Trump Tries To Cut Congress Out of U.S. Attorney Appointments
The 3rd Circuit’s ruling against Alina Habba highlights a disturbing pattern of legal evasion.
Alina Habba said she was the acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey. President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi agreed. All three were wrong, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled this week.
That unanimous decision, which was issued by a three-judge panel that included two George W. Bush appointees, highlights a disturbing pattern of conduct that extends beyond New Jersey to New York, Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, and California. In one state after another, Trump has sought to install loyalists as U.S. attorneys without the Senate approval required by the Constitution's Appointments Clause.
Habba's case illustrates the absurd lengths to which Trump has gone in attempting to evade that requirement. After U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger resigned in January, his first assistant automatically assumed the duties of his office, which John Giordano, now the U.S. ambassador to Namibia, briefly took over as interim U.S. attorney before Bondi replaced him with Habba in late March.
Three months later, Trump nominated Habba, who had served as his legal spokesperson from 2021 to 2025, as U.S. attorney, which would have required Senate confirmation. But Habba's chances looked iffy given her lack of experience in criminal law, opposition from New Jersey's two Democratic senators, and her record of frivolous pro-Trump litigation, which resulted in a $938,000 penalty that a federal appeals court upheld last month.
Under federal law, an interim U.S. attorney can serve no longer than 120 days unless the judges of the district approve an extension. But instead of allowing Habba to remain in that position, the District of New Jersey's judges chose Desiree Grace, a career prosecutor who was then the first assistant U.S. attorney.
Bondi overrode that choice by firing Grace. On July 24, Trump withdrew Habba's nomination as U.S. attorney, Habba resigned from her position as interim U.S. attorney, and Bondi appointed her as first assistant U.S. attorney based on the theory that she would then automatically fill the vacancy left by Sellinger's resignation.
"It is apparent that the current administration has been frustrated by some of the legal and political barriers to getting its appointees in place," 3rd Circuit Judge D. Michael Fisher dryly observed in this week's decision, which addressed challenges brought by three criminal defendants. But that frustration, the appeals court ruled, could not justify the Trump administration's attempts to skirt the law.
"Habba is not the Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey by virtue of her appointment as First Assistant U.S. Attorney," Fisher wrote, "because only the first assistant in place at the time the vacancy arises automatically assumes the functions and duties of the office" under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA). In fact, Habba was doubly disqualified under the FVRA because she had not served as first assistant for at least 90 days and had been nominated for the permanent position of U.S. attorney.
The 3rd Circuit rejected Bondi's attempt to avoid those difficulties by appointing Habba as a "special attorney"—a maneuver it said was precluded by a provision describing the FVRA as "the exclusive means for temporarily authorizing an acting official" unless another statute "expressly" allows an alternative. Under the government's theory, the appeals court noted, "Habba may avoid the gauntlet of presidential appointment and Senate confirmation and serve as the de facto U.S. Attorney indefinitely."
The president tried something similar with Lindsey Halligan, another former Trump lawyer with no prosecutorial experience. The president picked Halligan to replace Erik Siebert as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after Siebert proved insufficiently enthusiastic about prosecuting two Trump nemeses: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Last month, a federal judge dismissed the indictments that Halligan had obtained against Comey and James after concluding that her appointment violated the 120-day limit on interim U.S. attorneys. Trump could have avoided that embarrassing setback if he had not been so keen to avoid legal limits on his powers.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Let me ask you something Jacob.
Suppose every single federal judge dropped dead tomorrow. No foul play, just a crazy weird coincidence. All those vacancies - and Trump replaces every single one of them. Congress pushes them through because the federal courts have come to a grinding halt.
You still going to defend the federal bench as the stalwart check on Executive Power?
Or is that just a rationalization you use to justify whatever "ends justify the means" utilitarian mindset that cares less about what's right and just, and more about what you agree with?
But instead of allowing Habba to remain in that position, the District of New Jersey's judges chose Desiree Grace, a career prosecutor who was then the first assistant U.S. attorney.
Which means literally nothing, and is the statement of an activist - not a journalist.
They couldn't have allowed Habba to remain even if they wanted to. But the way Fake Jake The Pinko Drug-Addicted Not-Journalist frames it, you'd think they chose Grace OVER Habba.
They did not. They could not.
Bondi overrode that choice by firing Grace.
Not a thing that happened Fakey Jakey. Bondi couldn't have fired her if she wanted to. It's a federal appointment.
Grace did, however, resign.
Ooh, left that fact out, didn't you.
You are such a fake hack clown world piece of literal garbage.
“But instead of allowing Habba to remain in that position, the District of New Jersey's judges chose Desiree Grace, a career prosecutor who was then the first assistant U.S. attorney.”
Yeah, judges have zero authority to appoint US attorneys. Once again, Sullum is a propagandist hack.
"judges have zero authority to appoint US attorneys."
False, both federal law and the Constitution allow it.
Shorter AT (and shorter Penguin Poop):
"Rules, laws, and the USA Cunts-Tits-Tuition are only for the "little people", so long ass Dear Orange Caligula Shall Rule and Drool!"
We’re literally pointing out where Sullum supported an unconstitutional appointment by judges, you fascist shitweasel.
Unconstitutional appointment according to Penguin Poop and other Poopy-Headed partisans, and no more! Citation please, constitutional "expert"!
Article 2, Section 2
"but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."
shitweasel
Hey Google AI, did congress pass a law allowing courts to appoint us attorney's?
No, Congress has not passed a law allowing courts to appoint U.S. Attorneys; they are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. While the initial draft of the Judiciary Act of 1789 proposed giving district judges the authority to appoint U.S. attorneys, this provision was removed before the bill became law, and the final version explicitly directs the President to make the appointments.
scotterbee 2 hours ago
Article II:
"Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers...in the Courts of Law...
Article III:
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested...in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
SQRLSY comment, MANY AIs will decipher TWAT exactly shit is that the question-asker wants, and answer accordingly!!! AI's programmers already KNOW what makes them some money!
PLEASE tell us twat WE want to hear!
"shitweasel" is an apt descriptor of MAGAs.
Ironically sullum ignores that article 3 has zero role in the appointments he cries about unser the constitution, yet sullum defends the article 3 appointments.
JS;dr
JS;dnr
JS;dr
Turds of a feather, fuck together, udderly slurpporting their beast fiends against their cumming enemas. Twat a NUTTER slurpprise!
CRY BABY; DNR.
CRY BABY = Cuntinuously Repeatedly Yelping Boring Asinine Bullshit Yawnfests
(Also PLEASE Do NOT Resuscitate!)
Misplaced comment...
VD;dr. VD (Venereal Disease) is some BAD shit! Go see the Dr. if you've got the VD!!! THAT is why I say VD;dr.!!!
(Some forms of VD also cause bona fide mental illness… THINK about shit! VD is NOTHING to "clap" about!)
Trump has sought to install loyalists as U.S. attorneys
Your use of the word "loyalist" might carry a little more credibility if you hadn't regarded everyone up to and including people who called him a "fucking moron" as a crony and supported every sham impeachment, show trial, and insanely baseless civil suit against him for the last 9 yrs.
You don't care about the Senate approvals, the Appointments Clause, The Constitution or the ideas of impartial justice that serves as their foundation. It's clear that between an unqualified US Attorney and an experienced State AG conducting malicious prosecutions without consequence that justice and liberty are what die. It's abundantly clear to everyone else that, for years if not decades, there has been an entrenched, loyalist, career-path status quo at all levels of government and that it serves no other purpose than to protect itself. As it is doing here.
You're a terrible, insanely anti-liberty partisan hack.
"You don't care about the Senate approvals, the Appointments Clause, The Constitution or the ideas of impartial justice that serves as their foundation."
Casually Mad KNOWS this through the use of Shit's Magic Mind-Reading Tri-Cornered Tinfoil Hate-Hat!
No, it’s based on Jacob’s body of work presented here.
Based on Jacob’s body of work presented here, I'd say he cares more about individual freedoms and less about the Powers of Government Almighty and of Dear Orange Caligula, by far, than the average poster right here!
Sullum, youre a big "Our Constitution" guy of the left... where in the constitution does it allow congress to grant article 3 the right to appoint prosecutors in lieu of appointments? Because that is what trump is dealing with. An 86 law that gives article 2 powers to article 3 when congress doesnt approve a nomination. Yet you seem to enjoy this power give away.
Article II:
"Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers...in the Courts of Law...
Article III:
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested...in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
"Under federal law, an interim U.S. attorney can serve no longer than 120 days unless the judges of the district approve an extension. "
And since when does federal law override the constitutional powers of the POTUS? That is not the form of government created by The Framers.
The law is that the president appoints U.S. attorneys but they have to be confirmed by the Senate. Habba's chances of getting confirmed were quite low. The manipulations and contortions were to get around the requirement for Senate confirmation.
If it was merely subverting the Senate confirmation, one would think King Trump would just install whomever he wanted, Congress and the courts be damned. Instead he’s bobbed and weaved to try and get his way.
No, the song and dance was to get around the “blue slip” tradition (not even codified rule or law) of letting the senators of whatever state a US Attorney or judicial appointment was in tank a nomination.
“prosecuting two Trump nemeses: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.”
They’re a damn sight more than that, Jacob.