These Companies Want To Use AI To Make Cheaper and Cleaner Energy—If the Government Lets Them
Don't blame AI for your high electricity bill. Blame the politicians who are trying to take AI away.
Donald Trump promised on the campaign trail to halve electricity prices within 18 months of taking office. With more than half of that period now elapsed, it seems that the president will fall well short of his goal.
In October, the most recent month for which data are available, the annual price of residential electricity jumped by 5.2 percent, according to the Energy Information Administration. While there are myriad reasons for these price hikes, including Trump's own trade policies, AI and data centers have taken much of the blame from policymakers. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) recently suggested enacting a federal moratorium on data center construction, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) has opened an investigation into the role that data centers play in driving up electricity costs.
The public, too, seems to be souring on AI: An October poll from Arbor, an electricity software company, found that nearly two-thirds of respondents think AI is causing higher utility bills. Meanwhile, over 70 percent of Americans say they are concerned about the environmental impact of AI, according to an Associated Press–NORC poll conducted in September.
It might be convenient to blame AI for these challenges, but government intervention in the space could hinder the solutions that several companies are developing to make the grid cleaner and more affordable.
One such firm is Everstar, which is looking to address one of the biggest roadblocks to nuclear power: excessive paperwork.
While reducing paperwork may seem like a trivial fix, it's an important one; a reactor license application can easily exceed 10,000 pages and undergo up to two years of review from federal regulators. And simple errors in these documents can set projects back and cost thousands of dollars. For one of Everstar's clients, fixing an error in the licensing documentation, which CEO Kevin Kong tells Reason was "essentially a typo," required "developing and getting approval for a formal License Amendment Request." This request cost the developer "tens of thousands of dollars in engineering time and external consultants" and added months in regulatory review, according to Kong.
Gordian, the company's AI-enabled platform, aims to eliminate cases like these by "automat[ing] compliance, technical documentation, and regulatory navigation for the nuclear industry," says Kong. Since launching earlier this year, the technology has yielded impressive results. After Last Energy was given federal funding in August to demonstrate its advanced nuclear reactor, it partnered with Everstar to write a 50-page environmental assessment. What would normally take eight weeks was completed in one. The system was also able to turn around a 200-page ecology report—a revision that usually takes a few weeks—in one night.
Kong says his clients have been able to cut "30-40% of the time spent on major regulatory deliverables," which can be the "difference between projects penciling out or not." The company plans to scale up operations in the coming year.
But getting the federal government to green-light new sources of energy generation is only one fix for the electricity price problem; developers must also be able to get this power onto the grid. This process can take up to five years to complete, keeping large swaths of power off the grid.
Tapestry, a Google X moonshot, is working on what it hopes will be a fix to this issue with its Grid Planning Tool. Before a grid operator approves new interconnection requests, it often has to run simulations of the request, sometimes decades into the future. The Grid Planning Tool can take this process down from weeks to days and enables operators to identify the "most affordable, reliable, low carbon [energy sources]," according to the company. Tapestry's tech is being deployed by PJM Interconnection, America's largest grid operator, to speed up interconnection times.
Meanwhile, the firm's GridAware platform automates inspections of physical grid infrastructure, like poles and wires, to improve reliability, prevent outages, and reduce maintenance costs for utility companies (which often get passed on to ratepayers). GridAware has been deployed in New Zealand, where it cut down inspection times for the nation's biggest utility "from 45 minutes to around five minutes per asset," according to Latitude Media.
AI may be the boogeyman for high electricity prices these days, but the technology is unlocking solutions to deliver cleaner, cheaper, and more abundant energy. That is, unless the government gets in the way.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I blame Democrats in Lansing for my high electricity bill. But that doesn’t fit Reason’s current narrative so let’s not talk about that.
Same thing with gas prices in Washington State. Between bullshit climate change producer fees and a gas tax hike, WA gas prices are only down about ten cents per gallon. Were it not for the ,artists in Olympia, it would be down another thirty five cents.
But I’m sure Reason will blame Trump.
Energy increases in blue states are doing the heavy lifting for reason gloating energy pricing didnt come down enough. They refuse to acknowledge that.
Nothing to do with the failed solar and wind projects intermittency and unreliability, especially during winter?
It's true. At this point AI has not forced the energy prices to skyrocket, that was all the demonrats doing. But the future could very well bring this on.
Trump and common sense policies not driven by nonsensical ideology and/or pure stupidity, have reduced the price of fuel and goods will come down in price as transportation costs are reduced.
Once the coal plants shut down by Biden and the demonrat global warming agenda are brought back online, regulations thwarting Natural Gas power plants are removed and sites are permitted then electricity generation and supply will increase and prices will come down.
Using AI as a tool to assist will not reduce electricity costs that could increase because of the actual demand of AI on the grids...
We need dozens of new nuclear reactors and oil refineries too.
Well AI is only looking for low carbon energy sources according to the article so I'm not hopeful that my electric bill will go down.
Gee, if we only knew of an organization that has been using nukes for decades to run a bunch of ships, and could just ask them "will this work?"
My bad, a bit longer than decades - - - - -
Since 1954!
What the government isn't telling you is that all of those ships burned a hole through the planet and ended up in China. Or wherever the opposite place is.
The NRC is not going to accept an AI license application due to the errors and hallucinations seen in other AI uses. They are just getting around to digital control systems.
Another, 'don't blame the thing increasing demand for price hikes' articles. Maybe one day Reeeeason will figure out supply and demand economics.......one day.