These Companies Want To Use AI To Make Cheaper and Cleaner Energy—If the Government Lets Them
Don't blame AI for your high electricity bill. Blame the politicians who are trying to take AI away.
Donald Trump promised on the campaign trail to halve electricity prices within 18 months of taking office. With more than half of that period now elapsed, it seems that the president will fall well short of his goal.
In October, the most recent month for which data are available, the annual price of residential electricity jumped by 5.2 percent, according to the Energy Information Administration. While there are myriad reasons for these price hikes, including Trump's own trade policies, AI and data centers have taken much of the blame from policymakers. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) recently suggested enacting a federal moratorium on data center construction, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) has opened an investigation into the role that data centers play in driving up electricity costs.
The public, too, seems to be souring on AI: An October poll from Arbor, an electricity software company, found that nearly two-thirds of respondents think AI is causing higher utility bills. Meanwhile, over 70 percent of Americans say they are concerned about the environmental impact of AI, according to an Associated Press–NORC poll conducted in September.
It might be convenient to blame AI for these challenges, but government intervention in the space could hinder the solutions that several companies are developing to make the grid cleaner and more affordable.
One such firm is Everstar, which is looking to address one of the biggest roadblocks to nuclear power: excessive paperwork.
While reducing paperwork may seem like a trivial fix, it's an important one; a reactor license application can easily exceed 10,000 pages and undergo up to two years of review from federal regulators. And simple errors in these documents can set projects back and cost thousands of dollars. For one of Everstar's clients, fixing an error in the licensing documentation, which CEO Kevin Kong tells Reason was "essentially a typo," required "developing and getting approval for a formal License Amendment Request." This request cost the developer "tens of thousands of dollars in engineering time and external consultants" and added months in regulatory review, according to Kong.
Gordian, the company's AI-enabled platform, aims to eliminate cases like these by "automat[ing] compliance, technical documentation, and regulatory navigation for the nuclear industry," says Kong. Since launching earlier this year, the technology has yielded impressive results. After Last Energy was selected to participate in a federal pilot program for advanced nuclear reactors, it partnered with Everstar to write a 50-page environmental assessment.* What would normally take eight weeks was completed in one. The system was also able to turn around a 200-page ecology report—a revision that usually takes a few weeks—in one night.
Kong says his clients have been able to cut "30-40% of the time spent on major regulatory deliverables," which can be the "difference between projects penciling out or not." The company plans to scale up operations in the coming year.
But getting the federal government to green-light new sources of energy generation is only one fix for the electricity price problem; developers must also be able to get this power onto the grid. This process can take up to five years to complete, keeping large swaths of power off the grid.
Tapestry, a Google X moonshot, is working on what it hopes will be a fix to this issue with its Grid Planning Tool. Before a grid operator approves new interconnection requests, it often has to run simulations of the request, sometimes decades into the future. The Grid Planning Tool can take this process down from weeks to days and enables operators to identify the "most affordable, reliable, low carbon [energy sources]," according to the company. Tapestry's tech is being deployed by PJM Interconnection, America's largest grid operator, to speed up interconnection times.
Meanwhile, the firm's GridAware platform automates inspections of physical grid infrastructure, like poles and wires, to improve reliability, prevent outages, and reduce maintenance costs for utility companies (which often get passed on to ratepayers). GridAware has been deployed in New Zealand, where it cut down inspection times for the nation's biggest utility "from 45 minutes to around five minutes per asset," according to Latitude Media.
AI may be the boogeyman for high electricity prices these days, but the technology is unlocking solutions to deliver cleaner, cheaper, and more abundant energy. That is, unless the government gets in the way.
*CORRECTION: This article originally misstated the nature of the federal reactor pilot program.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I blame Democrats in Lansing for my high electricity bill. But that doesn’t fit Reason’s current narrative so let’s not talk about that.
Same thing with gas prices in Washington State. Between bullshit climate change producer fees and a gas tax hike, WA gas prices are only down about ten cents per gallon. Were it not for the ,artists in Olympia, it would be down another thirty five cents.
But I’m sure Reason will blame Trump.
Energy increases in blue states are doing the heavy lifting for reason gloating energy pricing didnt come down enough. They refuse to acknowledge that.
Sce run by the dems raised rates. Trump had nothing to do with it
Nothing to do with the failed solar and wind projects intermittency and unreliability, especially during winter?
It's true. At this point AI has not forced the energy prices to skyrocket, that was all the demonrats doing. But the future could very well bring this on.
