He Died of Thirst in Solitary Confinement. Now His Family Is Suing for Answers.
After 51-year-old Lamont Mealy was found dead in a Maryland prison cell, officials called it “natural causes.” His family’s lawsuit says guards intentionally shut off his water.
On December 22, 2022, 51-year-old Lamont Mealy was found guilty of the first-degree murder of his roommate and was sentenced to serve life in prison at the Western Correctional Institution in Cumberland, Maryland. A little more than six months later, he was found dead in his cell. Now, his sister, LaShawn Tyler, is suing the state, accusing prison staff of deliberate neglect and withholding records that could reveal how Mealy's death happened.
According to a complaint filed in the Baltimore County Circuit Court, Mealy, who had a history of mental illness, was placed in cuffs, chains, and a suicide-prevention vest and taken to solitary confinement "on or about" June 30, 2023. After placing him there, two officers—neither of whom was wearing name tags or displaying rank insignia—inexplicitly shut off the water to the cell.
Around July 2, the same two officers returned to the outside of the cell to taunt Mealy, asking him, "Are you thirsty?" Mealy repeatedly begged them for water but was never given any. The filing also asserts that he was denied several meals and that his condition rapidly deteriorated over the course of the next several days.
On or around the morning of July 5, a lieutenant warden allegedly stood in front of Mealy's cell, "but took no action," according to the complaint. From roughly 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. that day, the required welfare checks—meant to occur every half hour in Mealy's ward—were not performed. It wasn't until approximately 3 p.m. that the lieutenant warden ordered a sergeant to "pull the man out of there." Staff then dragged Mealy's fresh corpse out on a blanket; no medical staff were called prior to the removal, the filing attests.
Initially, the prison informed Mealy's family that he died of "natural causes," Kristen Mack, the plaintiff's attorney, tells Reason. However, Danny Hoskins, another prisoner who was being held in solitary confinement in a cell adjacent to Mealy's, claims he saw what really happened.
Shortly after the death, Hoskins asked to speak privately with prison officials about what he had seen. According to the complaint, Hoskins was met with bureaucratic stonewalling, physical assault from corrections officers, and warnings to mind his own business. He was eventually transferred to another prison, where he filed an Administrative Remedy Procedure request—Maryland's internal grievance system for reporting abuse. In it, Hoskins described the water shutoff and Mealy's death. Afterward, he sent letters to the warden, the secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, and Democratic Gov. Wes Moore, but never received a response. In June of this year, Hoskin's post-conviction attorney reached out to Mack about the incident.
Mack subsequently submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the state's Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services on or around June 5, requesting access to all written and electronic records—which included housing and classification records, tier logbooks, photographs, security footage, and medical records—surrounding Mealy's confinement and death. While the department agreed to produce some of this material, they refused to release a requested internal affairs report, with the state's principal counsel, Stuart Nathan, claiming that it was "quite voluminous" and that he would "need to review and determine if there is any need for any redactions" before releasing it publicly.
"The State is [still] doing everything that it can to avoid producing records that we know exist and that we are entitled to have," Mack says. "They have attempted to obstruct any and all efforts made to uncover the truth."
However, after several follow-up emails in August yielded no report or even a response, Tyler sued the state and the Department of Corrections for missing Maryland's one-month statutory deadline for public records requests, and for failing to provide a legally sufficient explanation for withholding the internal investigation. Tyler is seeking a court order compelling the release of the full investigation and all related records. A hearing is scheduled for January 2026.
Sadly, deaths like Mealy's are not uncommon. "The reality is horrific things like this happen all the time in prisons," Mack says, "and the public only hears about it if—and only if—information about what happened reaches the right set of ears."
The court's decision will determine how much the family—and the public—will ever know about what happened inside Mealy's cell in his final week, and whether anyone will be held accountable for a man dying of thirst behind bars.
*CORRECTION: This article originally misstated the amount of time between Lamont Mealy's conviction and his death.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
According to a complaint
I swear, that's this website's favorite phrase.
This entire complaint - and by extension this article - rides exclusively on the specious claims of another inmate currently riding out a lengthy sentence (and, if I'm looking at the same Daniel Hoskins, has also cried wolf quite a few times in prison).
Hoskins was met with bureaucratic stonewalling, physical assault from corrections officers, and warnings to mind his own business
Allegedly.
Sadly, deaths like Mealy's are not uncommon.
You have no basis for this claim whatsoever, except REEEEE ACAB!!!
