The Trump Admin Wants Western Union and MoneyGram To Report on Immigrants
An obscure bureau of the U.S. Treasury is using USA PATRIOT Act powers to sniff out under-the-table employment.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is one of the more quietly powerful arms of the U.S. government. Created by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in the 1990s to investigate money laundering and similar crimes, FinCEN was beefed up by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which made it an official Treasury bureau and required banks to secretly report on their customers to the bureau.
Now, the Trump administration is turning FinCEN against immigrants who want to send money to their home countries. The day after Thanksgiving, the bureau published a notice asking money services businesses (MSBs)—such as Western Union and MoneyGram—"to be vigilant in detecting, identifying, and reporting suspicious activity connected to cross-border funds transfers involving illegal aliens."
Although the notice says that "the vast majority of remittances from the United States are legitimate and can provide critical financial support to family members abroad," it lumps together "unlawful employment" by undocumented immigrants alongside terrorism and drug trafficking as a potential source of "illicitly obtained" funds that should be reported to the Treasury. In other words, the counterterrorism authorities are now looking for under-the-table jobs.
The notice is not technically a new law, just a friendly reminder from a government regulator. But in the past, FinCEN went after "big actors who were engaged in more serious illegal activity," not "retail clients," says Amir Fadavi, a lawyer with extensive experience in U.S. sanctions compliance. This new crackdown could change the way money transfers work for everyone.
MoneyGram currently asks money senders to show a valid ID, and Western Union also asks for proof of the source of funds, such as pay slips, for larger transfers. FinCEN's alert is essentially "deputizing MSBs to check the immigration documents of their clients," Fadavi says. "Now they have to think about what kind of documents they have to ask for, and how they're going to verify someone if getting paid on a non-expired visa."
Reason asked several popular remittance services whether they plan to implement changes in response to the FinCEN alert. None of them responded. According to U.S. government statistics, immigrants in America sent home over $72 billion in remittances to people in their home countries last year.
Along with issuing the FinCEN alert, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced over the weekend that the administration would cut off undocumented immigrants from certain tax credits. "If you're here illegally, there's no place for you in our financial system," he stated. "Illegal aliens that use our financial institutions to move their illicitly obtained funds is exploitation, and it will end."
But the administration has been snooping on legal immigrants and Americans sending money abroad, too. Over the past year, FinCEN has ordered money transfer businesses in certain counties bordering Mexico to report any transactions above $1,000, and money transfer businesses in other border counties to report any transactions above $200. (Normally, the threshold for automatic FinCEN reporting is $10,000.)
Earlier this year, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by Congress imposed a 1 percent tax on remittances sent by cash, a money order, or a cashier's check, starting in January 2026. Although Republicans claimed that the tax was meant to deter illegal immigration, they also expanded the target from immigrants sending money abroad to anyone in America sending money abroad, including U.S. citizens.
FinCEN's involvement expands the war on terror into the war on immigration. And like the war on terror, this new campaign is already expanding past its original targets, as the government uses its power to inconvenience ordinary Americans.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
...immigrants in America sent home over $72 billion in remittances to people in their home countries last year...
$72 billion leaving the US economy every year. That is more than the entire GDP of 111 countries. How can you support this?
Meanwhile US citizens spends billion$ more to support them living here.
You're right. In fact I think everyone should have to get permission from the government before sending money across a border. After all, you can't have a country without borders!
You already do, asshole. Try carrying more than $10,000 in cash through customs.
Lying Jeffy thinks illegal immigrants should have more rights than the rest of us. Sending money across the border is the least of them.
He also thinks they should get reduced sentences for raping children.
Hey Lying Jeffy, do you think it’s good journalism to cite the Former JAGs Working Group?
I will finally answer your question once you retract all of the lies that you have said about me just in this one comment section.
Ok. The comment about children in your basement was a joke.
Now, do you think it’s good journalism to cite the Former JAGs Working Group?
Keep going, there's more lies to retract.
Nope.
