Review: Tron: Ares Reminds Us That Artificial Intelligence Is Not the Enemy
It's the humans who develop and use AI for malicious ends, not the tech itself, who should worry us.
Will a hyperadvanced AI be a danger to humanity? That's nothing compared to the threat posed by military contractors.
That's the implicit conclusion of Tron: Ares, the third installment in the series that began with 1982's Tron. This threequel inverts the previous films' formula: Rather than humans trying to enter a digital world, Ares tells of an AI (Jared Leto) from inside "the Grid" finding its way into meatspace. It's a sci-fi spin on a fairy tale formula quite familiar to Disney, which made all three of the Tron films. The AI wants to be a real boy.
Standing in Ares' way is the tech executive (Evan Peters) who built him and intends to sell him to the highest bidder as a supersoldier who could be easily resurrected infinite times. Having achieved self-awareness, Ares decides it would be more meaningful to live just once. The message is as unsubtle as the film's pulsating Nine Inch Nails soundtrack: It's the humans who develop and use AI for malicious ends, not the tech itself, who should worry us.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
It's the humans who develop and use
AIguns for malicious ends, not the tech itself, who should worry us.The sine que non threat of AI is that it escapes the control of it's creators/owners and begins acting of its own volition. I'm no Alec Baldwin, but my guns don't just go off on their own.
If the AI is killing people/humanity strictly on the orders of its creator or commanders it's not much of an AI. Seems almost dishonest, even ironic, to portray AIs as characters without any agency in a polemic about human evil.
People used to call retarded bad remake movies like this "straight to video".