Brickbat: Irish Eyes Are Prying
Ireland Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris says that when his country holds the presidency of the European Union next year, it will lead a push for new rules that would require people to verify their identity before using social media across the E.U. Harris says this will reduce anonymous online abuse, bots, and the spread of false information. He said it could also include age checks to keep young users from viewing content regulators say they shouldn't. Critics say the plan could deal a big blow to user privacy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Critics say the plan could deal a big blow to user privacy.
WHO IS ALLOWING THOSE CRITICS TO SAY ANYTHING???
We saved Europe from the Nazi's and commies for this?
The cultures that spawned the Nazis haven't changed. If they can't have monarchism, left authoritarianism is the next best thing.
You were around for 2020, right?
The Socialist Media facilitated a hysteric censorship regime that the SS couldn't possibly dream of.
I don't know which copy of The Constitution or Universal Declaration of Human Rights or whatever you're using, but I'm hard pressed to see the fundamental individual right to privacy *on the internet* on it. Mine does have a "right to be secure in person and effects", a "right to petition", and a "right to face accusers", none of which specifically afford and rather directly contravene a widespread or broad anonymity.
On a more fundamental level from both a liberty and information technology perspective: any organization powerful enough to grant you perfect anonymity on the internet is also powerful enough to take it away.
I am always puzzled by how people think about privacy.
First, I doubt most people have any idea of what it is and when their concept emerged. For 99% of human existence, people had no "privacy", at least nothing like anonymity in their public and private lives. It was difficult to do or say things in the cave or village and not be seen or heard.
Second, what do people really want? I can get the idea that you want to do some things without an audience, and we can even define some actions with legal support for privacy, e.g. voting. But I also suspect that many people want the "freedom" to say and do whatever they want without consequences, and thus demand protection from attribution for their actions.
You're conflating the rights and responsibilities of the individual with the state.
"right to be secure in person and effects" from the state.
"right to petition" the state
"right to face accusers" when being prosecuted by the state.
None of these apply between individual citizens. I have no more authority over you than you have over me nor am I required to present myself for your interrogations should you feel slighted in any way.
So what you're saying is even under an exceedingly libertarian regime ISPs and third parties are in no way obligated to keep your identity a secret. Even less so if *anyone* waves money at them.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Who will save us all from the regulatory state?
Government Almighty will save us from Government Almighty!!! And Government Almighty says we will LIKE twatever methods that Government Almighty chooses in odor to PROTECT us from Government Almighty!!!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
Government loves me, This I know,
For the Government tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
GAWD does love me, yes indeed,
Keeps me safe, and gives me feed,
Shelters me from bad drugs and weed,
And gives me all that I might need!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
DEA, CIA, KGB,
Our protectors, they will be,
FBI, TSA, and FDA,
With us, astride us, in every way!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
Just for the record, there is no privacy online.
Even the term privacy online is, or can be, oxymoronic, akin to "social justice" and "diversity, equality, and inclusion". Especially in reference to (anti-)social or social(ist) media (lower-case-a)pplications.
How about kick out the muzzies first?
You did see the part where it says, "verify their identity", right? As Elon demonstrated, sending them back to where they came from only to have them post privately/anonymously from there isn't exactly better or more clear.
Whether the government issues them "Refugee of Swaziland" IDs or not you can or will read;
BBC Comment: "Destroy the Reform Party! End Brexit! Remain in the EU! Enforce vaccine passports!" - Barack Hussein Obama, Refugee of Swaziland
rather than;
BBC Comment: "Destroy the Labour Party! End Brexit! Remain in the EU! Enforce vaccine passports!" - extraordinarymercury017398
As E-bHS and I connote above, there's certainly a case to be had for the latter then it comes to individual healthcare or voting but the idea that society owes you, not just a soapbox, but a private/anonymous soapbox is taking (at least attention) from everyone to give (everyone else) an invisible pink unicorn fiction on par with increasing the chocolate ration from 30g to 20g.
England. Ireland, France, Germany, New Zealand and Australia are like a Ray Bradbury novel with the government imposing its ham-handed policy enforcement through spying on its own citizens. Is this what their soldiers died for in WWII?
What that you said? The DNC has 'Ministry of Truth' agents in Ireland too?