Nepal's Socialist Government Banned Social Media, So Activists Plotted a Revolution—on Discord.
The country's transition leader was selected not at the ballot box but on a 100,000-person Discord chat.
They marched to defend free speech online and ended up reshaping a nation. In September 2025, young protesters opposing Nepal's social media ban triggered a political upheaval that brought Sushila Karki to power as the country's first woman prime minister—with much of the organizing happening on the messaging platform Discord.
When the government collapsed, the Nepali military took charge and appointed Karki as transitional leader. Rather than a true "election," activists held a rushed Discord chat to discuss whom to suggest to the army as leader. Nepalese youth have been organizing quickly to ensure the revolution isn't hijacked by elements of the old political class who are still in power.
The revolution has been a crash course in "political literacy," says Samana Lawati*, a member of the Indigenous Gen-Z Collective, one of the organizations founded to represent the revolutionary youth. "A lot of people were saying that they didn't understand what a referendum is, what an ordinance is, what constitutional values are, and now these young people are trying to learn," she says. "Our generation is doing a lot, and I'm really proud."
The nation transitioned from a monarchy to a republic in 2008, but that revolution did not fulfill its promises. Nepal is consistently one of the poorest countries in Asia—hundreds of thousands go abroad to find work every year—and its ruling socialist parties have a reputation for corruption.
In summer 2025, the hashtag #nepokids (a reference to nepotism) spread on social media, criticizing the lavish lifestyle of politicians' families. When the government tried to ban several foreign social media platforms for ostensibly failing to follow new regulations, many critics thought the regulations were just a pretext to stop the spread of #nepokids content.
Protests against the social media ban broke out in Kathmandu on September 8. The protesters were neither expecting nor prepared to overthrow the government. Then authorities shot protesters with live ammunition. "Nobody expected the level of violence instigated by the state," says Lawati, who was at the protests. She recalls a peaceful atmosphere, with young schoolchildren in their uniforms joining the protests, and "could not comprehend" why she suddenly heard gunfire. "Even if there is shooting happening, it must be some kind of rubber bullets," Lawati recalls thinking at the time. "But it was not."
At least 19 people were killed on that first day. Enraged protesters stormed government buildings and politicians' houses. Zak Aldridge, a former classmate of mine who moved to Kathmandu to pursue the Buddhist path, was traveling through a small border town when the revolution broke out. "I'm up in this hotel thinking, this feels like a bad day to be in the big house," Aldridge recalls, as he soon learned that the hotel was owned by a member of Parliament and that several politicians were staying there. "I open up the blinds, and there's 100 guys across the street shouting."
Aldridge slipped out and greeted the protesters. "You know, they actually apologized to me," he says. They told him, "We're sorry, it's not about you. It's about us and our corrupt government today, and we're sorry you got caught in the crossfire," adding: "If you know anyone else still in the hotel, please tell them to get out because we're going to burn it tonight." They didn't follow through on that threat.
By the second day, former Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli resigned and the army took charge. Karki, a former Supreme Court chief justice who had come out early in support of the protests, met with the military after a 100,000-person Discord chat coalesced around her as a leader.
There are questions, of course, about the representativeness of that process. "The streets spoke louder than Discord. Gen Z movement was all of us, not a brand," social media user Suryasiva Kumar commented on a Reddit thread complaining about various organizers' self-promotion.
Nevertheless, Karki will lead a transitional government until the next elections, scheduled for March 2026, which will be the real test of the revolution. "This is a generation of various groups. All of us might not have the same political ideology," Lawati says. "This interim government needs to be solid, so that we can have a just and fair election."
*CORRECTION: This article initially misspelled Lawati's name.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Discord Revolution in the Himalayas."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Go, Nepal, go!!! Just say "no" to nepo-Nepal!!! Be free!!!
(Be ass free ass you PRACTICALLY can, of pus-plus-sized Government Almighty. Snot an anarchist, here... That's shit's snot my idiom or my pronoun, man...)
