Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Zohran Mamdani

What Mamdani's Win Means for Sex

While it wasn't a part of his campaign, Mamdani has been a vocal supporter of sex work decriminalization.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 11.5.2025 11:15 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Zohran Mamdani | Lev Radin/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Lev Radin/Sipa USA/Newscom)

With Zohran Mamdani's election as New York City mayor, can we expect a change in the city's policies related to sex work? There are some reasons to suspect that the answer to this question is yes.

Losing NYC mayoral candidate and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo certainly wanted people to think so. Back in August, Cuomo's team put out a press release calling out "Mamdani's dangerous support for decriminalizing prostitution."

You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

It's true that during his time in the New York State Assembly, Mamdani cosponsored legislation to decriminalize prostitution. Running for reelection in 2022, he pledged that he would reject legislation to implement the Nordic model of sex work regulation, in which some selling of sex is decriminalized but paying for it is not. And back in 2021, he supported the repeal of a statute—referred to by opponents as the "walking while trans" law—that criminalized loitering for purposes of prostitution, saying it is his "fundamental belief that sex work is work."

But Mamdani did not make prostitution an issue in his mayoral campaign, and even dodged some direct questions about decriminalization, including whether he still opposed criminalizing the purchase of sex.

What we can make of that is anyone's guess. I suspect Mamdani does support decriminalization, but was smart enough to realize that making a big deal of it wouldn't do him any favors in his bid to become New York City's next mayor.

The key question is, now that he has won, will Mamdani move to make a difference in the way the city handles prostitution?

And, as New York City mayor, what can he realistically do? After all, prostitution is a state-level criminal offense.

While New York City leaders can't change the state laws, they can affect the way they're enforced within city limits. And the city's mayor can play a big role in setting the agenda on this.

Former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who served from 2014 through 2021, became an advocate for decriminalization, pushed for state lawmakers to pass a decriminalization bill, and heralded a social services approach to helping sex workers, rather than a criminal justice approach. It's not clear exactly how de Blasio put these beliefs into practice, but during de Blasio's tenure, the city did cut down on prostitution arrests. Manhattan, for instance, went from around 600 prostitution arrests in 2014 to just a handful in 2021, per data from the Urban Justice Center. The city overall went from 1,790 arrests in 2014 to 376 arrests in 2019, according to a 2021 report from the city. And, in 2021, Manhattan and Brooklyn district attorneys dismissed hundreds of prostitution cases and announced that they would stop prosecuting people for selling sex. (Under Mayor Eric Adams, prostitution-related arrests have ticked back up again, according to The New York Times.)

Mamdani's campaign has said that he supports de Blasio's approach to handling sex work. "Zohran will return to the decriminalization approach taken by the de Blasio administration, which means he'll end raids on sex workers and work with District Attorneys to reduce unnecessary prosecutions," Mamdani spokesperson Dora Pekec said in a September statement.

Mamdani himself has implied as much, too. "What I want to do is look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue," Mamdani told reporters in August. "What we've seen from the previous administration is an understanding that the responses that have to be taken into account have much more to do with things beyond the question of an individual sex worker and through the larger system around that," he said in September. Mamdani also stressed then that he has never supported the legalization of prostitution.

Some—including Cuomo—have tried to portray Mamdani as flip-flopping on the issue of sex work, pointing to his statements supporting decriminalization and rejecting legalization. But there is nothing contradictory in these statements, because decriminalization and legalization are not the same thing.

Legalization refers to a highly regulated system in which prostitution is sanctioned by the state under certain circumstances (and still criminalized outside of those circumstances). It may be permitted, but only in certain districts, or in a brothel, or with a permit. Decriminalization, on the other hand, simply means removing all criminal penalties surrounding the (consensual, adult) selling and purchase of sexual services. There is no enforcement of sanctions against sex workers or their clients, but neither is there a state-regulated brothel system or anything else like that. (Sex worker activists and their allies tend to support decriminalization over legalization.)

"I don't get the impression that Mamdani's stance on sex work has shifted one bit," writes Lux Alptraum in Dame magazine. "I think he is deftly navigating an obviously bad faith attempt to misrepresent his past and present stances, all while avoiding getting sucked into a conversation that's far too complex to be appropriately addressed in brief sound bites or during a debate."

As mayor, Mamdani couldn't technically decriminalize prostitution in New York City, but he could encourage local police to halt prostitution stings and deprioritize prostitution arrests and raids, and support prosecutors declining to bring prostitution cases.

A system where sex workers and their customers face uncertainty about whether they'll be arrested or charged isn't ideal, even if they ultimately escape these fates. It still keeps prostitution operating in the black market, where it's easier for violence and exploitation to thrive and harder for sex workers to take steps to operate safely. That said, cutting down on sex workers' encounters with police (which can be harmful in their own ways) and helping them avoid criminal records, fines, jail time, and other life-disrupting consequences is still a net positive for sex worker well-being and safety.

Hopefully, Mamdani won't shy away from supporting decriminalization now that he has won, and will do whatever is within his power as mayor to lessen the negative effects of sex-work criminalization within New York City.


More Sex & Tech News

All noise, no signal: AI-written cover letters are making cover letters useless.

Do you know who has purchased your travel data? "Most people probably have no idea that when you book a flight through major travel websites, a data broker owned by U.S. airlines then sells details about your flight, including your name, credit card used, and where you're flying to the government," writes Joseph Cox at 404 Media. Here's how he opted out.

Meta moves to dismiss porn copyright lawsuit: Meta is being sued for copyright infringement by Strike 3 Holdings, which "discovered illegal downloads of some of its adult films on Meta corporate IP addresses" and alleges that they're being used to train AI, notes Ars Technica. But in a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, "Meta argued that there was no evidence that the tech giant directed any of the downloads of about 2,400 adult movies owned by Strike 3—or was even aware of the illegal activity" and claimed the videos had been downloaded by employees for "private personal use."

U.K. leaders can't ever seem to get enough censorship: They now want to criminalize porn that features choking.

Appeals court judges seem skeptical of Idaho book law: "An Idaho law restricting what materials students can access in schools and libraries drew scrutiny at the Ninth Circuit on Monday as a group of schools urged the court to block the law," reports Courthouse News Service. The law has a "pretty serious impact on the First Amendment rights of [librarians]," said U.S. Circuit Judge Milan Smith, while Judge Jacqueline Nguyen noted that "a lot of young adult novels that may actually have sexual themes or may have nudity and fall strictly within the definition of harmful to minors would then be swept up, despite the fact that it has serious value."


Today's Image

Brooklyn, NY | 2016 (ENB/Reason)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Washington’s State Capital Just Voted Against Increasing the Minimum Wage, Unemployment

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Zohran MamdaniSex WorkDecriminalizationProstitutionNew York CityLaw enforcementSexCriminal JusticeElections
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (51)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 months ago

    It means the saracens will be able to rape the infidels while waiting in line at the kebab food truck.

  2. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    "What Mamdani's Win Means for Sex"

    It means each and every resident of NYC just got fucked.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

      Is it masturbation when they do it to themselves?

      1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

        That makes Mamdani a dildo. Good choice! Cuomo was just a pile of pus.

      2. Chumby   2 months ago

        Mamdani should provide each NYC resident with a Dunker in every pot.

    2. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      You win

    3. Think It Through   2 months ago

      Slow clap.

  3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

    I’m guessing ENB needs to publish this here as Playboy no longer has a print edition. Of course, no one reads the articles here either.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      I get it for the pictures comments.

  4. mad.casual   2 months ago

    The law has a "pretty serious impact on the First Amendment rights of [librarians],"

    Fun fact: Public school librarians don't have a right to free speech as public school librarians.

    The word "library" doesn't even appear in The Constitution. Adams' original proposition for a congressional library failed. The actual original *C*ongressional *L*ibrary only contained 740 books, none of them were overtly pornographic or depicted nudity. To this day, the LOC notes, categorizes, and restricts access to pornographic material (as well as other material) as distinct from biological or artistic depictions.

    Just because pedophiles like ENB and the 9th Circuit want to misinform others so that they can sexualize children doesn't mean others have to or should accept their stupidity.

    Go ahead, tell me that firmly asserting that ENB and the 9th Circuit are open and avowed pedophiles and have been for years is dishonest, defamatory, or obscene.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Penises were thoughtlessly placed on, in or around anuses, like so much coffee cups without coasters.

    2. See.More   2 months ago

      The law has a "pretty serious impact on the First Amendment rights of [librarians],"

      Fun fact: Public school librarians don't have a right to free speech as public school librarians.

      Agreed. Curating collections of books for lending to others is not a form of speech or expression. It's just another fucking inventory management job.

    3. Think It Through   2 months ago

      Yes my immediate reaction was librarians don't have First Amendment rights to stock public libraries...they are employees. What the fuck are you talking about?

  5. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

    "We must limit breeding to once every seven years. For most of you, this will mean much less breeding. For me, much, much more" - Jeff Albertson

  6. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    Riiight. Remember when looter Dem brainwashees got it into their heads that the Democratic platform and McGovern would stop narcs from robbing, jailing and shooting people over weed? No such thing ever existed and dupes and dictators alike voted for Nixon. Barak was the first looter Dem in recent history to LAUGH at the idea of stopping narcs from robbing, jailing and shooting people over weed. Shrillary parroted this plus Sharknado Warmunism as pretext for dismantling electrical generating capacity. Remember Gary Johnson?

    1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

      What the fuck are you babbling about today, Hank?

      Do you even know or are you just typing the shit you find on a random word generator?

  7. mad.casual   2 months ago

    They now want to criminalize porn that features choking.

    Must be all the feminists and cultural Christians who can't even appear to pray outside abortion clinics that've gone in together to bring about this state of affairs. Progressive(ly) insane ideology would never choke and rape its own future for nihilist, contemporaneous social clout as policy.

  8. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

    *While it wasn't a part of his campaign, Mamdani has been a vocal supporter of sex work decriminalization.*

    Well, intifada wasn't part of his campaign, either, but he's a huge supporter of that. Sounds like we'll have to pass the Mamdani to find out what's in the Mamdani.

  9. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    My resumes have always been one page with an opening paragraph, and the first job listed was my time as a pirate in the Navy. Most resumes I have read were bloated jargon salads that would have done Kamala proud, could have meant anything, and so meant nothing.

    1. Roberta   2 months ago

      But I've been told repeatedly that the people who pass on hiring like and expect the jargon — that lack of the jargon marks you as unserious.

  10. damikesc   2 months ago

    You know, ENB. I now agree with you. Completely.

    Mamdani is going to help women do the only thing they are remotely good for. Serving as cock holsters for men. I used to think women had more to give society but a solid 80% do not so let them suck me off and then try and get me to give them the money afterwards.

    Shame that men will not stop y'all from being raped anymore. You get what you vote for.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Dont blame me. I voted for atilla the hun.

      1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

        JizzeAzz, you voted for Bush/Cheney and so you deserve all the blame!! 😉

  11. Jim Conley   2 months ago

    Make Times Square Sleazy Again

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      No, just dangerous.

      NY residents, for the most part, have decided that Giuliani's policies were bad. So, let them return to the 70's they so crave. I bet the hipster dipshits of NYC who laughably think they're "tough" will do great.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Maybe we will get a better batman comic book again.

        1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

          Or the Punisher

  12. Eeyore   2 months ago

    Living under Marxist rule you are raped 24/7/365. So there is that.

    Didn't the courts in England rule that as long as the rapist finishes in 60 seconds or less it doesn't count?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Do they have to finish?

  13. Rick James   2 months ago

    While it wasn't a part of his campaign, Mamdani has been a vocal supporter of sex work decriminalization.

    Yes, do you know why?

    Also, "sex work" is not 'criminalized'. Certain narrow categories of 'sex work' are illegal whereas other large swathes of sex work are 100% legal and are practiced right out in the open. We have useful names for those categories so people know what you're talking about.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Indeed. Sugar babies are definitely not remotely illegal.

    2. Eeyore   2 months ago

      As long as you film yourself fking her - she isn't a prostitute, you are a producer.

  14. Rick James   2 months ago

    referred to by opponents as the "walking while trans" law—that criminalized loitering for purposes of prostitution, saying it is his "fundamental belief that sex work is work."

    Your daughter could work here, or she could work here, either way, it's all just work.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Oh, btw, I've never heard of this 'walking while trans' law, and I couldn't help but think "why would an anti-loitering law be dubbed the 'walking while trans' law". Then I used my braincells and thought, "oh, yeah, right."

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Trans kids are just as bright, just as talented, and just as averse to hanging out on the street corner for complete lack of marketable skills as white kids.

        "It's a spectrum!" SSDD: It's so odd that all the butch lesbians walking around rocking "I'm not plus-sized, it's a dad bod" physiques adorned with flannel shirts, hiking boots with their wool socks pulled up over their cankles, and a baseball cap over their high-and-tight haircut never seem too concerned about or get swept up in these "walking while trans" 'dragnets'.

  15. Rick James   2 months ago

    As mayor, Mamdani couldn't technically decriminalize prostitution in New York City, but he could encourage local police to halt prostitution stings and deprioritize prostitution arrests and raids, and support prosecutors declining to bring prostitution cases.

    DOOO PROCESSEEZESSZ!

  16. Rick James   2 months ago

    But Mamdani did not make prostitution an issue in his mayoral campaign, and even dodged some direct questions about decriminalization, including whether he still opposed criminalizing the purchase of sex.