And, for that specific reason, I think you actually LIKE when bad things happen to inmates. All an excuse to keep the current, archaic, abuse-prone Prison Industrial Complex up and running - rather than transform into modern, tech-driven, abuse-proof Prison reform. I bring it up every time, and not a single ACAB ever wants to hear it.
Shows the priorities, y'know? ACAB Theater Kids want stages for their over-the-top Performance Art, right Jacob?
rather than transform into modern, tech-driven, abuse-proof Prison reform.
I have zero faith that you actually want to cut down on prisoner abuse. But, just for shits and giggles, what exactly do you mean by "modern, tech-driven, abuse-proof prison reform"?
It's not rocket science, Jeff. Just think about the tech we have and apply it to the kind of living pods that socialists already advocate for. The only difference is that inmates don't get to leave their pod. But, if you want specifics...
Ballpark it at 10'x12'x10'. A little bit bigger than a typical dorm room on a college campus, I suppose - which I can't imagine you'd dispute is any kind of 8A violation. That should be more than enough to fit in a convertible sleeper (ie. a sofa bolted lengthwise to the wall, where you can pull the seat out to become a twin-bed, or similarly something to what you'd find in a sleeper pod or train car), opposite corner holds a modular sink/toilet/shower combo (they exist, they're about 4'x6'x8'). Plenty of space for a good sized tablet behind plexiglass put into the wall with a mounted bluetooth keyboard/mouse to control it, with limited telecom/vidshare capabilities - so they can do remote court appearances, converse with counsel, remote learning, visit with family/friends (incoming calls only from a pre-approved list, all monitored and recorded, to which you can request updates at any time and receive assuming it's consented to by the other vetted party - meaning you can get incoming calls from mom/wife/kids, but not from your fellow gang members or criminal associates) that'll allow contact and digital presence on Christmas morning or on birthdays what have you, and a "PrisonNET" of sorts for placing menu-limited meal choices, requesting clean linens, limited temperature control, etc. Also allows for digital library and streaming services (content restricted, obviously). Wearable/implanted biometrics for health monitoring and teledoc. A window on the opposite wall of the door, that opens/shuts inwardly and is obviously caged from the outside (also, I should mention that these prisons are built vertically, with the first level built a minimum of four stories up). The corner between the end of the bed and the width of the modular bathroom should be more than enough room for body-weight calisthenics. Maybe (but I don't really see the necessity) bolt a table that locks vertically into the wall, so they have a place to sit and eat their meals or do... whatever, write letters or do homework or something I guess. And a slot under the door for three square meals a day (using disposable dishes/cutlery), clean sheets and laundry, medications, etc. Contingent, of course, on first receiving all previously provided materials through the slot first. Cameras in all corners for 24/7 video monitoring.
It reduces the need for guards (beyond camera monitoring and meal/toiletries delivery - and ANY tomfoolery in that regard results in instant termination and statutory criminal charges), prison staff in general (minimum of surgical certified doctors and nursing staff, with annually certified defensive/submission combat training, in 8hr shifts with access to a full surgical suite - so cons don't have to be transported to hospitals for medical emergencies), cafeteria and laundry staff (think the way airports do it for airplane meals and clean blankets/pillows), and maintenance crew. No contact - under any circumstances - with other inmates.
And then the only time the inmate comes out of the cell is catastrophic emergency - or to a temporary cell (this one gets no vidscreen) to make any needed repairs to their permanent cell.
The prison of the future. 8A violations disappear completely. Jailhouse crime and sex abuse disappears, because the inmates are NEVER allowed to interact with each other. Guard abuses disappears, because the guard has no access to the inmate but through a slot in the door.
The whole problem with our obsolete dungeon-style prison is that physical interaction is allowed between cons, other cons, guards, and visitors. Cross that off the board, and then build from the idea that all of that can be effectively mimicked using current technology.
We all did it during COVID. And, like I said, I guarantee you that there are plenty of people - especially on the left - who would LOVE to ride out their days in the pods of their dreams.
Excuses, excuses, excuses, that's all you have.
I was betting myself on how soon you'd show up in the comments making excuses. About my only real surprise is you didn't trot out something like he was serving a life sentence, that's what he got.
About my only real surprise is you didn't trot out something like he was serving a life sentence, that's what he got.
It's not relevant to the discussion.
That's you imposing ACAB prejudices on people, like me, who call ACABs on their nonsense.
First, I do actually appreciate the thoughtful reply, even if I disagree with large bits of it.
Second, I agree that current prisons are rather dungeon-like in their functioning. You are proposing a lot of high-tech upgrades to prisons. I believe that one reason why there aren't more upgrades to prisons now, is because whenever the issue is raised, folks on your team tend to make specious arguments like "they're prisoners, they don't deserve any more of MY tax money" and "how come they get tablets and electronic gadgets, *I* don't have a tablet, why should prisoners get better tech than what I have?" That is, they tend to view prisoners through a harsh moral hierarchy, that because they committed some crime, they therefore deserve nothing better than what non-criminals get. So letting prisoners use tablets to communicate - with tax money no less! - would be unthinkable because many non-criminals can't afford a tablet, and tax money from non-criminals shouldn't be going to subsidize "luxuries" of prisoners. See where this is going? For this type of plan to have any chance of success, your side needs to stop viewing prisoners according to such a rigid moral hierarchy. It doesn't mean excusing the crimes of prisoners. It does mean viewing prisoners as people who screwed up, sometimes significantly, who are paying a price for their crimes, instead of as moral monsters who deserve nothing but the pits of hell.
Third, keeping prisoners individually confined to a 10x12x10 cell is equivalent to solitary confinement, and yes it is a 8A violation to use solitary confinement on prisoners 24 hours a day.
folks on your team tend to make specious arguments like "they're prisoners, they don't deserve any more of MY tax money" and "how come they get tablets and electronic gadgets, *I* don't have a tablet, why should prisoners get better tech than what I have?"
If they're making those claims, I assure you they're not on "my team." At least not on this subject.
That is, they tend to view prisoners through a harsh moral hierarchy, that because they committed some crime, they therefore deserve nothing better than what non-criminals get.
And what I believe is that the 8th Amendment is violated any time a guy is shanked or raped or shaken down in prison - and even moreso when it's done by someone other than another inmate. These are wards of the State now. The State is OBLIGATED to intervene, frustrate, or otherwise prevent prison abuses from occurring. Yet they fail constantly, and the social attitude is that the inmate got what was coming to him - choosing not to realize that such abuses are an extra-judicial punishment that has no basis in law.
And I believe that a reason they constantly failure is in the design of the prisons - one that we refuse to evolve despite our ability to do so. I think the ACABs are against it so they can continue to have an axe to grind; I think the right-wing activists are against it because they like having a supply of unsympathetic whipping boys; and I think the politicians are against it so that they can continue advocating "better/harsher prison conditions!" depending on the color of their necktie (while never actually delivering).
What I also believe is that, to quote Dostoevsky, “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” A lot of people forget that, for about a decade, most of the world ignored the rise of Nazism - regarding their objectionable goings-on as a domestic problem or being appeasing even in the face of a growing open anti-Semitic mindset. Even when they invaded Poland, folks still just kind of viewed it as a military problem that was only a military concern.
It wasn't until the reveal of the prison death camps and their "Final Solution" that we finally came to appreciate just how abhorrent a "civilization" and "society" the Nazi empire really was. It was the prisons that made this absolutely and indisputably clear. There's other illustrations, of course - Arab prisons, especially in Sharia nations, are pretty inhumane too. Same with Russian prisons. That tells us something about them.
Just like it tells us something about America.
See, here's the thing about prison. When we sentence someone to a prison term, we are taking away nearly ALL of their civil rights. Now, don't get me wrong - we are absolutely, 100% right and justified to do precisely that. But it doesn't mean that we forget their humanity. Their dignity, maybe - I'm fine with taking that away, because prison is not a place to find self-respect or a sense of pride or accomplishment. But let's remember that these are human beings - and usually our own countrymen - we're talking about. I'm not saying go soft on criminal punishment, or to give them fine clothes and foie gras and regular pedicures - but I am saying that we can warehouse our criminals in a way that is tough but not oppressive.
Frankly, I think the toughest part is knowing that your entire world is now reduced to the size of a dorm room and that your exclusive connection to humanity is through a monitor for the length of your sentence (sidenote: I also think this kind of prison would demand lesser statutory sentence lengths for all but the most heinous crimes). But maybe I'm wrong - I guarantee I'm describing precisely a whole lot of incels, agoraphobes, and social misfits right this minute who find such living the ideal.
But a cell that can provide justly-deserved punishment as well as both protection from abuse and opportunity for self-improvement? I think that's a noble aspiration.
And I wish more people shared the view. (I also think you made some gravely false assumptions about me.)
Third, keeping prisoners individually confined to a 10x12x10 cell is equivalent to solitary confinement
If they have access to family, to a classroom, to self-help groups, to hobby clubs, to AA/NA, to a world of entertainment and information, to Church (yea, they're doing online services now even!), heck - we can even throw AI chatbots into the mix now - it's hardly "solitary confinement."
They can visit and interact with anyone who will have them. They just do it without physical proximity.
I did no such thing "during covid". But otherwise, not a terrible idea. So many problems in prisons come from prisoners interacting, forming gangs, crooked guards and all that.
So many problems in prisons come from prisoners interacting
Almost all of them, actually. That is the deep root of the problem. The obsolete dungeon-mentality couldn't avoid that problem. A modernized prison can.
It also, incidentally, eliminates the issue of segregating prisons by sex, and eliminates the practice of declaring transgenderism for exploitative purposes.
Actually a thoughtful comment. I don't have the expertise to sort through all of it but interesting read.
The compensation should be a case of Deer Park spring water. His former roommate whom he murdered had no comment.
That's funny, the court ordered a life sentence, not a death sentence. Guess that Rule of Law loses again.
And he was in for the rest of his life.
The guards should be punished (fired and prosecuted). The state should be out a case of Old Line State bottled water.
Proves my point that the rule of law is a myth. The rule of law didn't allow the guards to starve him to death. Yet people cheer the result. The judicial system is more interested in ritual than justice or fairness.
He premeditated a murder against his former roommate, was charged, tried, convicted, and incarcerated. How is the rule of law a myth?
While incarcerated, he ostensibly was denied water and died of dehydration. That issue is currently in the legal system.
The rule of law is not some magical forcefield dungeon master that physically prevents actions. It provides a mechanism for recourse when a law has been violated.
I agree that the application of the law sometimes does not meet the straight face test. The Iryna Zarutska murder is one such instance.
Wait wait, let me see if I can predict the responses to this article:
Lamont Mealy was a criminal. That means he has zero moral character. That means his claims, or his family's claims, about his alleged mistreatment, are lies, because people with zero moral character are liars. Therefore it's all completely false.
In order for any claim of prison guard mistreatment against any criminal to be considered valid, the prison guard must be caught in the act, with explicit malicious intent, with iron-clad unfalsifiable objective evidence. Otherwise, the benefit of the doubt (no matter how large that doubt may be) should go to the prison guard. Because criminals are scum.
Do I have that about right?
That’s kinda the way our criminal justice system works. Presumption of innocence.
This is just awful. And glorious.
The deceased isn’t making the claim, so your retarded moral character take isn’t even applicable.
The alleged acts of the prison staff would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Just like the with when the guy had murdered his roommate.
Do I have that about right?
No.
The 'claims' stem from another prisoner. Not the decedent or the family.
So Maryland does have a death penalty?
Yes, but in the form of excessive taxes.
" Give a man power over another, and he will almost assuredly become a devil. "
I knew AT would jump up to defend the prison. He always does.
The only time he's ever in his entire life found fault with law enforcement was when one of them woke up on the morning of January 6, 2021, with the intent of murdering a woman. The officer went through his day looking for a woman to murder. Then, when a bunch of peaceful protesters strolled in to the Capital building, he saw his chance! He patiently waited, gun in hand, until his victim came into view! Saint Babbitt the Innocent! And he shot her in premeditated cold blood! Bang! Pow! Killed her saintliness right then and there, for no reason at all other than he woke up wanting to kill a woman!
Other than that AT has always defended government violence. Every. Single. Time.
You defended the j6 killing.
I didn't defend the prison. Not once. I criticized the article for writing a bogus ACAB hit piece that has no evidence whatsoever to substantiate it beyond the claims of an inmate who won't be looking forward to freedom for quite some time working an angle.
In fact, had you actually read the post instead of just jerking your knee off, you'd see that I was actually quite CRITICAL of the prison - and I almost always am in these sorts of alleged prison abuse articles - because I'm a huge, long-time supporter of radical prison reform.
Saved us a lot of money.
Ten years ago I would read articles like this at Reason and nod and amen just like those old black dudes that always sit behind Leticia James when she screeches about racism every time she gets busted. These days I assume that the writer is lying at least in part. Sad that Reason has pissed away it's credibility.