(Also just say "no" to necro-Nepal and Marxist-Moose-Mammary Necrophiliac!!!)
No voting is a good thing!
Let's play a game of "spot the difference" for our little underdeveloped maga inbreds:
This country here, Nepal, is socialist. What is the difference between this country and Norway? What is the difference between this country and Belgium? What is the difference between this country and Switzerland?
You can do it! If you try really hard, you will find the answer. Keep trying my little friend, I believe in you.
It’s a similar method they used to select Kamala.
Which is also how they chose Biden, and it was 15 rather than 100,000... But it's all MAGAs fault.
Walz +9
The country's transition leader was selected not at the ballot box but on a 100,000-person Discord chat.
#libertarians4oligarchy
#cleanestelectionever
Truly advanced nations attempt to replace democracy with mobocracy, ass driven by Trumpanzees gone Apeshit, chanting "Hang Mike Pence"! They have all been pardoned by Dear Orange Caligula! Maybe next time they will "win"!
“Hang Mike Pence”!!! Dear Leader agrees!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798
Trump defends Jan. 6 rioters’ ‘hang Mike Pence’ chant in new audio
The audio captured part of an interview ABC News’ Jonathan Karl conducted with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in March for Karl’s upcoming book.
Trump is PROUD of His Imperial Support for His Storm Troopers and His Political Violence, and can SNOT shut His Trap about shit!!!
PS, Mike Pence’s dangerous words and ideas were that votes, voters, established democratic norms and processes, peaceful transfers of power, and the USA Constitution should actually be RESPECTED!!! Now just IMAGINE THAT!!! This was HERESY to True Trumpaloos!!!
There were long-standing rumors from staffers about Trump agreeing with "Hang Mike Pence". Evil people (like YOU, Moose-Mammary Necro-Reptilian Necrophilian Necrophiliac!) can SNOT keep their braggery about being EVIL to themselves for very long... They feel CUMPELLED to BRAG about shit!!!
So here You go, Queen, Trump could NOT shut His Pervfected yapper!!! “Hang Mike Pence”!!! Dear Leader agrees!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798
Trump defends Jan. 6 rioters’ ‘hang Mike Pence’ chant in new audio
The audio captured part of an interview ABC News’ Jonathan Karl conducted with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in March for Karl’s upcoming book.
Trump is PROUD of His Imperial Support for His Storm Troopers and His Political Violence, and can SNOT shut His Trap about shit!!!
PS, Mike Pence’s dangerous words and ideas were that votes, voters, established democratic norms and processes, peaceful transfers of power, and the USA Constitution should actually be RESPECTED!!! Now just IMAGINE THAT!!! This was HERESY to True Trumpaloos!!!
This claim has been litigated to death, and the video from that day has been available for years. The “hang Mike Pence” chant did not come from the crowd as a whole. It was a single individual shouting it, and you can clearly hear people around him telling him to shut up and accusing him of being a fed or an agent provocateur. The crowd response was rejection, not endorsement.
There is also no evidence that Donald Trump called for, encouraged, or endorsed the killing of the Vice President. Conflating one heckler with an entire crowd, and then projecting that onto Trump himself, is simply false.
So why are you still repeating a claim that’s been contradicted by the actual footage? If your goal is truth rather than outrage, this narrative should have been retired a long time ago.
Shillsy knows. dozens of people have told him. He just loves to tell lies. It's that simple.
Also, he was really invested in the story and thought he had the best way of rebuking "MAGA". He doesn't want to even consider that it might not be true, so he'll lie to himself about it too. Twenty years from now he'll still be screaming "Hang Mike Pence" and posting ancient links to the hoax stories from NBC and in Salon as proof.
You EVIL, lying sacks of vulture puke!!!! I previously posted the below, a long time ago: (Oh and by the way, where are YOUR PervFected cites?)
Your PervFected LIES mean nothing!!! Especially since you provide NO links!
Perplexity, see https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798 Is it true that Trump was documented on captured Audio, blessing "Hang Mike Pence"?
A = What has been confirmed and reported are recordings where, in a March 2021 interview with ABC's Jonathan Karl (as later broadcast and cited by major news outlets), Trump responded to questions about the Jan. 6 rioters chanting "Hang Mike Pence" by saying that the crowd was "very angry" and describing the chant as "common sense" in the context of believing the election was stolen. Trump defended the anger behind "Hang Mike Pence".[1][2][4]
Additionally, later testimony from former White House aides claimed Trump allegedly said things indicating support for the crowd’s animosity toward Pence (such as, per Cassidy Hutchinson's account, saying Pence "deserves" it), but these statements were relayed as secondhand accounts and were not captured on public audio recordings.[3][7][10]
In summary, Trump was recorded as excusing or minimizing the chant in interviews, thereby justifying the anger behind "Hang Mike Pence" in the chants.[2][4][1]
[1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOpWCtNqFQM)
[2](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798)
etc.
Now AGAIN after all this time, I repeat my question to Perplexity, asking if ANY of this has EVER been retracted or proven wrong!!! Where are YOUR cites, Lying EVIL PervFected ASSHOLES?!?!?
See https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798 Trump defends Jan. 6 rioters’ ‘hang Mike Pence’ chant in new audio … OK then my question: Has anything in this NBS News report ever been proven to be wrong, or retracted?
Nothing in that NBC News story has been publicly retracted or shown to be factually false; its core claims have been independently corroborated by the underlying audio and by other outlets that obtained the same recording.nbcnews+2
What the NBC story reported
The piece reports that Donald Trump, in a recorded March 2021 interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl, defended the “hang Mike Pence” chants as “common sense” because the crowd believed the election was fraudulent. NBC based this on audio provided by ABC’s “This Week,” which later also formed the basis for coverage by Axios, CNBC, and others, all of which quote the same exchange in very similar terms.axios+2youtube
Evidence and cross checks
Axios and CNBC both published their own stories using the same portion of the taped interview, with audio and quotations that match NBC’s characterization of Trump’s remarks. No major fact checking outlet or competing news organization has identified specific factual errors in NBC’s description of what was said on the tape, and there are no corrections or editor’s notes attached to the article on NBC’s site.cnbc+3youtube
Retractions or corrections
Searches of the article itself and of later coverage turn up no formal retraction, correction, or walk back by NBC News regarding this report. Subsequent reporting about Trump’s attitude toward the “hang Mike Pence” chants—including later pieces summarizing January 6 committee testimony—treats the Karl interview audio as part of the evidentiary record, not as a disputed or discredited claim.ms+3
1. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798
2. https://www.axios.com/2021/11/12/trump-hang-mike-pence-january-6-audio
etc.
I see by the double grey boxes that it is spazzing out again. Should burn it to ash at the first opportunity.
And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FACEBOOK!
So that's where at-gunpoint-voting Australia got the idea?
I used Discord for a while. Until they banned a conservative group I occasionally used to talk to some people. No other reasons given but it is assumed they said they did not like the content (critical of the Democratic party mostly) and shut it down. I assume this to be much like the Nazis fighting the communists. The people will lose, no matter who wins.
My favorite AI, "Perplexity", says...
There is no single well‑documented case of Discord banning a mainstream U.S. “conservative group” merely for being critical of Democrats; most reported bans have targeted extremist or hate‑oriented servers under Discord’s terms of service on harassment and violence.[1][2]
## What Discord has actually banned
Public reporting describes Discord shutting down:
- The public server linked to AltRight.com and other alt‑right, neo‑Nazi, or white‑supremacist servers after the Charlottesville events, explicitly for promoting white supremacy, Nazi ideology, and related hate content in violation of its TOS.[3][4][2][1]
- Additional extremist servers such as Atomwaffen Division, “The Right Server,” Nordic Resistance Movement, and others tied to organized white‑nationalist or violent movements, again citing hate, harassment, and calls to violence rather than ordinary partisan speech.[5][2]
- At least one large “boogaloo”‑movement server for “threatening and encouraging violence,” according to Discord’s statement.[6]
None of these are described by reputable sources simply as generic “conservative groups” that were banned solely for criticizing the Democratic Party.
## Why the commenter’s claim is hard to verify
Discord hosts hundreds of thousands of private and semi‑private servers, and many bans or takedowns are not publicly named, so an individual user could have seen a smaller political server removed without a public write‑up or clear explanation. However, known high‑profile enforcement actions that reached the press involve explicit ties to extremist ideologies or incitement, not normal right‑of‑center political discussion, so there is no way to match the commenter’s anecdote to a specific, documented group.[7][2][5][1]
## Bottom line
Based on available sources, it is not possible to identify which specific “conservative group” that commenter used, or confirm that it was banned only for criticizing Democrats. The best‑documented Discord bans have targeted alt‑right, white‑supremacist, or violent‑extremist networks that violated Discord’s rules on hate and violence, not ordinary partisan conservatism as such.[2][5][1][6]
[1](https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/14/discord-shuts-down-alt-right-server-and-accounts-for-tos-violations/)
[2](https://www.polygon.com/2018/2/28/17061774/discord-alt-right-atomwaffen-ban-centipede-central-nordic-resistance-movement/)
etc. . . .
YAWN on your copypasta, Melvin.
Evil Melvin is pro-censorship.
Marxist Penguin-Poop-Eater does SNOT BLEEEEEVE in pubic property; Discord does SNOT own Discord property!!! "The People" (AKA Dear Orange Caligula and Penguin Poop Eater and all of the other slurpporters of Dear Orange Caligula, Who ***IS*** "The People") own the property of Discord! Discord don't own SHIT!!! Ye will eat bugs and penguin poop and LIKE shit!!!
Boil it in acid.
Perplexity - Founded in 2022 by Aravind Srinivas, Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, and Andy Konwinski in San Francisco
Sounds about right for a Shillsy source.
If ye can SNOT disprove the FACTS, the attack the source!!!!
Hunter Biden art does (did) concern me, to be clear about it. However, this is an opportune time to call attention to the hyper-partisans, who will “refute” what you say, by pointing out that your source is “from the wrong tribe”!
Leftist media bias by Vox is a fib sometimes! Hunter Biden art…
https://www.vox.com/2021/8/3/22601671/hunter-biden-art-sales-walter-shaub “Why Obama’s former ethics czar is highly critical of Hunter Biden’s lucrative art sales … There have been many bad-faith “scandals” linked to the president’s son. Walter Shaub thinks this one should be taken seriously.
I wonder if the Trumpaloos will now show up to say that Vox is liberally biased, and can't be trusted? This here “Vox” article MUST mean that Hunter Biden is a GREAT artist, and there are (were) NO opportunities for corruption, here!
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/vox-news-media-bias
“VOX” rated as far-left as is allowed… The needle is pegged!
PROOF, then, that Hunter Biden art is (was) of NO concern to stalwart conservatives and Trumpaloos! (Since Vox always lies, of course).
Hey Marxist Moose-Mammary the Reptilian Necrophilian Necrophiliac... Are Ye now PervFectly rushing out to buy Yer PervFected Self some Hunter Biden art? Ye SHOULD ya know, since Vox says that You shouldn't!
YAWN, Melvin. Why don't you make like Tim and vanish.
Zak Aldridge, a former classmate of mine who moved to Kathmandu to pursue the Buddhist path, was traveling through a small border town when the revolution broke out. "I'm up in this hotel thinking, this feels like a bad day to be in the big house,"
*thinks*
This "Zach Aldridge"?
Former classmate of yours, huh? If I'm on the right 'Zak' Aldridge, this tells me a lot.
Total douchebag.
It his kid with his 'revolutionary cosplay keffiyeh' didn't exist, I'd have to invent him. But thankfully, he exists, so I don't have to.
He’s also keffiyeh, no camel.
Looks very punchable.
They always turn out to be antisemites. Every single time.
Yep. Young democrats are pretty much Hitler Youth at this point.
This speaks volumes about Petti.
So, this 'Indigenous Gen-Z Collective', are they just dissatisfied with the current leadership or are they dissatisfied with socialism?
The meeting consisted of the participation of key political actors from major parties such as the Nepali Congress, CPN (UML), CPN (Maoist Centre), Rastriya Swatantra Party, CPN (Unified Socialist), and Rastriya Prajatantra Party. Whilst the youth representatives were members of Indigenous Gen Z Collective, How to Desh Bikas, and Gen Z Movement Alliance presented their perspectives on youth involvement and accountability in governance.
I'm really trying to figure out what the libertarian angle here is.
Seriously.
I'm going to break down the elements of this story and everything I've been able to research about this situation over the last 30 minutes.
1. Nepal has a socialist government.
2. It is considered by many to be rife with corruption.
3. The government instituted a social media ban.
4. There was widespread discontent and protests which actually caused the military to take charge and appoint a leader outside any democratic process.
5. This military "coup" is supported by the so-called Gen-Z collective-- the fear not being that a leader was undemocratically installed via a military junta, but that the leader may be undermined by long-serving members of the government who oppose her.
6. As best as I can tell, this so-called Gen Z Collective hasn't demanded any free-market reforms but is mainly focused on the corruption within the existing system.
7. All of this Gen Z organizing was done using Apps and Phones and... I guess a form of social media that had NOT been banned. The article doesn't seem to make that clear.
8. A former classmate of Petti (the author of this article which is very thin on details but very thick on 'right on' vibes) who, if my research is accurate is a noted anti-semite*, supporter of bloodthirsty terrorist groups and has 'discovered Buddhism' went down into the crowd to show some fist-in-the-air-right-on-solidarity with the young people...
So if I take the above set of basic facts espoused in the article (and that I've been able to corroborate elsewhere) and I get out my hammer and start pounding on this oddly shaped peg into the libertarian hole we have:
1. A socialist government that the young people don't like. Please ignore the fact that the Gen Z collective doesn't seem to say anything about socialism itself, just the [OrangeMan] that was in charge of it.
2. Social media was banned which is like totally not cool and doesn't vibe with Section 230.
3. They did this organizing with a clever use of a different technology platform that wasn't banned... because I guess the Nepalese govt didn't consider 'discord' to be social media? *shrug*
3a. The government of Nepal responded with violence. No clear word on whether the violence was perpetrated by the very people that installed the new leader that the Gen Z Collective supports.
4. They want the socialist government to like not be corrupt and stuff.
5. Someone the author knows who is on a life journey that is like really cool and stuff made the scene of these protests and remarked on them after having had a totally right on moment in the street with some of the protesters.
Guys, this is a messy-assed grab-bag of issues here: Military coups are OK if the right person gets 'installed'. Protests are awesome when organized on
TwitterDiscord. Some people were killed after a violent reaction from the existing government. A guy resigned. Young people made their voices heard. Someone I know was there.*At this time I don't know if I've identified the Right Zachary (Zak) Aldridge from Columbia who has discovered Buddhism and moved to Kathmandu. It's possible there are multiple Zach (Zak) Aldridges who went to Columbia, don't like the Jews and are on a personal journey of enlightenment and have moved to Kathmandu. So unfortunately, consider any mentions of Aldridge from my perspective as "alleged".
Well done. You just did the same amount of actual journalism that Reason does in a year.
Indeed.