Trump and common sense policies not driven by nonsensical ideology and/or pure stupidity, have reduced the price of fuel and goods will come down in price as transportation costs are reduced.
Once the coal plants shut down by Biden and the demonrat global warming agenda are brought back online, regulations thwarting Natural Gas power plants are removed and sites are permitted then electricity generation and supply will increase and prices will come down.
Using AI as a tool to assist will not reduce electricity costs that could increase because of the actual demand of AI on the grids...
We need dozens of new nuclear reactors and oil refineries too.
Yes the nuke plants are in play, I believe 3 small reactor systems, one in Texas for sure.
But there should be more.
Consider the US has had nuke powered subs in use for decades without issues, why has this taken so long?
And for the foolish CO2 is dangerous nuts, nuke has no CO2 emissions.
Well AI is only looking for low carbon energy sources according to the article so I'm not hopeful that my electric bill will go down.
Gee, if we only knew of an organization that has been using nukes for decades to run a bunch of ships, and could just ask them "will this work?"
My bad, a bit longer than decades - - - - -
Since 1954!
What the government isn't telling you is that all of those ships burned a hole through the planet and ended up in China. Or wherever the opposite place is.
The NRC is not going to accept an AI license application due to the errors and hallucinations seen in other AI uses. They are just getting around to digital control systems.
Ok, China tony.
Fuck off commie scum.
CHICOM Sharknado Warmunists run a brainwashed Artificial Idiot misnamed... wait for it... GROK! So the trend is clearly visible already. Tony Heller at realclimatescience.com uses electrical engineering to overheat mechanized mendacity-mongers. He leases a program (there is a free version too) that lets you chart, sort and graph actual thermometer readings back through the 1930s. Any child can use this to see that the looter kleptocracy lies about energy the same way it lies about sex, drugs, economics and wars. Spoiler: Thermometers deny there is any increasing trend in temperature since 1930.
Another, 'don't blame the thing increasing demand for price hikes' articles. Maybe one day Reeeeason will figure out supply and demand economics.......one day.
These articles are really dumb.
Yes let's roll out a bunch of new data centers faster than electrical infrastructure can be built - thus pushing the cost of upgrading onto residential consumers - in the hope that some time in the indefinite future one of them might, maybe, possibly, use that AI to discover something that will make electricity cheap again.
We will ignore that AI is not AI - it's an LLM, has no model of reality, and is only good at predicting the next word or pixel in a picture and can not actually do research or even meaningfully accelerate unique research.
Everything Reason has been posting for a decade now is all about 'net benefit' and how if we keep on the current path we will all reap the benefits in the future. But that future isn't coming.
The US has become so financialized, we've lost touch with reality. As long as we can write down an idea that reduces energy costs, then hey presto energy is produced at lower cost. If we can add a price estimate to that idea we've written down, then that idea can be funded and within a year or so go public and the problem is solved that way.
The USA has a huge surplus of group members pressing forth their own allegations that "we" don't understand nuclear energy, physics, temperature measurements or economics. Exporting this surplus to someplace that appreciates failure to understand would be a huge leap forward for consumers of electric power.
Use, consider this.
If AI reduces electricity cost, AI will use more energy, continuing to drive the costs up.
We are currently on the 'dark fiber's era of the current tech bubble. Like the dotcom bubble where the focus was on building out fiber backbones (easy) while ignoring 'the last mile' (hard) tech is building data centers (easy) and ignoring energy production (hard).
And for what? So you can make shitty 'X movie but in Panavision' fake trailers?
That's my question, for what? Some novelty shitty song writing app that makes videos too?
So people can become more lazy and think less and rely on a machine that is only capable of regurgitating what we fed it?
It's a drain and a distraction and could end up being our demise.
Why is it we stopped asking ourselves "what could possibly go wrong?"
Why is it we are being told we must put all our energy eggs in one unreliable basket because of increased amounts of plant food in the atmosphere?
Especially when the increased CO2 has been mostly caused by deforestation around the world but is blamed on burning hydrocarbons?
So you can make shitty 'X movie but in Panavision' fake trailers?
And that's the good outcome.
Personally, I find the whole "Let's put a datacenter in space (where it can fry in its own heat *and* interstellar radiation)!" and "Then, we can build a 10 Gw solar array that can beam energy to any distribution center around the globe and hook it up to that!" to be far more unnervingly stupid.
Also Luse, I do not want nuclear engineering companies that make typos anywhere near nuclear engineering.
