Self-Driving Cars Will Make the World Safer for Cats—and Humans Too
The accidental death of one cat in San Francisco is triggering calls for banning Waymo. That would be a huge mistake.
San Francisco is an admittedly quirky city, but an emotional debate there over the tragic death of a cat is strangely emblematic about the way too many Americans react to current events. Something bad happens and then throngs of people mourn, get angry, and then demand that the government "do something"—even if the something they call for will only make the problem worse.
For those who missed the internationally publicized brouhaha, a tabby named Kit Kat had lived in the city's Mission, where he sauntered into bodegas and bars. Dubbed the Mayor of 16th Street, Kit Kat was by all accounts a charming character. Then on October 27, the unthinkable happened: a Waymo self-driving taxi ran him over. Kit Kat's fans have erected memorials and taken to social media to mourn.
There's nothing wrong with mourning the death of a neighborhood cat. You'll have trouble finding someone who likes cats more than I do. I've got housecats, but also keep a food dish out front to lure neighborhood strays. One of my wife's favorite memories from Istanbul: Friendly cats that wander around restaurants and stores. The city even erected a statue memorializing one.
So my problem isn't with the upset, but with the proposed solutions. As The New York Times reported, "Jackie Fielder, a progressive San Francisco supervisor who represents the Mission District, has been among the most vocal critics. She introduced a city resolution after Kit Kat's death that calls for the state Legislature to let voters decide if driverless cars can operate where they live."
She argued that human drivers can be held accountable, but not robot drivers. I seriously doubt that drivers are ever held "accountable" for accidentally running over an animal. And, actually, a new California law does hold driverless car companies accountable for traffic incidents.
Such arguments are anathema to public safety. I found research (thank you, AI robots) that cars kill or injure 5.4 million cats a year in the United States, with 5,399,999 coming at the hands of human drivers. I found estimates of hundreds of cats killed by drivers each year in San Francisco. I'd guess that buses and trains—some of Waymo critics' preferred transportation option—have probably squashed their share of critters.
Then there are those 43,000 humans who die in collisions in the United States each year, many of which could be saved if driverless cars were more prevalent. One reason for the company's rapid growth is robotaxis' stellar safety record. Per the Times: "[H]uman drivers killed 43 people in San Francisco last year, including 24 pedestrians, 16 people in cars and three bicyclists. None were killed by Waymos." Many women and schoolchildren rely on them because of safety concerns, as a Google search of "taxi drivers and sexual abuse" will reveal.
Many robotaxi critics have ulterior motives that are unrelated to safety: Unions that fear job losses, the taxi industry, progressives who freak out at every technological development, transit activists, and people who have watched "Terminator" too many times.
A study by Swiss Re, an insurance company with the obvious financial incentive to understand the relative benefits and risks, found the following, per Reinsurance News: "The Waymo Driver exhibited significantly better safety performance, with an 88% reduction in property damage claims and a 92% reduction in bodily injury claims compared to human-driven vehicles."
Waymo's data find 11 times fewer serious-injury crashes. Most crashes involving a Waymo were due to other vehicles hitting their taxis. That makes perfect sense given their Artificial Intelligence (AI) software is continuously learning, whereas as it's increasingly difficult to teach some human drivers not to get behind the wheel after downing some martinis.
In January, one person and a dog died in a horrible wreck in San Francisco involving a Waymo. But that's the first fatal collision involving a driverless car—and was caused by a human driver who plowed into a line of stopped cars. Tesla has received criticism for wrecks related to its self-driving mode, but those systems require active driver supervision.
If you are creeped out about a robot driver, then you need to read CalMatters' recent investigative report finding: "The California DMV routinely allows dangerous drivers with horrifying histories to continue to operate on our roadways. Too often they go on to kill. Many keep driving even after they kill. Some go on to kill again." A cat's death is sad, but this is devastating.
The state legislature fortunately failed to pass a bill that would have done what Fielder suggests: Give local officials, rather than the state, the power to regulate robotaxis. That would have been a disaster, as every locality would impose its own rules, with some effectively banning them. It would stifle the industry and lead to more deaths of humans…and cats.
When something bad happens, sometimes the best approach is doing nothing.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Save the pussies! Ban Waymo!
I like the technological advancement that waymo represents. I don't trust it from a safety perspective and hate many of the things that will come with mass implementation of self-driving vehicles.
Right wingers say: Safe the pussies (=right wing misfits)! Ban progress! Muh safety!!!!
It will continue to be shoved down their throats against their wills. I promise. Let's celebrate their demise.
They drive better than humans. And much better than right wingers. This is plain progress. You have nothing to worry about.
They drive better than humans. And much better than right wingers.
Heh... Seattle *drops microphone*
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits/medical-assistance-dying.html
How much do you distrust Waymo's safety? How, exactly, does that compare to your trust in the safety of the human drivers that are still on the road because you outlawed Waymo?
Remember that the right standard is not driverless cars versus the best possible drivers - it's driverless cars versus the worst drivers. The drunks, the very old, the sleep deprived, the distracted, etc. Frankly, it's not that high a bar to beat.
The worst human drivers can all be held accountable. Who goes to jail when a Waymo kills someone?
Why do SOME people always DEMAND punishment? If I and 2 or 3 or 98 other drivers are killed by a crashing asteroid-meteor impact, WHO shall be punished? WHO will be helped or protected by this punishment?
I’m still waiting for the lawsuit naming Gid.
I know it’s out there.
If a waymo kills a sf progtards would anybody care?
Is it an SUV? Those things already have a mind of their own.
Does anyone deserve to go to jail if a Waymo kills someone?
If not, then the just thing to do would be not to put anyone in jail.
If yes, who deserves it, why, why can't current laws be used to that effect?
If this is a case of negligence, then why can't the perpetrator (a programmer, perhaps) be prosecuted?
Whether it's actually negligence would depend on the specifics of the case, it seems to me.
False equivalence because most times no human goes to jail when a car kills someone.
Let's walk through some actual scenarios.
1. Driver intentionally plows into a crowd, killing and injuring people. Yes, driver goes to jail. Waymo can't do that. It's a computer and has no intentionality.
2. Driver is drunk, high or otherwise voluntarily impaired and kills someone. Driver might go to jail but if politically connected, probably just goes to a rehab program. Insurance makes the family "whole". Again, Waymo can't do that since computers can't choose anything, much less choose to get drunk.
3. Driver falls asleep at the wheel, is distracted by something on the radio or just isn't paying enough attention. Driver might go to jail but probably not. Insurance pays out. This one does have an electronic equivalence - overloading the system's processing ability. Under current law, the driver's insurance pays out regardless of who's driver, though there may be a subrogation claim against Waymo afterward.
4. Driver has a medical emergency, falls unconscious or otherwise becomes suddenly unable to drive (including bringing the car to a safe halt). No one goes to jail. Insurance pays out. Same for a Waymo driver's insurance.
5. Mechanical failure causes the driver to lose control. Again, no one goes to jail and insurance pays out (but with lots of subrogation claims in this scenario).
6. Child runs into road (or deer, dog, etc), driver swerves causing injury to another. Again, no one goes to jail and insurance pays out regardless of driver.
Yes, there are exceptions and extenuating circumstances possible for all of these scenarios - but the general principles remain the same. Humans are held accountable for the things they can control. Waymo failures are legally no different from mechanical failures of axles, brake lines or any other essential safety system on the car.
"Remember that the right standard is not driverless cars versus the best possible drivers - it's driverless cars versus the worst drivers. The drunks, the very old, the sleep deprived, the distracted, etc. Frankly, it's not that high a bar to beat."
Nope, it's between those of us who make allowances for the driveless (AI) cars and the rest. Allowances for the fact that AI cars seem not yet to understand 'yield to the right'. AI cars with whom you cannot make eye contact or signal your intentions with a wave.
Watched the 'development' of AI cars for close to 20 years now, and they are still not capable of dealing with the fact that humans drive cars. And often do better than AI cars.
You 'watched' the development of something you have no clue about with your old, blurry eyes? God, the ai-resistance of old clingers adds a whole nother dimension of delicious 😀
But im sure youre somehow proud when you tell younger folks "i have watched xyz for 20 years now, maaan I'M so experienced and my judgment is beyond question because of that!"
But all we really hear is "i have watched xyz for 20 years now, god im old and my opinions are outdated, i stopped knowing whats going on a decade ago but somehow i think i look like an authority on recent developments - because im pointing out that im OLD" AHAHA YOU FUCKING CLOWN 😀 😀 😀
This is the first time a car has run over a cat.
Pussies shouldn't BE such pussies!!! When attacked by a car (regardless of WHO is driving shit), said pussies should STAND THEIR GROUND AND FIGHT!!!
(Shit is THEIR fault for BEING such pussies in the first place! Shit is just like being an illegal sub-human, or a peaceful speed-boat driver upon the high seas! Do SNOT be ANY of these things!!!)
Cats kill and eat SQuiRReLS if they're hungry enough and can't find any mice or rats.
So? They are STILL a bunch of pussies!!!
(We SQRLSY ones derisively stand chittering and chattering in the branches above them, and PELT them with our nuts!!! We throw our nuts in their general direction!)
Yeah, my pussy is VERY well fed, yet she killed 2 baby squirrels quite a few years ago. I was SOOOO angry... Butt ye can't spank them, they know not twat they do...
Dead SQRLS are a good thing.
Hey SCROTUS You PervFected Punk Boogers You! HERE is your “fix”! Try shit, you might LIKE shit!!!
https://rentahitman.com/ … If’n ye check ’em out & buy their service, ye will be… A Shitman hiring a hitman!!!
If’n ye won’t help your own pathetic self, even when given a WIDE OPEN invitation, then WHY should ANYONE pity you? Punk Boogers, if your welfare check is too small to cover the hitman… You shitman you… Then take out a GoFundMe page already!!!
Also, in case of a “miracle happens here” and ye want to get OFF of welfare and get yourself an honest, respectable, upstanding-kinda JOB, then be advised that rent-a-hitman is HIRING! See https://rentahitman.com/careers-1
I see a grey box has appeared beneath me. It should be trapped and napalmed.
I think the larger issue is the proliferation of childless cat ladies. The Waymos and Haitians are doing their part but these feral beasts continue to breed at alarming rates.
And assholes who feed strays are a big part of the problem.
.you should never feed stray childless cat ladies. That just lads to a densification of Karens.
San Francisco is an admittedly quirky city
If by quirky you mean gay.
There's nothing wrong with mourning the death of a neighborhood cat.
It's a bit demented when it crosses over to creating little shrines and demanding justice for its death.
You'll have trouble finding someone who likes cats more than I do. I've got housecats
Yea, that tracks.
Many women and schoolchildren rely on them because of safety concerns, as a Google search of "taxi drivers and sexual abuse" will reveal.
What the hell is wrong with Frisco.
I suppose we should start with the obvious: the illegals and the gays. The women and schoolchildren, respectively, have a legitimate fear there.
The California DMV routinely allows dangerous drivers with horrifying histories to continue to operate on our roadways.
They even give them CDLs.
Waymo's data find 11 times fewer serious-injury crashes.
So, ultimately, here's the issue Greenhut:
You lack credibility. So when you make what, on its face, seems like a reasonable argument - we're all forced to consider what insidious ideas are behind it. And you know what klaxon is blaring after reading your article?
The same bulls*** arguments for high-speed rail, light-rail, increased public transportation, etc etc etc. Which are ultimately a State effort to restrict/control freedom of movement. To make you dependent on their schedules and force you to abide by their routes.
Now, Waymo has a really cool innovation working for it. And, for now, it's more or less the same as a taxi. But it's more controllable. If I'm in my own car, I can intentionally break the speed limit if I feel compelled to do so to get where I'm going. If I'm in the back of a cab, I can throw money at the hack to convince him to do the same. In an autonomous vehicle, I get in and I'm at the mercy of its programming - including speed limiters and pre-established routing. Much like I would be with public transportation. I wonder if I could even open the doors while it's idling or rolling.
I, for one, don't trust your intentions even a little bit when you talk on this subject, Greenhut. You've destroyed your credibility in that regard after so many years of being a mindless left-wing shill.
Waymo. Great idea. But I don't trust any PRC's advocacy when they speak of it. Because we all know what they're ultimately after.
"San Francisco is an admittedly quirky city
"If by quirky you mean gay."
And if by gay you mean equal parts Marxist, self-absorbed, elitist, suicidal, and retarded.
Also, they like sodomy.
The correct answer is C: All of the above
Who, priests?
No, just the local red diaper baby faggots. But we get it Hank, you’re an antichrist bigot, and a racist.
"... suicidal, ..." says the Death-Worshitting Servant, Serpent, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One, disapprovingly, while recummending suicide to ALL of the Lesser Beings...
Hypocrite much, Oh PervFected, Mind-Infected hypocrite?
If by quirky you mean gay.
It's not the 90s any more.
'You'll have trouble finding someone who likes cats more than I do. I've got housecats, but also keep a food dish out front to lure neighborhood strays. One of my wife's favorite memories from Istanbul: Friendly cats that wander around restaurants and stores.'
Somebody needs to be tested for toxoplasmosis. And then quarantined.
It's like he's not even aware there's a comments section.
Somebody needs to be tested for an EVIL mind. And then quarantined.
Cuntclusion first, THEN the pretended sham of a FASCIST facts-finding seSSion!!!
but also keep a food dish out front to lure neighborhood strays.
You should be prosecuted and jailed for that.
I only feed wild animals when there is a sign telling me not to.
And the food pile is near my blind.
Stray cats are not wild animals. Few of them would survive without morons feeding them.
Try telling that to a 3rd generation ferral.
There is virtually no such thing. Stray cats being fed by humans are not feral.
True, you can’t tell SQRLSY anything.
RePoopLicKKKunts can’t tell SQRLSY anything... Except for LIES!
Butt I am smart enough to SNOT BLEEEVE any of them!!!
"I'd guess that buses and trains—some of Waymo critics' preferred transportation option—have probably squashed their share of critters." Um, look at how "nine-dollar cow" entered legal vernacular. Train hist cow, farmer sues RR, wins. Suddenly every sick or freshly dead cow lands on RR tracks after dusk and the farmer sues the RR when the county clerk office opens. Railroad lawyers got judges/politicians to impose a $10 limit on claims for cows hit by trains. Decades later the feds paid $9 apiece for cattle destroyed to contain brucellosis outbreaks.
The real reason the cat is such a legal pretext is that cops cannot stop, search and rob under color of faith-based asset forfeiture a self driving car. Where would dirty cops get folded legal tender handed to them along with drivers licenses if the car contains only passengers? Who's gonna pay for the Station house margarita machine? I recently saw for the first time a cat get run over--by a human driver.
Like anyone in San Francisco carries folded legal tender. We're not in the Comstock era, little bro.
There's nothing wrong with mourning the death of a neighborhood cat.
?!!
Why would you even write this sentence?
Because he likes cats.
Many women and schoolchildren rely on them because of safety concerns, as a Google search of "taxi drivers and sexual abuse" will reveal.
Wait, really? Who do the upper middle class white people of San Francisco think are driving these cabs?
Oooooh, ok, never mind. Carry on.
So I googled that... Ok, gotcha now. Now it's all coming together.
So another precious rapefugee.
"Female only" lol, okayyy. Someone hasn't gotten the memo I guess.
What is a woman?
My favorite thing about Reason over the last ten years or so is it's total inability to see past the political brake lights right in front of them and perceive the road conditions ahead. I gotta hand it to the feminists, they (many) did and when they pulled off the road and said, "nope" the results were hilarious.
You think self-driving cars will be safer for cats? Huh. Are they programmed to brake or swerve to avoid small cats? What about possums and squirrels? Is this an *improvement* in safety? Will it at least know not to do that when there are icy conditions?
Self-Driving Cars Will Make the World Safer for Cats—and Humans Too
In that order. We know.
Letting cats roam should be illegal. The same as it is with any other domestic animal.
And, I’m a cat lover on my seventh, strictly house cat. Six of those seven were picked up as strays or ferals.
Oof.
https://www.tmz.com/2025/12/01/waymo-police-standoff/
Broken-record-playing Demonic Death-Worshitter Worshits Death... More news at 6:66!!!
Cuntsorevaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant, serpent, and slurp-pants (pants-slurper) of the Evil One?
EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…
He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
Loves death and the dying moans,
Then he likes to munch their bones!
He’s truly, completely a necrophiliac,
His brain, squirming toad-like, is REALY, really whack!
Has no thoughts that help the people,
He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
Kool-Aid man, please listen,
You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!
A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439167265/reasonmagazinea-20/
Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
Who would feed you? Whose tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!
Signed, Yours Truly, Heaven-on-Earth-Based Skeptic of Servants, Serpents, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One