state of Israel than to the United States. Shapiro himself seemed to feel this way about the question: He writes in the book that he was offended by the line of inquiry, and told the Harris campaign as much.

As I wrote in response on X, I like Shapiro much more than Harris' other potential veeps; indeed, I like him much more than I like Harris. It's crystal clear she should have picked him instead of the uninspiring Walz.

Yet it does not seem to me like these questions should have been deemed unreasonable. If Shapiro were merely asked about his ties to Israel because he is Jewish, then yes, that would have been scandalous. But Shapiro also spent five months living and studying in Israel during his college years, which included volunteering with the Israeli Army, according to The New York Times. Shapiro has subsequently claimed that this involved service projects on a military base: He did not perform military duties or activities.

There is nothing wrong with any of that, but in an election that involved Israel as a significant wedge issue for the Democratic coalition, Shapiro could have expected questions about it from voters and the media. It seems odd, then, for him to take umbrage with the Harris campaign for due diligence. The campaign also asked Walz about his ties to China, which were far more extensive. In retrospect, they should have looked more closely at his actual record of governance in Minnesota, which has not aged well.

Harris doesn't seem to generate very much positive media coverage these days: A typical, recent profile of her in Politico essentially makes the point that there isn't a particular constituency clamoring for her to return to politics, even though she appears determined to make another go of it. If anything, it's Shapiro who now generates glowing mentions: See this profile of him from The Atlantic in December. It begins: "It is a rare thing to see Josh Shapiro sweat." If that's true, then he shouldn't take offense at being asked about his time abroad.


In Other Shapiro News…

Another Shapiro moment that caught my eye: After Shapiro criticized Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the official HHS X account unleashed on him for having "forced masks on babies and toddlers" during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Josh Shapiro forced masks on babies and toddlers. https://t.co/m6Ddo7j4fG pic.twitter.com/1lPZ5SuZ1d

— HHS Rapid Response (@HHSResponse) January 22, 2026

There's just one problem: Shapiro was not the governor during the COVID-19 pandemic. He took office in 2023.

That tweet referenced and screenshotted by HHS was not written by Shapiro, but rather by his predecessor, former Gov. Tom Wolf, from the official governor of Pennsylvania social media account. When a new governor assumes the position, he inherits the account, and the little profile icon changes. If a Republican were eventually elected governor of Pennsylvania, you could make it look like he had written in favor of masking toddlers, too.

This can produce some pretty amusing results. Glenn Greenwald called attention to this old X post from former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio that now looks like it was written by Mayor Zohran Mamdani:

That Zohran took over the @NYCMayor account without deleting all of the old tweets from Eric Adams and Bill De Blasio, or doing anything else to prevent old tweets from appearing under his name, will be a never-ending source of confusion (and amusement): https://t.co/r609R5ofxm

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 8, 2026


Too Late To Apologize

I ran out of time to turn in this newsletter the last two weeks—and I apologize for that!—so I am late weighing in on this: Two left-of-center comedians issued groveling apologies after (correctly) pointing out that Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D–Texas) is not going to win the Texas Senate race and Democrats would be better off spending their money elsewhere.

Matt Rogers: "Don't waste your money sending to Jasmine Crockett."

Bowen Yang: "I must agree." pic.twitter.com/ljM5dVaoVJ

— Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) January 8, 2026

"I have great respect and admiration for Rep. Crockett, and I regret that my words suggested otherwise," said Matt Rogers in a statement. "I just want us to win and I will be better at finding ways to help."

He had it right the first time, and in any case, there was zero reason to apologize for slagging Crockett. I suspect the reason he did so was because he faced pushback from online progressives along the lines of How dare he criticize a black woman! Of course, he did not criticize her because he harbors racism or sexism; he criticized her because she is a thoroughly unimpressive and gaffe-prone candidate who is obviously far less likely to win a general election in Texas—a red state—than her opponent, James Talarico. Remember when she accused Republican opponents of taking money from Jeffrey Epstein…but it was a different Jeffrey Epstein?


This Week on Free Media

I am joined by Amber Duke to discuss the news of the week.

Also, are you watching Freed Up, my new show with Christian Britschgi? It's taking the world by storm!


Worth Watching

Many people have asked for an update on my fantasy novel, so here it is: It's coming along! Obviously I missed my self-imposed, very aggressive deadline of January 1. Nevertheless, I have completed about two-thirds of it, maybe more. A third of that is in really good shape and only requires minimal editing, and another third is done but needs serious revision. The last third is still being written. My new plan is to finish by the end of next month. That's probably a bit ambitious, but progress is progress.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The GOP Looks Increasingly Like a Home for Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismPoliticsIsraelCancel Culture
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 hours ago

    It’s always fun when pinko losers tear each other apart. I’ll be popping the popcorn.

    (First, but not Fist)

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   2 hours ago

      As long as it's not the evil Republican party tearing itself apart and everyone else around them down with Cancel Culture, it's all good.

      Log in to Reply
      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   52 minutes ago

        Do the democrats even have anyone that is intelligent and competent anymore?