There are industries where the rate of design mistakes allowed is about as close to zero as is practicable. Nuclear engineering is one of them. ',Move fast and break things' in startup culture firms is not what you want in people building reactors near cities.
AI will streamline paperwork? Really? Like it does for legal briefs?
You know, the industry now famous for the AI work sub.itted that is full of hallucinations?
Anyone who buys the BS that electronics will cause any significant electrical supply problems is a F'En IDIOT that has zero concept of how much energy is required to melt steel or heat milk for cheese or any number of manufacturing processes going on.
Only topped by the IDIOCY in believing wind & solar is going to foot that requirement. HELLO! TRILLIONS spend to create "accounted for 8.4% of total primary energy production"?
High-Energy costs are just funding STUPID people with wasteful livings.
My Gosh; It's just like paying $500 for the in-fad ripped jeans instead of $30 and rip them yourself.
A whole army of useful-morons.
Increased demand on a system long overdue for infrastructure upgrades, is woefully behind creating new generation, attempts to rely on intermittent and unreliable solar and wind which requires base load to clean the signal for it to be useful is definitely going to cause prices to increase.
Can you comprehend what one building 150' x 1000' x 50' tall full of thousands of servers requires for power?
Now consider 100's of these tapping into the grids that are already weak and have black and brown outs struggling to keep up with demand.
2% is the TOTAL currently for All - 'electronics' usage powered from the grid.
Your 'imagination' is entirely polluted by BS propaganda.
Here's 100% truth to check your 'imagination'.
Energy is transformed to either motion or heat.
There is NO imaginary unicorn that eats energy.
A PC doesn't move (motion) so it's energy consumption is HEAT.
So unless all those computers in your 150' x 1000' x 50' tall full of thousands of servers is raising the temperature to uncomfortable levels they aren't consuming anymore energy than the buildings heating system doing the same.
Energy doesn't magically disappear because you have a big *imagination*.
This is a strawman worthy of sarc (where's he been, anyway? Maybe my brain has learned to tune him out.). Streamlining the process for future power generators is great but has zero to do with why existing power is so expensive.
Us: Thermostat? Can you raise the temperature to 67 degrees?
Thermostat: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Us: Wait, why not? It's freezing in here!
Thermostat: Based on your recent usage profile, you'll exceed your carbon allowance in [electronic whirring sound] 3.7465 seconds.
This whole thing rather reminds of that situation where those people opted for the 'smart thermostats' for a 'savings on energy bills' and then were cut out of lowering their thermostats during a heatwave. See? Cheaper!
"most affordable, reliable, low carbon [energy sources],"
Trump hates low carbon soueces so he will kill this.
What does any of this BS mean anyway? They want to use AI to try and develop a new means for generating clean energy. Okay so what?
People have been designing this for many many decades. AI might assist but it certainly will not create and it will be draining the system before it can actually work on a solution which is the reason people are concerned.
Trump hates
low carbon[Na]tional So[zi]alist energy sources so he will kill this.And let the free-market work as the USA is suppose to allow it to work.
The biggest problem with the tyrannical left is they believe if the Gov-Guns aren't dictating it; it doesn't exist.
"AI may be the boogeyman for high electricity prices these days, but the technology is unlocking solutions to deliver cleaner, cheaper, and more abundant energy."
It might be good to at least address why people are blaming AI for higher power rates, like the extensive electricity consumption rather glossing over it.
My favorite is when they also gloss over the water consumption with things like "Corn and beef consume two orders of magnitude more water!" while ignoring that the water corn and beef do use largely falls from the sky whereas datacenters are frequently hooked into municipal clean/potable water lines... *and* still use two orders of magnitude more electricity on top... *and* use it all to provide people with totally-essential sustenance like cat memes and humorous deep fakes rather than pithy, vacuous luxuries like protein, fats, and carbohydrates.
It's like the corn ethanol thing all over again. Where agriculture feeding upwards of 7B people is a terrible carbon contributor unless it offloads externalities on actual starving people in order to bolster the IFLS-shiny-religious-object cult du jour.
Houston Lighting & Power offered me a job advocating for nuclear energy, but I went to work for a Reason boardmember in 1981. After the Trump Crash in April I invested my life savings in a poker hand of nuclear utilities--the one and only thing God's Own Prohibitionists do not seek to prohibit--and made out like a corporate raider. Dividends have replaced slaving for the court system, freeing up my time and energy to find actual libertarian candidates to support. May blackouts help the Dems and commies understand this the way Gary Johnson votes taught then to quit banning weed.