    Why would that be? Could it be that sex-work-is-just-work ideology is pretty toxic, even to the famously liberal New York electorate? Nah, it's gotta be that it's just so broadly popular in our Libertarian Moment that it's not even worth talking about. It's like self-driving cars, lab-grown meat or taxing cars crossing over a social construct using mass-surveillance license plate scanners to identify the time and place the driver crossed over said social construct... and other totally libertarian ideas.

  17. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...Mamdani has been a vocal supporter of sex work decriminalization..."

    So was Harris, until she wasn't.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      With Kamala, a lot of things ended up being lip service.

  18. Rick James   2 months ago

    (Sex worker activists and their allies tend to support decriminalization over legalization.)

    Correct, because one of your very own personal guests explicitly said so in a different socialist/marxist podcast as she was explicitly anti-capitalist.

  19. Super Scary   2 months ago

    Up next: What Mamdani's Win Means for Honor Killings

  20. Thoritsu   2 months ago

    Keep dreaming about your next socialist who supports sex work and sexual freedoms. As soon as the new moral majority (“liberal” Karens who are anything but liberal) hear about legal prostitution, they will jump up and down about denigrating women, and this POS communist-medieval jackass will happily drop it.

    You know who demonstrably supports it? Trump.

  21. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    ENB, sex is *normally* not with prostitutes or masturbating to porn and e girls. Mamdani will have no effect on sex.

    At least until the burkha mandate and the requirement to always be accompanied by a male relative.

  22. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    Also ENB - when have communists ever been 'sex positive'?

  23. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

    "What Mamdani's Win Means for Sex."

    It means all women in NYC must cover their themselves from head to foot just like they do in Afghanistan.
    Otherwise, his Iman will not let Mamdani into the mosque.

  24. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Hookers will really attract customers while wearing a burka.

  25. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

    ENB might want to discuss the penalties handed out in Islamic countries for “sex work”, since she’s yapping about Mamdani.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Work? (reposted):

      Child bride faces execution in Iran for killing her abusive husband unless she can pay £80,000 blood money
      ...
      When she once ran away from her marital home back to her father's, he sent her back and told her: 'I gave my daughter away in a white dress, the only way you can return [is wrapped in a shroud]'.

      Aside from her 5 yr. old kid (whom she'd never get to see again even if she paid the blood money) getting beaten by his Dad, it all sounds pretty transactional to me.

      1. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

        Fuck me, what a story.

        Submit, indeed.

  26. Roberta   2 months ago

    ...

    Legalization refers to a highly regulated system in which prostitution is sanctioned by the state under certain circumstances (and still criminalized outside of those circumstances). It may be permitted, but only in certain districts, or in a brothel, or with a permit. Decriminalization, on the other hand, simply means removing all criminal penalties surrounding the (consensual, adult) selling and purchase of sexual services. There is no enforcement of sanctions against sex workers or their clients, but neither is there a state-regulated brothel system or anything else like that. (Sex worker activists and their allies tend to support decriminalization over legalization.)

    Why can't we ever get to consensus on this terminology? I prefer to stay to the most obvious meaning of the words:

    Decriminalization of an action means making it no longer a crime. It may still be illegal, but only a civil violation, not a criminal one.

    Legalization of an action means making it no longer illegal at all. It says nothing about concomitant regulations. The ownership of gold was legalized without ushering in a regulatory regime for it.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Your definition is correct, but not the only one, allow me to elaborate:

      Decriminalization, two meanings:

      1. The laws making an action are repealed, leaving no law or regulation in its place.
      2. The laws making an action are not repealed, but through a political understanding are no longer enforced.

      Legalization:

      1. Largely the same as Decrim #1, but usually in the context that something was previously illegal, but now made legal
      2. An activity expressly made legal.. with a regulatory framework of some type put in place This one is contentious with 5th wave feminists with Marxist leanings because they believe #2 empowers corporations and Brothel Owners, meaning the prostitariat can't seize the means of feet pics. Seriously. See ENBs article where it is proudly proclaimed "Pimps have to register with the government!"

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Wants To Seize Greenland Because He Doesn't Understand Trade

Eric Boehm | 1.6.2026 3:50 PM

Venezuela's Acting Dictator Is Delcy Rodríguez, a Maduro Regime Ally With a History of Human Rights Violations

César Báez | 1.6.2026 1:33 PM

The Contradictions of Supply-Side Socialism

Christian Britschgi | 1.6.2026 12:50 PM

Is This the End of American Capitalism?

Jared Dillian | 1.6.2026 11:46 AM

How the Trump Administration Quietly and Quickly Took Over 3 Golf Courses in Washington, D.C.

Jason Russell | 1.6.2026 11:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks