Trump Vowed To Stop Crypto Crackdowns. Samourai Wallet Proves He Hasn't.
If fairness in the justice system depends on wealth or political value, we’ve missed the point of justice entirely.
For years, President Donald Trump complained that his predecessor had weaponized the judicial system against him on what he claimed were trumped-up charges, including election interference, mishandling classified documents, hush-money payments, and fraudulent tax and property dealings.
Now that the shoe is on the other foot, the president seems wholly uninterested in stopping the very weaponization he once railed against.
This week, Keonne Rodriguez, the co-creator of the bitcoin privacy wallet Samourai, was sentenced to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine—the maximum sentence under the charge for which he pleaded guilty earlier this year. "In July, Rodriguez and his cofounder William Hill plead[ed] guilty [to] the known transmission of illicit proceeds," The Rage reported on Thursday.
Samourai Wallet did not perpetrate financial crimes, ransom data for bitcoin, or steal digital assets. Rodriguez and his team wrote code—that First Amendment–protected activity we learned to cherish after the crypto wars in the 1990s. Their service obfuscated users' bitcoin transaction histories, making it harder for observers on a public blockchain to trace funds after they had passed through the tool. In the Justice Department's view, that now constitutes money laundering and a failure to register as a money transmitter—even though Samourai never held custody of bitcoin (making the entire money-transmitting charge odd in the first place).
In a letter seeking leniency, Rodriguez acknowledged he should have obtained a license for the business, but U.S. District Judge Denise Cote, addressing the letter in court on Thursday, thought that was not relevant, even though that's explicitly the "crime" for which he was maximally sentenced. "You chose to use your considerable talents to make it harder to recoup those stolen funds," said the judge. Admittedly, some shady actors used the software—but five years in prison for that?
In the TD Bank money-laundering scandal in 2024, the Justice Department collected the largest penalty ever imposed under the Bank Secrecy Act for poor compliance practices that allowed far more illicit funds to flow through its dollar-based system than the amount of bitcoin that ever ran through Samourai. Notably, nobody went to jail for that crime, even though bank employees were bribed tens of thousands of dollars to look the other way while criminal networks laundered more than a billion dollars of illicit funds through a top-10 bank in America.
Tools can be wielded by users for good or bad—the moral or legal responsibility for that is on the users, not the creators. Most money laundering occurs using U.S. currency—physical or digital. Prosecutors claimed that terrorists and criminals used Samourai Wallet's services, but to a much larger extent, they use dollar bills.
The Samourai Wallet prosecution—and the closely related Tornado Cash trial on a similar Ethereum blockchain service in August—was always an outdated remnant of Operation Chokepoint 2.0, where the executive branch excessively and disproportionately went after cryptocurrency developers.
Earlier this year, the Trump administration publicly stated that it would cease prosecuting developers for writing code. In the months since, several bitcoin services that had shut off access for Americans in fear of legal repercussions have returned. The White House proclaims America to be the "crypto capital of the world," adding the laughably incoherent statement that "all the remaining Bitcoin [will] be made in the USA."
The president has issued various crypto-related pardons. On his second day in office, he made good on a campaign promise to libertarians by pardoning Ross Ulbricht from an excessive double life sentence for building a website. Last month, he pardoned Changpeng Zhao (known as C.Z.), the billionaire former CEO of the crypto exchange Binance, following a four-month money-laundering stint (though he recently admitted to not even knowing who C.Z. is).
It's time for the Trump administration to get its legal house in order—that should start with a pardon for Rodriguez.
Then again, unlike C.Z., Rodriguez doesn't have a billion-dollar investment to make in a Trump family–related business, nor a bunch of bitcoin votes to sway a critical election. Right now, leniency in crypto cases seems reserved for those with billions to invest or political leverage to trade.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
It you can't buy a pardon, you don't deserve one. Pardons aren't welfare.
You referring to the Biden crime family pardons?
Fuck off, Unger.
From the waki pedia:
emphasis added
So, because a guy investigated, prosecuted, and arrested by the Biden admin's DOJ pled guilty in the summer and was just sentenced, this is somehow an indictment of Trump? Dude, that's a stretch.
And it's "Proof" of something or other? That kind of stretches the definition of the word "proof" a bit. Maybe evidence of something, but not proof. A copy editor should be more careful with his words.
Not particularly well supported, even if we accept a softer stance than that it is "proof" of what Trump intends. Seems more like a typical emotional screed to me. Maybe find some better support.
And maybe something OTHER than a link to one of the stupidest opinion editors on Reason might be used to support the claim.
And maybe one of the myriad Libertarian issues surrounding a judges ruling, privacy, finances, etc might be far better things for a Libertarian magazine to delve into.
And maybe you should do YOUR actual job, because copy editing at Teen Reason is a fucking joke. Literally. We literally joke in the comments about Reason having a million editors and there seems to be no copy editing it is so bad, and now we learn that there IS a copy editor on staff. He's just writing "Hurr durr durr Trump is dum amirite?" articles instead of actually editing.
Man, Teen Reason keeps sinking to new lows.
Pro Tip: If you drop your pants, show the government your ass, and yell "Fuck Me!", they will.
You use a service whose *whole point* is to be able to track and verify every transaction - and then you want a service to obfuscate it?
But you're totally not committing a crime and the laundry totally isn't abetting you.
And this all happened under Biden - but it's still orangemanbad.
Nothing much new about this, is there? Garden variety corruption during Trump 2.0, really. At the same time this kind of thing tends to reinforce the general public's suspicious view of bitcoin. Which leaves the digital currency market as a playpen for crooks, cheaters, and billionaires. I know, so please pardon the distinction without any difference in my little list.