Okay, fine. No answer for you. You'd rather lie about me than get an answer to your question. Which just goes to show how you act in bad faith when you ask these questions.
It was a simple question you could have answered at the time.
I'm not compelled to answer any question of yours. I established the condition under which I would provide an answer, and you couldn't meet that condition.
Actually you established a condition, I met that condition, then you lied and continued adding conditions.
I will finally answer your question once you retract all of the lies that you have said about me just in this one comment section.
You have many more lies to retract.
Jeffy, are you some sort of noob here? It’s the internet. Get over being butthurt or fuck off.
Also, you understand that the "joke" about children in the basement is utterly disgusting?
Yes. Because your defense of pedophiles and groomers in general, and immigrants from cultures where pedophilia is acceptable is disgusting. That’s why the joke works.
You just can't help but lie about me.
You just can't help but lie
about me.ftfy
How would you know? You’ve got me on mute!
While jeff defends illegal rapists for raping children if theyaay sorry, he wont say sorry for defending illegal rapists.
Hasn’t he argued multiple times that we should grant asylum to people fleeing persecution in their home countries, even if they’re known abusers? Or am I misremembering that exchange?
Correct. He also advocated for an immigrant that raped an 11 year old to get less of a sentence because he felt bad afterwards, and the same for another one because he ejaculated on her instead of inside her.
Oh yeah, there was also the time he said it was ok for a man to stand in front of his front window and masterbate while children walked by on the sidewalk.
The intrusive checkpoints are what really gets the MAGA crowd excited. The borders just happen to be a (one of many) place to have a checkpoint. But internal checkpoints - far away from a border. Those are even better.
This guy was for vax mandates ^
And denying medical care without a vax card.
And, JFree, what checkpoints exist beyond the border and within the 100-mile zone of the southern border? Please name them.
Hey, dummy, guess what happens to those dollars? The foreigners don't burn them. They use them to buy things with dollars, which ultimately means American exports, because they are American dollars. You got a problem with foreigners buying American exports?
Read Henry Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson, you can find it for free on the internet.
You misspelled CHINA.
They have their own currency. Americans buy Chinese exports with dollars, and Chinese have to buy American exports with those dollars or invest those dollars in America.
You really belive money leaving america where it might buy US exports (but probably not because the US exports mostly high end products) is better for the US economy then staying in america were 100% will be spent in domestic markets?
Who decides what is better, and how do they enforce it? Do you really want to empower government officials to tell you that you're not using your dollars correctly? Of course not. But you jump at the opportunity to tell immigrants how to use dollars that they earned.
Principals, not principles. Who, not what.
Except you lack principles, Mr. Relevantist.
C'mon, you should know by now that Trump defenders consider economics (and learning in general) to be leftist.
They have certainly adopted the leftist view of trade that it is a zero-sum game. "If an illegal sends money from the US to Guatemala, then that means America loses and Guatemala wins!"
What actually happens is:
An employer in the US got the benefit of the migrant's labor - win
The migrant was paid for that labor - win
The migrant's family got financial support - win
Who exactly loses here?
The left/right political paradigm is actually a circle, and Trumpians have gone so far right that they're now leftists.
You only think that because you’re so far left now that anything near the center appears to be on the far right.
Always an amazing comment from one of the most retarded student of economics here. Lol.
False, they definitely do burn those dollars.
It's been over 30 years since such transfers were normalized.
That's hundreds of billions, and their countries are still third world.
This is how someone says they know absolute dick about economics without saying they know absolute dick about economics.
You keep saying this without making an actual argument filled with either theory or evidence. Why?
LMFAO. Wow. I couldn't imagine how high you'd get with mental gymnastics if you actually had a brain.
Why are people sending money overseas for the recipients overseas to pay more for American goods there? Why wouldn't the people send the fucking goods instead so it is cheaper for them all?
How to not be brain dead in one lesson. Try to understand the answer. Recipients of money overseas use the American dollars to exchange into the local currency and buy local goods like potatoes.
Why are people sending money overseas for the recipients overseas to pay more for American goods there? Why wouldn't the people send the fucking goods instead so it is cheaper for them all?
Way to say you don't know the purpose of money without saying you don't know the purpose of money.
Recipients of money overseas use the American dollars to exchange into the local currency and buy local goods like potatoes.
What happens to those exchanged dollars? I'll give you a clue. They eventually come back to America as payment for goods and/or services, or as investment.
You'd know this if you weren't deliberately ignorant of economics simply because you hate everyone who knows anything about the subject.
So you think propping up their economy is better than keeping those funds within our economy?
Illegal immigrants are just as bad as terrorists. Got it.
Worse, illegal immigrants kill, rape and rob far more americans every year than terrorists. But it is ok because I hear they feel bad about it after.
Angsty white teenagers kill, rape and rob far more Americans every year than terrorists. Time to round up all the angsty teenagers and throw them in the pokey!
There is no basis to deport angsty White teens who are Americans.
I didn't say "deport". Instead as a group they should be treated as worse than terrorists, because they commit far more crimes than terrorists do. What do you think?
You have a cite for that?
It seems your version of criminal justice reforms or letting the guilty fuckers back onto the street over and over and over is increasing the amount of Angsty white teenagers that kill, rape and rob far more Americans every year, along with BIPOC too.
Deport is the solution being proposed by the people you disagree with…
See how easy he lies? It’s amazing, really.
We should put criminals of all stripes in the 'pokey'. But your kind lets them free if they feel bad for their crimes.
*note pedojeffy couldn't help but put teens and poke in the same sentence.*
Is this how you justify the angsty white kids locked in your basement?
Angsty white teenagers kill, rape and rob far more Americans every year than terrorists.
Huh?
Actually, they're one in the same at this point.
So AT, who is worse: terrorists, illegal immigrants, or gays?
You
AT wants the United States to go on a glorious worldwide crusade to convert everyone into Christian, democratic capitalists. Anyone who doesn't like it gets shot.
The USA is a Republic...
The 17A did away with that. You'd know this if you studied civics and the Constitution. Instead you have a pathetic life that revolves around scoring points about things you don't know anything about in an effort to hurt people you don't know anything about in order to impress people you don't know anything about.
Dudette, your only reading is from the label of a bottle of Colt 45.
It's like you didn't even read it.
Let's try this again:
Actually, they're one in the same at this point.
There is no "worse" among them.
Thanks for including the gays though. That's a good pickup.
Good.
Since we've apparently got the Blue states funneling money into foreign terrorist organizations.
2005 Libertarians: The PATRIOT Act will inevitably lead to a loss of liberty for more than just terrorists!
2025 Libertarians: Thank heavens we have the PATRIOT Act to keep us safe from illegal immigrants!
Real 2025 libertarians: Get rid of all the laws, regulations, and welfare that hurt citizens while benefiting immigrants and then leave everyone alone.
2025 Lying Jeffy: Continue forcing citizens to subsidize his favorite people, while they scam billions of dollars while raping children.
Real 2025 libertarians: Get rid of all the laws, regulations, and welfare that hurt citizens while benefiting immigrants
That's not the Real 2025 Libertarian position. The Real 2025 Libertarian position is to get rid of all welfare regardless if that welfare is going to citizens or non-citizens.
The fact that you snuck in there that phrase of "hurting citizens while benefitting immigrants" seems to suggest that you are more in favor of welfare for citizens than you are for non-citizens.
“seems to suggest”
Lying Jeffy can’t help himself.
“and then leave everyone alone.”
What does this seem to suggest, Lying Jeffy?
Libertarians have principles. Trump defenders have principals.
Keep lying to yourself, Sarc.
Your projection of Maddow being your Principal is shining bright. Maybe you should toss in a smidge of Joy Reid to help you from your blind allegiance?
How many blowies did Jesse promise you for that comment?
IDEAS!
More projection. You and jeff are also leftists, not libertarians.
The brown guy loitering at Home Depot is just as dangerous as Mohammed Atta. I mean, they are illegal! That means they've broken laws! That means it's only a matter of time before they commit mass murder and fly planes into buildings!
If he is here illegally, he should be brought before an immigration court for a chance to plead his case.
You want to give those terrorist scum a chance to plead their cases? What are you, a terrorist-sympathizer? Do you work for Hamas?
Congress set up immigration courts for that purpose.
Juast as they authorized ICE to apprehend suspected illegals.
And to apprehend illegal aliens who’ve already been through the process, had their due process, and were given deportation orders.
So. Much. Straw.
Everything he says is dishonest in some way. What’s impressive is the wide range of ways he’s dishonest.
I think Jeffy bought straw commodities and needs to justify them somehow.
He can't help but wear his favorite fragrance, non sequitur du straw
“loitering at Home Depot”
Look at this dishonest framing by Lying Jeffy. Poor thing thinks he can slip this in without anybody noticing.
That's a good idea. Also, post ICE agents there. Hobble any ability they have to make/transfer money as much as possible.
Frankly, I think we need government agents in front of every store. What if those sneaky illegals want to spend their illicit funds at the grocery store to buy food? We can't permit that. To be on the safe side, I think every financial transaction should be monitored by the government. What do you think?
“Frankly, I think we need government agents in front of every store…to check vaccine passports.”
This is what Lying Jeffy actually believes.
Those agents will also check your trunk for bears.
The worst crime of all!
You already live in the era of this happening.
You traded away privacy for convenience.
It's way too late to go back.
I like it. I'm glad you're on the same page with me about suffering a little hardship in the short-term, for the long-term goal of getting all the illegals out of here.
Not "some." Not "just the bad ones." ALL of them.
That'd be really putting the screws to them. Yea, maybe they got into America. Maybe even got a little scratch. But as soon as they spend it, BAM - deported. I like it.
We'll make a Conservative out of you yet, Jeff!
Why is this tagged "immigration" instead of "fraud"?
So as to cloak what’s actually going on.
To wind up Lying Jeffy to spam the comments with lies. Although he’s recently added pro-fraud to his toolbox so that might not be necessary going forward.
Release the Epstein Files. (Looking forward to Dec 19th)
Release the Jack Smith Report.
Why do we have to beg for transparency from our (supposedly) government ?
They will never release "the Epstein Files" whatever those are. They will never, ever give us the full true story of what they know about the Epstein saga.
Why did you not beg your heroes and overlords when they had the power to give you what you want?
That story went away the second it started making Democrats look bad, but I admire your persistence.
As an American citizen, my deposits are tracked and reported. Why is it no problem for others to be tracked that have no right to be here?
Reason supports immigrants having special privileges.
Maybe, just maybe, we should be arguing in favor of the government not violating anyone's rights, instead of arguing "well, if the government is going to violate MY rights, then the government should violate EVERYONE'S rights"
When are you going to start arguing this?
^
He's too busy running from bears.
You never know when they’re going to jump out of trunks.
Your Covid comment record states otherwise, Jeff.
Talking to yourself again? Why is your answer in favor of the government violating everyone's rights?
This will definitely pressure illegals to self-deport, at least on the margins. Most likely those who are here with criminal records will be more likely to just give up and go back now.
However, the real play from the Trump admin right now is the SNAP benefits game. The states that are witholding recipient data may get the benefits cut off.
The number of illegals getting SNAP benefits must be mind boggling for these states to play chicken with the admin over the money. Truly astonishing.
The states that are witholding recipient data may get the benefits cut off.
It is an empty threat and everyone at this point knows it.
The number of illegals getting SNAP benefits must be mind boggling for these states to play chicken with the admin over the money. Truly astonishing.
So you think that the only reason why these states are not handing over this data to the federal government is because they are defending fraud? Could there be any other reason that you can think of where they might not want lots of data being sent to the federal government for them to do with as they please?
The federal government is the one taking my money to give to them. Shouldn’t they monitor who’s getting it?
Or do you think they have a right to this money?
Or do you think they have a right to this money?
Who specifically is the "they" in this question?
And, what does the law say?
Look at Lying Jeffy continue to ask disingenuous questions while refusing to answer one simple question from me for several days based directly on a comment he responded to!
You would prefer to lie about me instead of getting an answer to your question.
You would prefer to lie
about me instead of getting an answer to your question.ftfy
When are you going to stop projecting, Sarc?
And, look at Lying TrollMac who refused to answer my questions and instead dodged to once again lie about me.
He could have gotten an answer to his question if he had just chosen not to lie about me just this one time. But no, he couldn't even do that.
I’ve been asking the question for days, since it was a pertinent question directly to your response to shadydave, so this is a lie. Then you asked my opinion on Dominion as a condition, which I answered, and then you still wouldn’t answer.
You can keep lying about why you won’t answer the question, but everyone reading this knows the real reason.
I won't answer your question because, in my opinion, you don't deserve an answer, because the question isn't asked in good faith.
I'm quite aware that you will not believe this, and instead you will lie about what you think my real motives are, just like you have lied about me all up and down this entire comment thread.
I placed a very simple condition: retract the lies you've said about me just in this one comment section, let alone all of the thousands of other lies you have told about me. And you won't do that. Because you were never sincere about any of it. It's all just a game to troll and bait me.
I knew that from the very beginning when you asked the question. I knew you would never actually retract any of your lies.
I won't answer your question because, in my opinion, you don't deserve an answer, because the question isn't asked in good faith.
That’s really rich, coming from you.
The first time I asked it was directly related his response to another post, so even this is a lie.
“I won't answer your question because, in my opinion, you don't deserve an answer, because the question isn't asked in good faith.”
Haha, Lying Jeffy just admitted he’s not going to answer my question even though he’s previously said he would if I met his conditions.
Good job Lying Jeffy!
That was in response to a request to answering your question without any conditions.
But I meant what I said. I would have answered your question if you had met my condition. If you had, then you would begin to deserve an answer. But you didn't, and I don't think you ever will.
Haha, nice try Lying Jeffy! It’s right there, plain to see!
And again, I already met your first condition. But you were lying then, and you’re lying now. Because you’re a psychopathic liar.
Now lie some more for us Lying Jeffy!
It's the truth.
And again, I already met your first condition.
But this is a lie. There was no condition attached to my question about Dominion voting machines. I never pledged to answer your question if you answered mine. Yet one more example of you lying about me.
Why won't you simply retract all of the lies that you have spread about me in this comment section?
Because the data will also implicate them and could expose more of their crimes and the dems are afraid of not being let back out on the street without charge or investigation because Trump and the GOP are in power Federally?
“So you think that the only reason why these states are not handing over this data to the federal government is because they are defending fraud?”
Yes. 2020 should have disabused you of any notion that local governments gave a damn about your privacy or your information.
There is no amount of freedom that Trump defenders are unwilling to give up if it means one illegal being harmed.
May we remind you of your Covid stances?
Thanks Rachel. Another astute observation. Can you believe how he pardoned those J6 grandmother's for daring to walk in a public building?? The outrage.
The administration has no authority to request any more information than the law allows.
And the law requires reporting of transactions, including remittances of $600 or more. Don’t like it? Go take it up with the Democrats who passed and signed it, Commietard.
Fuck off commie scum.
If an illegal immigrant works for cash under the table, then he's more of a drain on the nation then people chronically living on welfare. Not only is he not paying FICA (and his employer dodges payroll tax) but the money he sends back is not being used on the American economy. Can you imagine Toyota in Texas not paying any taxes here but send back 50% of its earning back to Japan?
If an illegal uses a fake SS number to receive a paycheck at least he's paying FICA. But if he does anything bad the person whose identity he stole is in a bind. And again, the money he earns here might not stay here.
If you work lawfully, you're free to spend or send your own money however you see fit. This is a privilege we cannot afford to illegals. This is common sense. Imagine the government legalizing cash wages - it loses tax revenue while the local economy possibly loses money when its sent elsewhere. Meanwhile we subsidize or pay welfare to prop up people who need support because..... they sent their earnings abroad.
"But why lump them with terrorists" is an ironic sentiment, given what's happened in Minnesota. How do you ensure unvetted illegal workers aren't sending money to terrorists? Are you sure millions of dollars sent back to Mexican families won't fall into the hands of the drug cartel?
but the money he sends back is not being used on the American economy.
Sure it is. Ever heard of foreign investment?
If an illegal uses a fake SS number to receive a paycheck at least he's paying FICA.
Yup. Or if he uses an ITIN he loses all the money.
But if he does anything bad the person whose identity he stole is in a bind.
How so? That's something that can be easily sorted out.
And again, the money he earns here might not stay here.
You're right. It might go overseas, be converted into local currency, and then used by foreign investors.
If you work lawfully, you're free to spend or send your own money however you see fit. This is a privilege we cannot afford to illegals.
No. Living and enjoying the fruits of your labor is not a privilege. That is one of the most anti-American things I've read in a while.
You are essentially saying that freedom consists of asking permission and obeying orders. That's what liberty lovers stand against. And it's what Trumpians champion because there is no amount of liberty they will not sacrifice if it means hurting someone they hate. And face it, you guys hate everyone who isn't in your clan.
“Ever heard of foreign investment?”
Not sure the sweet Abuela of the guy selling tamales down the street is really engaging in that.
Not that I really care. Remittances is a time tested way immigrants help support their families in the old country.
but the money he sends back is not being used on the American economy.
Even if true - SO WHAT? Where is it written that someone who earns money in this country MUST spend that money in this country too?
If you work lawfully, you're free to spend or send your own money however you see fit. This is a privilege we cannot afford to illegals.
It's not a PRIVILEGE, it's called property rights. Whether a worker is here legally or not, that worker traded his/her labor for compensation. That worker ought to be able to decide what to do with that compensation because that worker OWNS the money.
The more severe the crackdown on illegal immigrants, the more communist you all become. Now you all are claiming that money that a person earns isn't *really* that person's money, it's a mere "privilege" that the government grants that person to keep that money. Karl Marx would have loved you.
One might expect that, given how much money goes overseas, the unidirectional nature of immigration to the US would reverse or stop.
But it continues apace.
So yeah, money leaving is indeed bad given the lack of massive improvement over the past x years.
There wouldn’t have to be a crackdown on illegal immigration if it hadn’t been allowed to get so out of control in the first place.
"But why lump them with terrorists" is an ironic sentiment, given what's happened in Minnesota. How do you ensure unvetted illegal workers aren't sending money to terrorists?
The overwhelming majority of the people implicated in the Minnesota fraud scandal are *American citizens*. And there is zero evidence that any of that money went to terrorists.
But, you know, if you're a bigot, and you see brown people accused of fraud, of course you must immediately think ILLEGAL TERRORISTS.
Are you sure millions of dollars sent back to Mexican families won't fall into the hands of the drug cartel?
I could ask the same question about the much larger sums of money that American citizens spend in Mexico. How do we know that the next time you are on a cruise in the Caribbean and you spend money at a Mexican port of call, that some of that money doesn't wind up in the hands of a drug cartel? Hmmmmmmm? Maybe the government should prevent everyone, citizens included, from spending money in Mexico. You can't be too careful, right?
Why is it that it's only the immigrants who get the finger-wagging accusations but the citizens get the benefit of the doubt? Why it's almost as if you believe immigrants are inherently inferior.
Why are you so bothered by it, Jeff? If you’re a US citizen, then you’re unaffected by any of this.
someone ... FDR? ... took all the Western Union wires so they could see who was wiring what
So what?