Trump's DOJ Indicts John Bolton for Leaking Classified Information
The former Trump administration official is facing a maximum of 180 years in prison.

President Donald Trump really doesn't like former National Security Adviser John Bolton. At the beginning of his administration, Trump signed an executive order specifically banning Bolton from receiving a security clearance because of the "grave risk" Bolton posed to national security. And on Thursday, the president celebrated as the Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted Bolton under the Espionage Act.
"He's, you know, a bad person. I think he's a bad guy," Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday. "Yeah, he's a bad guy, too bad, but that's the way it goes, right?"
The indictment accuses Bolton of sending "diary-like entries" containing top secret material to two unnamed individuals, one of whom is a relative of Bolton, via a private message app and personal email accounts. With eight counts of transmission of national defense information and ten counts of unlawful retention of national defense information, Bolton faces a maximum sentence of 180 years in prison.
The indictment also claims that a "cyber actor believed to be associated with the Islamic Republic of Iran" hacked into Bolton's email account, which contained the top secret messages. Alleged Iranian operatives have pulled off several high-profile email breaches over the past few months, including the leak of Vice President J.D. Vance's opposition research dossier and an email trove containing many of Jeffrey Epstein's communications.
"I look forward to the fight to defend my lawful conduct and to expose [Trump's] abuse of power," Bolton said in a statement to the media, before surrendering himself on Friday morning to a federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Maryland.
In a press release, FBI Director Kash Patel denied that the indictment was political retaliation. "The case was based on meticulous work from dedicated career professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor. Weaponization of justice will not be tolerated, and this FBI will stop at nothing to bring to justice anyone who threatens our national security," he said.
Bolton was the face of the first Trump administration's foreign policy until September 2019, when the ultra-hawkish consigliere had a dramatic falling out with the president. Foreign leaders would "give me everything I wanted because the guy's a nut job," Trump later said of Bolton, but Bolton's hardline stances "set [the administration] back very badly" during sensitive diplomacy with North Korea.
What really angered Trump was Bolton's decision to write a salacious tell-all memoir, The Room Where It Happened, about his time in the Trump administration—and to publish it against the White House's objections. The DOJ sued to stop the publication and opened a criminal investigation into Bolton's handling of classified information, then dropped both the civil and criminal cases in 2021, after President Joe Biden took office.
Trump's 2025 executive order specifically pointed to Bolton's book as evidence of his danger to national security. The order accused Bolton of "reckless treatment of sensitive information" for "monetary gain."
Several sources told CNN that the current indictment came out of a years-long investigation into Bolton's email account that is separate from the investigation into his book. According to the indictment, Bolton's office informed the government about the alleged Iranian hack in July 2021 without mentioning the classified information in his emails.
One irony of the case is that Trump himself was charged with mishandling classified information in 2023 after he took home boxes of White House documents. That case was dismissed in 2024, after he won the presidential election. On Wednesday, he publicly called for the prosecution of Jack Smith, the special counsel who filed the 2023 charges against Trump.
Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer who specializes in tough cases involving classified information, called the indictment of Bolton "far, far weaker (and more customary of conduct by senior govt officials) than allegations against President Trump in stealing & storing marked classified documents at Mar-a-Lago."
Another irony is that, despite their personal falling out, Bolton has politically gotten everything he wanted. Within its first year, the second Trump administration has bombed Iran and authorized a regime change campaign in Venezuela, two of Bolton's obsessions during the first Trump administration. In fact, much of Bolton's frustration towards Trump came from his feeling that Trump wasn't serious enough about these projects.
"The President vacillated and wobbled, exacerbating internal Administration disagreements rather than resolving them, and repeatedly impeding our efforts to carry out a policy," Bolton wrote in The Room Where It Happened. (Wobbled, you say?) Bolton complained about Trump's "indecision" on Venezuela and "irrational" order to cancel a planned attack on Iran.
Now that Trump is back in the White House, his administration seems much more determined to carry out his will—whether that's attacking countries Bolton doesn't like or jailing Bolton himself.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Michael Bolton is known for his rendition of “When a Man Loves a Woman.”
This Bolton might soon be singing about his love for his fellow cellmate.
https://tenor.com/view/office-space-gif-26835770
I celebrate his entire catalog.
Just hold him down and shave off his mustache, then stomp on his glasses.
Then maybe charge him with war crimes.
"...At the beginning of his administration, Trump signed an executive order specifically banning Bolton from receiving a security clearance because of the "grave risk" Bolton posed to national security. And on Thursday, the president celebrated as the Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted Bolton under the Espionage Act..."
Perhaps there's a relationship between these two acts?
Bolton has never seen a war that he wasn't willing to send other people to die so he could make a buck. Fuck him
The demleft hated him during the Bush II administration. I'm expecting to see them come out in force to support him now. Making popcorn!
Wouldn't be surprised. They did it for Dick and Liz Chaney.
And Republicans in Congress voted Lizard Cheney into House leadership in January 2021. At that time Republicans’ dream ticket was DeSantis/Haley with Lizard as Speaker.
What does that have to do with my comment?
That grey box had never offered anything useful. While Reason gave us the mute feature due to SSqrlsy, it can be used for good elsewhere.
We can hate him and see him as a victim of vindictive prosecution at the same time.
Glad you are starting to thaw on Trump and recognize that team D had been engaging in a multi-year lawfare campaign against him.
"...see him as a victim of vindictive prosecution..."
Or you could make up some other lie, as the left constantly does.
Why? He clearly did the things he's accused of.
What a long winded article to get to Bolton knowingly published a memoir he was told contained classified information prior to release.
Yep, JizzeAzz…you knew I was a scorpion.
"...Now that Trump is back in the White House, his administration seems much more determined to carry out his will..."
Helps when you're no longer surrounded by those who would gladly stab you in the back.
Unfortunately Kavanaugh and AOC are still on the Supreme Court. Trump wanted to pull Kavanaugh’s nomination but Bush ordered Collins to vote for him.
Whatever moral questions can be raised about retaliatory indictments are outweighed by the benefits to the public.
* The deep state and politicians have been jacking around the public since the first king. I'd rather have them indicting each other than jacking around the public.
* This lawfare hit its stride with the Clinton/Obama cabal attacking Trump. Did they expect no consequences? Bolton as collateral damage doesn't bother me at all.
* It bears repeating: the more these jackals attack each other, the less they can attack the public.
Many years ago, I worked in an electronics factory, writing hardware diagnostics, and learned what "out of control" meant there. It meant you could not control your solder bath temperature well enough to get consistent results. It meant your burn-in chamber did not like having the door held open long enough to change the temperature too quickly.
"Out of control" meant it was literally uncontrollable and broken.
Government is out of control when the public cannot control it. It has been out of control since the Civil War.
Nope, the Durham prosecutions were the most brazen example of lawfare.
Yes. When you prosecute criminals for the crimes that they committed one expects there not to be political retribution. That is a foundational part of living in a country that has rule of law. The fact that you see the opposite of this shows just how far the fascist rabbit hole you are.
You finally opened your eyes and realized how horrible and wrong the Biden admin and dems were creating fake charges and lies to destroy a man and supported any and all that hated him.
Now that this has come to light I am glad you agree actual criminals should be indicted regardless of political affiliation when they actually break the law.
Bravo, there is hope for you afterall. I am sure you support charging officials for fraud where the evidence is overwhelming.
Objectively Trump did everything he was accused of. There is no denying he stole and refused to return classified documents. There is no denying that he used illegal means to attempt to remain as president despite losing the election. None of these are fake and all of them are the result of actions that Trump decided to take.
MAGAs can't admit it because they are still clinging to the victim narrative and refuse to see Trump as the authoritarian criminal traitor that he is. But that will soon change and the MAGAs will defend and support Trump as an authoritarian criminal traitor.
Nope, you’re still fully retarded.
"Objectively Trump did everything he was accused of."
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
No one was defrauded in his real estate dealings.
He did not "steal" classified documents; as POTUS, he was entitled to them.
"No denying" by slimy piles of lying TDS-addled shit like you and no one else.
Every one of those are TDS-addled fantasies; fuck off and die, asswipe.
NY State had to pass a law changing the statute of limitations just to allow Trump's prosecution, then they changed it back afterwards. How is that not lawfare?
You can tell how small Trump's mind is because he is only charging his opponent with crimes that he has committed himself.
What does that say about your comments? I know you've got a swelled head, but that says nothing about your mind.
Trump published a book with classified information? Trump was an advisor who transferred classified data to personal notebooks?
Do you retards even try for logical arguments?
Is MG capable of recognizing one?
She probably lacks a mirror.
Refuted
Yes Trump and the GOP will only charge people for crimes they committed themselves, unlike the democrats who create fake charges to try and destroy their political opponents and push their agenda and false narratives.
Once again, it seems you have turned to corner and have realized who the criminals are and why they should be charged...
As I said before and you are somehow too dumb to understand: Trump did everything he was accused of. Openly.
Nope. You’re just a stupid, raving faggot Tony. Yiu puke up whatever DNC pablum Maddow shoves down your throat. Just like all the cocks that blowbang you at the bathhouse multiple times a week.
You see, the problem isn’t that you’re gay, it’s that you’re a full on pinko degenerate, and a raving faggot. If you want to see someone who is an upstanding intelligent gay person, look to Douglas Murray.
"...Trump did everything he was accused of. Openly..."
Refuted above, shitstain.
What? This vindictive, frivolous prosecution by the Trump Administration and the DOJ cannot stand! This is a grave injustice against the American people that any judge from any court circuit from would rightly strike down as blatantly partisan politics!
j/k - If you could work in a colonoscopy for him as part of the investigation, that'd be hilarious.
I would confiscate his passport and mustache while he is awaiting prosecution!
former DNI indicted. president such a meanie.
Let that be a shot across the mustache of the neocons.
Bill Kristol hardest hit.
Petti, no one cares what the maximum 'could be' - hardly anyone gets close to it. It's lazy and a waste of your reader's time.
As are all of his ‘articles’.
Watching the left struggle to find a way to defend Bolton is pretty hilarious.
Don't worry, they'll figure out a way.
Trump appointed him knowing he was a war criminal. Oops.
That can be easily spun as correcting a mistake. So that's not a defense, it's a weak attack vector. You can do it, just keep on trying!
It’s nearly as entertaining as listening to the Democrats complain about Gerrymandering.
Can he still run his Super PAC from prison?
https://www.boltonpac.com/