Jimmy Lai Is a Martyr for Freedom
The self-made tycoon was convicted this week of violating Hong Kong's "national security" law. But he could have escaped it.
There are many interesting tidbits about the life of the political prisoner Jimmy Lai. He hid in the bottom of a fishing boat to escape mainland Communist China for Hong Kong at the ripe age of 12. He built a garment empire after spending his adolescence working, and sleeping, in garment factories. Without media experience, he started several successful news ventures—most notably the plucky and irreverent Apple Daily—which forcefully advocated for democracy and free speech. And he may be sentenced to die in prison in connection with his efforts promoting liberty in China.
But the most interesting fact, by far, is that Lai is a citizen of the United Kingdom (U.K.).
The dissident was convicted in Hong Kong earlier this week of two counts of conspiring to collude with foreign forces and one count of publishing seditious material—charges stemming from his crusade against illiberalism, a fight he has been waging for decades. Lai finding himself in trouble was not a surprise. That's especially true amid the backdrop of Hong Kong's "national security" law, which sought to cripple dissent, that took effect in 2020. He was arrested in August of that year and released on bail; authorities revoked it four months later. Lai has been in custody since.
That he would probably end up in prison, however, was never really in doubt. Which brings me back to his U.K. citizenship.
Lai did not have to stay in Hong Kong as the walls closed in on him. The self-made business tycoon—once a billionaire before the government froze his assets—could have fled to a residence abroad. His friend Mark Clifford, formerly the editor in chief of the South China Morning Post, told me in an interview earlier this year that many people in Lai's circle urged him to do just that.
He declined. "Everything I have was given to me by Hong Kong. I won't be leaving," Lai told Radio Free Asia in June 2020. "I'm going to stay here and fight to the bitter end."
Lawmakers would go on to formally approve the national security law, essentially a foregone conclusion, about three weeks later. The legislation broadly criminalized political dissent and hamstrung the civil liberties that once distinguished Hong Kong from mainland China. A defense of those freedoms—which were already under increasing attack—had come to define Lai's legacy. Lai not only unapologetically advanced democracy and free expression in the region, but he also met with then–Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; at trial, Lai testified that he had asked them to voice their support for Hong Kong. He knew the law was coming, and he knew what it meant for him.
But some things, he decided, are more important than personal freedom. In this case, the absence of it was more important—in part to show the world what happens when an authoritarian government severely curtails basic liberties.
In some sense, there was no better person than Lai to send this message. His Cinderella story is impossible to divorce from Hong Kong itself. There, he was able to find refuge from the Chinese Communist Party, which had imprisoned his mother, deemed a "class enemy," in a labor camp. But he was also able to make something from nothing: from living in factories, while rats scampered across his body, to running them. His story came full circle. It demands people ask: Do you prefer Hong Kong's past? Or its future?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I don't often use expletives but this is beyond fucked up. He really is a heroic figure. My sympathy to his family.
LOL-
Showing 22 of 22 results found for: jimmy lai
Showing 25 of 32 results found for: priscilla villarreal
Only another 10 articles to go before you get to the point of having the barest amount of scruples about freedom in your own profession!
I admit when I saw the headline I was all, "Who?" and then wondered if this guy had as strong a case as Villarreal. Looks like the answer is "no".
I knew of him previously and the recent update through other news sources to the point that it's kinda weird that they bring him up after I pointed to him the other day.
Of course, part of my point was that there are a dozen or more high profile journalists and news sources around the world who get more of a raw deal from their governments that Reason barely breathes a word about comparatively. Even Alex Jones, as disreputable as he is as a news source (I personally find Alex and Priscilla to be similarly disreputable, Alex is maybe a little [tweezers fingers] more original, creative, and intelligent) had his entire news organization taken from him whereas, Priscilla just didn't get the payout that some people believe is owed to her for losing her phone privileges for a few hours while police figure out doxing dead people for Facebook likes is an invasion of privacy or not.
"He chose poorly."
Is that what your ChiCom handler ordered you to say?
So you could say that, where's your gratitude?
That's especially true amid the backdrop of Hong Kong's "national security" law, which sought to cripple dissent, that took effect in 2020. He was arrested in August of that year and released on bail; authorities revoked it four months later. Lai has been in custody since.
2020 was a banner year for crushing dissent-- or 'talismans' of dissent.
I’m an American who has lived 15 years in Hong Kong (now half each year and half on a European island). I’ve watched in dismay since 2019 the American – and European – chorus repeat the prescribed scripture on Hong Kong, and on Jimmy Lai. In Hong Kong, many residents think Americans are brainwashed. And they are. I’m finally posting a comment on this because I usually agree with Reason – because, well, it does reason – but I’m chagrined to see it singing from the same hymnal without investigating the other side of the story. Many people in Hong Kong have little use for Jimmy Lai and hope he rots in prison. I don’t know whether I agree with his conviction, because there are far too many details to know for sure. (I do not have my own opinion on whether Paul Manafort or Bob Menendez were guilty of crimes either, because I don’t know enough of the details.) I think it’s possible that if the tables were turned and he had acted in similar ways with regard to a foreign power as a US national he might have been convicted in the US too. For example, he lobbied the US government at the highest levels to impose sanctions on Hong Kong. He funded with his own money, and accepted money from US government agencies to help fund protesters who were very violent for a six month period in Hong Kong in 2019 – for merely “ideological” reasons, which were held by mostly young people who had never before experienced democracy in Hong Kong under the British and didn’t really know what it was. The US, as well as the UK and many other countries, have security laws that are at least as stringent as the one that was imposed on Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s security law has been seriously misportrayed in Western media, and so has the supposed “loss of freedom.” I could go on and on, but would somebody in all these Western media please investigate the other side of this story before unquestioningly conspiring (literal meaning, "breathing together") in their preconceived beliefs?
