Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Marijuana

Stoner King Trump

Plus: Universal childcare, Canada's abortion industry, the new media personality cults, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 12.12.2025 9:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Donald Trump | Victoria Jones/Shutterstock / Avalon/Newscom
(Victoria Jones/Shutterstock / Avalon/Newscom)

Schedule III: President Donald Trump is soon expected to push for the federal reclassification of marijuana.

"Trump discussed the plan with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) in a Wednesday phone call from the Oval Office, said four of the people, who, like the others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly," reports The Washington Post. "The president is expected to seek to ease access to the drug through an upcoming executive order that directs federal agencies to pursue reclassification, the people said."

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Cannabis advocates have long hoped for this. Reclassifying marijuana, bringing it down to Schedule III from Schedule I (drugs with "high potential for abuse" and "no currently accepted medical use"—so, not cannabis) would allow for fewer barriers to research and to more legal businesses springing up, as well as less harassment by the authorities.

"We're looking at [reclassification]. Some people like it, some people hate it," Trump said over the summer. "Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because it does bad for the children, it does bad for the people that are older than children." Now it seems that, for whatever reason (maybe looking for an easy public-sentiment win?), the idea is back on the table (timing unclear). This is the blessing and the curse of Trump: You never really know which idea is going to pop in his mind and stick there and become quickly enacted, or when he'll embrace his sleeper libertarian tendencies.

Trump, of course, can't unilaterally decide this, but he "can direct the Justice Department to forgo a pending administrative court hearing and issue the final rule," reports the Post. 


Scenes from New York: "Universal child care need not be a pipe dream in America—something we envy the Danes and the Swedes for, but never imagine having for ourselves," writes Rachel Cohen Booth for The New York Times. "It can and should be as fundamental to a city's infrastructure as transit or housing, as essential for attracting workers and residents as any investment a mayor can make."

I disagree on a principles level—it's not clear to me why other taxpayers need to subsidize my family's choices or why relatively high-earners should be subsidized by the state, given practical funding realities—and Cohen Booth is far more optimistic than I could ever be about whether Zohran Mamdani's program will be possible to implement and well-designed. Bill de Blasio was rather explicit when rolling out universal pre-school for 4-year-olds (later expanded to 3-year-olds too) that "anything that has a broad constituency will also have more sustainability." This appears to be part of Mamdani's thinking, and perhaps more broadly behind the rise in universal everything from vast swaths of the left. But the $6 billion price tag is going to be hard to handle—especially for Albany—and Mamdani's expectation that child care workers be brought up to pay parity with public schoolteachers seems unrealistic.


QUICK HITS

  • "Through video, we get to know our pundits the same way we engage with influencers, and the more we are convinced by their multimedia performances the more readily we join their podcasting personality cults," writes The New Yorker's Kyle Chayka. "Increasingly, this world of digital broadcasting is embroiled in slow-burning rivalries and rhetorical fights, a Marvel universe of independent opinion-givers."
  • "China is considering a package of incentives worth as much as $70 billion to bankroll and support its chipmaking industry, pouring more state money into a sector it deems pivotal to its technological conflict with the US," reports Bloomberg. "Officials are deliberating proposals to earmark a package of subsidies and other financing support in the range of 200 billion yuan ($28 billion) to 500 billion yuan, people familiar with the matter said, asking to remain anonymous to discuss private talks. The final details of those incentives, exact amounts and target companies are still getting worked out, the people added."
  • Oral exams are back.
  • "The far right is powered by left-wing illiberalism and hypocrisy," writes Reason's Stephanie Slade in a must-read piece.
  • "The United States on Thursday issued new sanctions on Venezuela's oil sector and on members of President Nicolás Maduro's family, while taking steps to keep tens of millions of dollars' worth of oil from a large tanker that U.S. forces seized off the country's coast," reports The New York Times.
  • Long, worthwhile piece in First Things on a pregnant woman who went undercover in Canada to investigate their abortion industry.
  • This is big:

INDIANA STATE SENATE has rejected redistricting.

19-31.

TRUMP's push for a 9-0 map failed. Big defeat for the Trump administration.

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) December 11, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: LA Metro Is a Dangerous, Costly Mess. What Would Fix It?

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

MarijuanaPoliticsReason RoundupTrump AdministrationDrug PolicyDrug Legalization
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (346)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    President Donald Trump is soon expected to push for the federal reclassification of marijuana.

    His approval rating is about to go through the roof with people who don't vote.

    1. mad.casual   5 months ago

      Still better than reluctantly and strategically supporting the party of people who do vote but don't inhale anything.

    2. Quicktown Brix   5 months ago

      Hey! I vote sometimes.

      Rescheduling pot to safe for medical use makes a lot of sense. He should also reschedule cocaine to unsafe for any reason due to the recent epidemic of people exploding from it.

      Seriously though. WAY overdue. I commend Trump for this rhetoric and even more so if he goes through with it.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        It is indeed overdue. Now watch Sullum pen an article about why it’s a bad thing. 😛

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

          Ha, beat me to it.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

          Sullum doesn’t use a pen. He scrawls his ravings on the wall of his cell at the insane asylum. Then Tosin comes and takes a photo, which is transcribed into an ‘article’ using AI. This is similar to how SQRLSY and Sarc publish their comments.

          1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

            Sarc pens his wit in the drunk tank, but otherwise, yes.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

              I wonder how often Sarc gets his ass beaten when he goes to jail? He’s a really mouthy drunk.

          2. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

            He scrawls his ravings on the wall

            In poop.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

              Thank you, I meant to include that

        3. Outlaw Josey Wales   5 months ago

          Trump Stops the Democrats from Re-Classification of Marijuana to a Lesser Schedule
          Trump signs order making it impossible for the next administration to re-schedule weed from 1 to 3.
          by Jacob Sullum

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      If only dead people smoked ganja...

    4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      What’s poor Sullum gonna do if a lower court overturns this?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        Praise it. Saying trump did it illegally.

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          It only counts if a Democrat does it.

    5. Minadin   5 months ago

      Moving it down to Schedule 3 is a great first step, but I'd prefer that it be de-scheduled completely. Schedule 3 still requires a special prescription to be legal on the federal level. I suppose it does at least open up some avenues for private research and funding, at least.

      It should be in the same category as alcohol and tobacco.

      BTW, our current drug scheduling is wild. Marijuana is a 1, same as heroin; cocaine and meth are a 2, same as Ritalin.

      Schedule 1: marijuana, heroin, LSD, ecstasy, and magic mushrooms. Schedule 2: cocaine, meth, oxycodone, Adderall, Ritalin, and Vicodin. Schedule 3: Tylenol with codeine, ketamine, anabolic steroids, and testosterone. Schedule 4: Xanax, Soma, Darvocet, Valium, and Ambien.

      https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling

      1. damikesc   5 months ago

        Honestly, I am beyond sick of marijuana. Makes me long for the smell of cigarette smoke. I am so damned sick and tired of smelling that BS everywhere.

        1. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

          Have someone smash you in the face with brick. That can eliminate your sense of smell.

          1. damikesc   5 months ago

            I'd rather do that to a pothead. Useless wastes of carbon.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

          If people are in public, they should stick to odorless vape pens. Or edibles. Smoking it in public is incredibly obnoxious.

          1. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

            Smoking anything in public where others are in close proximity is rude.

        3. Bruce D   5 months ago

          smelling that BS everywhere.

          Exaggerated B.S. I don't think you smelled it "everywhere". Maybe you smelled it somewhere sometime, but I doubt it was frequent or often enough to qualify as "everywhere".

      2. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

        It should be in the same category as alcohol and tobacco.

        It should be in the same category as zucchini and kale.

      3. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

        cocaine and meth are a 2, same as Ritalin.

        Ritalin IS meth.

        1. Zeb   5 months ago

          Well, no, it isn't. Unless you want to say that all phenethylamine stimulants are exactly the same.

      4. Square = Circle   5 months ago

        Schedule 1: marijuana, heroin, LSD, ecstasy, and magic mushrooms.

        Which itself is a bizarrely arbitrary group of chemicals to lump together.

        The only one of these that is even addictive, let alone dangerous in any way, is heroin (and I suppose ecstasy, if you take enough and behave stupidly). And there's not actually a ton of difference between how addictive and dangerous Schedule I heroin is and Schedule II oxycodone and other opiates. Heroin just has a Hollywood mystique about it that makes people superstitious.

        And none of them is even on the same order of magnitude as destructive as alcohol, which isn't even on the schedule at all.

        The Controlled Substances Act is quite simply one of the dumbest and most destructive pieces of legislation in human history.

        1. Zeb   5 months ago

          Schedule I seems to be an entirely political category. Drugs that people got all scared about at one time or another ended up there, regardless of their actual danger or utility.

          1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

            Drugs that people got all scared about at one time or another ended up there, regardless of their actual danger or utility.

            100%. It's the 'moral panic' category. Maybe we can round it out by adding smart phones - my daughter's school administrators assured us they're as addictive as fentanyl.