        Log in to Reply
      2. Gaear Grimsrud   50 minutes ago

        Technically the Republicans are the stupid party and the Democrats are the evil party. But it's hard to tell the difference.

        Log in to Reply
  2. mad.casual   2 hours ago

    Many people have asked for an update on my fantasy novel

    Hey Robby, in depth updates on the deadline are nice, but if some of us aren't following along on X or wherever, can we get something a little more descriptive than 'fantasy'?

    Are we talking 'postapocalyptic political future-historic fiction' or a more contemporary Gaiman's Sandman-style 'low-to-mid fantasy'? I think I know the answer but I don't think a 3 word description of the story is going to chain you to a plot or spoil anything.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 hours ago

      He could just collect a large number of his articles into one text. That would qualify as fantasy.

      Log in to Reply
    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

      Went to his X to help you out but didn't see anything. Thought I'd share his bio:

      Free Media @reason+ Rising @thehill+ The Group Chat@2waytvapp.

      "Sought-after player in Beltway D&D circles, noted scooter anthropologist, baby Ryan Seacrest"

      Log in to Reply
  3. Rick James   1 hour ago

    Josh Shapiro Goes to War With Kamala Harris

    Who and WHO?!!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Scooter   1 hour ago

    When Harris stupidly chose Walz over Shapiro, I figured Trump had the election in the bag. Walz had more baggage than a Delta wide body jet at Thanksgiving. Between his lie about attaining the rank of Command Sgt Major or his dipping out right before his unit was going to deploy to a combat zone, he was not the right choice for the VP slot.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   55 minutes ago

      Really? I thought he accurately represented, the intelligence, integrity, courage, and competence we’ve come to expect from an elite Democrat, and was commensurate with the Harris campaign.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Gaear Grimsrud   46 minutes ago

      But he related to white good old boys. He put an air filter in a Chevy.

      Log in to Reply
  5. Anastasia Beaverhausen   1 hour ago

    Harris chickened out and picked the safe midwestern white guy for veep. She wrote in her book that's why she didn't choose Pete Buttigieg, who would have been a vastly better choice than Walz, because he was gay. She felt the country wasn't ready to elect a ticket of a black woman and a gay man. Similarly, she obviously felt the country wouldn't have been ready for a west coast black woman and an east coast Jew.

    I remember President Ford writing in his memoir that he really wanted to select Anne Armstrong as his veep choice at the '76 convention, but chickened out at the end and picked Bob Dole, who he thought was a safe choice (oops - that turned out to be a bad decision!).

    Log in to Reply
    1. Scooter   59 minutes ago

      Post Watergate, I don't think any Republican could have won the White House. The Watergate issue was a large part of what resulted in Jimmy Carter getting the nomination and the Presidency. That, IMO, resulted in Reagan's victory in 1980.

      Log in to Reply
    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   53 minutes ago

      Buttgag is an incompetent lightweight, weak of character and possessing little intelligence. So definitely a good fit for a democrat ticket.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Gaear Grimsrud   32 minutes ago

        Yeah Bootygig wasn't a bad choice because he's gay. He was a bad choice because he's a retard. The point difference between he and Walz on my retard detector is a rounding error.

        Log in to Reply
  6. Dillinger   46 minutes ago

    fuck Josh Shapiro. go ask Josh Shapiro about how when he was D.A. a chick with a multitude of stab wounds including to the back of her head was ruled a suicide ... and he did nothing to overturn it and solve her murder

    Log in to Reply
    1. Gaear Grimsrud   28 minutes ago

      Shapiro is a dreamy moderate like that chick that Reason endorsed in Virginia. He's libertarian adjacent. Or something.

      Log in to Reply
  7. DRM   44 minutes ago

    Texas hasn't elected a Democrat in a statewide election in over three decades. A Fetterman might have a chance to break that streak, especially if Cornyn is knocked off by Paxton.

    But donating to the Senate campaign of the Democrat currently representing the 30th District? That's taking your money and jamming it in a crock of shit.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Gaear Grimsrud   39 minutes ago

    Well it's rumoured that Harris paid a bunch of hookers to piss on a bed where Bibi once spent the night and Shapiro had the receipts. I know it seems crazy but presidents can get impeached for shit like that. No way she could take that chance.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The FDA's Hands-Off Approach to Medical AI Is a Win for Health-Conscious Consumers

Alexandra Stinson | 1.22.2026 4:35 PM

Uvalde Cop's Acquittal Shows Why It's Hard To Criminalize Failing To Stop a Mass Shooting

Jacob Sullum | 1.22.2026 4:20 PM

The Greenland Fiasco Shows the Stock Market Is the Ultimate Check on Trump

Jack Nicastro | 1.22.2026 3:47 PM

Josh Shapiro Goes to War With Kamala Harris

Robby Soave | 1.22.2026 3:20 PM

The GOP Looks Increasingly Like a Home for Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders

Veronique de Rugy | 1.22.2026 2:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks