Trump Wants Higher Beef Prices and Also Lower Beef Prices
The president somehow believes that tariffs can deliver wins for both producers and consumers. It is maddening and nonsensical.
It remains genuinely astonishing that someone as obsessed with tariffs as President Donald Trump can also be so maddeningly ignorant about how they actually work.
Case in point: On Thursday morning, the president simultaneously took credit for raising beef prices (with tariffs, naturally) while also demanding lower beef prices for consumers. This reflects an ongoing tension within the Trump administration's trade policies, as Trump is currently seeking additional beef imports from Argentina to offset the higher prices caused by his tariffs on beef from other countries.
There is usually little to be gained by parsing Trump's social media posts in a serious way, but this one might be an exception. Here's what Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social:

So, on one hand, the president believes he's helping American cattle farmers by imposing tariffs on imported beef—particularly beef from Brazil, which is now subject to a 50 percent tariff. (Amusingly, that tariff is officially for "national emergency" reasons, but in reality, it exists simply because Trump got mad at the current government of Brazil for prosecuting his buddy, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.)
Leave aside the question of whether American cattle farmers are actually happy about this. Let's just think about the mechanics of what Trump is describing. He says the cattle farmers are "doing so well" because of the tariffs. Presumably, that's because they can now raise prices. That's what tariffs do: by making foreign goods more expensive, they benefit domestic producers, largely by allowing them to raise prices in an environment with less competition.
Trump wants cattle farmers to be able to charge higher prices. Well, OK, what he really wants is the cattle farmers to appreciate him for creating the conditions in which they can charge higher prices—but same difference.
But, wait. Trump says he also wants those same cattle farmers to "get their prices down," because consumers are unhappy about beef prices hitting record highs.
My dude. How is this supposed to work?
I understand that Trump sees tariffs as effectively a magic wand that he can wave around to accomplish literally any policy. But even by that standard, this is a wild set of claims to make in consecutive sentences. The cattle ranchers are supposed to applaud Trump for letting them charge higher prices, and then also save him from the direct consequences of his own policies, I guess?
The last line of Trump's post does give me some small bit of hope, however. His tariff policies have never acknowledged any concern for consumers whatsoever—even though it has always been obvious that tariffs would hike prices. Now, data from Harvard Business School, the Federal Reserve, and other sources show that's exactly what's happening.
As I wrote earlier this week, the reality about the consequences of tariffs (higher prices for just about everything) seems to be finally puncturing the White House's bubble of tariff-related delusions. Trump admitting that consumers are "a very big factor in my thinking" may be further evidence for that thesis.
And, of course, the Trump administration's recent effort at circumventing import quotas on Argentine beef suggests that someone at the White House understands economics. If you want to lower prices, a reliable way to do it is to open up more supply via trade.
It turns out that central planning is a lot harder than it looks, even when you believe in magical tariffs. Instead of trying to personally decide what cattle farmers should get to earn and what prices they should charge, maybe the president should let the market work.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Sounds like SOCIALISM to me.
How will the Trumpeteers contort themselves to reconcile with this ? I can't wait.
Not Socialism. Certainly Statism. And absolutely, astoundingly stupid.
Easy. Now tell us about domestic taxes.
The 'Socialism' BILL has already been made.
It's time to pay the piper.
Ok, I'll take a shot since you don't understand trade along with supply and demand. Biden waged war on not only beef producers but processors. This drove a number out of business to the point the beef supply is falling short of demand causing beef prices to rise. Another way to put it is that the cattlemen in this country can not raise enough to supply the market. Trump is proposing to import extra beef from Argentina to both make up the supply gap and lower prices until Biden's mess is cleaned up and to support Miliel's efforts to free Argentina from decades of socialist rot. Instead of just handing them money, we are being given a way to solve one of our temporary problems and help another country friendly to us.
Is any of that clear enough for you?
EB;dr
Steakholders confused.
Seems like he has a beef with trump.
That is what I herd.
Don't have a cow.
It's udderly confusing. But something tells me that Eric is going to milk this for his narrative peddling, and but never actually grill anyone outside of his echo chamber as he continues to butcher the facts and be Reason's resident rodeo clown.
Basic tenets of economics tell us taxes raise prices and artificially forcing prices down causes shortages. So obviously these tenets have TDS.
have you ever considered maybe you just don't understand the happenings?
Since you clearly understand nothing about economics, Boehm let's make this simple.
American beef sellers sell their beef for more.
But it still costs less than tariffed beef.
American beef buyers are encouraged to buy American beef, and, barring that to buy beef from non or lightly tariffed trading partners.
So you get the situation where farmers are getting more for their beef while consumers are paying less.
Kinda almost. The consumers are still paying more than if there were not tariffs at all.
So, U.S. beef costs more than non-tariffed beef.
FIFY lol
So you get the situation where farmers are getting more for their beef while consumers are getting less.
while consumers are paying less
uhhh no.
Logic simply escapes Azathoth!! He couldn't grab it with both hands even if he knew what it looked like.
You missed the part where there is a producer shortage caused by Brandon's war on cattlemen. The cattlemen left can not cover the increased demand coupled with a declining producer pool. Cows are not widgets, you can't just work overtime to produce more of the widgets. The prices are going up due to increased demand and a shortage of beef. Trump is trying to cover this gap by importing beef. It's really not hard to understand unless you just want to be reflexively TDS like Liberty Belle.
Trump has contradictions in his policy because he is just too stupid to have sensible policy.
It’s really surprising that you aren’t the billionaire twice elected president.
They probably haven’t raped enough people to meet the Trump standard.
Boehm, as usual, is simplifying the situation to support his biases.
Trump is asking beef producers to not take too much advantage of the tariffs allowing them to raise prices while remaining price competitive with imported beef.
Rather, keep their prices near where they were - and thus buyers will be incentivized to buy from them over foreign sources ensuring they can sell all their stock and put them in a place to gain advantage in the future by enlarging operations to gain more of the market at those lower prices.
Now, Trump may be naive expecting them to do that, but that is what he's expecting, not that he's expecting 'prices to both raise and decrease'.
Trump wouldn't do it if he were in their places ... so why would he expect them not to gouge as well ? Remember, this is the list that swears that price gouging in an emergency is a good thing.
Trump is asking beef producers to not take too much advantage of the tariffs allowing them to raise prices while remaining price competitive with imported beef....Trump may be naive expecting them to do that
The whole thing is ridiculously naive to the point of being idiotic.
This is why you can't have democrats in charge of economic policy.
And you're saying exactly the same thing Boehm is, just sugar coated.
Yeah except this is retardedly ignorant of economics.
There is a shortage. That's due to lower yields reducing the cattle herd + tariffs that make in expensive to import. That naturally causes prices to rise. The higher prices would lead to profits for cattle ranchers, who could invest that money into breeding to grow their herd, increasing supply. Forcing prices down causes a shortage and will cause ranchers who are on the brink to shut down.
There's a reason managed economies fall behind, and ours will be no exception.
not that he's expecting 'prices to both raise and decrease'
When they put the "Why is Trump trying to do this completely nonsensical contrivance that I made up?" in the headline, I tend to stop there.
No, as usual it's more Boehm bullshit.
So we need price controls! Put them in place Trump and your journey to the dark side will be complete.
^Leftard Self-Projecting again.
Let's examine the flip side of Trump's quote:
You may have too much spare time on your hands.
Aren't we all just wasting time here?
if I can't express my thoughts to strangers I have no reason to live.
Sad to say, we are all just wasting time here, to the 99.8% level or so. Ideological enemas are and will remain hide-bound, inflexible, non-data-driven ideological enemas and fiends-enemas of genuine data-exchange cuntversations, and ANY genuine abilities to be cuntverted! They swill ONLY be PervFectly Perverted to THEIR Pervfected, Mind-Infected, neglected ways!!!
(The PervFected are ALREADY PervFected, and swill SNOT be enticed or cunticed, in ANY way, to be swayed, in Their PervFected Ways! Snot even, major Dear-Leader-Blessed "access" to Queen Spermy Daniels, is likely to change their hidebound ways!)
Well put, captures Trump's idea very well.
If that is what you think then you are a retard. I'm surprised there are not more spelling errors in your post since your mommy forces you to wear mittens.
What people are seeing is increased beef prices in the supermarket. The response will not be to pay more to the beef farmers but to reduce beef in the diet. Probable good for people's health and for the environment. I am saying that as a beef lover.
It remains genuinely astonishing that someone as obsessed with tariffs as President Donald Trump can also be so maddeningly ignorant about how they actually work.
Eric Boehm said that.
Eric. Boehm.
I can't even.
Roots of the Article.
BIG gov-spending Coastal-[D] Importers can't stop crying about getting a BILL for all their BIG spending bills!
"[WE] [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] didn't vote for ?free? ponies so you could send us a BILL!" 🙂
"Heck. If we wanted that we'd just focus on ensuring justice instead of ?free? ponies for all!"
My brain hurts not only from reading this article but the retarded posts. Biden and the Dems hate the fact Americans like beef. They pumped Impossible Meat, how's that stock doing, and coupled that with a war on beef producers using the EPA and Dept of Interior driving cattlemen and slaughter houses out of business. This resulted in a production shortfall and rising beef prices. Hey, if you can't afford it you will eat less, right? Trump is trying to fill the temporary production gap until the nations herds recover with imported meat which will lower the cost for consumers. But, like everything else, immediate Trump bashing is more important than if people get helped. I'm old enough to remember Dems for a short time carping on food prices like milk and eggs every interview blaming Trump for something, again, Biden caused. Chickens caught Avian flu. Instead of treating it on a farm by farm basis Biden used the Covid approach and ordered the wholesale slaughter of birds and coupled that, again, with new EPA regulations no one could meet. Funny when you do that there are no egg producers which restricts supply and raises prices. Dems then ran around bizarrely trying to blame Trump for it as if he could defy nature and instantly pull full grown egg layers out of his ass.
This is all a really stupid way to attack Trump for something.