    6. Open Borders Libertarian (formerly Sandra)   5 months ago

      In Blue states (where I live) I can get a Michelin-star weed right cross the street from where I buy my bananas. When I go home to Florida good luck with that. It’s cute that libertarians think that rescheduling marijuana is going to do anything in states ruled by Christian nationalists and GOP Church ladies.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        Thanks for that odd input, KAR.

        1. Minadin   5 months ago

          Fake OBL, again?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

            Yeah. He can’t even be bothered to get the name right. It’s Liberal-tarian.

          2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

            That’s creepy.

        2. KARl hungus   5 months ago

          That’s not me. I have tried to change my username recently and it won’t let me, so I’m pretty sure I’m stuck with Karl Hungus as my username

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

            You shouldn't lie by claiming you cant change your username since anyone can lol.

            1. KARl hungus   5 months ago

              It won’t let me change mine.

              Anyway I’m not the one impersonating Sandra

      2. Square = Circle   5 months ago

        It’s cute that libertarians think that rescheduling marijuana is going to do anything in states ruled by Christian nationalists and GOP Church ladies.

        Why do you think libertarians think that it would?

        1. Minadin   5 months ago

          It could be that he's a moron, and as such, is too stupid to realize it. People in that situation often seem to blame others for their own shortcomings and failures.

          1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

            It could be that he's a moron

            You might be on to something there.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    The president is expected to seek to ease access to the drug through an upcoming executive order that directs federal agencies to pursue reclassification, the people said.

    Federalization means states can still profit from prohibition on their own, God love 'em.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

      Just due process.

  3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    Trump legalizes weed? Will Reasonistas finally embrace him as a hero? Or will he have to open the borders, and reveal his secret boyfriend?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      HE DIDN'T GET PERMISSION FROM CONGRESS!

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Congress? That’s so 20th century. No, he must have approval from Boasberg.

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          The judiciary can be the administrative branch too.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

            Why not? According to democrats, boys can be girls and girls can be boys. So this isn’t much of a stretch for their kind.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Nah. Watch Reason go from pro-weed to anti-weed because Orange Man Bad.

      1. Dakotian (descendent of Kulaks)   5 months ago

        Reason will cover it if it passes and then never bring it up again. They will ignore it and move on to the next "bad" thing the media pushes. They can't be seen acknowledging anything pro freedom that comes from Trump.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

          My guess is it will still be banned for security clearance holders which is what reason will focus on.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

            Because security clearances are a human right!

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Theyve moved on to stanning for fisherman caught cocaine.

    4. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

      Pretty amazing that something libertarians have been clamoring for for years is now suspect at Reason because Trump may have evil motivations. Every time I think this rag can't get any worse they prove me wrong.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        It’s like their response to Trump trying to dismantle the Department of Education. For fuck’s sake, that’s a libertarian wet dream, but Reason pisses on it.

      2. Zeb   5 months ago

        I don't see anything about his motivations being suspect here. Just that his actions on things like this can be a bit unpredictable (which I think is fair). Was there another Reason commentary on it?

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          I know you're trying to be fair, Zeb, but watch what happens.

          1. Zeb   5 months ago

            If it happens in this case, I will be a bit surprised. This is exactly how Reason and other drug law reform advocates have been pushing for this to get done for ever. Congress has given clear authority for this type of action.

            1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

              Yes, but watch them come up with excuses that this wasn't the right way, or congress should've had more involvement, or there should be more bipartisan consultation.

              Their hatred of Trump supersedes everything else.

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

          "maybe looking for an easy public sentiment win?" Liz speculates. In other words cynically buying votes. Liz absolutely challenges Trump's motivation.

          1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

            Liz absolutely challenges Trump's motivation.

            Is that against the rules now?

            1. Zeb   5 months ago

              And it's not really a challenge, but a speculation. If that's why he's doing it, then great. Isn't it good for a politician to do something sensible because it's what people want?

              1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                Exactly - my reading is basically "a true believer would have done this day one, and he's talked about doing it before but has balked at various times for various stated reasons, so it's worth wondering what's changed now."

                In fairness, OTOH, reason does try pretty hard to put a negative spin on everything Trump does, so I can see why a good percentage of the commentariat are easily triggered by anything other than "hey, look, Trump did a good thing!"

                1. Zeb   5 months ago

                  Yeah, I'm not here to argue that Reason in general doesn't have a pretty bad anti-Trump bias. But sometimes I think people are reading it in where it isn't. Liz isn't a Trump booster by any means, but she seems to be quite willing to give him credit where it's due.

                  1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                    But sometimes I think people are reading it in where it isn't. Liz isn't a Trump booster by any means, but she seems to be quite willing to give him credit where it's due.

                    100%

          2. Zeb   5 months ago

            That just seems like normal cynicism about politicians to me. And a pretty plausible suggestion as to the motivation. It's not exactly an unusual or particularly controversial motivation among politicians in general for anything they do.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Liz needs to get the hell out of NYC before it destroys her.

        1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   5 months ago

          This

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

            If not for herself, then for her family. No one should raise children in that blighted, soon to be Islamist shithole.

    5. Social Justice is neither   5 months ago

      They'll whine that hd didn't do it right, early enough or that somehow State taxes and restrictions are his fault.

  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    Leftist cognitive dissonance on display. Read thr first 2 sentences and laugh.

    Ezra Klein
    @ezraklein
    Trump often lies about Democrats giving healthcare to undocumented immigrants. In California, Newsom actually did it. And defends it.

    "I'm proud of that. I believe in universal health care."

    But, he says, "we failed on the border. We need to own up to that."

    1. HorseConch   5 months ago

      Klein seems to be one of the more sane voices of the left. This tweet of his just goes to prove how crazy the less sane ones are.

      1. damikesc   5 months ago

        No, Ezra is a moron. Writes a long book on how Democrats champion unworkable policies --- then votes for Mamdani.

        1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

          No, Ezra is a moron

          I would have gone with "cynical political operative."

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Newsom isn’t the only one doing so.

      https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1946983911617155105?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

      Illinois governor JB Pritzker: Illegals in Illinois do not receive taxpayer funded Medicaid

      Also Illinois: Medicaid rolls back coverage for illegals

      .@JBPritzker lied to Congress

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

        And the fat fuck thinks he can arrest ICE agents.

        1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

          Nah, it's a virtue signal for the crazy leftists in Illinois. He knows better.

      2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

        "JBPritzker lied to Congress"

        It's what Pritzkers do best.

      3. Rick James   5 months ago

        Shyeah, and Reason lied to its readers on this subject.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      "Trump often lies about Democrats giving healthcare to undocumented immigrants. In California, Newsom actually did it. And defends it."

      So what's the lie?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        If trump says something? Then lie.

        Democrat programming.

        1. HorseConch   5 months ago

          They lie so blatantly that they don't even bother not proving their lies. It's no different than all of the D's sharing charts showing off Trump's inflation that primarily occurred while he wasn't in office.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

            Hey, those chart narratives are all over boehms writing. The lie is working.

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

            Liberals have re-defined "lie", just like all other inconvenient patriarchal words. Now "lie" means anything they disagree with, while any statement that promotes the leftist agenda is "truth".

            Do you think they took over English departments for no reason?

            1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

              See leftist's definition of "phobia".

              1. Outlaw Josey Wales   5 months ago

                And virus or vaccine

            2. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

              I've argued many times that the left uses words with commonly understood meanings in completely different ways, much like Humpty Dumpty says "glory" means "a nice knock-down argument" and that a word means "just what I choose it to mean.".

              I give this example:

              Seen on Slashdot, the alarming headline:

              The Arctic Ocean Could Be 'Ice-Free' Within the Decade, Researchers Warn

              Now, I'm not here to argue about global warming, or climate alarmism, or any of that.

              I just want to point out that when you get to redefine terms to not mean what the reasonable reader might think, you can always be right:

              The study defines "ice-free" as when the Arctic Ocean has less than 1 million square kilometers, or 386,000 square miles, of ice.

              I mean, I could sell ice cream and advertise it as "turd free", but define "turd free" as "contains no more than one dog turd per 5 gallons of ice cream". But defining it that way sure doesn't seem like I'd be truthful or accurate.

              I'm sure that there is some agreement among the arctic researchers that 1Msqkm is a critical level, but here's a good time for scientists to make up a term or to use a more accurate term. "Critically low" or "Below the 1Msqkm threshold" or "Lowest ever recorded." Even "below one gargleflop, where a gargleflop is the level of ice scientists believe is a critical threshold for [reasons]". Maybe even "Oh God Oh God we're all gonna die!"

              But not "ice-free"! That means something already, something which is not 1Msqkm of ice!

              1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

                Another method they use is to redefine the word entirely into something amorphous or even opposite, like racism.

                Standard definition of racism:
                The belief that groups of humans possess different behavioral traits corresponding to physical or inherited attributes, and that these differences render some groups inherently superior or inferior to others.

                Progressive/reversed usage observed in activist and academic circles:
                The claim that certain behavioral traits (e.g., being “racist” or “oppressive”) are themselves inherent, inherited attributes of specific racial groups, most commonly applied as “whiteness = inherent racism” or “white people are inherently racist by virtue of their race.”

                In this reversed form, racism is no longer treated as a belief or action that any individual of any race can hold or reject, but as an essential, inescapable characteristic automatically assigned to members of one racial group.

                This effectively adopts the structure of the traditional racism it claims to oppose.

              2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

                Yeah, but what size dog made the turd? Maybe a chihuahua turd doesn’t qualify as a full turd? Didn’t think of that, did ya?

                See, this is the selective nuance of defending nonsense. Chemjeff can demonstrate it much better.

              3. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                The Arctic Ocean Could Be 'Ice-Free' Within the Decade, Researchers Warn

                And also worth noting that it's not actually unprecedented for the Arctic to go "ice-free" in the summer.

                And while we're on the topic, worth noting that through most of the Earth's history there has been no permanent ice anywhere on the planet.

            3. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

              Liberals have re-defined "lie", just like all other inconvenient patriarchal words. Now "lie" means anything they disagree with, while any statement that promotes the leftist agenda is "truth".

              Weird, that's Reason's definition too.

    4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      Also beat me to it! Damn I should have read all the comments first.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    "Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because it does bad for the children, it does bad for the people that are older than children."

    "Eloquence's not here, man."

    1. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      Yeah, not always erudite, is he?

  6. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    Democrats keep posting charts proving democrat rule is a disaster.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-know-their-constituents-cant-read-charts-thats-why

    1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

      Ask a democrat what "per capita" means.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        And ask them what "wealth" is, where it comes from, and if they learned economics watching Scrooge McDuck cartoons, i.e. fixed pie.

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          Wealth is fixed eternally. There's hasn't been any created since the beginning of the world.

          1. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

            Except by slaves. But all the wealth they created is in Scrooge McDuck's vault.

          2. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

            Every time someone flushes a gold plated toilet an aspiring artist in Manhattan is forced to eat ramen noodles to survive.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    Trump, of course, can't unilaterally decide this, but he "can direct the Justice Department to forgo a pending administrative court hearing and issue the final rule," reports the Post.

    Lower court judges, start your gavels!

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

      Pretty sure this will have a disparate impact on BIPOCs. The ACLU will have to file lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions
      and Reason editors will write long think pieces.

  8. mad.casual   5 months ago

    TRUMP's push for a 9-0 map failed. Big defeat for the Trump administration.

    Wait, did I miss the announcement that he's running for a third term?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Too many RINO and GOPe. You have to play hardball because the other side already is. Look no further than Illinois’s map,

      1. mad.casual   5 months ago

        Kidding. Half of more of Indiana is red specifically because of IL or just Chicago. Spending money rather than just letting Pritzker and Let's-Go-Dark-Brandon continue to blame Hoosiers for their gun and other social problems is throwing good money after bad.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        Democrats learned under Reagan that if they shared the NGO wealth they would get compliant RINOs.

        See MTGs quick flip to the new Cheney.

        Flake, kizinger, etc. Etc.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        "Look no further than Illinois’s map"

        Ahem, Massachusetts.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   5 months ago

      Indiana made a huge mistake there. The dems don't care about loading their states, Republicans need to play the same game

  9. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    Universal child care need not be a pipe dream in America—something we envy the Danes and the Swedes for, but never imagine having for ourselves...

    The Danes and the Swedes don't have to be the world's piggy bank.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      Nor the free world's military protectors. Nor the worlds medical innovators. Nor the worlds technology innovators. Nor the worlds largest immigration sink. Nor...

    2. Bubba Jones   5 months ago

      The most comprehensive comparison is the total tax revenue as a percentage of GDP, which accounts for all taxes.
      Sweden's tax-to-GDP ratio was approximately 42.6% in 2021.
      The U.S. tax-to-GDP ratio was approximately 24.5% in 2021.
      This indicates that the overall tax burden is significantly higher in Sweden.

      Individual and Consumption Taxes
      While average income tax rates for individuals are comparable for middle-income earners (and corporate tax rates are lower in Sweden), the significant difference comes from social security contributions and consumption taxes, which are a much larger share of revenue in Sweden.
      Average effective income tax rate for a typical worker in Sweden is around 32% (local income tax), with a top marginal rate of around 52.3% for higher earners. In the U.S., the effective federal income tax rate for average earners is around 12%, with combined federal and state top marginal rates often around 43.7%.
      Value-Added Tax (VAT) vs. Sales Tax:
      Sweden has a high standard VAT rate of 25% on most goods and services, with reduced rates of 12% and 6% for specific items like food and books.
      The U.S. has no national sales tax; instead, there are state and local sales taxes. The population-weighted average combined state and local sales tax rate is about 7.5%.
      Social Security Contributions:
      Sweden has mandatory employer social security contributions of around 31.42% of gross salary, and employees pay a general pension fee that is credited against income tax.
      The U.S. has FICA taxes for Social Security (12.4% combined employer/employee) and Medicare (2.9% combined), plus an additional 0.9% for high earners, which are lower than Sweden's total social contribution burden.
      Corporate Taxes
      Sweden's corporate income tax rate is 20.6%.
      The U.S. combined federal and state corporate tax rate is slightly higher at approximately 25.8%.
      Ultimately, the structure of the Swedish system means a higher tax burden is placed on the average consumer through VAT and social contributions compared to the U.S. system.

  10. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    '"Universal child care need not be a pipe dream in America—something we envy the Danes and the Swedes for, but never imagine having for ourselves," writes Rachel Cohen Booth for The New York Times.'

    Do we also envy Denmark taking almost 50% of GDP in taxes, compared to 25% for the US government? And taxing EVERYONE much more, especially middle and even low income households?

    If your answer is "yes", then you are part of the problem.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      I’m not interested in paying for someone else’s kids.

      1. HorseConch   5 months ago

        When the premise of the story is that the state has driven the cost of private care up to $20k, what is the magic number that the state will be paying w/ your stolen earnings to make it free?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

          "If you think it's expensive now, wait until it's free!"

      2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

        "I’m not interested in paying for someone else’s kids"

        They're your kids too. As a wise lawyer once said, it takes a village.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Kmw and Boehm are actually envious. See their complaints on extending 2017 tax structure.

  11. shrike   5 months ago

    Layoff announcements top 1.1 million this year, the most since 2020 pandemic, Challenger says

    Layoffs and manufacturing contraction every month Donnie has mismanaged the economy, Peanuts.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/04/layoff-announcements-this-year-top-1point1-million-the-most-since-2020-when-pandemic-hit-challenger-says.html

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Anything to push your Open Society agenda, Shrike. By the way, care to tell the commentariat exactly how you managed to get your original SPB account permanently banned and Reason to nuke an entire thread of comments?

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      Looking at the performance of the stock market says that people that actually invest money in this economy disagree with your premise.

      1. Zeb   5 months ago

        I'm not saying anything one way or another about the state of the economy. But the stock market has been known to display "irrational exuberance".

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          Somehow I don't think it'd be based in this case on glowing press coverage.

      2. CE   5 months ago

        Stock market investors are forward looking though.
        Until they all suddenly realize they've been wrong.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      States With the Highest Unemployment Rate
      District of Columbia tallied the nation’s highest unemployment rate in August at 6%. It is followed by Puerto Rico at 5.6%.
      State Unemployment Rate Annual Change (perc. points)
      District of Columbia 6.0% 0.7
      Puerto Rico 5.6% 0.1
      California 5.5% 0.1
      Nevada 5.3% −0.4
      Michigan 5.2% 0.2

      South Dakota held the nation’s lowest unemployment rate, 1.9%. Next on the list are North Dakota and Vermont at 2.5%.

      State Unemployment Rate Annual Change (perc. points)
      South Dakota 1.9% 0.1
      North Dakota 2.5% 0.0
      Vermont 2.5% 0.0
      Hawaii 2.7% −0.3
      Alabama 2.9% −0.2
      Montana 2.9% −0.1

      Cities With the Highest Unemployment Rate
      At 21.5%, El Centro, CA, had the highest unemployment rate in the U.S. in August. It is followed by Yuma, AZ, at 18.2%.

      City Unemployment Rate Annual Change (perc. points)
      El Centro, CA 21.5% 0.3
      Yuma, AZ 18.2% 1.4
      Visalia-Porterville, CA 10.3% 0.0
      Merced, CA 9.4% 0.1
      Ocean City, NJ 9.4% −0.6

      At 2.1%, Rapid City, SD, had the lowest unemployment rate in the U.S. Next on the list are Decatur, AL, Huntsville, AL and Sioux Falls, SD, at 2.2%.

      Table with 3 columns and 5 rows. (column headers with buttons are sortable)
      City Unemployment Rate Annual Change (perc. points)
      Rapid City, SD 2.1% 0.2
      Decatur, AL 2.2% −0.8
      Huntsville, AL 2.2% −0.7
      Sioux Falls, SD 2.2% 0.4
      Bismarck, ND 2.3% 0.0

      https://www.forbes.com/advisor/personal-finance/unemployment-rates-by-city/
      https://www.forbes.com/advisor/personal-finance/unemployment-rates-by-state-10-21-25/

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        Almost like unemployment correlates with how many benefits for not working are handed out...

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

          Hmm, I'm gonna pick "generous benefits cause long term unemployment" (and not "unemployment causes generous benefits"). And also put me down for "Democratic policies cause both unemployment and generous benefits".

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      You were banned for posting a link to child porn.

      1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

        You were banned for saying that other posters said that they LOVED to eat shit, without ONE iota of evidence, Penguin Poop!

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

          Except I wasn’t banned evil one.

          1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

            Citation please! (For You PervFectly SNOT having gotten banned!) Also citations please for me saying that I love to eat shit, and shrike having gotten banned, other than "everyone says so"!

            Also, PervFected You should know, cummenters like Moose-Mammary the Necrophilian Necrophiliac here HAVE been known to steal IDs; I have a cite for THAT one! Maybe Moose-Mammary the Necrophilian Necrophiliac stole shrike's ID and made posts that got shrike banned, for all that I know, if shit ever happened in the first place... Shit would be a SLUT-LOAD less cuntfusing, if Ye PervFectly EVIL Ones could STOP lying!!!

          2. shrike   5 months ago

            Except I wasn’t banned evil one.

            Nor was I banned you idiot Trump-Tard.

            1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

              Yes you fucking were.
              You posted the child porn links, Reason nuked the entire thread and permabanned SPB1. The only reason you're still here is because you're a sockpuppeting, ban-evading piece-of-shit.

              1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

                Citation please, ID-stealing, lying Servant, Serpent, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One!

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

                  ML doesn’t steal IDs, retard.

                  1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

                    She did and I saved a link to shit.

                    In https://reason.com/2021/03/21/why-we-still-shouldnt-censor-misinformation/#comment-8818090 Mamma fesses to her being an identity-thief and sock!
                    chemjeff radical individualist
                    March.21.2021 at 4:27 pm
                    Uh oh, I think you left your sock on.
                    Reply
                    1. SQRLSY 0ne
                    March.21.2021 at 5:06 pm
                    Yeah, sigh.

                    Hey MammaryBahnFuhrer, Expert Christian Theologian! Did Jesus appear to You in a vision, and tell You that ID theft is a GREAT, wonderful thing? Or ARE You Jesus, returned to us, maybe? Are You necrophiliac-Jesus, push-people-to-suicide Jesus?

                    She changed SQRLSY One to SQRLSY 0ne, zero put in for capital "Oh".... OH so clever!!!

                    InsaneTrollLogic (More Evil than The Average Dude)... Do You PervFectly apologize for Your PervFected LIE? I bet You cun't do shit, Ye are TOOOOO PervFected to admit error, EVER!!!!

                2. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                  Citation please

                  Can't be cited because reason nuked the thread and disabled his account, but if you go back to comments from that era, you'll see big holes where people are responding to his comments that aren't there anymore.

                  In fairness to SPB/shrike, he was trying to show how easy it is to find child porn on the web despite attempts to restrict it. I didn't click on his link to confirm what it was, but the commentariat generally reacted to the fact that he so readily knew how to find child porn on the internet, and it hasn't been forgotten.

                  The fact that reason was so quick to just memory hole that whole page and ban his account, only the second account banned in the history of the site, AFAIK, supports that it really was what he said it was.

                  1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

                    So how does anyone know that SPB = = shrike?

                    There was also a "Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2" or "II" ass I recall...

                    In any case, the whole thing brings out the stink of the dog-pilers-on here, who mob the posters with name-calling, rather than posting one iota about the points that the "of the wrong tribe" people make...

                    Ad hominem out the wazzoo! Shit's the BEST that the BEASTS can do, doooo-doooo-doooo, dog-pilers (mobbers) and piles of doggie dooo-dooo that they are!

                    1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                      In any case, the whole thing brings out the stink of the dog-pilers-on here, who mob the posters with name-calling, rather than posting one iota about the points that the "of the wrong tribe" people make...

                      You're not wrong, but shrike, SPB and SPB2 are the same guy - he himself says so. He just denies that he was ever banned.

            2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

              Yeah, you were. You’re a pedophile. And you’re stupid. I suspect you attempted to paste a link, but instead pasted a child porn link you previously copied instead. Which fits your history of laziness and stupidity.

              That about cover it Kiddie Raper?

    6. Bubba Jones   5 months ago

      It's just a temporary disruption as we begin to phase out the income tax in favor of tariffs.

      The first ones to benefit are the unemployed people who won't pay any income tax at all!

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    New evidence shows Jack Smith also spied on conservative lawyers. A habit he had bad in prior cases of prosecutors abuse.

    https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2025/12/10/guess-who-else-jack-smith-spied-on-with-arctic-frost-harmeet-dhillon-n2197018

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Why does that asshole still have a law license?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        At least he doesnt have to worry about more 0-9 scotus rulings due to KBJ.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Why is he still alive?

  13. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    Latest dem led lie was yesterday when they pushed trump was deporting veterans. This of course is false. Even confirmed by NPR.

    Greg Price
    @greg_price11
    The guy in this video-- Sae Joon Park-- was not deported by DHS.

    He self-deported to Korea.

    He had his green card revoked and was given a removal order in 2009 after spending three years in jail for felony drug possession and bail jumping.

    He also spent five decades in America on a green card and never chose to pursue citizenship.
    https://npr.org/2025/06/24/g-s1-74036/trump-ice-self-deportation-army-veteran-hawaii

    1. HorseConch   5 months ago

      Are there truly no innocent people being deported that they can use as an example?

      1. Michael Ejercito   5 months ago

        A removal order means he had his due process.

        1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          No-no-no-no-no.
          Due process is multiple trials by juries until a result Sarcasmic approves of is reached.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    Through video, we get to know our pundits the same way we engage with influencers, and the more we are convinced by their multimedia performances the more readily we join their podcasting personality cults...

    TEAM TUCKER 4EVER

  15. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    CBS shows Somalian capitalists living the high life off their capitalism. Maybe reason can report on it now?

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-fraud-spent-millions-luxury-cars-villas/

    1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

      I find it hilarious that the lefties have now adopted the Somalia flag as their newest virtue signal. So fucking predictable.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

        Any country but america.

        1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

          No shit. Embarrassing we share resources with these people.

          1. mad.casual   5 months ago

            Remember when the debate was trifling over people (not) wearing American flag lapel pins?

            Wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then.

            1. Mickey Rat   5 months ago

              Still running against the wind?

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

            And by "share" do you mean they have managed to legalize wealth redistribution?

            1. Idaho-Bob   5 months ago

              I meant oxygen.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

                We need Trump to declare that oxygen is a good thing. Watch all the assholes with TDS try to stop breathing voluntarily.

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

                  Even better, a Trump rant against CO2. I predict actual exploding heads.

                  1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

                    Even better better, trump signs an EO, (call it the uncle bosie bill) that outlaws cannibalism. Dems will start eating people.

                    Well, non dems will shoot them if they try that shit on them, so they’ll have to eat each other. So, technically not “people”. But still….

          3. tracerv   5 months ago

            I'm embarrassed to share oxygen with them.

            Edit - Ha. You agree.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

          More like, any country that hates America.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    China is considering a package of incentives worth as much as $70 billion to bankroll and support its chipmaking industry, pouring more state money into a sector it deems pivotal to its technological conflict with the US...

    This was a valued chip, was it not? It really tied the technological conflict together.

  17. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    Newsome, who signed a bill making AI videos illegal, posts AI video if trump and team arrested.

    https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1998898153131749714

    Im sure jeffsarc will condemn this rhetoric.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      I’m surprised it wasn’t an AI assassination video.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Day ain’t over yet.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Im sure jeffsarc will condemn this rhetoric.

      Of course, and I’m just as sure California will tumble into the sea.

      /for those wondering, Donald Fagen did eventually return to Annandale.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      Didn’t he just sign a law making this illegal in California?

      1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

        Didn’t he just sign a law making this illegal in California?

        Didn't he sign a law in 2020 that said we all had to stay home and avoid fancy restaurants like The French Laundry?

  18. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

    A what now?

    Greg Price
    @greg_price11
    Rep. Bennie Thompson refers to the terrorist attack against two National Guardsmen in DC as an "unfortunate accident."

    Sec. Noem: "Unfortunate accident? It was a terroist attack. They shot our Guardsmen in the head."

    https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1999145717063962959

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

      Is it mean and racist to hope that Bennie has an unfortunate accident? After all, accidents just happen, right?

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      See my comment yesterday in the Slade article about leftist leaders defending assassinations.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    Oral exams are back.

    Are, like, fillers included in word counts and whatever?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Does ENB know oral is back?

    2. Quicktown Brix   5 months ago

      I thought voters rejected this when they rejected Kamala.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    The far right is powered by left-wing illiberalism and hypocrisy...

    You inevitably get canceled a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

  21. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   5 months ago

    Why quote Slade? She's a retarded cunt

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Groyper is the new favorite narrative. Slade is brave for repeating it. Even Google is pushing it with Owen's and Fuentes.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        Owens is a nutbar, and Fuentes is either a fed or fed-adjacent.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

          Seems like it by how his promotion on social media is happening.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

            cONspiRacY!!!

        2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          Owens is pretty sexy though.

          1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

            She was 8-10 years ago. Haven’t seen her since she whelped some pups.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   5 months ago

    Long, worthwhile piece in First Things on a pregnant woman who went undercover in Canada to investigate their abortion industry.

    Outside maybe Slade or even perhaps 2Chili, this is probably the only place you'll see this referenced in Reason.

    1. mad.casual   5 months ago

      Imagine going back in time during the discussion of "Safe, legal, and rare." and saying "Relatively passive female voices will refer to this as an *industry* plainly spoken in the full sense of the word... people will go undercover in the 'abortion industry' the way Peta goes undercover in the 'beef industry'... and no one will bat an eye. There are enough ardent participants that pregnant women have to go undercover."

      Go on about the other end of life and MAID and they'd probably invent the idea of temporal asylum on the spot.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        And imagine going back in time during the first wave discussion of gay rights, and the focus on "just being able to marry and be like other people". And then explain to those activists that mission creep now demands sex training for kindergarteners, chemical and surgical castration for pre-teens, and public accommodation of sexual freak shows. And the first steps in normalizing pedophilia.

        1. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

          "If you hate elementary school kids reading graphic books about how to give your gay partner a rim job, or drag queens reading stories to kids in skirts and crotchless panties, you are a homophobic bigot."

          I think we can all agree the common denominator was the 19th.

        2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          Because when you made a living in gay rights advocacy, where do you go when the goal is fulfilled?
          So you have to invent something else to justify still taking donations and your continuing employment.

          1. Zeb   5 months ago

            Has there ever been an advocacy org that got what they wanted and simply said "mission accomplished, we're closing down now"?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

              No. They’ve got to keep their phony baloney jobs somehow.

          2. mad.casual   5 months ago

            Once again, at least in this country, the Street Transvestite Activist Revolutionaries and the Sister Bob's Home for Wayward Girls (or whatever it is) was right there, shoulder-to-shoulder with the Gay Liberation Front protesting since Stonewall.

            I was always less "Where do you go?" and more "We'll just put this pot of hot garbage to simmer on the back burner."

      2. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

        "Imagine going back in time during the discussion of "Safe, legal, and rare." and saying"

        How about:

        "Safe, legal, and rare will evolve into: we can abort your basically fully grown, viable, healthy baby child, without questions (or with encouragement!), in a fashion that is convenient as getting drive through fast food, and it will be so accepted that half the country will applaud you, and the half that thinks its horrible wont really do anything about it"

        I would wager what they end up doing with MAID will make us look back at the suicide booths of Futurama and say "Matt Groening still batting 100% on predictions"

        Anyone that would abort a third trimester baby (both the mom and the doctor) should be in jail, no questions asked.

  23. shrike   5 months ago

    Costco seeks 'full refund' for tariffs in new lawsuit against Trump administration
    ....
    President Donald Trump imposed a flurry of tariffs earlier this year.

    https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/costco-seeks-full-refund-tariffs-new-lawsuit-trump/story?id=128032688

    Got to side with Costco - a true All-American company.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Yes, one that sells cheap Chinese shit.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      A true All-American company wouldn’t be buying so many imported goods.

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

      turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      Walz +5

  24. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

    "child care workers be brought up to pay parity with public schoolteachers"

    The tacit implication is that they are all just glorified babysitters.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Also states they are overpaid.

    2. Social Justice is neither   5 months ago

      So long as this demand is met by reducing schoolteacher pay to reflect the value these Marxist propagandists provide, then I'm all for it.

  25. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

    Headline: It is not racist to tell the truth about Britain’s rape gangs
    Subhead: Why is the left so hell-bent on burying the truth of what was done to working-class girls?

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/12/12/it-is-not-racist-to-tell-the-truth-about-britains-rape-gangs/

    Here’s a surefire way to know if you’ve lost the moral plot – you get angrier about the public discussion of mass rape than you do about the mass raping itself. Your moral conscience gets more fired up by people talking about the industrial-scale abuse of working-class girls than it does by the abuse itself. You’re more horrified by the phrase ‘Pakistani rape gang’ than you are by the existence of Pakistani rape gangs. If any of that applies to you, then your morals have been well and truly shattered on the wheel of cultural relativism, classism and cowardice.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      They said they were sorry. MoveOn.

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

        It’s not like the girls suffered the trauma of losing a federal government job.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

          And they'll probably get an extra day to complete assignments in Ivy League colleges.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

          Indeed, they'll be fine.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

      Think like an elitist "citizen of the world" type. Actual working class girls matter much less than debating an abstract social concept, especially if your progressive ideals are offended.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      Is it even rape if you hold a 12 year old down while your friend penetrates her and then all you do is jerk off on her?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        Jeffy says it’s ok if he feels bad about it afterwards.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

          Indeed. More selective nuance from the worlds most thoughtful rape apologist.

    4. Michael Ejercito   5 months ago

      Where are all the feminist groups?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        Having the regions around their lady dicks waxed.

      2. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

        Arguing that some 12-year-olds like violent sex. Their bodies, their choice.

      3. Square = Circle   5 months ago

        Where are all the feminist groups?

        They are now known as TERFs, and are no longer allowed to spread their hate speech in public.

      4. mad.casual   5 months ago

        Fleeing.

        The former daytime talk show host, 67, and the Arrested Development actress, 52, are said to have been 'climbing the walls' due to the absence of the lively social circuit that once defined their lives in Los Angeles. Their ambitious plan to put down permanent roots in England, which began following the re-election of President Donald Trump in 2024, has completely unravelled.

        Imagine being so unhinged that girls are being raped in the country to which you fled as a 60-IQ political stunt, and you're climbing the walls, not because of the rape, but because you're unable to sit quietly in a room with yourself or go about your day with sycophants adoring you.

        It hasn't even been two full years, half a term, and you've got a pile of cash. FFS, there are country bumpkins who come to "The Big City" with nothing but a broken down truck that last longer.

        1. Stuck in California   5 months ago

          You know what? I'm going to give them a thumbs up for ACTUALLY leaving the country.

          I mean, every fucking election I vote for the asshole because histrionic stars say "If he's elected I'm leaving the country" and yet they NEVER FUCKING DO. I mean, come on! They promised!

          These idiots actually left us in peace for nearly a year.

          That said, what would we expect? You're right. Sycophants are the currency of Hollywood. You can't feel like you've made it unless you have people to boss around and a posse of brown nosers to validate your every opinion.

          1. mad.casual   5 months ago

            I'm going to give them a thumbs up for ACTUALLY leaving the country.

            This was hashed out on the The Boyscast podcast. 0.5 stars at best.

            She isn't/They aren't plebs who pulled their kids out of school... packed up all their belongings... hired movers... forwarded their mail... or simply walked away and left it all behind. She hired an assistant to purchase and furnish her estate, the one in the UK, had her stylist purchase all new clothes to match her old wardrobe to be waiting for her when she got there, had her agent book her travel ticket. This was a year-long sabbatical conveniently timed around the revelation about how horrible she is to work for with the words "Permanent Move" hung from it. Almost certainly not even a full-fledged, citizenship-holding ex-pat.

            She strolled over to the British part of the airport lounge, saw that without Hollywood to affirm to her who she was she wasn't anything, and strolled back over to where she was. If The, or a, Civil War happens, she won't be on any side anybody seriously fighting wants to be on and anybody on any side seriously fighting won't want or need her/them.

  26. shrike   5 months ago

    In Congressional testimony, FBI can't define or identify "Antifa".


    How Many Members Does Antifa Have? Where Is Its Headquarters? The FBI Has No Answers.
    ...
    Despite saying that antifa is the biggest U.S. domestic threat, the FBI couldn’t explain how the movement is a “terror organization” — or an organization at all.

    https://theintercept.com/2025/12/11/fbi-antifa-terrorist-location/

    #Dumbass Craka Meme

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      You’re seriously using The Intercept as a source in 2025? They haven’t been credible since Glen Greenwald left.

      1. shrike   5 months ago

        It's a Congressional testimony, you idiot.

        Tape is everywhere.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

          turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

          Then post from the source, not a commtietard version of events, twit.

        3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

          Walz +6

        4. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          It's a Congressional testimony, you idiot.

          No. It's Matt Sledge posting literally six cherry picked partial sentences total from it, which he proceeds to sprinkle throughout his radical narrative.

          This is everything from the testimony he posted:
          “Well, the investigations are active,”
          “our primary concern right now”
          “the most immediate, violent threat”
          “We are building out the infrastructure right now,”
          “Well, that’s very fluid,”
          “It’s ongoing for us to understand that. The same, no different than Al Qaeda or ISIS.”

          That's not "Congressional testimony" Shrike. See, you never read your own links before you start lying about them.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      No notarized membership cards!

    3. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      How many members does Hamas, ISIS, Al Quaeda have? Where are the headquarters? Same answers for all the terrorist organizations.

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. Zeb   5 months ago

      Because the whole point of how they are organized and operate is based on not having formal leadership, headquarters or organization that is publicly visible. This is pretty basic stuff for organizing a subversive communist revolutionary group. The whole fucking point is to be organized in such a way that the FBI can't easily identify obvious leaders or formal structure.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

        You're attempting to explain a concept to someone with a low two-digit IQ.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

          That’s generous to give Shrike. I thought his IQ was single digits.

        2. Zeb   5 months ago

          Well, might as well keep it explaining it for the benefit of people who might actually think about it.

      2. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

        "I dont know why the FBI just doesnt go to the Antifa headquarters and arrest all the people at the meeting with notarized membership cards?!? Why are they letting them off the hook?>!"

      3. mad.casual   5 months ago

        The whole fucking point is to be organized in such a way that the FBI can't easily identify obvious leaders or formal structure.

        Since WWII, the tactic has been understood to have an on-the-books legitimate political wing and an informal group of brownshirts to do the dirty work and make things look organic.

        Sinn Fein and the IRA, Palestinian Authority -> Palestinian Liberation Organization -> Hamas... ... ...TdA

    6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

      Kill yourself.

      1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

        Broken-record-playing Demonic Death-Worshitter Worshits Death... More news at 6:66!!!

        Cuntsorevaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant, serpent, and slurp-pants (pants-slurper) of the Evil One?

        EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…

        He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
        Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
        Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
        His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
        https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
        Loves death and the dying moans,
        Then he likes to munch their bones!
        He’s truly, completely a necrophiliac,
        His brain, squirming toad-like, is REALY, really whack!
        Has no thoughts that help the people,
        He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
        On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
        Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
        Kool-Aid man, please listen,
        You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
        Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
        The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!

        A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
        https://www.amazon.com/Glimpses-Devil-Psychiatrists-Personal-Possession/dp/1439167265

        Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
        If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
        Who would feed you? Whose tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
        You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!

        Signed, Yours Truly, Heaven-on-Earth-Based Skeptic of Servants, Serpents, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

          YAWN, Melvin.

        2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

          If M. Scott Peck were still alive he'd kick you in the nutsack for using his books to help you tell lies, Shillsy

    7. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      Walz +7

    8. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

      Ya, we didnt all see countless videos of mobs of people coordinated, dressed in all black with masks, burning down shit, harassing people on the streets, and attacking people that tried to record it.

      Yup, it was my lying eyes. Those people carrying the "anti fascist" signs that were terrorizing the public, in my Twitter feed daily, didnt exist. Must have been my imagination

      1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

        An illusion. You were manipulated into thinking you saw it by Trump and his devil words.

    9. Square = Circle   5 months ago

      Gee, look what I found when I asked Google how I can form an antifa group.

      "If you form a local antifa group, you will be expected to do a few things:"

      Now who do you suppose is doing this expecting, and what happens to Antifa groups who don't do "what is expected?"

      1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

        That was put on the internet by the devil to test our faith.

        1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

          It's actually tempting to think it's a false flag, because it's just too cartoonishly dead on (bolding mine):

          4) Visibilty
          Both the authorities and fascists will be interested in your group s membership, so you should consider the question of public visibility carefully before you start. We strongly recommend against antifa groups being organized using the open, public model of most contemporary activism because of the risk of infiltration. If an emergency situation—such as responding to fascist public event—calls for public meetings and a traditional mass organizing activist model, this should be kept separate from the long-term group structure.

          In fact, we recommend that you stay anonymous both while forming and until your first action. Anonymity is your best defense, and you should keep it intact as long as you can. Develop your group, get on the same page, and decide what you want to focus on. Also, note that once groups are formed, it’s very difficult to change the type of person who is in the group. Whether this is about gender, age, race, or counterculture—it will be hard to alter later on.

          Use a “closed collective” model: this is a membership-based policy with no open meetings. Don’t allow new people to walk in off the street. Instead, develop a process for researching and vetting people who want to be involved.

          One extreme option is to function as a group but not give yourself a name, and not tell fellow activists what you are doing. Once you have a name, fascists will try to figure out “who is in the group.” Not having a public face makes your actions even more anonymous. If people are being targeted, for example after a conflict with fascists, a publicly known group will draw attention first. If there is no public presence, or no formalized organization with a name, this will complicate the process of identification and retaliation.

          Consider using a cell model whenever possible, in which one member meets with others when required. For example, you might need a public face to talk to other groups, club owners to convince them to cancel Nazi bands, to meet people to receive information they don’t want to share online, or to table at events. To limit exposure, make sure one person is designated as the semi-public face, even if they never admit they are a group member. This limits how many people can be exposed.

          I mean, they pretty much hit on every point. The only reason I don't think this site was set up by the FBI is that their table of contents, in addition to stuff like "The Strategy of Transgression in the Phenomenology of Ontological Anarchy," "Fragments of an Anarcha-Transfeminist Sociology of Sex Work," and other straight-out-of-Disco Elysium type stuff, they have a "How Liberal Identity Politics Paved The Way For Fascism," which I don't think would be there if someone were trying to fictionalize a far-left organization.

          1. mad.casual   5 months ago

            Back in my day, everybody knew all the rules of Fight Club.

            The fact that journalists today continue to play retarded about it only beclowns them.

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    'This appears to be part of Mamdani's thinking, and perhaps more broadly behind the rise in universal everything from vast swaths of the left.'

    Except, of course, those pesky old universal ideals, like property rights, free speech, guns, free markets, personal responsibility, self-reliance, contracts, etc.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      Or how to pay for it all.

    2. HorseConch   5 months ago

      Affordability is key. Everything is a right, and work is bullshit.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        (Checking my Woke Dictionary again...)

        "Affordable" means free for good, i.e. oppressed people.

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Will reason realize rhe entire dem affordability narrative is gov funded universal handouts?

  28. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    "China is considering a package of incentives worth as much as $70 billion to bankroll and support its chipmaking industry, pouring more state money into a sector it deems pivotal to its technological conflict with the US"

    BUT FREE TRADE!!!

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    'Oral exams are back.'

    Is this another trad wife thing?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Isn’t that how Kamala got her job?

    2. MK Ultra   5 months ago

      A good way to avoid becoming a TradMom before they're ready.

  30. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

    A history lesson.

    https://x.com/overton_news/status/1999321014644187241?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    It almost looked like he couldn’t believe what he was hearing.

    During a CNN debate, Democrat strategist Ameshia Cross pulled the race card and claimed the GOP has “gone out of its way” to keep black Americans from voting.

    @ScottJenningsKY let her finish her rant — then absolutely torched her entire narrative with three simple facts.

    CROSS: “I was born black. I’ll be black all my life. I don’t want to hear anybody say that the Republican Party has not gone out of its way to keep people who look like me away from the ballot box, because it’s painfully untrue.”

    “It is something that has been charged in the courts time after time, decade after decade, particularly across the south, across the south, where the largest concentration of black people live.”

    Jennings’ face said it all...confused and stunned.

    Then he dropped the hammer.

    JENNINGS: “Okay, so a couple of things.”

    “Number one, has anyone ever personally tried to stop you from voting? Answer…no.”

    “Number two, there are no ‘illegal’ orders.”

    “Number three, in this country, I hate to remind you of our history, but it was the Democratic Party that tried and tried and tried to suppress black votes in this country, not the Republican party.”

    “We’re for voting!”

    Cross tried to fire back with a revisionist history lecture, but Scott wasn’t having it:

    CROSS: “I would like to remind you that when the Jim Crow laws were eroded, they were eroded by the Democratic Party, not by Republicans who tried to hoist them up and tried to continually reenter, reenter Jim Crow in the modern era.”

    JENNINGS: “I think you need to reread your civil rights history. The Democratic party doesn’t have a clean record on this.”

    “But the bottom line is Democrats are going to continue to be ruthless. They’re going to continue to try to gerrymander. They’re going to continue to try to say the president’s delivering illegal orders to mess up our military.”

    “Who knows what they’ll do in Washington from here on out. But the bottom line is Republicans tonight didn’t do this redistricting. Democrats are going to keep doing it. And if you’re looking for who the most ruthless, partisan players are, the Democrat Party.”

    With video.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      Democrats lie. Why they get along so well woth Islam.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        Also, they both hate "white culture" and can be allies. For now.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

        It's just a little taqiyya, you know just to snow the infidels.

  31. shrike   5 months ago

    Donnie deporting veterans:

    Democrat Forces Kristi Noem to Face Veteran Deported by ICE in Dramatic Reveal Following Adamant Denial at Hearing
    Jennifer Bowers Bahney
    Thu, December 11, 2025 at 1:23 PM EST

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/democrat-forces-kristi-noem-face-182311483.html

    Remember how Donnie said Gold Star veteran was trash?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 months ago

      Debunked

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

        turd lies and continues telling the same lies. turd is stupid and dishonest.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

      Remember how turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does? turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Remember how you got banned for posting child porn here?

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

      Kill yourself.

      1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

        Broken-record-playing Demonic Death-Worshitter Worshits Death... More news at 6:66!!!

        Cuntsorevaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant, serpent, and slurp-pants (pants-slurper) of the Evil One?

        EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…

        He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
        Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
        Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
        His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
        https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
        Loves death and the dying moans,
        Then he likes to munch their bones!
        He’s truly, completely a necrophiliac,
        His brain, squirming toad-like, is REALY, really whack!
        Has no thoughts that help the people,
        He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
        On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
        Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
        Kool-Aid man, please listen,
        You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
        Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
        The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!

        A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
        https://www.amazon.com/Glimpses-Devil-Psychiatrists-Personal-Possession/dp/1439167265

        Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
        If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
        Who would feed you? Whose tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
        You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!

        Signed, Yours Truly, Heaven-on-Earth-Based Skeptic of Servants, Serpents, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

          Just fuck off, Melvin. Your copypasta is terrible, idiotic, and retarded, and is below the level of insults that a kindergartner could think of.

          1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

            Soooo... You PervFectly Slurpport the evil pain-and-death-lusting suicide-lusters, then, I take it! So let shit be recorded, then, for posterity... This IS going onto Your Perfected Spermanent Record, ya know!

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

              You’re boring, Melvin.

              1. SQRLSY   5 months ago

                You’re whoring for the Evil One, Death-and-Suicide-Worshitting FOOL!!!

                Twat do Ye PervFectly think and stink that this SHIT will get for Ye?

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

                  Borrrriiiinnnggggg!

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

                It would be more exciting if it were set on fire.

    5. Sailor1989   5 months ago

      Ah yes, the man who self deported.

      I don't remember Donnie saying that. I do remember news outlets claiming it was said with anonymous sources. But then multiple people came out and said it didn't happen on record.

    6. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

      Remember how Donnie said Gold Star veteran was trash?

      No, because what you're inferring is a lie.

  32. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    '"The far right is powered by left-wing illiberalism and hypocrisy," writes Reason's Stephanie Slade in a must-read piece.'

    Which "far right" now? All the racists and Nazis who dare to challenge the progressive agenda and captive media? Or some fringe theocratic monarchists?

    1. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

      Given where today's progressives have placed themselves, lefties from 2010 are now far-right.

  33. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

    a pregnant woman who went undercover in Canada to investigate their abortion industry.

    "Women’s College Hospital nearby would go up to thirty-two weeks. She would have to pay cash. “Canada doesn’t have a limit, okay?” the abortionist told her. "

    "Late term abortions never happen"

    1. Medulla Oblongata   5 months ago

      I mean, once the kid is born, just apply for MAID for it.

    2. Mother's Lament   5 months ago

      Canada literally has no abortion law. Nothing is forbidden.
      But just because there is no abortion law, does not mean that other laws may not apply. There's speculation that if the personhood of the unborn is established, then every abortion could result in a murder charge.

      On a different note I was watching a documentary on the addiction crisis in the BC lower mainland and there was a former abortion counselor who now counseled addicts on MAID. And the uncanny look in her eyes and the sound of her voice was like a demon was speaking through her. She took such a delight in death. She was probably the most frightening thing I've seen in years.

    3. LIBtranslator   5 months ago

      Canadians actually READ the 1972 Libertarian platform. https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/canadian-liberals-and-american-libertarians/

  34. Social Justice is neither   5 months ago

    If you think anything Stephanie Slade has to say is worth reading, much less a must read, you're either a principleless paid hack or a Leftist retard.

  35. Use the Schwartz   5 months ago

    "Does bad for the children."

    Makes you nostalgic for Dubya's silver tongue.

    "President Donald Trump is soon expected to push for the federal reclassification of marijuana."

    The broken clock seems to be right more than twice a day? My Facebook feed is going to be nuts for the next few weeks as the NPC's get stuck in the walls.

  36. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

    "..."Universal child care need not be a pipe dream in America—something we envy the Danes and the Swedes for, but never imagine having for ourselves," writes Rachel Cohen Booth for The New York Times..."

    If you're not paying for it, fuck you!

  37. Mickey Rat   5 months ago

    ""The far right is powered by left-wing illiberalism and hypocrisy," writes Reason's Stephanie Slade in a must-read piece."

    Which the reaction to the Left's illiberalism has been warned about for over a decade, but nice to come to the party. albeit quite late. Though only to come to that realization through pearl-clutching about the 'far-right" is a problem.

  38. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    'NDIANA STATE SENATE has rejected redistricting.

    '19-31.

    'TRUMP's push for a 9-0 map failed. Big defeat for the Trump administration.'

    Uh, OK. When can we talk about the 9 reps from Massachusetts who just incidentally are all Democrats, despite 37% of voters preferring Trump over Harris?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      That’s (D)efinitely (D)ifferent.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

        Sure is. Can you imagine the retarded howling if some state had 9 GOP reps, and even just 25% Harris voters?

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   5 months ago

      On this issue, both sides are bad, but Team Red is worse.

      Both Team Red and Team Blue gerrymander. But Team Blue actually proposed to ban gerrymandering, which every Republican rejected.

      One team plays a dirty game but wants it to end.
      The other team embraces the dirty game and wants it to get dirtier.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

        So, it’s ok if Democrats do it, Jeffy?

      2. Zeb   5 months ago

        Team blue still seems pretty keen on mandatory racial gerrymandering. What was it exactly that they proposed to ban?

      3. Outlaw Josey Wales   5 months ago

        On this issue, both sides are bad, but Team Red is worse.

        Both Team Red and Team Blue gerrymander. But Team Blue actually proposed to ban gerrymandering, which every Republican rejected.

        Disingenuous. Did the Blue folks propose to ban gerrymandering and go back to an equal distribution within districts or essentially keep all of their very gerrymandered districts in place if the Repubs would stop trying to gerrymander them out of control?

        That's quite a different model. Could it be that the R's aggressively gerrymandering is a response and not a tactic?

        Seems more like typical Dem remorse.
        'How come they're doing what we've been doing to them back to us now! No, fair!!'

  39. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

    Is Lying Jeffy Ezra Klein? This is amazing:

    This is a work of art. This is their magic trick: Once they label something Trump said “a lie,”no amount of proof, no towering mountain of evidence, will force them to rethink

    https://x.com/KeenanPeachy/status/1999276511405420819

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 months ago

      Trump often lies about Democrats giving healthcare to undocumented immigrants. In California, Newsom actually did it. And defends it.

      "I'm proud of that. I believe in universal health care."

      But, he says, "we failed on the border. We need to own up to that."

      https://x.com/ezraklein/status/1999222362894663980

      1. I, Woodchipper   5 months ago

        California dems didnt "fail on the border".

        They did exactly what they planned to do and got exactly what they were hoping to get.

        1. Marshal   5 months ago

          Exactly right. Further, the key takeaway from this fact is that they will do it again the next chance they get. Maybe they will hide it better, or maybe they will do it faster so the effects are more entrenched and harder to reverse. There is a conflict about tactics and you can't be sure which they will choose. But they will always choose to try again.

        2. Michael Ejercito   5 months ago

          It is almost as if they feel that illegal aliens are victims of American oppression.

  40. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

    I think I like Bovino.

    https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1999316142058254498?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    NEW: Border Patrol Chief Bovino absolutely TORCHED SEVERAL Democrat Governors, including Illinois’s JB Pritzker

    “Pritzker doesn’t have it figured out. I don’t think he could figure his way out of an OPEN FIELD.”

    Bovino also blasted NC Gov. Stein’s attempts to STIFLE Border Patrol action in North Carolina, resulting in an illegal conducting a STABBING ATTACK on the Charlotte light rail just days ago.

    Tons of support for Governor Jeff Landry of Louisiana from Bovino though, as the assistance from Louisiana State Police have resulted in ZERO assauIts and ZERO ramming attacks against Border Patrol agents during this operation.

    THAT is how it’s done!

    “Maybe Pritzker oughta come down here [to Louisiana] and take a look at how you conduct an operation without VlOLENCE,” Chief Bovino said.

    1. mad.casual   5 months ago

      “Pritzker doesn’t have it figured out. I don’t think he could figure his way out of an OPEN FIELD.”

      Of course with JB, even if you wanted to point him in the right direction, "How big of an open field are we talking?" is a valid concern.

  41. Longtobefree   5 months ago

    Good old Reason.
    They can't even publish a "good" thing about Trump, like reclassifying the devil weed, without adding "king" as a descriptor.
    TDS cannot be cured.
    But I do wonder what will happen when he is no longer there to kick around - - - -

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Remember, JD Vance is wrong.

  42. Earth-based Human Skeptic   5 months ago

    Love the Bee:

    "Jasmine Crockett Hits Campaign Trail To Axe For Votes"

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Is she going for 40 whacks?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        If she goes the Kamala route, and starts walking for votes.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

          ‘Whacking’

          Although I’m not sure how appealing the prospect of being jerked off by a boozy, cackling sexagenarian is for most people.

  43. JFree   5 months ago

    Congrats to Indiana Rs for rejecting the push towards 'living constitution ' redistricting.

    It is no surprise that the SC moved the US in this direction by allowing gerrymandering/redistricting on mere whim and FYTW. Even less of a surprise that the national partisan Dickheads and Royalists want to subordinate the states to perpetual redistricting every election to serve their national agenda.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Ok, so are you going to now criticize Massachusetts for doing the same thing, but for the opposing party?

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 months ago

      You do realize that the constitution leaves it up to state legislatures right retard?

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      Goddamn you’re an ignorant idiot JewFree.

  44. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 months ago

    an upcoming executive order that directs federal agencies to pursue reclassification

    Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber, you go and do something like this... and totally redeem yourself!

    Good work, if done.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

      Just when a TDS-addled lying pile of steaming shit whines again.
      Fuck off and die, asswipe.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 months ago

        Lefties always wishing death against comedies for wrong think. Dumb and Dumber is a great movie and you being triggered by a quote from it...well maybe you should find a safe space.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

          Fuck off and die, TDS-addled asswipe.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 months ago

            Typical lefty, so unoriginal.

            1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

              Fuck off and die, TDS-addled lying shitstain.

              1. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 months ago

                Emote harder!

                1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

                  Fuck off and die, TDS-addled lying asswipe.

                  1. Square = Circle   5 months ago

                    That was pretty much just the same amount of emoting.

                  2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

                    Second, you need to work on making them feel small and worthless. (Which they are). That is more effective in pushing them towards retroactive self abortion.

  45. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

    One would think this is an issue that should be Reason’s raison d'être.

    https://prestonbyrne.com/2025/12/12/the-u-s-counter-offensive-against-foreign-censorship-should-be-bipartisan/

    Currently, 30 countries – 31 sovereigns, if we count the EU separately – are launching a coordinated and systematic assault against the United States and our technology sector in an effort to prove that the First Amendment is a dead letter online. The “baddies” are the EU and its member states, the UK, Australia, and Brazil.

    People don’t talk about Brazil very much, but Brazil is nonetheless a very active belligerent in this fight. That country has targeted X, Rumble, and Truth Social, and also attempted, on October 13th, on the same day that Ofcom fined my client 4chan, to impose their content moderation rules on 4chan.

    Australia’s age verification rules have targeted every U.S. tech major. Reddit is challenging it in Australian court. I am not optimistic.

    Wikipedia tried that in England and, because England doesn’t have free speech, they lost. Reddit’s fighting in Australia. Australia doesn’t have free speech either:

    Rumble and Truth won ex parte emergency relief confirming that their orders from Brazil were not effective in America, either:

    Everyone’s fighting back, across the political spectrum, because we all know that every American is threatened by foreign censorship.

    Every American deserves to be shielded from this foreign intrusion on American sovereignty.

    The GRANITE Act, if Congress chooses to enact it, is that shield.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   5 months ago

      Reason: but TARIFFS!

    2. shadydave   5 months ago

      Too local

  46. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

    "Newsom Pushes Farmland Redistribution For Non-White Farmers, Indigenous People"
    https://climatechangedispatch.com/newsom-farmland-redistribution-racial-minorities/

    But this is GOOD racism!

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      He’s trying to create Newsombabwe.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

        ^+1.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Newsom doesn’t want to be outdone by Walz and Little Somaliasota.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      It’s good for a trial attorney to sue him for discrimination.

  47. MWAocdoc   5 months ago

    "Universal child care ..."

    Once again: big blue cities are a whole 'nuther universe. Who cares whether corrupt officials at City Hall try to implement socialism in New York City or not? Who cares whether it fails massively at great expense or just turns out to be another imaginary promise that never gets manifested? How many people will die the next time one of the monopolistic stakeholder unions goes on strike? If you never pass a "City Limits" sign you will never have to "Escape from New York" no matter how many homeless, violently insane drug addicts are encamped on the city streets there, so why do we care?

    1. Outlaw Josey Wales   5 months ago

      Because those that flee bring the plague with them.

      1. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

        Like immigrants from shithole countries.

  48. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   5 months ago

    "Automakers win big as EU rethinks combustion engine ban"
    [...]
    "The European Commission will move to scrap plans for an effective ban on new combustion engine cars from 2035, a senior EU lawmaker said on Friday, in what would be a major victory for Germany, which has been pressing to protect its automakers..."
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/news/2025/12/12/eu-combustion-engine-ban-reversal/87733254007/

    Being pushed as a successful lobbying effort, but, in fact, the EU is being saved from an impossible goal. Absent purple unicorns, there is simply no way that was possible.

    1. mad.casual   5 months ago

      EVs. Are. Just. Really. Popular.

      “When railroading time comes you can railroad—but not before.”
      ― Robert A. Heinlein

  49. TJJ2000   5 months ago

    Excellent move.....
    Still waiting for anyone to acknowledge...
    "Where's the enumerated power for the Union of States to do drug prohibition."

    Once upon a time the people realized it required an amendment.
    Once upon a time the people realized the USA is a *Constitutional* Republic.

    Just don't see this nation saving itself from political despair until it can honorably acknowledge what made the USA great in the first place.

  50. chemjeff radical individualist   5 months ago

    when he'll embrace his sleeper libertarian tendencies.

    Trump doesn't have libertarian tendencies, sleeper or otherwise. Trump has self-aggrandizement tendencies. So if he can imagine himself as THE HERO of the story, he will do that, and if it happens to accidentally coincide with something that libertarians advocate on principled grounds, that is just a coincidence.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 months ago

      Remind me again, Jeff, of which President is looking to get rid of regulations, deschedule marijuana out of Schedule 1, close the Department of Education, looking to cut waste, and cut off USAID graft?

    2. TJJ2000   5 months ago

      LOL.... Some of the straightest-shooting spouting by the Leftarded.

      paraphrased ...
      "All the De-Regulation, Tax-Cuts, EPA de-funding, Agency Abolishing is just a coincidence."
      "Trump is a fascist narcissist ... because ...because. Well just because."

      It's no wonder your ilk was the party of slavery.
      Your emotional self-entitled prejudices is about all you have.

    3. LIBtranslator   5 months ago

      Trump is a prostitute Svengali hired by Christian National Socialists to hypnotize dumb voters and folks who think electricity ought to be safe and legal (but are cowards). How his string pullers also got The Lizard on the Reason payroll is an exercise best left to the student. I hear "by our fruit" Heise is still on the LP staff, but only because the LP vote share hasn't yet fallen below zero. https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/2023/02/11/austrian-anschluss-2-may-2022/

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      Walz +4

  51. Rick James   5 months ago

    "Through video, we get to know our pundits the same way we engage with influencers, and the more we are convinced by their multimedia performances the more readily we join their podcasting personality cults," writes The New Yorker's Kyle Chayka. "Increasingly, this world of digital broadcasting is embroiled in slow-burning rivalries and rhetorical fights, a Marvel universe of independent opinion-givers."

    Why doesn't she just come out and say, "Stop listening to these people and go back to listening to me."

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 months ago

      “….she…..”

      “…..writes the New Yorkers Kyle…..”

      She = Kyle? Like in broflovsky?

      Do we even know Kyle’s preferred pronouns? Would Rick James misgender someone?

      I can’t even right now…..

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

        Maybe it’s Kyle’s cousin, Kyle 1.

        He’s baaaaccckkkk!

    2. CE   5 months ago

      Sounds like Mr. Chayka is peeved that some other pundits have much bigger personality cults than he has.

  52. Rick James   5 months ago

    "The far right is powered by left-wing illiberalism and hypocrisy," writes Reason's Stephanie Slade in a must-read piece.

    Is that why Reason instinctively sides with the left wing?

    1. Zeb   5 months ago

      Because they're secretly promoting the far right? Interesting plot twist.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   5 months ago

      And why must I read anything SS writes?

  53. Vernon Depner   5 months ago

    child care workers be brought up to pay parity with public schoolteachers

    Considering the results they get, it would be more fair to bring urban public school teachers DOWN to parity with day care workers.

    1. Mike Parsons   5 months ago

      Ive had babysitters/nannies in the past that did teaching equal or greater to the average public school teacher.

      1. LIBtranslator   5 months ago

        -2. Missing apostrophe and misspelled trannies. -5 math: greater than or equal to is the missing syntax.

  54. LIBtranslator   5 months ago

    A modest proposal: On a bridge somewhere in Quebec or Barbados Reason could send the Lizard and Saint Stephie over to Fox in exchange for Kat.

  55. Neutral not Neutered   5 months ago

    This will secure the house and senate in 2026 elections if the GOP decriminalizes or legalizes mary jane

  56. Neutral not Neutered   5 months ago

    So you don't care that you subsidize others through private insurance which includes paying high fees for their profit and share holders and for the insurance company to deny claims not on a medical basis? But refuse to allow costs for health care to reduce with the government in control?

    "I disagree on a principles level—it's not clear to me why other taxpayers need to subsidize my family's choices or why relatively high-earners should be subsidized by the state, given practical funding realities"

    91% of all health care in America is subsidized in one way or another and over 40% get it free...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Reform Wins Big in British Local Elections, Reshaping the U.K. Right

Reem Ibrahim | 5.8.2026 7:00 PM

A Venezuelan Mother's Desperate Search for Her Dead Son Is Representative of Ongoing Human Rights Violations

César Báez | 5.8.2026 5:00 PM

Secret ICE Memo Tells Local Police Not To Disclose Immigration Enforcement Info Without ICE's Permission

Autumn Billings | 5.8.2026 4:40 PM

D.C. Circuit Seems Disinclined To Let Pete Hegseth Punish a Senator for His Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.8.2026 2:00 PM

California Spent $450 Million on a Failed 911 System. Now, the State Is Restarting the Project.

Meagan O'Rourke | 5.8.2026 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks