The Trump Admin Wants Western Union and MoneyGram To Report on Immigrants
An obscure bureau of the U.S. Treasury is using USA PATRIOT Act powers to sniff out under-the-table employment.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is one of the more quietly powerful arms of the U.S. government. Created by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in the 1990s to investigate money laundering and similar crimes, FinCEN was beefed up by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which made it an official Treasury bureau and required banks to secretly report on their customers to the bureau.
Now, the Trump administration is turning FinCEN against immigrants who want to send money to their home countries. The day after Thanksgiving, the bureau published a notice asking money services businesses (MSBs)—such as Western Union and MoneyGram—"to be vigilant in detecting, identifying, and reporting suspicious activity connected to cross-border funds transfers involving illegal aliens."
Although the notice says that "the vast majority of remittances from the United States are legitimate and can provide critical financial support to family members abroad," it lumps together "unlawful employment" by undocumented immigrants alongside terrorism and drug trafficking as a potential source of "illicitly obtained" funds that should be reported to the Treasury. In other words, the counterterrorism authorities are now looking for under-the-table jobs.
The notice is not technically a new law, just a friendly reminder from a government regulator. But in the past, FinCEN went after "big actors who were engaged in more serious illegal activity," not "retail clients," says Amir Fadavi, a lawyer with extensive experience in U.S. sanctions compliance. This new crackdown could change the way money transfers work for everyone.
MoneyGram currently asks money senders to show a valid ID, and Western Union also asks for proof of the source of funds, such as pay slips, for larger transfers. FinCEN's alert is essentially "deputizing MSBs to check the immigration documents of their clients," Fadavi says. "Now they have to think about what kind of documents they have to ask for, and how they're going to verify someone if getting paid on a non-expired visa."
Reason asked several popular remittance services whether they plan to implement changes in response to the FinCEN alert. None of them responded. According to U.S. government statistics, immigrants in America sent home over $72 billion in remittances to people in their home countries last year.
Along with issuing the FinCEN alert, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced over the weekend that the administration would cut off undocumented immigrants from certain tax credits. "If you're here illegally, there's no place for you in our financial system," he stated. "Illegal aliens that use our financial institutions to move their illicitly obtained funds is exploitation, and it will end."
But the administration has been snooping on legal immigrants and Americans sending money abroad, too. Over the past year, FinCEN has ordered money transfer businesses in certain counties bordering Mexico to report any transactions above $1,000, and money transfer businesses in other border counties to report any transactions above $200. (Normally, the threshold for automatic FinCEN reporting is $10,000.)
Earlier this year, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by Congress imposed a 1 percent tax on remittances sent by cash, a money order, or a cashier's check, starting in January 2026. Although Republicans claimed that the tax was meant to deter illegal immigration, they also expanded the target from immigrants sending money abroad to anyone in America sending money abroad, including U.S. citizens.
FinCEN's involvement expands the war on terror into the war on immigration. And like the war on terror, this new campaign is already expanding past its original targets, as the government uses its power to inconvenience ordinary Americans.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
...immigrants in America sent home over $72 billion in remittances to people in their home countries last year...
$72 billion leaving the US economy every year. That is more than the entire GDP of 111 countries. How can you support this?
Meanwhile US citizens spends billion$ more to support them living here.
You're right. In fact I think everyone should have to get permission from the government before sending money across a border. After all, you can't have a country without borders!
You already do, asshole. Try carrying more than $10,000 in cash through customs.
Lying Jeffy thinks illegal immigrants should have more rights than the rest of us. Sending money across the border is the least of them.
He also thinks they should get reduced sentences for raping children.
Hey Lying Jeffy, do you think it’s good journalism to cite the Former JAGs Working Group?
Hey, dummy, guess what happens to those dollars? The foreigners don't burn them. They use them to buy things with dollars, which ultimately means American exports, because they are American dollars. You got a problem with foreigners buying American exports?
Read Henry Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson, you can find it for free on the internet.
You misspelled CHINA.
Illegal immigrants are just as bad as terrorists. Got it.
Worse, illegal immigrants kill, rape and rob far more americans every year than terrorists. But it is ok because I hear they feel bad about it after.
Angsty white teenagers kill, rape and rob far more Americans every year than terrorists. Time to round up all the angsty teenagers and throw them in the pokey!
There is no basis to deport angsty White teens who are Americans.
I didn't say "deport". Instead as a group they should be treated as worse than terrorists, because they commit far more crimes than terrorists do. What do you think?
You have a cite for that?
We should put criminals of all stripes in the 'pokey'. But your kind lets them free if they feel bad for their crimes.
*note pedojeffy couldn't help but put teens and poke in the same sentence.*
Actually, they're one in the same at this point.
So AT, who is worse: terrorists, illegal immigrants, or gays?
You
Good.
Since we've apparently got the Blue states funneling money into foreign terrorist organizations.
2005 Libertarians: The PATRIOT Act will inevitably lead to a loss of liberty for more than just terrorists!
2025 Libertarians: Thank heavens we have the PATRIOT Act to keep us safe from illegal immigrants!
The brown guy loitering at Home Depot is just as dangerous as Mohammed Atta. I mean, they are illegal! That means they've broken laws! That means it's only a matter of time before they commit mass murder and fly planes into buildings!
If he is here illegally, he should be brought before an immigration court for a chance to plead his case.
You want to give those terrorist scum a chance to plead their cases? What are you, a terrorist-sympathizer? Do you work for Hamas?
Congress set up immigration courts for that purpose.
Juast as they authorized ICE to apprehend suspected illegals.
And to apprehend illegal aliens who’ve already been through the process, had their due process, and were given deportation orders.
So. Much. Straw.
That's a good idea. Also, post ICE agents there. Hobble any ability they have to make/transfer money as much as possible.
Frankly, I think we need government agents in front of every store. What if those sneaky illegals want to spend their illicit funds at the grocery store to buy food? We can't permit that. To be on the safe side, I think every financial transaction should be monitored by the government. What do you think?
Why is this tagged "immigration" instead of "fraud"?
So as to cloak what’s actually going on.
Release the Epstein Files. (Looking forward to Dec 19th)
Release the Jack Smith Report.
Why do we have to beg for transparency from our (supposedly) government ?