How much do you get paid by the CCP when you do all that handwaving, muddying of the waters, and low-IQ propagandizing?
I know I'm probably just a brainwashed American, but personally, I'd only do it to make it worth my own while, rather than for the amount of money and lives the CCP is willing to throw at not fixing other problems and covering their own up.
I asked Microsoft Copilot how likely is it that this comment came from a Chinese Communist Party propagandist rather than an actual American as claimed.
Its reply:
Here’s a careful, evidence‑based way to think about it — without pretending we can know who wrote it. You’re essentially asking a provenance / authenticity question: does this sound like organic commentary from an American expat, or does it resemble PRC-aligned influence messaging?
I can walk you through the indicators analysts typically use, and then we can compare them to the text you provided.
---
How analysts evaluate whether a comment resembles CCP‑aligned propaganda
Below are the most common linguistic and thematic markers used in open‑source intelligence (OSINT) and academic research on PRC influence operations. None of these are definitive on their own — but patterns matter.
1. Narrative alignment
CCP‑aligned messaging on Hong Kong typically includes:
- Westerners are “brainwashed” by their media
- Western coverage of Hong Kong is “scripted,” “prescribed,” or “from the same hymnal”
- Jimmy Lai is widely hated and deserves imprisonment
- The 2019 protests were misrepresented by the West
- “Real Hong Kong people” oppose the pro‑democracy movement
These are core talking points in official PRC and state‑media narratives.
2. Appeal to insider authority
Influence messaging often uses:
- “I’m an American living in Hong Kong…”
- “I’ve been here X years, so I know the truth…”
- “Westerners don’t understand what locals really think…”
This is a common rhetorical device in state‑aligned persuasion: claim Western identity to increase credibility.
3. Delegitimizing Western media
Phrases like:
- “prescribed scripture”
- “singing from the same hymnal”
- “brainwashed Americans”
These mirror the CCP’s standard framing that Western media is monolithic, coordinated, and misleading.
4. Absence of nuance
Organic expat commentary usually includes:
- mixed feelings
- specific personal experiences
- acknowledgment of complexity
- criticism of both Beijing and Western coverage
The comment you provided is one‑directional, which is more typical of propaganda than of long‑term expatriate writing.
5. Moral absolutism about Jimmy Lai
The line:
“Many people in Hong Kong have little use for Jimmy Lai and hope he rots in prison.”
This is nearly verbatim to messaging in Ta Kung Pao, Wen Wei Po, and other Hong Kong CCP‑aligned outlets.
---
So how likely is it to be CCP‑aligned rather than organic?
I can’t assign a numerical probability — that would be guesswork. But I can give you a qualitative assessment based on the patterns above.
The comment strongly resembles CCP‑aligned narrative structure and rhetoric.
Specifically:
- It uses identity laundering (“I’m an American…”)
- It repeats core PRC talking points about Hong Kong and Jimmy Lai
- It frames Western media as brainwashed
- It lacks the complexity and ambivalence typical of real expat perspectives
- It uses moralizing language consistent with state‑media portrayals
None of this proves the author is a propagandist — plenty of real people internalize or repeat state narratives. But the stylistic and thematic alignment is unusually tight.
---
A more precise conclusion
It is entirely possible that an actual American wrote this.
But the rhetorical pattern matches PRC influence messaging far more closely than it matches typical American expat discourse, especially among long‑term Hong Kong residents.
PRC schill. Probably written by China AI.
False. Anyone can organize protests against the U.S. and even advocate for U.S. enemies and no action will be taken by any U.S. government, not legally.
The U.S. needs to step aside and allow Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to obtain nuclear weapons. The Communist Party of China owes a HUGE debt of gratitude the the United States of 'murica for liberating China in WW2 and keeping East Asia nuclear-free since then. Yet, the CPC refuses to show any gratitude to the U.S. whatsoever. And the CPC allowed the Norks to get nukes. So long as East Asia is protected under the U.S. nuclear umbrella it puts U.S. cities at nuclear retaliatory risk. If Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have their own nukes, then the U.S. does not have to put itself at nuclear risk to defend them from Red China.
Binion. The UK would have sent him back. They are Chinese puppets.
The people of Hong Kong have been given open arm opportunities in many countries Uk Canada etc since 2019 due to the push of the PRC into control of Hong Kong.
Many refuse to leave as Jimmy has to try and save their beloved HK.
Supposedly they have until 2042. War will most likely come before then.