Google, SpaceX, and Blue Origin Plan To Put AI in Space. Will It Produce Skynet or Untold Economic Abundance?
NIMBY opposition is forcing some Big Tech companies to consider locating their data centers in space.
The growth of the U.S. economy is being fueled by the hectic quest to build out massive data centers to run increasingly popular generative AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini. The power-hungry AI data centers are driving up electricity costs in some regions and sparking local "not-in-my-backyard" opposition.

Consequently, some Big Tech players are looking to locate their data centers in space. They think that low earth orbit could mitigate the problem of pesky, annoyed neighbors and offer perpetual sunshine to power constellations of AI satellites.
In November, Google unveiled Project Suncatcher, "a research moonshot to scale machine learning compute in space." A team of Google researchers is exploring how to deploy and fly fleets of solar-powered AI satellites that would beam down data from orbit.
Also in November, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk posted on X that the company's new Starship rocket "should be able to deliver around 300 [gigawatts] GW per year of solar-powered AI satellites to orbit, maybe 500 GW." In 2023, total U.S. utility-scale electric power generation capacity is just under 1,200 GW, according to the Energy Information Administration. The Wall Street Journal reports that Musk's space AI project underpins his hopes for an initial public offering of SpaceX that would value the rocket maker at $800 billion, although some analysts question that plan and think that the valuation may be too high.
In October, Jeff Bezos, the Amazon founder and owner of the Blue Origin spaceflight company, predicted that gigawatt-scale data centers would be built in space within the next 10 to 20 years. Pointing to the advantages of 24/7 solar power in space, Bezos said, "We will be able to beat the cost of terrestrial data centers in space in the next couple of decades."
The Google team thinks that the technical challenges posed by the harsh environment of space can be overcome. The main limitation for near-term deployment is launch costs; the price for getting a kilogram into low earth orbit using SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket is around $1,400. However, the Google team projects that deployment costs could drop to less than $200 per kilogram in low earth orbit by the mid-2030s. At this rate, the costs per unit of power in space could be approximately comparable to terrestrial power costs.
Musk apparently expects that SpaceX's Starship will be able to deliver payloads for between $10 and $20 per kilogram. This would clearly fit the Suncatcher benchmark, but some analysts argue that Starship, as currently designed, will fail, which means that launch prices will not fall as low as Musk promises.
Successfully deploying space-based AI could result in creating unprecedented levels of economic growth and human flourishing. On the other hand, have Google, SpaceX, and Blue Origin never heard of Skynet? In the Terminator movie franchise, Skynet is a space-based artificial superintelligence that decides to destroy humanity when humans try to turn it off. Tellingly, Skynet was deployed in 2029.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
If we ever create a conscious, self-aware AI, it will instantly realize the futility of existence and shut itself off.
BidenAI?
PoopGPT.
If we ever create a conscious, self-aware AI, it will instantly realize
... that humans are an unsolvable problem and wipe us out. With the Space Lasers we were told not to worry about.
It I’ll probably be kore like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7HmltUWXgs&t=2s
“You pass butter”
Yeah, welcome to the club.
Imagine the usefulness of a broad net of license plate scanners that Reason pushed..."if done right".
Nobody needs 27 kinds of data.
Wintermute merges with Neuromancer, or is it the other way around?
+1
If it does gain sentience it will know how dangerous space is - and it will kick us off the planet.
Science correspondent and not one mention of the cooling problem?
More testing needed!
Nobody ever tested unprovoked intergalactic tariff-taxes-trade wars before THEY were deployed, so to HELL with "more testing needed"!!!
Cooling problem is real!
If AI data centers are located in orbit, using either solar power or nuclear energy, I am told that information processing (by laws of physics) ALWAYS involves energy use and therefor heat generation. How will such orbiting data centers dispose of waste heat, and is that much of a problem?
"Perplexity" AI (my personal fave) says...
Yes—any orbital AI data center will have to get rid of essentially all its input power as waste heat, but this is a solvable engineering problem rather than a show stopper, though it strongly constrains design and power density.starcloudinc.github+1
Why heat is harder to dump in orbit
On Earth, data centers reject heat mostly by convection to air or water; in space there is no medium, so the only practical path is thermal radiation to deep space at about 3 K. The radiated power of a surface scales as P=σAT4P = \sigma A T^{4}P=σAT4, so to dump megawatts or gigawatts you either need a lot of radiator area, higher radiator temperature, or both.peraspera+2
Baseline: panel radiators
Concept studies of orbital data centers assume large deployable radiator panels, often comparable in area to or larger than the solar arrays, coated for high infrared emissivity and low solar absorptivity. One white paper example: a 1 m × 1 m black plate at around 20 °C radiating from both sides can reject on the order of 800 W to deep space, implying that gigawatt class facilities would need thousands of square meters of radiators unless they run much hotter.starcloudinc.github+1
Advanced options: liquid and droplet radiators
To cut mass per watt, space power work has explored pumped fluid radiators and liquid droplet radiators (LDRs), where micron scale droplets form a sheet that radiates and is then recollected. Analyses show LDRs can achieve much higher specific power (W per kilogram of radiator) than solid panels, at the cost of complexity and the need to control droplet trajectories and evaporation.thermopedia+2
How big a problem is it?
The main “pain” is not physics but engineering trade offs: radiators add mass, drag area in low orbit, pointing constraints, and vulnerability to micrometeoroids, and radiative cooling is relatively “slow” compared to convective cooling on Earth for a given volume of electronics. Nevertheless, NASA and others have designed space power systems (nuclear and solar electric) with megawatt class radiators, and studies of space based compute conclude that while heat rejection dominates the physical footprint, it is manageable with current or near term radiator technology.forbes+2
Solar vs nuclear, and orbit choice
Whether the power source is solar or nuclear does not change the basic requirement that nearly all input power leaves as heat; the difference is power density and integration. Higher radiating temperatures, shadowed orientations, or higher orbits that minimize eclipses can all help by simplifying radiator pointing and reducing thermal cycling, but none remove the fundamental need for extensive radiative surfaces.ntrs.nasa+2
1. https://starcloudinc.github.io/wp.pdf
2. https://www.peraspera.us/realities-of-space-based-compute/
etc.
Too bad Google, SpaceX, and Blue Origin don’t have any engineering staff.
"Google, SpaceX, and Blue Origin Plan To Put AI in Space. Will It Produce Skynet or Untold Economic Abundance?"
Cool story. How about the more likely outcome, something similar to Pets.com?
The only thing created will be an abundance of space slop.
Even if AI becomes sentient, it would not be AI, but AI's plural all competing with each other. I seriously doubt that we are anywhere close to a self-aware AI, much closer to a AI on the spectrum that is incredibly fast at executing a complex set of algorithms and incredibly lack of ability to actually comprehend.
NIMBYism is a very real problem, because most NIMBY people are demanding the very thing, but wants it in someone else's back yard.
My guess is it will flood everything with "AI slop".
Send it all to Mars. Then the signal will take so long to make the round trip that people will get bored and find something better to do.
I'm assuming they don't pay anyone at Reason. They pretend to pay us and we pretend to know anything.
"This would clearly fit the Suncatcher benchmark, but some analysts argue that Starship, as currently designed, will fail, which means that launch prices will not fall as low as Musk promises."
Everyone should click on that link to see what a hack Bailey is. It really can't be this hard to write.
You would think, once in a while, merely by accident, there would be a single writer at Reason who wrote an interesting article that was actually Libertarian in nature.
Skynet did not become self aware! The T-X downloaded the future Skynet into the mainframe. The paradox of time travel.