Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Kyle McFarland

Donate

Entertainment

Warner Bros. Accepts Netflix's $83 Billion Bid, but Antitrust Threats Still Loom

If antitrust regulators allow the deal to go through, consumers stand to benefit from a less expensive Netflix–HBO Max bundle.

Jack Nicastro | 12.5.2025 3:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Illustration of the Warner Bros Discovery and Netflix logos with a sword hanging between them and the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission logos behind | Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Midjourney
(Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Midjourney)

Netflix announced its plan to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) for $83 billion on Friday. The merger between the entertainment giants will likely draw international antitrust scrutiny, as rival bidder Paramount Skydance ominously predicted in an 11th-hour plea to WBD to reconsider its deal with Netflix. As the deal moves forward, the public should be wary about the political weaponization of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Justice Department (DOJ), given the relationship between President Donald Trump and the owners of Paramount Skydance.

Reuters reported that Netflix was considering a bid to acquire WBD in October. Netflix wasn't the only one; Paramount Skydance and Comcast were also vying for the company. Initial bids were submitted by each company on November 20. On December 1, the deadline for second bids, Paramount Skydance drew the all-mighty antitrust saber as it became clear that WBD favored Netflix's bid of $27.75 per WBD share to acquire Warner Bros. studio, HBO, and HBO Max over Paramount Skydance's bid of $30 per WBD share for the entire company.

Paramount Skydance lawyers sent a 4,000-plus-word letter on December 1 to WBD emphasizing that Netflix's acquisition of HBO Max, the fourth-largest streaming video on demand (SVOD) provider, would result in Netflix obtaining a 43 percent share of SVOD subscribers. Whenever market share numbers are tossed around, you can be sure that antitrust concerns are afoot. And that's just the sort of language Paramount Skydance lawyers invoked.

The lawyers asserted that Netflix's deal with WBD "would face grave uncertainty and significant opposition by competition law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad." Jason Kilar, CEO of WarnerMedia from May 2020 to April 2022, when it merged with Discovery to form Warner Bros. Discovery, said he "could not think of a more effective way to reduce competition in Hollywood than selling WBD to Netflix."

The Paramount Skydance lawyers offered a tentative theory of consumer harm from the merger, prognosticating that Netflix's acquisition of "WBD's world-class IP library," which includes Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, and the entire DC Universe, would harm "theatrical distribution, talent and moviegoers [by reducing] the number of films for broad theatrical release." Former Federal Trade Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya affirmed this point, calling the merger "a death knell for movie theaters." At the same time, bundling Netflix and HBO Max "is expected to reduce streaming costs for consumers," reports Reuters.

The letter stated point-blank that Netflix's WBD acquisition "will entrench and extend Netflix's global dominance in a manner not allowed by domestic or foreign competition laws," and anticipated that Netflix's "gerrymandered [SVOD] market definition that includes services like YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook" would be rejected by the DOJ, FTC, and international regulators. While competition experts doubt that the European Commission will block the merger, The Hollywood Reporter reports that the DOJ is "planning an investigation and potentially a lawsuit to try and block it, given the potential combination of Netflix and HBO Max."

Political appointees at the DOJ's antitrust division may be encouraged by Trump to scrutinize the deal, given the president's chummy relationship with Larry Ellison, Oracle co-founder and father of Paramount Skydance CEO and majority shareholder David Ellison. However, the merger would not substantially reduce competition when ad-supported video, social media, and gaming are included in the broader entertainment market. Eric Fruits, senior scholar at the International Center for Law and Economics, estimates that the combined Netflix-WBD share of the overall entertainment market could be "less than 5% of total consumer entertainment time."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Webathon Woodchips Through $400,000 Goal Before the Halfway Point!

Jack Nicastro is an assistant editor at Reason.

EntertainmentAntitrustNetflixCompetitionTechnologyBusiness and IndustryTrump AdministrationDepartment of JusticeFederal Trade CommissionMergersTelevisionFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Longtobefree   1 hour ago

    The feds should approve the merger on the condition that no ads are allowed in a service that has a subscription price.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   16 minutes ago

    Garbage buys more garbage.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 610 donors, we've reached $458,221 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

French Study on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Finds a Drop in Severe COVID—and No Increase in Deaths

Ronald Bailey | 12.5.2025 4:25 PM

Warner Bros. Accepts Netflix's $83 Billion Bid, but Antitrust Threats Still Loom

Jack Nicastro | 12.5.2025 3:36 PM

Reason Webathon Woodchips Through $400,000 Goal Before the Halfway Point!

Matt Welch | 12.5.2025 2:20 PM

The 'Threat' That Supposedly Justified Killing 2 Boat Attack Survivors Was Entirely Speculative

Jacob Sullum | 12.5.2025 1:45 PM

What America Can Learn From Japanese Housing

Andrew Heaton | 12.5.2025 11:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks